More

Obama Homeowner Program Hits 10-Month Low As Prices Drop And Foreclosures Surge

First Posted: 09/22/10 10:21 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:50 PM ET

Mortgage

The number of homeowners receiving permanent relief under the Obama administration's primary foreclosure-prevention initiative hit a 10-month low as home prices dropped and repossessions jumped, threatening more homeowners just as the administration's aid program winds down.

Just over 33,000 homeowners had their monthly mortgage payments reduced in August for the next five years as part of the administration's Home Affordable Modification Program, Treasury Department data released Wednesday show. Obama promised in 2009 that some 3 to 4 million homeowners would be helped. About 449,000 borrowers have thus far received mortgage modifications.

The program, sold as a $50-billion effort, is unlikely to spend that much helping delinquent homeowners keep their homes. Nearly one and a half years into the program, only 1 percent of that money has been spent.

The effort, known as HAMP, was meant to keep homeowners from losing their homes while the subprime mortgage crisis was decimating property values and bank balance sheets. While the banking sector has stabilized, the housing market is still weak.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency reported Wednesday that home prices fell 3.3 percent in July compared to last year. Lenders repossessed more than 95,000 homes in August, according to California-based data provider RealtyTrac -- the highest monthly total the firm has ever recorded and a 25-percent jump from August 2009. And experts, including mortgage giant Fannie Mae, predict that home prices will keep dropping.

As repossessions mount, those prices will drop further. That will lead in turn to an uptick in delinquencies and foreclosures -- especially if the unemployment rate stays near 10 percent -- necessitating further aid.

But while HAMP is winding down, the administration "will continue to monitor the market closely in case more is needed," Raphael Bostic, an assistant secretary at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said in a statement.

Analysts and homeowner advocates had expected more from the administration. Thus far, experts agree the program has been a disappointment.

Meanwhile, less than 18,000 new homeowners entered HAMP last month for three-month trial plans -- the third straight month the number of new entrants failed to reach 20,000.

In sum, about 51,000 homeowners in August received either permanent or temporary reductions in their mortgage payment. But nearly 53,000 homeowners were bounced from the program, the fifth-straight month more homeowners were tossed from HAMP than new ones were helped.

Through August, more than 651,000 homeowners remain in HAMP. Yet more than 682,000 borrowers have been booted -- over 95 percent of them during the trial stage, Treasury data show. A senior administration official last month likened the situation to a tax cut without cost to the taxpayer.

But for those who remain, the median reduction in monthly payments is about $515, or 36 percent of the median original payment. Borrowers overall have saved about $3.1 billion in lower monthly mortgage payments through HAMP.


*************************

Shahien Nasiripour is the business reporter for the Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 646-274-2455.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The number of homeowners receiving permanent relief under the Obama administration's primary foreclosure-prevention initiative hit a 10-month low as home prices dropped and repossessions jumped, threa...
The number of homeowners receiving permanent relief under the Obama administration's primary foreclosure-prevention initiative hit a 10-month low as home prices dropped and repossessions jumped, threa...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 751
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
ResearchtheFacts 12:41 AM on 09/23/2010
They should have just cut out the middle man and had homeowners apply directly to a government agency setup to receive the tarp funding.

The program, sold as a $50-billion effort, is unlikely to spend that much helping delinquent homeowners keep their homes.

You would think in the many years the american government has been in operation they would at least be able to do a  Read More...

As sad as our government has become you would think the entire operation was being ran by a bunch of minimum wage workers.  With the kind of money they are being paid to do their jobs we should be getting better service.  No offense to anyone making minimum wage just an analogy.

Its annoying when so many talented, competent workers are unemployed and these that are employed--getting paid good money should be standing in an unemployment line somewhere.  Fired for failing to do the job.
photo
KAL-EL
Every time I fill out my bio I get banned.
09:13 PM on 09/23/2010
obama needs to keep selling this success story.

Everybody loves a good fairytale.
04:48 AM on 09/24/2010
but not many are buying it though
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
07:29 PM on 09/23/2010
Foreclosures and jobless claims rise - but we are told that the recession ended months ago. Have I missed something?
03:31 PM on 09/23/2010
I look at it htis way.. it will be about another 15-25% decline in price. Then you dive in a clean up, rent them out until prices rebound and tata//// make a few bucks..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:43 PM on 09/23/2010
I work in that field and many of the delays I see happen because borrowers don't know exactly how to file and banks/servicers don't tell them clearly how to apply. A lot of people ask for modifications but are not able to provide solid proof of income to put aside 31% towards mortgage/Escrow and 40% gross income ratio to consumer debt. Many people are being confronted with a new obstacle, the requirement that borrowers produce solid proof of income and they are frustrated when they see that the flexibility they had before has changed. Many erros on original applications are coming back to hurt borrowers trying to get a mod, for example listing two borrowers but only one is available now, or the original application says the property was investment, not residential, fake SS numbers, among other cases. This effort by the government was supposed to help up to 4 million people but that's also including shortsales and refinancing.They miscalculated how people were going to react and most people don't see shortsale as help and they are focused mainly in getting a modification. I think it's time for the government to retrieve and let the market take care of itself. In this case I think the conservative argument makes sense. The program is not working as they expected, just wasting money and not helping enough people, and that makes people more impatient. It's both bad policy and bad politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missgramma2005
01:48 PM on 09/23/2010
Yeah that conservative argument is what got us where we are now...If the homeowner needs a modification to their loan it makes good sense to America to give them a reasonable modification to keep them in their homes.

Perhaps the $$$$ signs in the bankers eyes makes them overlook the fact that there is only so many houses to be foreclosed on and resold to foreign buyers. Buying up America one house at a time how American is that?

Of course I am a Christian bleeding heart liberal social Democrat who believes in people first always..
01:55 PM on 09/23/2010
You believe in helping one class at the expense of other classes. It is people that rent that will have to pay taxes to implement your plan. And renters for the most part are less wealthy than the homeowners.

So you are not believing in people first, you are believing in homeowners first.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:37 PM on 09/23/2010
The problem is that in this business we see people getting 2% interest rate and two months later they are running behind on their payments again and asking for more help and telling you that "the banks got bailed-out by us, I saw it in the news, Obama gave you money" and that's not true. Servicers get an incentive if they can have someone passed through the trial period, but you know what, many people think that they are entitled to it and that's not true. Look , greed is not only a sin of the wealthy, there are a lot of poor people who are greedy too and borrow and get credit cards that they can't afford, because they are greedy too. Banks are greedy and they don't make things easy for borrowers because they make a lot of money on late fees and corporate advances, but it takes two to tango. People lie to you ignoring that you are looking at their credit history and financial behavior in front of you. It's a mess. I have helped a lot of people get mods, but I also deal with a lot of dishonest and greedy poor people. It's not just the banks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slocomgp
03:23 PM on 09/23/2010
And bad lender behavior!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
picaman
Conservatism is an Un-Christian lack of Empathy
10:57 AM on 09/23/2010
"Obama promised in 2009 that some 3 to 4 million homeowners would be helped"

I think we can assume that this "promise" was predicated on the belief that banks would actually participate in the program.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
11:58 AM on 09/23/2010
Banks will release their hoarded cash when the RTP is back in power. It's deliberate. Businesses are dying for cash but 'oh hell no'. Not until they get their 'enemy' out of the White House. They, like the RTP couldn't give a s@it about America.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:54 PM on 09/23/2010
I think they said up to 4 millions but that also included refinancing for those with good credit and shortsales for those who couldn't refinance and couldn't get a mod because of their income. One of the things they miscalculated was that people don't see shortsales as help. Some banks/servicers don't provide explanations on how to go about applying. The trial period was a good idea, it prevents people that were going to fail anyway from getting help that could be given to someone who can actually keep the property but in this tough market the chances of selling, even shortsale, are minimal, and when this happens the only role that HAMP played was to delay the inevitable, more foreclosed homes. I think they tried enough, they should recognize there's no artificial fix and just let the market take care of itself in this instance.
10:42 AM on 09/23/2010
imagine that, a government engineered economic plan fails. who would have thought? oh, yea, i did.

i predict the next home owner plan from president 7-iron will fail too.
JStading
Trust me, I'm an attorney...
11:01 AM on 09/23/2010
Out of curocity, who was the last president who didn't play golf?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
11:52 AM on 09/23/2010
"imagine that, a government engineered economic plan fails. who would have thought?" Bush should have. But, then again, thought require something to think with. And before you say stop blaming Bush - we will when you stop blaming Obama. You stop we stop.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetTheFreakOuttaHere
Let Freedom of Speech Reign Supreme
12:44 PM on 09/25/2010
Hear, hear!! (It had to be said!)
photo
MaryMay
May your tears come from laughing
10:42 AM on 09/23/2010
You have to go delinquent and have your credit wrecked to qualify for this program.

Homeowners are delving into their retirement funds and having yard sales to stay current on their mortgage payments because they value the good credit rating they have built over the years. HAMP takes all of that away, reduces payments for only five years by extending the term of the loan, and puts you through hell in the process.

Under these terms, how could anyone think this would be a popular program that would extend relief to 3-4 million people?

We need cram down now, without the bankruptcy stigma attached to that either. Reduce principle owed to market value and let the banks take the hit to their inflated balance sheets. They recoup less than market value when they throw someone out of their home and sell it off as a foreclosed property anyway.
01:28 PM on 09/23/2010
How is that fair to me?

I rent and I didn't buy a house for exactly the same reason you want a cramdown. Prices were too high. But you want to pay too much for your house, live in it, refinance and take out cash, and now that reality hits, I have to pay taxes to keep you in your house.
03:32 PM on 09/23/2010
They dont care, the bankers made them do it. You cant fix stupid dude
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slocomgp
03:32 PM on 09/23/2010
You want fair? How about you bought a house 15 years ago, you have equity, been making your payment on time for the entire life of the mortgage. You are a contractor, business all but stops, you are self employed, in your late 50's, no one is hiring, no chance for unemployment (independent contractor), NO INCOME! Are those people at fault for buying into to this housing bubble. If it were near as easy as you make it sound, well if would be easier than wouldn't it? Hey stop paying your rent for awhile and see what happens. I know people that are putting 10's of 1000's of $$$$ on credit cards in order to keep up with mortgage payments because they cant find work. Their next step in living in their car with a family of 5.
10:28 AM on 09/23/2010
The problem is not with Obama's program, it's with the banks and mortgage lenders. They won't go along with the program. They would rather foreclose on the property.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MountainPenelope
Hands off my micro-bio (& my Medicare)!
10:32 AM on 09/23/2010
I agree.

If people do not take advantage of the program, it is not the fault of the program or the President. It's the old "you can lead a horse to water" scenario.

Very often, I think, those who are in the situation either do not know how to take advantage of it, or, they are so beaten down, they just do not have the heart to pursue the option.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
12:03 PM on 09/23/2010
Mostly the Einsteins in the Tea Party and dishwashers that moved from their trailers to McMansions with no money down that brought the real estate market to it's knees that resulted in the wiping out of equity within the portfolios of Americans who did the right thing. Now, they're bitching about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missgramma2005
01:40 PM on 09/23/2010
Heavens but the propaganda some have swilled. I don't know anyone who was/is a dishwasher who bought a McMansion. That is so wrong. Class warfare anyone?

Greed is where those who bought houses to flip and expected to double their $$$$ in a short time. Once the party was over and the hangovers commenced the realization that the credit market was overly, if not gigantically overinflated, started to dawn.. The rats started running for the lifeboats to no avail but hey let's blame the new administration.

Yeah it's easier to blame the poor folks who were swindled by overinflated prices than facing facts that the majority of us were all in for the gorging.,

Appraisers were at fault for not drawing the line and banks for going along with high interest rates and gleefully rubbing hands over the $$$ to be made...

Look look is that a iceberg ahead said the Captain to the bridge!!
10:19 AM on 09/23/2010
Declare every ARM illegal. Refinance those properties at current market value with a reasonable fixed rate for the life of the loan and prohibit second mortgages.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:13 PM on 09/23/2010
They are actually illegal now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:14 PM on 09/23/2010
Not the ARMs but the type of ARM loans that got us in this mess no longer exist. The current problem was not created 2 years ago, this problem was created in 2003 and now we have to deal with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
10:12 AM on 09/23/2010
WoW !

A radical, socialistic , government program that benefits a few individuals.

Wait, are we talking about Obama health Health care?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dardedar
Not here to play patty cake...
10:44 AM on 09/23/2010
No, that benefits everyone. All Americans benefit when our populace is allowed access to healthcare.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
11:02 AM on 09/23/2010
A little info for you.

Now about 25-35 million people don't have health insurance. Everyone , 100%, has access to health care.

After Obama care is in place, about 15 million people will still not have health insurance and about 10 million people will be forbidden BY LAW to purchase health insurance. These are US residents that currently, can now buy health insurance legally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marmmalou
You have a voice. Use It.
10:11 AM on 09/23/2010
Why is there no information regarding the large number of homeowners who have applied to HAMP through their mortgage holder/bank for help, and had documents lost, again and again , which delayed assistance until it was too late? What has happened to the many homeowners who have applied and then been rejected for inconsequential reasons ? Where is the help?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FerrellGummitt
http://ferrellgummit.wordpress.com
10:07 AM on 09/23/2010
Now there's real Hopey-Change.
10:00 AM on 09/23/2010
The flaw with all these housing programs is that it's up to the bank to decide which borrowers they want to approve for them. And alot of people are getting burned in the approval process. Check out this story about a bank actually lying to a person about the qualifications for the loan modification program:
http://onthefrontlinesofamericanswarwithdebt.wordpress.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SlyPhox
11:02 AM on 09/23/2010
The "bank" didn't lie, the rep was ill-informed. She even admitted fault.
09:47 AM on 09/23/2010
I lost respect for Warren a few months back when he insisted that the rating agencies were fabulous investments and should be left alone.  I just plain can't get my head around that statement.  He was an ardent defender of those that contributed greatly to this downturn. 

I am sure the government wants to declare the recession over believing it will boost the spirits of those looking for work, or businesses just barely hanging on that there is a light at the end of the tunnel.  It is similar to the government cheering a weak GDP of 1.6 insisting that means things are still going in the right direction.  More importantly is the GDP a true measure of the health of an economy? 

Another false statement from the government is insisting that the unemployment rate is 9.6 when in fact it is much closer to 18 percent when part-time, reduced hours, discouraged, etc. are counted.  The system is designed to keep people in the system to some point and then they are dropped forever.  They just stop being counted.  Period.  They are banished and yet they still exist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ResearchtheFacts
09:39 AM on 09/23/2010
You can tell they have put very little effort into solving this problem.  They could care "less".
09:44 AM on 09/23/2010
right