iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Super WiFi' Coming: FCC Opens Up Unused TV Airwaves For Broadband

JOELLE TESSLER   09/23/10 05:35 PM ET   AP

Super Wifi Frequency

WASHINGTON — The Federal Communications Commission is opening up unused airwaves between television channels for wireless broadband networks that will be more powerful and can reach farther than today's Wi-Fi hotspots.

The five-member FCC voted unanimously Thursday to allow the use of so-called "white spaces" in the broadcast TV spectrum to deliver broadband connections that can function like Wi-Fi networks on steroids. The agency is calling the new technology "super Wi-Fi" and hopes to see devices with the technology start to appear within a year.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said white spaces networks will serve as "a powerful platform for innovation," driving billions in industry investment.

Leading technology companies, including Google Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Dell Inc., are eager to develop the market. They say television white spaces are ideally suited for broadband because they are able to penetrate walls, have plenty of capacity and can travel several miles.

Just like the spectrum used by Wi-Fi, white spaces will be available to all users for free, with no license required. The FCC hopes they will help ease strain on the nation's increasingly crowded airwaves as more consumers go online using laptops and data-hungry smart phones.

Computer maker Dell, for one, envisions white spaces networks that will be able to send streaming video and other multimedia content to electronic devices around the home, deliver broadband to rural areas that currently lack high-speed Internet access and create "large-scale hot spots."

"By opening this broadcast spectrum for Internet use, the commission is helping to unleash a whole new class of mobile wireless broadband services with applications that are nearly limitless," Dell Chairman and Chief Executive Michael Dell said in a statement.

Although the FCC first voted to allow the use of white spaces for broadband nearly two years ago, the plan ran into serious opposition from television broadcasters worried about interference with their over-the-air signals. Wireless microphone manufacturers and users - including churches, theatres, karaoke bars and all types of performers - raised similar concerns.

Thursday's vote mandates the creation of a database with a map of TV channels across the country as well as big wireless microphone users, such as Broadway theaters and sports leagues. White spaces networks and devices would be required to determine their own location and then consult the database to find vacant frequencies to use. The FCC is also setting aside at least two channels for minor users of wireless microphones.

David Donovan, president of the Association for Maximum Service Television, said the group will work with the FCC to develop the technical protections to safeguard television signals.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 187
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lordcron
Progressives Push Forward!
02:21 AM on 09/27/2010
If we are no longer using short wave transmission television use to use then why don't we just use that? It's already been tested and television isn't using it anymore sense we went digital. It makes sense....... Or maybe too much sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saidas
06:57 PM on 09/25/2010
In the US, the airwaves belong to "the people" and are controlled the FCC which exists because of "the people". It then apportions the free airwaves to providers who sell them back to us at obscene prices. Yes I'm aware of the cost of building and running the system, but I'm also aware of the balance sheets of these companies. It is the same argument used by Big Pharma..."it costs so much to research and develop drugs"...yet they manage to have obscene profits as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TripleBypass
04:36 PM on 09/25/2010
Sounds great, but will our current wireless devices work with this? Or will we need to buy all new equipment?
09:00 PM on 09/24/2010
Do I have to wear a lead cup over my bawl sack now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lordcron
Progressives Push Forward!
02:19 AM on 09/27/2010
LOL! That's funny as hell! LOL!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCPrincess
I'm probably gaming.
07:12 PM on 10/12/2010
Omg.. thanks, that was hilarious!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:28 PM on 09/24/2010
Now this I like!
photo
Highentology
A California Cannabis Lifestyle
03:01 PM on 09/24/2010
YES!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MESGAIN26
02:39 PM on 09/24/2010
just what is this going to cost the consumer ?? one thing i learned is nothin is free ughh
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EHarold
02:20 PM on 09/24/2010
Followed by Super Cancer, can't wait.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MyNameIsJames
What should a person say in their micro-bio
03:10 PM on 09/24/2010
Not so sure about that because these waves are already around us. I do understand your concern but it may not be so bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miles120
03:30 PM on 09/24/2010
It's the same spectrum that broadcast television was using.
01:53 PM on 09/24/2010
Wi max and the technology Verison and AT & T are about to use can travel around 30 miles or so so hopefully this will add to that making Hi speed internet available to those in rural locations and at a reasonable price.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:50 PM on 09/24/2010
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski is already onto something else? He should implement Net Neutrality instead of playing footsies with communication bottleneck companies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueknight41
DEMHOUSE2014
01:44 PM on 09/24/2010
so your average wifi hot spot could 50 or more miles like broadcast tv
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:42 PM on 09/24/2010
The human body is also made up of electrical frequency signals. Cells communicate via the signals.

Anyone know at what level of bodily exposure to such frequencies turns them into mutagens?

Who will monitor the possible deleterious effects?

What laws will Dell use to prevent any negatively effected person to sue them for damages?

If and when people are effected and complain, will they be ridiculed and demeaned by the "full speed ahead" crowd with the tin foil head reference?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Plurabelle06
01:49 PM on 09/24/2010
There is no danger from wifi. That is a myth.
01:57 PM on 09/24/2010
http://www.fullsignalmovie.com/trailer-credits.html

No danger?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:52 PM on 09/24/2010
What kind of danger are you talking about?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WilliamTheV
I drank what? -Socrates
02:12 PM on 09/24/2010
electro-chemical signals do not interact with electro magnetic waves. If they did, then standing in the sun or using a flash light would be even more dangersous than wifi.

Wifi in the radio and infra-red parts of the spectrum are forms of non-ionizing radiation, that is, they do not cause ionization in atoms and therefore cannot affect the chemical structure of molecules, the way X-Rays do. A good rule of thumb is that anything with a wavelength beyond ultra-violet is safe (that is, the visible spectrum and beyond)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Scarbrough
middle of the roader fanatique
01:21 PM on 09/24/2010
The whole idea of freedom and free in relation to communications connectivity and dare I say it, Convergence, requires some reasonable thinking and some reasonable action on the part of regulators and competitors. Currently my free wifi in my home is not really free because it is tethered to my cable service. Currently my free television is not really free because it is likewise tethered to my cable service. Currently my smart phone is similarly tethered to my home wifi or a mandatory 3G data plan. In total my costs for all of this is around $200-$240 per month.

The biggest challenge in all of it is that competing entities lock me away from my services unless I am firmly planted at home base. Some areas even when traveling are problematic in both the 3G world and the wifi hotspot world ( more cost to use remote hotspot services). Competition is a great American capitalist principle and it has fostered the leaps in technology we enjoy today but the other edge of that sword has fostered an anti-convergence situation wherein our paid services cannot cross the jealously guarded barriers erected by the mis-named common carriers.

In summary this expansion of bandwidth utilization will, in fact, open the envelope a bit. I look forward to the time when truly converged communications and entertainment services that I already pay for will become tethered to my personal self instead of my personal real estate.
12:53 PM on 09/24/2010
Can't wait for the possibilities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjcarrasquillo
Musician, Filmmaker & Web Developer
12:47 PM on 09/24/2010
...and SUPER CANCER will be shortly behind it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lordcron
Progressives Push Forward!
02:18 AM on 09/27/2010
I would like to see a study on that myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjcarrasquillo
Musician, Filmmaker & Web Developer
11:08 AM on 09/27/2010
Unfortunately that won't happen...telecom industries, I'm sure, are keeping data like that far away from anyone.