More

Joe Miller Admits Reaping Federal Farm Subsidies Despite Railing Against Taking Government Funds

BECKY BOHRER   09/22/10 12:52 AM ET   AP

Joe Miller Federal Farm Subsidies

JUNEAU, Alaska — Alaska Republican U.S. Senate candidate Joe Miller, who believes the federal government is on the brink of bankruptcy and has called for an end to the "welfare state," received federal farm subsidies for land that the fiscal conservative owned in Kansas in the 1990s.

The acknowledgment by the Miller campaign that he accepted farm subsidies follows a story by the Alaska Dispatch, which discovered through a Freedom of Information Act request that he got $7,235 in subsidies from the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 1991-97.

It drew a sharp response from critics, including the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which headlined a news release: "Extremist Joe Miller also a hypocrite."

Separately, a blog last week reported that Miller, an attorney, received subsidies for land in Alaska. The campaign called that a "manufactured story from a Democratic blog," and said that the land Miller has owned in Alaska isn't under production and has received no federal farm subsidies.

Miller, a self-described "constitutional conservative" who believes federal spending must be reined in, won last month's GOP primary over U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, whom he'd cast as part of the problem in an out-of-control Washington.

Miller's message of less government has resonated with conservatives and the nascent tea party movement in Alaska, a still-young state that's long relied heavily on federal money and earmarks to operate and to build up and maintain its infrastructure. Miller has called for less government regulation and giving Alaska greater control over its resource base so it can take charge of its own future and wean itself off what he considers an overdependence on government.

Miller spokesman Randy DeSoto said Miller isn't against all federal spending, "but one could argue, since he's calling for some belt tightening as a nation, why not start by forgoing these subsidies himself?" He answered his question, saying, in part, that in Kansas, in the '90s, some of the crops grown on Miller's land were eligible for aid, and "The government offers these payments in exchange for farmers growing certain crops."

"Like the vast majority of farmers in that region, Joe received payment from the USDA in exchange for managing his crops according to government standards," DeSoto said, adding that Miller sold some of the roughly 140 acres he had in Kansas when he moved to Alaska in the early '90s and the rest by 1998.

DeSoto said none of this has to do with Miller's belief – more than a decade later – that the nation must find ways to address its deficit. Miller has said he launched his first statewide run for public office because he felt the nation was at a crisis point.

DeSoto said it would be different if Miller was currently receiving subsidies, which he isn't. He said Miller isn't a hypocrite.

DeSoto could not confirm the amount in subsidies that Miller received.

Steve Wackowski, a spokesman for Murkowski, who is mounting a write-in campaign, said Miller should have spoken up and acknowledged the subsidies earlier. Wackowski said it speaks to Miller's character that he did not.

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee spokeswoman Deirdre Murphy said Miller's "just another hypocritical politician with one set of rules for himself and one for everyone else."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
JUNEAU, Alaska — Alaska Republican U.S. Senate candidate Joe Miller, who believes the federal government is on the brink of bankruptcy and has called for an end to the "welfare state," received ...
JUNEAU, Alaska — Alaska Republican U.S. Senate candidate Joe Miller, who believes the federal government is on the brink of bankruptcy and has called for an end to the "welfare state," received ...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:00 AM on 09/23/2010
Typical bulllsh&^ from these people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eva belle
Occupy Wall Street
10:36 AM on 09/22/2010
Of course, it's all good for him now, he doesn't need subsidies and neither should others. Sigh!
08:57 AM on 09/22/2010
Does Joe know the truth about Scarah?

http://palingates.blogspot.com/2010/09/sarah-palins-wild-ride-on-april-17-2008.html
07:43 PM on 09/21/2010
Isn't Miller on record saying he's pretty much opposed to all federal spending except for defense? Ohh wait - that was a few weeks ago, before he won the primary and his advisors told him he has to sound sane.
I hope he has a way to teleport to Washington DC if he wins. Because I'm sure he wouldn't want to drive on any Alaska highways (federally paid for), leave from the main Anchorage airport (beautiful new facility - named after Stevens who brought in the federal bucks for it), or have to submit to anti-terrorist flight TSA security (federally paid for). And let's not even get into how the feds might have some imprint on the safety of the jet he is going to fly on or the food he is going to eat on his trip.
What a joke! He and Palin are pretending that Alaska is the "truest" state because they can make it on their own w/out the feds. And yet per capita, Alaskans gets more federal dollars coming back than anywhere else.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
1murillo
Can't be neutral on a moving train - Zinn
07:06 PM on 09/21/2010
Subsidies and fines should be new attack points.
Miller received the subsidies in the past - he admits - so let's have him pay them back. Even if it's in payments - $1 per month. If he truly believes in what he says, he'd gladly pay them back.
Fines too, are merely a part of doing business. Fines should be for 10 times the amount that was stolen or destroyed. For example, if Palin was found ethically guilty of misusing $53,000, she should be made to re-pay $530,000. Not the mere $6,000 that she did pay.
02:03 AM on 09/24/2010
ok, then let Pelosi pay back the million dollars plus (tax payer money) she spent on her little trip with 109 people recently.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
1murillo
Can't be neutral on a moving train - Zinn
07:01 PM on 09/21/2010
The word "hypocrisy" should not be used in political campaigns. So many politicians are hypocritical to one degree or the next that the word barely makes a dent anymore.
Miller's misuse of government funds, for example, could be pointed to as being against what a "constitutional conservative" (even if that term means nothing) stands for.
09:07 PM on 09/21/2010
And that last sentence is exactly what the word hypocrisy means which is why it was used.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
1murillo
Can't be neutral on a moving train - Zinn
09:28 PM on 09/21/2010
I don't mean that hypocrisy is misused. Only that it is so common now, that it doesn't register with voters as much as it should.
05:52 PM on 09/21/2010
Does the term, corporate welfare, mean anything to these Miller fans? What welfare state is he talking about? Social welfare? Programs to enhance the health and well-being of society? Now, why would an American call for the end to programs that enhance the health and well-being of Americans? Hey, Tea Baggers, vote for Miller. He wants to make America in the image of a corporate welfare state.
05:43 PM on 09/21/2010
You'd think with all the subsidies received by angle, bachman, and now this clown would tell baggers all they need to know about how serious these people are about "gittin' the gubmint out of their lives.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
1murillo
Can't be neutral on a moving train - Zinn
07:10 PM on 09/21/2010
Subsidies will be acknowledged only by people that will already vote against the Angle/Miller group.
"Subsidies" sounds so nice. "Embezzlement" sounds worse. Instead of charging someone with a crime however, new terms should be found to replace "subsidy."
05:39 PM on 09/21/2010
Hey joe! Why not give back some of that "gubmint money" and lower the debt, you loud-mouthed hypocrite?
05:35 PM on 09/21/2010
Republicans never claim they want things they want for you.Almost all of them against gay are gay themselves.That's a tricky party over there
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
eddw88
05:50 PM on 09/21/2010
Bulls eye!
photo
tinri
The New Confederacy - Taliban Occupied America
05:35 PM on 09/21/2010
Is it me or is Joe Miller trying to look more and more like a brunette version of Chuck Norris.. without the mullet of course.
05:40 PM on 09/21/2010
I thought that was Don johnson's old 5 o'clock shadow.
05:33 PM on 09/21/2010
A bearded Marxist!
05:32 PM on 09/21/2010
GOP, (including teabaggers) = hypocrite. No news here.
05:26 PM on 09/21/2010
I don't appreciate the republicans having their own set of rules to live by while trying to impose another set on the rest of us. Joe Miller, Sharron Angle, that O'Donnell nut -- all of them -- STOP IT!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SPacific
Get a clue, then get a life
05:19 PM on 09/21/2010
Joe Miller: "Hypocrisy if fine......as long as you're a republican hypocrite......."