iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Announces New Approach To International Development At UN Summit

BEN FELLER   09/22/10 08:48 PM ET   AP

Obama Un Development

UNITED NATIONS — President Barack Obama on Wednesday defended U.S. aid to impoverished people even during sour economic times at home yet promised a sterner approach, favoring nations that commit to democracy and economic revival.

Addressing world leaders, Obama offered no new commitments of U.S. dollars, but rather a blueprint of the development policy that will drive his government's efforts and determine where the money flows. His message was that the United States wants to help countries help themselves, not offer aid that provides short-term relief without reforming societies.

"That's not development, that's dependence," Obama said. "And it's a cycle we need to break. Instead of just managing poverty, we have to offer nations and people a path out of poverty."

Obama spoke at a major anti-poverty summit convened by the United Nations, one day ahead of his main speech to the U.N. General Assembly. The president is in the midst of a three-day trip to the U.N. for its annual meeting.

World leaders on Wednesday were wrapping up an intensive review of the poverty reduction goals adopted 10 years ago, a highly ambitious effort that has yielded mixed results. The mission is to cut extreme poverty, reduce child and maternal mortality and expand primary education, among other objectives, by 2015.

The president, met by applause as he took the grand U.N. stage, sought to elevate the mission of U.S. development.

Noting the Americans hurting at home, where a recession has eroded millions of jobs, Obama defended the spending of U.S. tax dollars to help others build up their agriculture, transportation and health systems. He called it not just a moral imperative but an investment that can help the global economy and reduce the threats of instability and extremism.

"Let's put to rest the old myth that development is mere charity that does not serve our interests," Obama said.

The White House framed the president's blueprint as a fresh, far-reaching approach to helping other countries, although it builds on programs of other presidents. Obama sought to offer a sense of clarity of why the United States aids other nations, saying it is "rooted in America's enduring commitment to the dignity and potential of every human being."

Obama said development should no longer be measured by how much money or medicine is delivered, but by the extent to which the U.S. helps countries build up themselves. He aimed to show toughness in setting demands of recipient nations.

"The purpose of development – and what's needed most right now – is creating the conditions where assistance is no longer needed," he said. "So we will seek partners who want to build their own capacity to provide for their people."

He said the U.S. will not abandon countries that need lifesaving help. But he made a plea to developing countries to show responsibility: "We want to help you realize your aspirations. But there is no substitute for your leadership."

International aid organizations praised Obama's commitment to the cause but offered sober words about the challenge ahead, pressing the U.S. president and other leaders of rich nations to follow up on their promises.

Obama then shifted quickly from the plight of the developing world to domestic politics. He was raising money in New York City on Wednesday night for Democratic congressional candidates ahead of the midterm elections in six weeks.

The centerpiece of Obama's trip comes Thursday when he addresses the General Assembly in a speech expected to defend his efforts to advance Mideast peace and combat nuclear threats in Iran and North Korea.

__

Associated Press writers Darlene Superville in Washington and Anita Snow and Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
UNITED NATIONS — President Barack Obama on Wednesday defended U.S. aid to impoverished people even during sour economic times at home yet promised a sterner approach, favoring nations that commi...
UNITED NATIONS — President Barack Obama on Wednesday defended U.S. aid to impoverished people even during sour economic times at home yet promised a sterner approach, favoring nations that commi...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 666
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
06:49 AM on 09/23/2010
"That's not development, that's dependence," Obama said. "And it's a cycle we need to break. Instead of just managing poverty, we have to offer nations and people a path out of poverty."

What an ironic statement
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Pandaforum
04:24 AM on 09/23/2010
"That's not development, that's dependence," Obama said. "And it's a cycle we need to break. Instead of just managing poverty, we have to offer nations and people a path out of poverty.""

obama should take his own advice with regards to the dems treatment of African Americans. Ever since the "great society" dems have been giving AA's a few dead mackerals rather than teaching them to fish.
04:01 AM on 09/23/2010
Wow! The burden of his job is showing. He's starting to grey. Has anyone done a study on presidential greying rates?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Pandaforum
04:24 AM on 09/23/2010
I think they did one on obama's greying rats.
photo
CarolinaDem
they DID take the last train for the coast!
03:11 AM on 09/23/2010
Can't tell whether the 'hand up rather than a hand-out' baloney is just a nod to the right or a serious attempt to lecture the experts on aid, but the main tone here is superbly serious. We haven't had the funding that was promised, but even Bush at least made a major promise, and this President is saying good things. I guess part of the point is we're not going to deal with Darfur, but no one would anyway. Women's care remains the ticket to pushing back global poverty and these goals really matter for that.
02:41 AM on 09/23/2010
Mr. President.

You are a tireless fighter (for all the poeple of THESE UNITED states )
You are a champion ( for equality among all people )
You are a visionary ( that sees a STRONG America leading into the future)
You are a compassionate man ( that makes the time for less needy in your busy schedule)
You are a leader (that charts a course needed to be taken )
You are dedicated ( to trying to be the best you can be daily)
You are a role model ( for fathers and parents everywhere with your strong family)
You are a tactician ( of the highest magnitude)
You are sensible man ( that realizes where and how to strive for common ground)
You are a transcendental figure ( giving hope to all around the world -myself included)

You are a human being
-like us all .
-doing your best .
-regardless of daily polls

in this world of hostility ...and anger ..and confusion ..

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------------------------((( CLAPPING )))--------------------------------------------
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

and for that ..I thank you SIR.”
gparks
Fan of truth, justice, prosperity for all!
03:40 AM on 09/23/2010
AFL .... Fanned-38- and faved -2- well said!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Pandaforum
04:27 AM on 09/23/2010
gee. get out much? I give you the prize for sycophancy.
photo
RussT
A system of reward, not entitlements.
02:14 AM on 09/23/2010
As long as the U.S. can "absorb another terrorist attack" it's all good.

Isn't that right Obama?!

He is one cold man.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:16 AM on 09/23/2010
We are a strong nation that does not buckle or betray its principles just because we are attacked. Thank you Mr. President. Well said. We have survived and strengthened our core belief in democracy and rights.
01:39 AM on 09/23/2010
Its now very clear that some people are just set to bash Obama whenever he speaks, no matter the topic. US intl. development budget is not even close to 1% of the total US budget folks, relax!. For the wealthiest country in the history of the world, we contribute a truly minuscule amount to the overall intl. development efforts. Not to mention that its the best and cheapest (and now only) marketing tool we have in international community at this point - unless somebody here thinks we live in this world alone, in a gated community?

BTW - it would be great if you could visit a place in Africa (or Asia, Latin America etc) - any place, jut close your eyes and put your finger on a map. Perhaps it will give you a different perspective on 'poverty', the word the is so easily and randomly being thrown around these days.

Whats really ironic, however, is that some truly die-hard Christians (or so they say they are) are complying about development efforts and eradicating poverty. Go figure, we are not all god's creatures after all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whyus
San Francisco native
01:06 AM on 09/23/2010
His hair is turning white.
12:31 AM on 09/23/2010
Typica demwilling to give away others $$ never their own
12:27 AM on 09/23/2010
You do your thing, chairman Mao-Bama. Give them Biden's ability to break the filibuster. That'll show 'em who's boss. LOL!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RudyHaugeneder
12:17 AM on 09/23/2010
Meanwhile, a great danger lurks that Obama may not be able to control.

What’s this?
"(Reuters) - U.S. lawmakers may vote next week on legislation that would penalize China for keeping its currency artificially low, a touchy issue that has gained broader political support as congressional elections approach. . .
"Critics inside and outside Congress say China deliberately undervalues its currency by as much as 25 percent to 40 percent to give Chinese companies an unfair trade advantage, hurting U.S. exports and job prospects."
Very dangerous. For a country that borrows massively to avoid bankruptcy, the USA is ill-advised to start a trade war with its biggest banker, China.
But that’s what appears to be gaining Congressional momentum, an American-launched trade war because the USA is no longer able to balance its operating budget or current account.
Of course, much of this is crass politics, but once the Dogs of (trade) War are unleashed . . . nobody wins.
Pray it doesn’t but this danger is entering the space of critical mass.
And don’t expect help from Japan. It has been under American attack for a decade.
12:23 AM on 09/23/2010
It's either confront them about the unfair currency/trade practices or watch American industry be lost forever.. Interest rates will go out the roof when China sells off our bonds.
12:32 AM on 09/23/2010
Japan has been getting away with this for 50 years
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:16 AM on 09/23/2010
President Obama,
If you really want to aid international development, you can take the funds that are being used for the CIA's secret army in Pakistan...for starters.
And please don't forget to shore up the national development, while you're at it, OK Guy?
12:33 AM on 09/23/2010
better still take the $$ your sending to japan and kora for sending their cars here. What country in their right mind with 20% unemployment would be sending them $7500 for every car the export to us
12:11 AM on 09/23/2010
I am betting the end of this story is more money given to countries that do not like us now and the money will be stolen by some dictator just like in the oil for food scandal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gus Adaire
Challenging libs with truth.
12:04 AM on 09/23/2010
This is not a bill, it's a gift.

Grow a pair, don't pay it.
11:21 PM on 09/22/2010
We don't want to just give money and create dependence. We want to offer a path out of poverty. That entails more money. Same plan, differerent day

Hopefully his international plan will be more sucessful than his domestic plan, which resulted in record high poverty levels.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:03 AM on 09/23/2010
His domestic plans did not cause our current record level of poverty. It was previous administrations' policies, mostly voo-doo economics by Reagan. It is coming home to roost NOW from BACK THEN. This is part of the LONG TERM EFFECTS of worthless, non-working "trickle down" economics.
02:28 AM on 09/23/2010
Actually, it translates to "getting countries out of poverty, is easier when we actually aid them in ways that lean towards self-sufficiency, instead of lending them money while dumping our food onto them, causing their economy to tank and making them endlessly indebted to us.. which works out great when we tell them they can climb out by letting our mineral and energy companies extract their resources on the cheap."

Whether its genuine or not, (and if it even is, whether policy makers can even fend off corporate strong arming), is another question.

Go to college or something, read credible writers even. Unemployment would have been upwards of 14% at best had no stimulus went through. If they'd passed a WPA style employment/infrastructure program, half the electorate would have sealed themselves in their bunkers waiting for Obama's communist marxist black liberation baptist secret muslims to commence full Sovietization. So we got a wimpy stimulus, and you state's schools and police departments got to stay open.