More

AP Poll: Republicans Pulling Further And Further Ahead Of Democrats

LIZ SIDOTI   09/15/10 10:23 PM ET   AP

Gop Gaining Ground

WASHINGTON — Tilted toward the GOP from the start of the year, the political environment has grown even more favorable for Republicans and rockier for President Barack Obama and his Democrats over the long primary season that just ended with a bang.

With November's matchups set and the general election campaign beginning in earnest Wednesday, an Associated Press-GfK poll found that more Americans say the country is headed in the wrong direction than did before the nomination contests got under way in February. Also, more now disapprove of the job Obama is doing. And more now want to see Republicans in control of Congress rather than the Democrats who now run the House and Senate.

The country's pessimism benefits the out-of-power GOP, which clearly has enthusiasm on its side. Far more people voted this year in Republicans primaries than in Democratic contests, and the antiestablishment tea party coalition has energized the GOP even as it has sprung a series of primary surprises.

"We're definitely in a stronger position than we've been in really at any point this year," Sen. John Cornyn, who leads the effort to elect Senate Republicans, said in an interview.

Said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell: "Turnout and enthusiasm are off the charts."

Indeed, Republicans expected turnout of 30,000 to 40,000 in Delaware on Tuesday. Some 57,582 people showed up to vote as tea party-backed Christine O'Donnell upset moderate Rep. Mike Castle for the Senate GOP nomination. By most accounts, the outcome diminished Republican chances of winning former Vice President Joe Biden's seat. But Republicans got their preferred candidate in New Hampshire as former state Attorney General Kelly Ayotte fended off tea party-supported Ovide Lamontagne by a razor-thin margin.

Fueling voter anger is an unemployment rate that's hovered near 10 percent all year despite efforts by Obama and fellow Democrats to accelerate the economic recovery.

"I'm going to do everything in my power to make sure that they're out of office," said independent voter Robbin Payton of Newport News, Va., reflecting just how toxic the environment is for the party in power.

Overall, it's an extraordinarily dreary backdrop for Obama's beleaguered party. And with just seven weeks until Election Day, Democrats are running out of options to mitigate widespread expected losses of House, Senate and governor's seats from coast to coast on Nov. 2.

"The reality is if you take the 30,000-foot view, it doesn't probably look that inviting," Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey, who leads the committee charged with electing Senate Democrats, said in an interview. "If you take the state-by-state view ... it's far more beneficial to us" because in places like Delaware "Republicans have chosen extremists to be their nominees."

In the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi predicted that the Democrats would keep control. But, underscoring the woes facing Democrats, she stopped short of the kind of confidence she's shown in past campaigns when her party had a political tail wind.

"I am not yielding one grain of sand. I want to have the same big, strong majority that we have," said Pelosi, D-Calif.

As Illinois kicked off the primary season Feb. 2, there was little talk even among Republicans that power in the House was in reach, much less in the Senate. But the national landscape has only has worsened for Democrats.

Back then:

_The unemployment rate was 9.7 percent; it's 9.6 now.

_Half of the country said in January that the country was on the wrong track; 57 percent say that now in the new AP-GfK poll.

_About 42 percent of the country disapproved of Obama's job performance; half does now.

_Democrats had a 49 percent to 37 percent advantage over Republicans on the party that voters want to see control Congress; the GOP now enjoys a 55-39 lead among likely voters.

Republicans have steadily gained ground on economic issues and now have a slight advantage on handling the economy, the federal deficit and taxes. They improved their standing in the past month even as Obama stepped up his efforts to persuade the public to give Democratic solutions more time to work.

At the same time, 40 percent of likely voters call themselves tea party supporters, and most of them lean toward Republicans while nearly two-thirds have a deeply negative impression of Democrats. That means the GOP could be in strong shape on Nov. 2 if tea party backers turn out and vote Republican. That's what they've been doing so far this year: The grass-roots, antiestablishment movement can claim wins in at least seven GOP Senate races, a handful of Republican gubernatorial contests and dozens of House primary campaigns.

Also, Obama's job-performance standing on the economy is at a low point, and a majority of people now say they will consider their feelings about him when they vote for Congress this fall.

"I don't care for what the man is doing. I think he's leaving a lot of Americans behind," said independent Larry Schmidt, 61, of Shingletown, Calif. He says he'll back a Republican, if he even votes.

The House is most at risk of changing hands.

Upward of 75 races are competitive, most held by Democrats. Republicans need to gain 40 seats to seize control.

Most vulnerable are conservative-to-moderate Democrats in districts John McCain won in the 2008 presidential campaign, and other Democrats who rode Obama's coattails, benefiting from participation spikes among young and minority voters.

The GOP needs a 10-seat gain for Senate control, a tall order.

Republicans and Democrats alike say that quest got even more difficult Tuesday in Delaware when O'Donnell won the GOP nomination. Democrats had all but written off that Senate seat when it was assumed that Castle would be the nominee, but now they say they're favored, and many Republicans agree.

Nonetheless, the National Republican Senatorial Committee is sending O'Donnell's campaign the maximum possible donation, $42,000, and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a potential presidential candidate in 2012, is kicking in $5,000 from his political action committee.

The GOP still is virtually assured to pick up a North Dakota seat. Republicans also could overtake vulnerable incumbent Sens. Blanche Lincoln in Arkansas and Michael Bennett in Colorado, as well as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in Nevada. Among other Democratic-held seats: GOP candidates are leading comfortably in Indiana and Pennsylvania, and Republicans are competitive in Illinois, Connecticut, California, Washington, Wisconsin and West Virginia.

Republicans also have an advantage in states where they are defending seats they now hold that are coming open: Florida, Ohio, Kentucky, Missouri and New Hampshire.

With less than two months to go, Democrats are focused on slowing a GOP wave that could give Republicans control of Congress and on trying to fire up their deeply dispirited Democratic base while stemming the flood of independents who now are leaning strongly toward the GOP.

They haven't gained traction with warnings that electing Republicans would mean a return to George W. Bush's policies. Now, Democrats are trying a different tack by elevating – and subsequently tearing down – House GOP leader John Boehner, the likely House speaker should Republicans win control. They're also pouring millions of dollars into advertising designed mostly to make GOP candidates unacceptable instead of highlighting their own accomplishments.

But there's no certainty any of those tactics will work.

For now at least, Republicans are simply selling themselves as something other than the status quo. And, if the antiestablishment results of the primary season are any measure, it may just work.

The AP-GfK Poll was conducted Sept. 8 to 13, 2010 by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cell phone interviews with 1, 000 adults nationwide, and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4.2 percentage points for all adults, 4.5 for registered voters and 5.7 for likely voters.

___

Associated Press Polling Director Trevor Tompson, AP Deputy Polling Director Jennifer Agiesta, AP News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius and AP Writers Jennifer C. Kerr, Laurie Kellman and Natasha Metzler contributed to this report.

___

Online: http://www.ap-gfkpoll.com

(This version CORRECTS McConnell is the Senate minority leader, not majority leader.) )

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Tilted toward the GOP from the start of the year, the political environment has grown even more favorable for Republicans and rockier for President Barack Obama and his Democrats ov...
WASHINGTON — Tilted toward the GOP from the start of the year, the political environment has grown even more favorable for Republicans and rockier for President Barack Obama and his Democrats ov...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,901
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (60 total)
  1 of 28  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
robodweeb 08:05 AM on 09/16/2010
CBS Poll:

7. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Democrats in Congress are handling their job?
Approve 30
8. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Republicans in Congress are handling their job?
Approve 20
15. If the 2010 election for U.S. House of Representatives were being held today, would you vote for the Republican candidate or the Democratic candidate in your  Read More...
photo
Fritzwood
in vino veritas
12:46 AM on 09/18/2010
bummer for America....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
h23154
03:01 PM on 09/17/2010
There is probably something to be said to having neither party control both Congress and the White House. I have been a Democrat for close to 50 years and even I can't stand Pelosi and Reid. They are both too partisan for my taste and in Reid's case, also an ineffectual leader and both are saddled with a President who seems to feel politics is beneath him, and he should be followed just because he is wise and articulate. It does not work that way except on television. I have seen Martin Sheen, I watched Martin Sheen, and Obama is no Martin Sheen.
09:34 AM on 09/17/2010
I am just hoping we hold onto both houses.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RMorr2002
09:46 AM on 09/17/2010
Still working on that HOPE thing???   Not happening!   Republicans will take the House in a Big WAY!
Dems may well hold control of the Senate, but will only be like 52-48.
11:15 AM on 09/17/2010
Of course, the downside for regressives will be when the fickle constituency abandons their support for a party that will - just like the Dems - fail to accomplish anything.

The inescapable fact is that neither party is going to achieve anything of substance with supermajority rules in place. The problems that this country continues to struggle with will not be mitigated one bit with a GOBP majority in either the House, the Senate, or both.

You might swing this election, but your party is dead in the water. The regressive base in Congress is still a minority and public support won't last long once it's clear that it's just more business as usual. The NEXT pendulum swing will be even further to the left...
08:51 AM on 09/17/2010
Duh! Of COURSE we [Republicans] are! I guess our strategy of letting you have all the rope you needed worked. Granted, it was a huge risk. Saying no to all of your kooky ideas was a risk too. Had you been right on all of your stupid bets (HA!), we'd have looked like buffoons. But, alas, you were WRONG on all of your bets. Don't feel badly. It's in your [democrats] nature. You always overextend yourselves. You did it with Carter. You did it with Clinton. And, you SURE as hell did it to the nth degree with Obama. You guys will never learn. Actually, Clinton DID learn. Thus, we rewarded him with a 2nd term.

Obama still has time to change his ways. But, I doubt he will. He's too loyal to the loons. I'm just happy that the Conservatives are coming back. I'm ready for this kooky kruize to port! 10% unemployment, most poverty in almost 50 years, debt 90% of GDP. Great change.
09:35 AM on 09/17/2010
Obama has lost all credibility because of the economy. He is a dead man walking if someone credible runs against him in 2012.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RMorr2002
09:47 AM on 09/17/2010
My guess is that the Dems will have someone challenge him in the Primary.  They know that obama has no chance of being re-elected.
11:23 AM on 09/17/2010
Duh? Yeah, duh.

I'll sure be glad to have another shot of that good old Republican leadership that lied us into a WASTE OF TWO (going on THREE) TRILLION DOLLARS with NO ROI. Looking forward to the decimation of social programming at the expense of tax cuts for people that neither need the cuts, nor will put that money into circulation.

Especially looking forward to watching the DOD expand beyond a trillion per year with LESS national security:

You can look at 9/11 one of two ways: either the Bush administration got caught with its pants down, or it was COMPLICIT. Frankly, I believe the latter - as do more than 1200 registered architects and structural engineers. That is the legacy of the GOBP, they staged a terrorist attack on their own country in order to financially aggrandize their members.

Heinous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Golemaximus
01:32 AM on 09/17/2010
This is a reposting of a comment: third attempt
RE: lacie - welcome to the Huffington Post. The unsupervised HP appointed moderators try to shape the debate by deleting comments. Most conservative comments are entirely legitimate and civil. Those comments from conservatives that directly oppose the passions of the Liberals are often met with very unsavory responses. Liberal moderators seize on this opportunity to delete an entire string of comments from the conservatives when this happens. This is a fact of commenting on HP. I personally prefer to debate with Democrats and dislike the kumbaiya of any like idea debate. There are some very intelligent and articulate Democrats on this post that are capable of sincere and educated debate. I blog here to reach out to them not the inflexible and uneducated pundits of either Democrat or Republican. You can predict if your comment will get through the moderation process and how many frivolous abuse flags you will receive from some Liberal bloggers that are very passionate about their beliefs. I would recommend copy and paste your comments until they are posted. If you do that enough, eventually the Liberal that is attempting to block your comments will either give up or move on. This is the price for debating on this site. Liberal or not these are people like you and I that are advancing the cause of political literacy. It is worth staying here if you want to reach out!
09:37 AM on 09/17/2010
The censorship on this site is maddening, and no one seems to be looking at the posts sent in via the contact us, report a problem, channel. I think Ms. Huffington would be very disappointed that the community moderators do not even make an attempt to follow the actual rules of the website.

Look you already got one abusive flag lol.
11:34 AM on 09/17/2010
I just responded to 1011Awaits above. My post will be deleted because I used the word 'terrorist' as relating to the Bush administration.

EVERYONE has comments deleted here, not just regressives.

In response to Golemaximus' statement that he/she prefers to debate, then I say "welcome." While posters here allow their emotions to get in the way (probably happens to me about twice a day) the fact is that very few on the other side of the political spectrum are willing - or, perhaps, capable - of engaging in a dialectic.

Political rhetoric is tiring and rarely progresses the discussion. Commentary on Obama has become sophomoric (anyone suggesting that Obama is a socialist doesn't know the definition of socialism) and, frankly, if you believe that Obama ISN'T an improvement on his predecessor, then you've pretty much disqualified yourself from the conversation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Golemaximus
11:48 AM on 09/17/2010
That's not funny! I like your sense of humor! LOL!! F&F
01:43 AM on 10/01/2010
So, where's the debate? This seems more like a complaint rather than a debate.
06:23 PM on 09/16/2010
As a foreigner, I won't discuss the merits of November's congressional power shift on US domestic policy (although I do expect improvements)... Nonetheless, I do expect Republicans will push the Obama Administration to be more responsible internationally... We can't have the leader of the Free World waffling half the time and equivocating the other half... It almost seems like Mr. Obama has the spine of a gummy bear! And having a monolingual President with no friendships among other world leaders, has been a disappointment, after genial, bilingual President Bush...
06:51 PM on 09/16/2010
hey, don't insult the gummy bears! they may be bears, but they have feelings, too.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Angie Tyne 1
I want my disagree button!!
08:02 PM on 09/16/2010
As a native Spanish speaker, I will vouch for Mr. Bush's fluency in the language... Nonetheless, I will grant you that his English fluency sometimes left something to be desired...
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
optimist7
06:22 PM on 09/16/2010
If the electorate realize what the consequences of a Republican majority in the House would mean, it won't happen. And, if liberals and progressives think about the sharp contrast between a Republican/conservative agenda and a Democratic/progressive/liberal agenda, they will not stay home on November 2nd.

Ed Schultz is planning a DC rally with the AFL-CIO on 10-02-10, and it looks as though there just might be a follow-up rally in DC on 10-10-10 with Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart leading the charge. Colbert said last night he'll be making an announcement tonight. Does anyone think that those rallies won't go a long way toward energizing liberal and progressive voters?
04:31 AM on 09/17/2010
If the electorate realized what the consequences of electing Obama with a super-majority in the House & Senate would be, they wouldn't have done that either. The electorate wants balanced government.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George R Williams
Publius Cincinatus
04:59 AM on 09/17/2010
Ed Schultz! Now there's a whacko to avoid. He should put on quite a tirade of hate mongering that turns off the average American. It will be quite a conversation piece for conservative news commentators, adding fuel to their cause.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
06:05 PM on 09/16/2010
What this article failed to mention was the Republicans didn't take Deleware! A Tea Partier did, who says her agenda is not like the Republicans an it is the Tea party Agenda! Not to mention they can caucus on their own now, an don't need the Republicans for nothing! Even so they forgot to mention that O'Donnel only got 16% of that vote in Deleware, an republican Castle will NOT support O'Donnel an has stated so publically, an called Hannity on Fox out for telling lies an loseing him this election! So I think those common sense republicans who voted for Castle will be smart enough NOT to vote for O'Donnel an with the Dems following that crowd will make sure O'Donnel does not get in!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Golemaximus
01:29 AM on 09/17/2010
treadway123 - That like saying Democrats didn't win the Presidency Liberals did! And O'Donnel will get the support of Republicans without your wishful thinking.
06:01 PM on 09/16/2010
"Republicans have steadily gained ground on economic issues and now have a slight advantage on handling the economy, the federal deficit and taxes."

How can any party that hasn't done or PROPOSED ANYTHING in four years - FOUR years - have an approval rating? I guess for those polled, showing up is all that's necessary.

The American public, proving daily that its education system has failed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George R Williams
Publius Cincinatus
04:41 AM on 09/17/2010
Read it and weep. From two years ago when we heard the shrill announcement that the Republican party was totally destroyed, to the present, when the Democrats are trembling and whining about how the public has forsaken their messiah. Apparently the education system as suddenly collapsed between November 2008 and the present.

I can hardly see how the Democrats can be said to paragons of the educated when they propose to assault our national literacy rate with the adoption of millions of poorly educated illegal aliens from Latin America by giving them amnesty. And if you believe that illegal aliens will do ONLY the jobs that citizens won't do, you take them for idiots. The amnestied illegal alien will not confine himself to the economic cage that the Democrats and the illegal alien supporters currently confine him to, the former due to the propensity to patronize and the latter by obfuscating their ulterior motive, which is to develop a source of political power. Ultimately, he will be competing for your job. If our educational system is a failure, it's Democrats who are it's prevalent product, because they have not been taught to think at a higher level than their emotions permit.
11:07 AM on 09/17/2010
The Dems AREN'T paragons of the educated nor, necessarily, progressives. They are the lesser of two evils, though how MUCH lesser is debatable.

But, George, the GOBP IS dying. It is no longer relevant to the economic landscape. With this election the party is skewing even further to the right. It is nonresponsive, issuing the same old tired meme. Tax cuts. The reduction of social programming at the expense of corporate hegemony. More military activity when NONE is needed.

This concern surrounding illegal aliens is simply distraction. ALL fiscal matters would be taken care of - and the national debt all but eliminated - with a 60% cut in DOD's budget and close down of bases in Germany and Japan (leaving a marginal UNC garrison in Korea if that is felt to be necessary). Latino immigrants - legal or otherwise - are simply the latest target on which the right can focus their enmity.

Sorry, George, the political miasma that is the Republican Tea Party has NO answers to the real social ills that this country is suffering. True, centrist Dems don't have the answers, or intestinal fortitude to make the changes that would restore this country to what it advertises itself as. The changes, this year or next, will be much more Draconian simply because of the political inertia brought about by Palin and her ilk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean777
05:49 PM on 09/16/2010
I can not believe Tea Party candidates are wining elections. At least you can try to reason with Republicans but the Tea Party is like dealing with a Terminator: “It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever,” until we are deep into an economic depression.
06:02 PM on 09/16/2010
As poster JohnDTuttle suggested elsewhere, the Tea Party platform is to burn everything down and then rule in Hades.

TP bumper sticker: Megiddo or Bust!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
06:09 PM on 09/16/2010
this was a republican election, an a Repubican didn't even take it! the Republican Candidate Castle has publically said he will not endorse or help the Tea Party Candidate get elected, an she only got 16% of the vote while the common sense Republicans voted 15% for castle. now if those common sense Republicans for a good educated Republican an at 15% an they weigh up their option of a extreme Tea partier like O'Donnel an follow Castles lead an throw her to the way side she still remains with only 16% come Nov. an add Castles 15% R to Dems turn out an she is beaten.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ConservaYoda
Your micro-bio did not meet our guidelines
07:04 PM on 09/16/2010
Castle was a progressive. He just used the Republican party for funding. Don't count your chickens quite yet...the Delaware race is not even close to being decided.
photo
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
05:41 PM on 09/16/2010
It's hard to imagine people being so stupid to put the wolves back among the sheep so soon after getting them out. Wise up folks these extremists will only make things worse.

Vote out ALL Hide and Lie Republicant's and their pet blue lap dogs
04:35 AM on 09/17/2010
What makes them "extremists"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George R Williams
Publius Cincinatus
04:50 AM on 09/17/2010
The fact that you Democrats perceive The People as sheep to be herded and not voters with their own thoughts and free will, is what is driving the voters from the Democratic party.
photo
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
07:39 AM on 09/17/2010
I know this is hard for you TeaBaggers to understand but you folks aren't ALL The People.
You practice politics of fear exclusion b*gotry and economic enslavement to a corporate world prepared to make millions suffer so they don't lose money. For decades folks vote against their economic interests to assuage the xenophobic devils of the GOBP. Time for some of them to wise up
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
optimist7
05:41 PM on 09/16/2010
The actual poll Ms. Sidotti references doesn't quite bear out the claims she makes in her article. One glaring fact that is contrary to her analysis of the current political climate is that an equal number of those polled strongly disapprove of both the Republicans and the Democrats in Congress, and the strong disapproval of Republicans has increased by 10% since the beginning of the year while strong disapproval of Democrats hasn't significantly changed. Overall, a higher percentage disapproved of the Republicans than disapproved of the Democrats.

http://www.ap-gfkpoll.com/pdf/AP-GfK%20Poll%20September%20Topline%2009.15.10%20final%20FULL.pdf
05:40 PM on 09/16/2010
I am surprised that traditional polls have been as accurate as they have been, given that they still call land lines. None of the young people I know from 21-35 years of age have land lines. Are there any polls that get online data? The polls focus on registered, likely voters. I don't think voting registration forms ask for an email address. If we had an election where the polls were way off the mark, it would cause a huge disruption in the way campaigns are run.
04:36 AM on 09/17/2010
They also used cellphones.
09:41 AM on 09/18/2010
Where do they get cell phone numbers? I do not get any unsolicited calls on my cell. And if I did, I wouldn't answer. Control over incoming calls is also possible for people with caller ID. According to info I just read on the web, Rasmussen does not tap into cell phones except for robocalls. It seems they hear mostly from angry old white folks. But, the fact is, polls are only as good as their next election predictions. We will just have to wait until Nov. 3 to see how they do.
05:35 PM on 09/16/2010
Democrats need to start acting like Republicans and do what they think is best and not what they think the Republicans will be ok with. That is why I am voting for the Green Party and hope some real change happens after November. Both Dems and Repubs are lined in money from corporations and I am sick of it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:33 PM on 09/16/2010
I can't believe any of this polling chit
04:37 AM on 09/17/2010
Why?...because you don't like the results?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:04 PM on 09/17/2010
No, because of things like ....the other day they asked 600 people in NY what they though about the building of a Mosque/ community center and, regardless of what the outcome was, I don't see how 600 random folks can represent the population of NY city.
Also a lot of the polling is done by landlines...Not many people have land lines these days, especially young people,so they are asking the questions of, usually, mostly elderly voters.... and I still don't see how a few thousand people can be used to determine the thoughts of the US population.
And...polls from a specific site, whether it's a left or right leaning site, would determine and tip the polls in the specific way they are leaning.
So I just don't have much faith in them.