More

Royal Caribbean Amends Settlement With Family Of George Smith IV, Who Disappeared 5 Years Ago

PAT EATON-ROBB   09/14/10 05:33 PM ET   AP

George Smith Iv Widow

HARTFORD, Conn. — The parents of a Connecticut man who disappeared from his honeymoon cruise in 2005 say an amended settlement with the cruise line could help solve the mystery of what happened to him.

George Smith IV, of Greenwich, was aboard a Royal Caribbean ship when he vanished somewhere between Greece and Turkey on July 5, 2005, after an apparent night of drinking. His body was never found.

Smith's widow, Jennifer Hagel Smith, reached a nearly $1.1 million settlement with Royal Caribbean in 2006. But his parents and sister filed a lawsuit challenging it as inadequate, alleging it was reached in part to avoid embarrassing disclosures about Hagel Smith's conduct during the cruise.

The family, in a statement Tuesday, said the amended $1.3 million settlement requires the cruise line to turn over witness statements and other information from the company's own investigation that would have remained confidential under the original deal.

"Most people involved probably other than Jennifer Hagel Smith believe pretty strongly that George was murdered," said Michael Jones, an attorney representing Smith's parents and sister. "If that's the case then hopefully this documentation gives us a better indication of exactly what happened to him."

Smith's parents' share of the settlement with the cruise line will increase under the new deal from about $50,000 to about $300,000, Jones said. He said that will not fully cover the amount they have spent investigating their son's disappearance.

"Our goal from the beginning of this litigation was to find out what happened to George and bring his perpetrator(s) to justice," his mother, Maureen Smith, said in a statement.

Hagel Smith's attorney, Richard Sheeley, said that also is her goal, and she would welcome any new information.

"The truth is, after all this time, we have no more answers than we had at the beginning of this process," he said. "Candidly, we don't expect there is going to be a heck of a lot in there."

Hagel Smith has said her husband's relatives refuse to acknowledge the possibility that George Smith's intoxication from alcohol and prescription drugs may have been a factor in an accidental death. She has said they instead believe Smith was a victim of foul play, despite a lack of evidence.

Royal Caribbean spokeswoman Cynthia Martinez said the cruise line agreed to the settlement in the hope that it will be part of a healing process for the Smith family.

"We are confident that the disclosure of any additional information will again demonstrate that we acted properly in assisting Jennifer and the Smith family in the aftermath of their tragic loss," she said in a statement.

Jones said the information from Royal Caribbean includes thousands of documents and boxes of videos from security cameras and interviews. He said the FBI recently reaffirmed that its criminal investigation is still open and active, and the family will provide the criminal investigators with a copy of everything.

"We're hoping there might be additional information they don't already have, but we won't know that until we go through it and the FBI goes through it," the attorney said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TRAVEL

HARTFORD, Conn. — The parents of a Connecticut man who disappeared from his honeymoon cruise in 2005 say an amended settlement with the cruise line could help solve the mystery of what happened ...
HARTFORD, Conn. — The parents of a Connecticut man who disappeared from his honeymoon cruise in 2005 say an amended settlement with the cruise line could help solve the mystery of what happened ...
Filed by Kate Auletta  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 159
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
01:12 PM on 09/21/2010
As a full-time cruise reporter I have read much on this case. Royal Caribbean settled because the widow went "postal" with accusations of being treated badly by them. RCL gave ger clothes to wear from the gift shop, so she later went on Oprah and said she felt humilated being forced to wear RCL logo after what happened... blah blah.

She accused RCL of abandoning her in Istanbul and denying her phone calls, etc. (she was taken off the ship by Turkish authorities for questioning). In truth she called her family on the cellphone of the RCL guardian that was with her every minute and they decided to send her money to fly home immediately. She was not abandoned, she left.

Why did RCL pay? She had a lawyer who instructed her to make the cruise line look as bad as possible from jump. He knew where the money was going to come from. That is his job. She was following orders.

1.1 million is not a lot to make the amount of bad publicity she was generating go away. To her credit, she eventually changed her tune and cooperated with the FBI and stopped harassing RCL. She also now says George's death was accidental. For the record, this settlement will now get her money, she has not received any previously. The Smith family made sure of that.

cruisemates.com
01:34 PM on 09/15/2010
I agree it was likely murder.

However, perhaps it was one or more of certain ship's staff members who did it. This has happened too many times of cruise ships all over the world. And being as these ship lines don't have to report to anyone, pretty much autonomous, and they want to protect their image first and foremost (can't have people being murdered by your staff on what's supposed to be a fun-filled vacation ya know), why, of course they'd do everything possible to thwart investigation and throw suspicion on the passenger(s).

Big Business. Always blame the customers. Just like in our financial meltdown in which We, The People were/are being blamed, instead of the corporate fa-scist robber baron neo-cons/GOP.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LindyK
01:26 PM on 09/15/2010
There was a huge expose, i believe in VF, and over-riding conclusion, based on witnesses and evidence in hand, was that he accidentally went overboard. He was drunk as a skunk.
photo
Jeffin90019
Independent, occasional absolutist
01:44 PM on 09/15/2010
I remember this article, too. She was also hammered and flirting with other men, as I recall. Didn't she also bring a man back to their stateroom? The authorities found blood on an awning below their stateroom, which indicated that be may have fallen from the balcony. she was so drunk that she allegedely had no recollection of the previous evening. A black-out drunk isn't going to be a reliabvle witness, and it's easy to see why she would want to keep that quiet. But another commentor noted that this isn't an isolated instance of violence on cruise ships. Rapes, murders, disapperances, and robberies are as common on cruise ships as they are in any big city.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LindyK
02:58 AM on 09/16/2010
What I remember about the article is exactly as you say.

Yes, crime on cruise ships does appear to be a deep dark secret. You really are at their mercy. I was on a cruise and a group of us got a tour of the underbelly, where all the steering, etc goes on - or something was going on down there, can't recall what. I asked the Captain what would happen if someone fell overboard and he basically said it's near impossible to get them. First someone has to see them go over, and even then the speed of the ship moving away and the weight of it, makes it very difficult.
01:50 PM on 09/15/2010
That could be the simple aswer as well. Who knows (as yet).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
boyer37212
12:57 PM on 09/15/2010
This person is living the life of Riley somewhere.
01:52 PM on 09/15/2010
Could be. Ya never know in a case like this. Has happened before.
photo
OutAtFirst
Believe it! You don't know how to text and drive
02:10 PM on 09/15/2010
In Davey Jone's Locker.
12:45 PM on 09/15/2010
I don't know much about this story, but can someone please explain to me how this is Royal Caribbean's fault and why are they having to fork over 1.1 million dollars?
01:08 PM on 09/15/2010
They withheld information about there investigation from the family and police.
photo
zizizzi
Power to the PEOPLE... Right on!
01:26 PM on 09/15/2010
They are supposed to look out for the safety of their passengers.
If someone goes overboard, they are supposed to know, and do something about it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Olderandwiser55
getting older and wiser....
01:38 PM on 09/15/2010
They are supposed to have roll call?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TrekBear
03:05 PM on 09/15/2010
You really expect the cruise line to track each of thousands of passengers on a given ship at any given time? That's like requiring cops to nab every criminal at the moment the crime is committed!
12:24 PM on 09/15/2010
This happened in International waters (between Greece and Turkey) on a ship registered in the Bahamas. The FBI has no jurisdiction on a foreign flag ship outside US territorial waters. And, both these people were falling down drunk. You think you'll find answers if the cruise line forks over more money?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
moonflowerjewelry
Buy American made, no excuses.
11:46 AM on 09/15/2010
This never happened on The Love Boat.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
johnqpublik
11:33 AM on 09/15/2010
Missing for 5 years? Did they check her room?
11:30 AM on 09/15/2010
That's why I never go on a cruise, I saw a documentary once where this movie star, and some rich couple a professor went on a cruise with some chubby captain and skinny mate and they were never heard from again for about 10 years later, as it turned out they got into trouble at sea and landed on some crazy island.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
moonflowerjewelry
Buy American made, no excuses.
11:44 AM on 09/15/2010
I saw that same documentary...many times... who knew you could build a car out of bamboo?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dancingstu
Christian, liberal lawyer
11:47 AM on 09/15/2010
I remember that incident. I believe that cruise was only a three-hour cruise. A three-hour cruise!

When you consider that they should only have been an hour and a half out of port at most when they reached the farthest distance (assuming that the skipper had the engine at full throttle), how bad must that weather have been? I hear the tiny ship got tossed and, if not for the courage of the fearless crew, the boat would have been lost.
12:17 PM on 09/15/2010
Life imitates art.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LindyK
01:27 PM on 09/15/2010
You mean he's LOST?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HouseProletariat
Placing the Petit-bourgeois is propper perspective
11:04 AM on 09/15/2010
The alcohol sales on an RC cruise are staggering. The perception that it is easy to get drunk and fall off a cruise ship, never to be seen again, is one that RC can not allow to happen. I imagine the settlement was more about protecting their image than admitting negligence.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TeacupKitten
10:56 AM on 09/15/2010
I saw an entire coverage of this. It looks like the wife had a part. Some friends apparently threw him overboard.
10:54 AM on 09/15/2010
And it was just supposed to be a 3-hour cruise, too.
10:54 AM on 09/15/2010
Nice payday for the lawyers. Something like 300K?

I've seen some crazy stuff of cruise ships. This guy was either drunk and got pushed or he was drunk and jumped. I doubt he survived the fall into the water.

I wonder why RC settled? Would a jury find RC culpable in this matter?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dancingstu
Christian, liberal lawyer
11:53 AM on 09/15/2010
It's likely the following arithmetic; they took the likely amount of a verdict divided by their estimate of the percentage likelihood of a plaintiff's verdict and they added that figure to the cost to battle this out in curt and then they added a figure to represent the effect that the publicity of this incident would have on their business.

Even if Royal Caribbean thought it had a virtual slam-dunk defense, no decent lawyer is ever going to tell his client that victory is guaranteed.
12:26 PM on 09/15/2010
I imagine RCI settled just to get rid of the publicity, there was never wrong doing on the cruise line's part. The couple was falling down drunk and they only place he would have wound up is in the ocean.
photo
zizizzi
Power to the PEOPLE... Right on!
03:27 PM on 09/15/2010
And how did they get "falling down drunk"?
10:01 AM on 09/15/2010
I don't understand why a cruise line is responsible for this. If someone gets drunk and falls off the ship, is that Royal Caribbean's fault? I just don't get it. I have been on a dozen cruises and seen people do some really, really, really stupid things. Hey, it is like a little city and represents a microcosm of the world. Again, don't know why the cruise ship needs to pay -- very strange story and an example of a society gone made with litigiousness.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dancingstu
Christian, liberal lawyer
12:00 PM on 09/15/2010
Here's the likely theory for the plaintiff's side: If a business serves an unlimited amount of alcohol to someone in an environment where that person's very life is at risk from being intoxicated, then the business has a duty to make sure the person isn't injured as a result of the intoxication.

For example, even if there was no foul play, the plaintiff still might succeed based on a claim that the cruise ship's railing were too low and the decedent could have stumbled and fallen over the railing into the water and drowned.

By the way, that's just a hypothetical. I don't know what the actual conditions are on the ship. But I do believe that while you're on their property (the cruise ship) and they're serving an endless amount of alcohol, they have a duty to make sure at least the structure of the ship is reasonably safe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Olderandwiser55
getting older and wiser....
01:41 PM on 09/15/2010
Maybe they need to build a taller "fence"
Cantinflas
My micro-bio is not empty.
09:50 AM on 09/15/2010
Where is Hercule Poirot when we need him?
01:38 PM on 09/15/2010
Fanned and faved for both your handle and Mssr Poirot.
Cantinflas
My micro-bio is not empty.
03:15 PM on 09/15/2010
Right back atcha. It's good to meet someone who is a fan of vintage talent.