iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Five Progressives In Swing Districts Are Bucking The Tide

First Posted: 09/13/10 04:36 PM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 06:40 PM ET

The 1980 election that brought Ronald Reagan to power also swept out a bloc of liberal champions -- George McGovern, Birch Bayh, Frank Church, Warren Magnuson, Gaylord Nelson, Jacob Javits -- who had spent a generation or more advancing progressive causes. The washout swept the ground from under the liberal wing of the Democratic Party, planting the seed that would grow into the idea that Democrats' path to power lies through the center. A generation of New Democratic centrism would follow, personified by Birch's son, Evan, who took the lesson to heart and ran far from his father's liberal legacy when he entered politics.

In 2010, a handful of House Democrats have an opportunity to prove that maxim wrong and to demonstrate that even in a tough year, by standing up for core progressive values, a Democrat can win a tough race.

Tom Perriello in Virginia, Carol Shea-Porter in New Hampshire, Alan Grayson in Florida, Mary Jo Kilroy in Ohio and John Hall in New York all represent swing districts and have cast votes that Washington consultants label "tough." Those tough votes, though, are paying off in unexpected ways: By bucking the conventional wisdom, the progressive Democrats have locked down support among their base and are winning over independents, while Blue Dogs face a dispirited electorate unsure what they stand for.

Having solid progressives in Congress does far more than give the party an extra vote. The effect they have on other members is hard to quantify but can have real results. Without Grayson, for instance, it's virtually certain that Congress wouldn't have approved a broad audit of the Federal Reserve -- over the objections of the administration.

If Grayson and other progressives are defeated in November, it sends a signal that standing up for progressive values is at best politically useless and at worst costs a politician at the polls. But if progressives survive, while Blue Dogs are wiped out, the opposite message will be sent: The path to victory requires standing for something.

Progressive groups have seized on the symbolic importance of these races. "As progressives, it's our job to show political incentive and genuine support for the folks who have not just led on the issues that matter to most Americans, but who have stood up to the corporate elites and their lobbyists who all too often run the show in Washington," said Ilyse Hogue of MoveOn.org, which is raising money to support Democrats it calls "progressive heroes." "If we don't, we'll lose more than just some races; we'll lose the core principle that democracy works best when elected representatives respond to the needs of their constituents and that organizing power can actually restore some balance to our corporate-tilted government."

MoveOn's effort to raise money for its progressive heroes pulled in pledges of a million dollars and 100,000 hours of volunteer time over a single day this week. Democracy for America, a progressive group whose roots stretch back to the Dean campaign, allowed million-plus members to vote on which candidates deserve the honor of full DFA support: Grayson and Sen. Barbara Boxer of California won.

"There's no 'enthusiasm gap' for Democrats who stand up and lead," said Jim Dean, chair of DFA. "That's why Alan Grayson and Barbara Boxer earned DFA's support. These Democrats don't back down when pressured by corporate lobbyists or attacked by Tea Party Republicans."

Darcy Burner, head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC, said that "the backlash this year hasn't been against incumbents, and it hasn't been against Democrats: it's been against corporate sell-outs. Voters want representatives with actual values... But too many people in DC haven't gotten the message -- so we need to send it again."

The Progressive Change Campaign Committee, whose acronym PCCC sets it up as a liberal version of the DCCC, is raising money and providing infrastructure for progressive candidates. The PCCC and its lobbying arm the P Street Project work closely with progressive House members, using its donor base to encourage other Democrats in Congress to move in a progressive direction.

"The pundits will try to say that Democrats lost this year because they fought too hard for progressive policies, but the truth is Democrats focused too much on bipartisanship and were willing to water down reform so much that Obama voters aren't enthused to vote. That point will be proven if corporate-backed Blue Dogs lose but progressives can keep champions from swing districts like Alan Grayson in Congress," said Adam Green, a PCCC cofounder.

The GOP sees the symbolism, too. "When someone is seen as a progressive hero, it certainly makes victory especially sweet for conservatives," said Andy Sere, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC).

The labor movement is sending a clear message this election cycle to the lawmakers who have fought for its priorities -- and those who have abandoned them. The AFL-CIO, AFSCME, and SEIU are all mobilizing their members on behalf of progressive candidates, through direct mail, worksite targeting, and ads. "We think it's very important to stand up for who your friends are, which is the corollary with us holding people accountable," said AFL-CIO spokesman Eddie Vale. "So the same way that Blanche Lincoln sold out working families, and we would not support her. The flip side of that is that, if you're a progressive who stands up on the issues that are important to working families, we're going to go all out and make sure you're getting our support. Because you were there for us, we're going to be there for you."

The Republican approach to knocking out progressives is to make the case that they march in lockstep with Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. "Knocking off partisans like Kilroy and Shea-Porter remains a top priority not only because they are puppets for a Democratic leadership taking our country sharply left, but also because they represent areas that strongly oppose this reckless agenda. They don't realize that they aren't representing San Francisco, even though their voting records would suggest that, and that's why they're in trouble this fall," said NRCC spokesman Tory Mazzola.

But dubbing them puppets misses the fact that progressives are often a thorn in the leadership's side. They they have been far more independent than a standard Democrat, often pushing a more progressive agenda than the president. Perriello, for instance, voted against Wall Street reform, not because he's in the pockets of the bankers but because he argued it wasn't tough enough.

"To me, part of the reason not to play into the media's sense of right versus left is that it's just full of crap," said Perriello. "The real position in this country is really not even Republican versus Democratic, but corporate-backed politics versus people-backed politics. And to me, I'd much rather be trying to solve problems standing with the people than being just another person who's just playing along for the power... I think what you're seeing in the Democratic caucus is the push back against the Summers-Geithner consensus and say, 'You know what? This whole idea of everything being about Wall Street is missing significant parts of the economy."

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.)
1 of 6
Alan Grayson has wasted no time. The freshman representative from Orlando has quickly become one of the GOP’s most despised Democrats and, not coincidentally, built a national base of progressive supporters that have his campaign coffers bursting at the seams. Grayson glories in the attack, whether it’s dubbing Republicans “knuckle-dragging Neanderthals” or announcing from the House floor that their health care plan amounts to “die quickly” -- a flamboyant charge that had the effect of putting Republicans on the defensive after a summer of angry anti-health care town hall gatherings.

Grayson’s amendment to audit the Fed, which passed the House with the co-sponsorship of Ron Paul (R-Texas) and became law in a weakened form, could end up being one of the signature achievements of the 111th Congress, depending on how well it's carried out. He pushed the amendment through against the opposition of the White House, Treasury Department and Federal Reserve.

Grayson shares the Orlando media market with freshman Suzanne Kosmas, a Democrat who has followed the Washington-consultant playbook and behaved as a centrist. For her trouble, she was rewarded by the local AFL-CIO by being shunned for her first vote against health care and by voters with distrust for her second vote in favor of it. Florida Blue Dog Allen Boyd also initially opposed health care reform and ultimately voted in favor of it; a GOP aide who has seen internal polls said that the flip-flop cost the pair dearly among Democrats and independents, many of whom say they can’t trust them. “I think all three of those guys are gonna lose, but ironically enough, Grayson has the best chance of winning,” said the aide, citing Grayson’s feverish backing among supporters and his national fundraising base.

But Grayson’s outspokenness comes at a cost. “There is serious, serious vitriol among everyone who is not a fan of Alan Grayson,” said the GOP aide, saying that more than 50 percent of those surveyed have a negative impression of Grayson, a... more
Total comments: 3378 | Post a Comment
1 of 6
Rate This Slide
Forgettable
Game-Changer

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Top Five Progressives Bucking The Tide
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

*************************

What's happening in your district? The Huffington Post wants to know about all the campaign ads, debates, town halls, mailings, shenanigans, and other interesting campaign news happening by you. E-mail us any tips, videos, audio files, and photos to election@huffingtonpost.com.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
The 1980 election that brought Ronald Reagan to power also swept out a bloc of liberal champions -- George McGovern, Birch Bayh, Frank Church, Warren Magnuson, Gaylord Nelson, Jacob Javits -- who had ...
The 1980 election that brought Ronald Reagan to power also swept out a bloc of liberal champions -- George McGovern, Birch Bayh, Frank Church, Warren Magnuson, Gaylord Nelson, Jacob Javits -- who had ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,378
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (53 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FernandoRuiz
03:23 PM on 09/17/2010
keri burch 8 minutes ago (3:05 PM)
1 Fans
Become a fan
"Are you for raising the tax rate on the rich? if so why? to be mean? or to give to the less successful? if the latter, then you are a socialist"

Yes keri, I am for raising the tax rate on the rich for the following reasons:

1) Lowering the rate for the richest two percent does not create jobs. Bush lowered it in 2001 and 2003 and the following years saw the slowest job growth in recorded history.

2) We have an enormous deficit right now largely due to those tax cuts and spending cuts alone will not cut the deficit. Taxes have to be raised on someone and I prefer raising them on the rich who can afford it.

Does this make me a socialist? No, Im a social democrat, which means I think some areas need to be under regulation, like the banking industry that collapsed the economy for instance. Also, contrary to what you believe, socialism isn't some radical ideology. In fact its pretty much in line with many conservative values. The main tenet of socialism is "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need". Meaning people contribute what they can and they get back only what they need. "Socialists advocate a method of compensation based on individual merit or the amount of labour one contributes to society.[5]"
10:01 AM on 09/18/2010
Er, I'm pretty sure that "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" is the tenet of communism, not socialism (or at least not any modern form or socialism, which distributes wealth according to the value of work while placing a strong safety net beneath those whose work does not sufficiently support them).

It sounds as if you favor the kind of 'mixed economy' (a mixture of capitalism with government oversight where needed to mitigate its excesses) that countries as different as the U.S. and the Scandinavians use (though we're verging dangerously close to unrestrained capitalism these days).
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Yarrr
12:01 PM on 09/15/2010
Grayson is proof that running to the left in a swing district not only works, but actually gets you respect. However it demands a spine, which many in the dem party lack. Why would people vote for a wishy washy conservacrat? They'll just vote for a Republican.
08:30 PM on 09/14/2010
"Liberal champions." "Progressive heroes." My, how our standards have fallen.

EVERY SINGLE ONE of the 60+ members of the progressive caucus who had pledged, in writing, to oppose any health-care reform package that failed to include a public option caved in.

Since her first campaign Shea-Porter has claimed to support Medicare for All but has never lifted a finger to support it or to co-sponsor HR676 (she claimed that she was working on her own proposal - that was over 3 years ago).

She also broke her campaign pledge to oppose any war supplemental that failed to include a timetable for withdrawal only two months after first taking office. That bill passed by one vote - hers.

We sent Democratic majorities to both houses of Congress in 2006 to fix the abuses of the Bush administration, but they did virtually nothing. We sent even larger Congressional majorities (plus a president pledging "change we can believe in" and "an end to business as usual") to D.C. in 2008 to get our country back - and instead they've perpetuated the Bush abuses and even added a few new ones to the list.

We and organized labor tried to replace Blanche Lincoln recently with a moderate. The Democratic establishment turned out in force to support her, then ridiculed our efforts after she eked out a win (though appears destined to lose - badly - in November).

Electing Democrats - even nominally progressive ones - is not working. We need a different plan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tombaan
Live and let live
03:47 PM on 09/14/2010
I agree with the sentiments expressed above. it was Obama's consensus building bull crap that has the democrats demoralized...What is the use of Senators like Lincoln Blanche who will anyway vote not to the interests of the middle class? Why have a Geithner cause Wall street wants him or take time appointing a Warren because wall street has a negative opinion on her..Even the justices appointed were moderates and centerist compared to the retired Chief Justices...look what bush did with Alito and Chief Justice
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CherokeeGirl
one pissed off Indian.
03:24 PM on 09/14/2010
Thanks Koch brothers for pushing all those pee farty hatriots. They will ensure a win for the dems.
03:36 PM on 09/14/2010
Yep. F&F.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tombaan
Live and let live
03:48 PM on 09/14/2010
I hope ur right Cherokee but I think their enthu levels are higher than dem voters
photo
Sandman911
Self employed gun toting Bible thumper.
03:40 PM on 09/27/2010
The other option is unthinkable. A "Socialist" America ??? Hopefully not in my lifetime or my kids. Samuel Adams said "We did everything we could to make socialistic ideals unconstitutional" yet we have SEVENTY democtars registered with the socialist party http://www.scribd.com/doc/35733956/DSA-Members-American-Socialist-Voter-Democratic-Socialists-of-America-10-1-09 And they're doing everything they can to bring down our wonderful Republic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladyvader
Done with 2-party system that has failed us.
08:58 PM on 10/22/2010
And what have the Republicans done, but give the money to the rich and the jobs overseas. Yea, that is working great for the average American.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
03:19 PM on 09/14/2010
VOTE! Democrat of Course!
photo
Sandman911
Self employed gun toting Bible thumper.
06:03 PM on 10/13/2010
I looked at your link and the "SEVENTY Democtars" appears to be a cut and paste of another anti-socialist page which is, in turn, a cut and paste of a list of the members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. I can't find any correlation between that CPC list and the Democratic Socialists of America website you linked. So please prove that claim. Also, if you have time, find me some proof that Samual Adams(or Ben Franklin) said what you quoted. I have weeded through numerous quote sites, many of which are right-wing anti-socialist sites that would love to use words like those and I see no proof of that either. Please prove this or cut the crap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CherokeeGirl
one pissed off Indian.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CherokeeGirl
one pissed off Indian.
03:11 PM on 09/14/2010
It's not rocket science, I usually don't say that, but some of these dems act like they don't know what we want or how to please us. It's not hard to understand. STAND FOR WHAT's RIGHT!

GO PROGRESSIVES, SHOW them who's on the right side of history.
photo
Sandman911
Self employed gun toting Bible thumper.
03:43 PM on 09/27/2010
Again the "Socialists" ?? Just say it. You prefer socialism to our Republic.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35733956/DSA-Members-American-Socialist-Voter-Democratic-Socialists-of-America-10-1-09
03:03 PM on 09/14/2010
Here in the 5th District in Minnesota we have a great progressive in Keith Ellison, the Republicans aren't even trying to go after him, ( no attack ads from the right at all). But Bachmann has a strong contendor with Tarryl Clark in the 6 District. That race is a Tea Party candidate against a Progressive.
01:20 PM on 09/14/2010
Ohh I love how much conservatives hate Grayson. Wait, you guys are annoyed with a vitriolic windbag? Now you know how we feel about every one of you.
photo
Vince Weiguang Li
Alferd Packer-Epicurean Go Go Greyhound!
12:52 PM on 09/14/2010
Alan Grayson:

Answer to the question: Who got elected when Mickey Mouse registered to vote.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HerbTee
An Aggressive Progressive, got a problem wit dat?
01:00 PM on 09/14/2010
Vince Weiguang Li:

An annoying, monotone, thread-spamming tr011!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Grumpy Old Dude
My screen name forms an Acronym
01:25 PM on 09/14/2010
Amen Brother Herb. Already a fan.
photo
Vince Weiguang Li
Alferd Packer-Epicurean Go Go Greyhound!
02:14 PM on 09/14/2010
Thank you, considering the source I consider that a compliment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CherokeeGirl
one pissed off Indian.
03:12 PM on 09/14/2010
YOU?
photo
Vince Weiguang Li
Alferd Packer-Epicurean Go Go Greyhound!
12:50 PM on 09/14/2010
Alan Grayson:

Living example of Any News is Good News.
photo
Vince Weiguang Li
Alferd Packer-Epicurean Go Go Greyhound!
12:49 PM on 09/14/2010
Grayson:

Political Lady Gaga in a suit.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
12:35 PM on 09/14/2010
The republicans have the tea party and the democrats have the progressives. I can only wish to have a progressive represent me because of where I live. Robin Carnahan is running against Blunt, and even though RC has done everything she can to play to the republican voters, she doesn't stand a chance. Personally I am not sure I care since she came out and declared that she planned to vote to extend the Bush taxcuts, AFTER I voted for her in the primary. I would just like a candidate with some integrity, someone like Grayson.
12:34 PM on 09/14/2010
Do Progressives still believe in Eugenics?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nealo
12:41 PM on 09/14/2010
Easy Glenn.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
09:27 AM on 09/15/2010
Was Oliver Wendall Holmes Jr. esq. a progressive? I think not.