iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Teresa Lewis, Mentally Disabled Woman Slated For Execution In Virginia, Won't Get Help From Supreme Court

STEVE SZKOTAK   09/22/10 12:00 AM ET   AP

Teresa Lewis

RICHMOND, Va. — The U.S. Supreme Court refused Tuesday to block the execution of a woman convicted of two hired killings, clearing the way for the state's first execution of a woman in nearly a century.

Teresa Lewis, 41, is scheduled to die by injection Thursday for providing sex and money to two men to kill her husband and stepson in October 2002 so she could collect on a quarter-million dollar insurance pay out.

Two of the three women on the court, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, voted to stop the execution. The court did not otherwise comment on its order.

The court's decision followed Gov. Bob McDonnell's refusal to reconsider a clemency request, which he rejected Friday.

"A good and decent person is about to lose her life because of a system that is broken," said attorney James E. Rocap III, who represents Lewis. He said he was referring to the decision by the Supreme Court and McDonnell's rejection of clemency.

Rocap appealed Monday to McDonnell to reconsider his decision to deny clemency to Lewis, claiming new evidence should spare Lewis the death penalty.

Rocap argued that one of the gunmen later claimed he manipulated Lewis, who is borderline mentally retarded, "to dupe her into believing he loved her so that he could achieve his own selfish goals."

The Virginia case has had repercussions as far away as Iran.

An Iranian news agency reported Tuesday that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accused the West of launching a "heavy propaganda" campaign against the case of an Iranian woman who had been sentenced to be stoned to death for adultery but failing to react with outrage over the imminent execution of Lewis in Virginia.

Ahmadinejad's reported comments came during a speech Monday to Islamic clerics and other figures in New York, where he is attending the U.N. General Assembly.

Lewis pleaded guilty in May 2003 to two counts of capital murder for hire in the slayings of her husband Julian Lewis and her stepson, Charles Lewis.

The triggermen, Matthew Shallenberger and Rodney Fuller, were sentenced to life terms. Shallenberger, who Rocap names as the mastermind, committed suicide in prison in 2006.

"If she was not the mastermind – and it is now clear she was not – it is grossly unfair to impose the death sentence on her while Shallenberger and Fuller received life," Rocap wrote to McDonnell.

McDonnell's legal counsel said the governor's decision would stand.

Based on a thorough review, "the governor found no compelling reason to grant clemency and made a final decision," J. Jasen Eige wrote to Rocap, who released the response Tuesday.

Teresa Lewis and Julian Clifton Lewis Jr. met in 2000 at a Danville textile factory where they worked and later married. In 2002, Julian's son Charles bought a $250,000 life insurance policy when he was called for active duty by the U.S. Army Reserve. He named his father as beneficiary.

Lewis offered herself and her 16-year-old daughter for sex to Shallenberger and Fuller. She stood by while they shot Lewis, 51, and his son, who was 25, in 2002 in Pittsylvania County in Southside Virginia.

Lewis rummaged through her husband's pockets for money while he lay dying and waited nearly an hour before calling 911.

Lewis allowed a judge to determine her sentence. Her attorneys believed she stood a better chance of getting a life prison term from the judge who had never sentenced anyone to death.

The last execution of a woman in the U.S. occurred in 2005 when Frances Newton died by injection in Texas. In Virginia, the last woman executed was in 1912, when 17-year-old Virginia Christian died in the electric chair for suffocating her employer.

Thousands of advocates have appealed for Lewis' clemency, arguing she is a changed woman. Her scheduled execution has also stirred interest because of her gender.

Out of more than 1,200 executions since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976, only 11 women have been executed. Of the more than 3,200 inmates on death row nationwide, 53 are women.

___

Online:

Save Teresa Lewis: http://www.saveteresalewis.org

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
RICHMOND, Va. — The U.S. Supreme Court refused Tuesday to block the execution of a woman convicted of two hired killings, clearing the way for the state's first execution of a woman in nearly a ...
RICHMOND, Va. — The U.S. Supreme Court refused Tuesday to block the execution of a woman convicted of two hired killings, clearing the way for the state's first execution of a woman in nearly a ...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,922
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
08:46 PM on 09/26/2010
Abolish the death penalty STOP USING VIOLENCE TO FIGHT VIOLENCE!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neutralground
02:12 PM on 09/24/2010
I will try one more time. Twice my comment has not appeared. I know someone personally, a distant relative, who does not live near me and will never see this, who has an IQ of this 72-79, borderline retarded, level. She has very poor judgment. She has made some bad mistakes and suffered dearly for them. Even though she is smart enough to know you need an umbrella if it rains, the part of her brain that makes moral decisions and judgment calls does not work like it should. It may be that this Ms. Lewis has that part of her brain impaired. Surely selling herself and her daughter is also a bad judgment call. Sadly, peoople like her are preyed upon.

I am an attorney, and I worry, with such a large portion of our population now suffering from neurological and mental disorders of many kinds, including the autism epidemic, whether we will not be seeing a whole lot more injustice in the treating of the "mentally ill and deficient." With no offense meant to those within that umbrella. We may, unless there is massive education of law enforcement and the courts as to these issues. If a four-year-old did what she did, would you still say she was "evil?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theobserver4
progress is a process not an end result
12:56 PM on 09/24/2010
Mentally disabled Masterminds....only in America can people say this with a straight face.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalDemIda
You can't spell "Conservative" without Con.
07:15 PM on 09/25/2010
Not only say it, but actually believe it too since a court said so, and that's like a commandment to some people. Rational thought doesn't seem to come into play when a nation, (in)famous for its religiousness compared to other western, civilized countries, believes the Bible is literal and faith carries more weight than fact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Free Plaxico
12:28 PM on 09/24/2010
Okay am I missing something, did this women not have her husband and step son killed for 250K? I don't care what kind of person she turned into after she was in prison she has to atone for her crimes. No Sympathy from me on this one I don't care what her IQ was, she was smart enough to hire two people to kill and bribe them with sex on top of dividing up the loot with them.
Some how I have to wonder if this was a man who did this would people be so forgiving?
photo
maribelle1963
Welcome to the end of the world. Coffee or tea?
12:30 PM on 09/24/2010
Did you know that he confessed in prison to setting her up to do it b/c he saw her as an easy mark and needed the money?

Do you know how low an IQ of 70-72 really is?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Free Plaxico
12:47 PM on 09/24/2010
No I did not know that "he" (not sure which gunman that is) set her up. However she decided that the money sounded nice and by all accounts I read she did her part in the murders (unlocking doors and moving dogs so that the murder could take place) On top of that the women seems to have been smart enough to use sex to get what she wanted throughout her life so I don't really care how low her IQ was... What's next we excuse someon from robbing a bank because they had a low IQ and another bank robber conviced them to help out? If anything "he" should have been sentenced to death too.

Even people with low IQ's desire money if you ask me all of them should have been put to death for such a crime. What about the poor husband and son who are dead?
11:56 AM on 09/24/2010
When did the Huff become Psychologist or Phyciatrist. Because she has a low IQ of 72?
She planned a murder. Her partners in crime made a deal first. Happens all the time.
The death penalty will always be debated. If they have somene dead to rights on a crime, sorry, I'd pull the switch or issue the injection.
I guess some of you are okay with the two scumB's that killed that family in Conn. They tied up the mother, the 11 year old, the raped them. Poured gas on them while alive and set them on fire.
We should let them live? They should be put to death in the same manor.
11:43 AM on 09/24/2010
So now that its ok to kill masterminds with low IQs lets go after Bush and Cheney!
12:05 PM on 09/24/2010
First all the liberals than the white house.
photo
mmsuki
Fine; I evolved, you didn't.
12:23 PM on 09/24/2010
You mean, "then" the white house, dolt?
photo
mmsuki
Fine; I evolved, you didn't.
12:24 PM on 09/24/2010
I like it. Tens of thousands of people were killed by their actions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rodger leMonde
I call them as I see them.
11:38 AM on 09/24/2010
Other issues aside, note that evil has no intelligence requirement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
astraia
Romney: NONE & DONE!
11:08 AM on 09/24/2010
lewis's actions were wrong on every level. shallenberger's and fuller's actions were wrong on every level.

so lewis got the death penalty but the scumbags who committed the murders got spared the harshest, most barbaric sentence of all?

capital punishment is wrong on every level.. EVERY SINGLE ONE.
11:02 AM on 09/24/2010
"A good and decent person is about to lose her life because of a system that is broken," said attorney James E. Rocap III
How can he say she is good and decent knowing what despicable things she did? Always looking for mitigating factors, which is their job I guess, but the fact remains that the husband and stepson were murdered for money.
11:46 AM on 09/24/2010
Oh yeah, and Iraqis were killed for oil! Whats your point? You live in a country that kills for power what do you expect? morality?
10:49 AM on 09/24/2010
To whom it may concern, what ever happened to Thou shall not kill? I don't remember that commandment having any exceptions. You are either pro life or you are not. We as a country need to stop thinking that killing someone under some circumstances is OK.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Curbrunner
10:58 AM on 09/24/2010
For those in power and for many others, their so-called "ten commandments" are nothing more that pick-n-choose disposable options to be used depending on whichever circumstance best servers their current interests.
12:35 PM on 09/24/2010
Idealistic but unrealistic. It's empathy for scum bags like this that has deteriorated the US to its current state. Few fear the systems because the system hardly ever follow through.
I'm all for the death penalty especially when we are100% sure we have right person, which in this case she admits she did it. The border line IQ is a lawyer just trying to make an excuse. She took responsibility now its a eye for an eye.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theobserver4
progress is a process not an end result
01:37 PM on 09/24/2010
I agree with the death penalty when particularly heinous crimes can be proven 100% as well (essentially caught red handed), but keep in mind confessions are not always on the up and up. She did it in this case but some people are coerced into false confessions.
01:42 PM on 09/24/2010
Reality is what we make of it.
An eye for an eye? and, who's eye is the last eye? Don't you get it? It doesn't stop at one, it keeps going.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher1971
10:19 AM on 09/24/2010
I'm against the death penalty and always have been on both moral and practical grounds. However, some of the outrage against her execution I have seen on the net isn't about the immorality of the death penalty but about the fact that a woman is about to be executed.

Egalitarian principles demand that if a man can be executed for a capital crime then a women cannot be made exempt by merit of their gender. Real feminism is about equality, not about protectionism toward the female gender. If anything, not allowing women to suffer the same consequences as men for the same crime is stating quite clearly that women are the weaker gender.

If it is misogyny to execute a woman for a capital crime than certainly it is misandry to execute a man. Of course that is nonsense unless their gender inequality was the source of the sentence received. This is clearly not the case in regards to Teresa Lewis.

I believe that we should as an enlightened nation (I know its a stretch) abolish the death penalty but until such time we cannot allow different rules for different genders.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
cybersense
10:27 AM on 09/24/2010
If a person has a mental capacity of a 12 year old, that would be important bit of information. Think of a 12 year old. She wasn't even the one who pulled the trigger. The man that did, whom she thought she loved - he had a high iq. I think that is important bit of information. Yet, because he made a deal - he lives. Yep.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher1971
10:32 AM on 09/24/2010
Yes, he made a deal. For good and ill such deals are made every single day by both men and woman in our system. Whether or not we should allow such deals is a seperate debate.

In our system, conspiracy to commit murder ie. hiring someone to "whack" your husband and stepson is the equivalent of pulling the trigger...as it should be. If no deals were struck, the man involved would have been looking at capital punishment as well. Misogyny was not the issue in this case.

Perhaps the issue of mental retardation is a valid argument in regards to this case, but misogyny is not.
10:08 AM on 09/24/2010
I wonder what the IQ was of the poor guy who married her was
10:30 AM on 09/24/2010
Good point.
geoffstaples
liberal anarchist
10:06 AM on 09/24/2010
Welcome to the United States of Brutality and Greed. where Darwinian survival of the fittest is brought to you by born-again Evangelical "Christians" who don't believe in evolution.

Sadly, I must agree. Evolution couldn't possible exist since we are obviously more savage than the apes from whom we supposedly descended.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
10:43 AM on 09/24/2010
Upon what evidence do you base the claim that we human great apes are more savage than our cousins?
11:04 AM on 09/24/2010
Drivel
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
theMightyT v3
saving wingers from themselves since 2008
09:47 AM on 09/24/2010
lendtolease 15 minutes ago (9:30 AM)
Sorry, guys. Not OK to murder. Putting her to death was not murder. Nice try.

================

what is it, then?

What is your rationale for implementing the death penalty as a punishment for a crime?

What is it supposed to do?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve41
Never insult anyone by accident. R.A.H.
11:12 AM on 09/24/2010
It is supposed to keep the murderer from killing again. Works quite well. Murders to date committed after the murderer was put to death... zero.
12:41 PM on 09/24/2010
It's confirmed. I searched the internet and could not find any case of a executed prisoner committing any more crimed after execution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beaverlocal
Born 1947, USAF 1966-1970
09:38 AM on 09/24/2010
There seem to be many complex issues in this case. Although I am generally against the death penalty ,I reserve judgement in a case like this without all the facts.