iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Citi Boosts Executive Pay

Citi

PALLAVI GOGOI   09/25/10 05:52 AM ET   AP

NEW YORK — Citigroup, still partly owned by the government after a rescue during the financial meltdown, is giving raises to top executives that could amount to millions of dollars.

CEO Vikram Pandit, who is drawing a salary of $1 for the second year in a row, did not get a raise, but the chairman of the bank hinted it plans a big payout for him next year.

The announcement Friday by Citi, which remains weaker than most of the large American banks two years after the meltdown, raised questions among experts on corporate governance.

By paying the raises in company stock, not cash, Citi has decided to follow previously issued guidelines that limited salaries to $500,000 for the top 25 executives at financial institutions still receiving large amounts of federal help.

"The question is do they deserve higher salaries, and are they evading rules to avoid losing talent?" asked Charles Elson, director of the Weinberg Center for corporate governance at the University of Delaware.

Citi is fighting to keep talented bankers from jumping ship to any of its rivals on Wall Street, all of whom have repaid their federal bailout money and are not under the same kind of compensation restrictions.

Edward Skyler, a spokesman for the bank, said the compensation levels "correspond with similarly situated executives in the industry."

Citi was the hardest-hit U.S. bank during the credit crisis of 2008, and received $45 billion in government bailout money under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, part of which was converted to stock last year. The government is gradually selling its stake and still owns about 17 percent of the bank.

Though Citi has posted profits recently, Citi continues to be weighed down by large amounts of bad loans and investments it made in the run-up to the crisis.

Pandit, who pledged last year to take a $1 salary until the bank returned to profitability, elected to keep that figure for this year, but he seems set for a big payday in 2011. Citi's chairman, Richard Parsons, said in a statement that beginning next year the bank's board "intends to compensate Vikram commensurate with the job of CEO of Citi."

Rolfe Kopelan, a managing partner at search firm Capstone Partnership and an expert on corporate compensation, said $1 still seems appropriate for Pandit.

"It's not ridiculous when you're living on public funds, and when you're one of the major causes of the recession," Kopelan said.

The biggest raise disclosed in Citi's regulatory filing will go to John Havens, head of the bank's institutional clients group. He will get a cash salary of $500,000 this year, the maximum under the cap, and $9 million of salary paid in stock.

That compares with a salary of $975,000 last year for Havens, also in a blend of cash and stock. Including other awards of stock and options last year, Havens' total compensation last year came to $11.2 million.

Citibank did not disclose how much Havens might be awarded in other stock grants, but he could be eligible for a bonus this year of up to 50 percent of his salary, or $4.75 million.

Manuel Medina-Mora, head of consumer banking for the Americas, will also get a cash salary of $500,000 and $7.45 million of salary in stock, making him eligible for a bonus of up to $4 million. Last year, Medina-Mora's base salary was $972,000, and his total compensation including other awards of stock and options was $9.8 million.

Chief Financial Officer John Gerspach's salary will be $500,000 in cash and $4.17 million in stock, making him eligible for a bonus of up to $2.3 million. Last year, his cash and stock salary was $3.3 million, and his total compensation including other stock awards was $5 million.

Under an amendment to the bank bailout law of 2008, Citi is still subject to the compensation restrictions as long as the government remains a shareholder. That means the top 25 executives cannot receive bonuses exceeding 50 percent of their salaries. In deciding to give their salary raises in stock, Citi chose to abide by a previous rule that governed the bailout, under which top executives could not receive more than $500,000 of their salary in cash.

The Associated Press' calculation for executive pay aims to isolate the value the company's board placed on the CEO's total compensation package. The figure includes salary, bonus, incentives, perks and the estimated value of stock options and awards.

The calculations don't include changes in the present value of pension benefits, and they sometimes differ from the totals companies list with federal regulators.

___

AP Business Writer Matthew Craft contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NEW YORK — Citigroup, still partly owned by the government after a rescue during the financial meltdown, is giving raises to top executives that could amount to millions of dollars. CEO Vikram ...
NEW YORK — Citigroup, still partly owned by the government after a rescue during the financial meltdown, is giving raises to top executives that could amount to millions of dollars. CEO Vikram ...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 159
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
11:59 AM on 09/27/2010
I don't care if these people make $1 Million, $5 Million, or $10 Million in wages. What has to end is the rigged lottery whereby they can make $50 Million, $100 Million or even $500 Million by meeting the easy to attain financial targets in their executive contracts. We've got to stop the bonus system which steals from customers, average employees (not the executives), and shareholders, while concentrating wealth at the top. At the same time, it is imperative that we raise top marginal tax rates to 90% or more (as existed during the Eisenhower years) to bring an end to the salivating lust of RAVENOUS GREED that is destroying the Republic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Everts
Combat vet. technical trainer, progressive,atheist
10:11 AM on 09/27/2010
These bastards should be rendered and what's left used as fertilizer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:31 AM on 09/27/2010
Let's see, you have a handful of inexperienced government oversight people working for a big government boss who will soon leave government to work for Citibank for millions. And you have hundreds, possibly thousands of veteran Citibank executives highly skilled at scamming billions from the public.
Who's going to win, the bankers or the taxpayers?

As long as there is no real punishment for the theft of billions, and no tax on to speak of on astronomical unearned income, a person would have to be certifiable NOT to break the law every day and steal every acre of cash that was thrown at him or her.

I honestly believe that if the CEO of Citibank were caught on video from ten different angles using a tax-paid-for forklift to heist a ton of gold directly out of Fort Knox, no CIA, FBI, ATF, police, militia, National Guard, Blackwater sentry or museum security officer would lift a finger to stop him. And if some lunatic law enforcement newbie accidentally did arrest the thief for, perhaps, parking his getaway limo next to a fire hydrant, all state and federal judges, including the U.S. Supreme Court, would find the defendant not guilty by reason of mutual golf club membership.
Hey, if that's not a 'strict constructionist' reading of the Constitution, I don't know what is.
08:10 AM on 09/27/2010
CEO's are figureheads with a sometimes skill in picking subordinates that that in turn delegate authority and insulate the CEO. Some are just more skilled in figuring out ways to pick America's pockets better than than their peers. The sympathizers should reveal HOW MANY millions this guy made before his pathetic gesture of taking a dollar for one year. It's not like he had to sell his cars or pawn his Rolex just to get by to make this enormous sacrifice for us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robjh1
We Have Met the Enemy and he is Us: Pogo
07:38 AM on 09/27/2010
The collaspe bomb is ticking.
07:21 AM on 09/27/2010
Pay me a dollar for 5 mos if ur going to pay me 12 mill next year for doing zero except taking our tax money and hiding your debt disgusting!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nicole Dixson
02:55 AM on 09/27/2010
As soon as I pay my loan off, I am going to close down my Citibank account, cancel my credit card and no longer have anything to do with these people. Let's see.....that should take another 5-10 years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:22 AM on 09/27/2010
It is the outrageous pay given to people who do not actually do any work that really should be the uniting point between the Teabaggers and the Lefties.

None of us are doing well.

As F. Scott Fitzgerald said, "The rich are different from you and me." Or something close to that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LogicNotEmotion
Less than 20% of Americans are liberal
03:03 AM on 09/27/2010
Well thats hard when the huffpost and the rest of the liberal media spends half their time and resources trying to discredit the teaparty....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:25 AM on 09/28/2010
It is also hard when Fox News and right-wing media call Liberals and democrats terrorists and Marxists...and when they are being kind, socialists.

What do you say that Fox stops it first?
01:49 AM on 09/27/2010
so what specifically do you people want? do you want the global head of retail banking for citibank to be paid the same as the postmaster general? do you want the head of investment banking to make the same as a mailman? what?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggy
11:29 PM on 09/26/2010
Citi Group received the TARP laid of 21000 American workers and will now expand operations in China and plan to hire 12000 Chinese workers. Nice and totally American!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary James
12:18 AM on 09/27/2010
China is a growing for them not to be over there would be very stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggy
07:20 AM on 09/27/2010
China is growing because we have sent all work there...China is the US in the hayday! These companies need to invest in our country and our peope...it is stupid for them not to!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Everts
Combat vet. technical trainer, progressive,atheist
10:15 AM on 09/27/2010
Do the Chinese workers have the means to purchase what they make??? NO! They ship the crap over here, but pretty soon who will buy their garbage here when unemployment reaches 20%?
07:42 PM on 09/26/2010
How about a 50% tax on ALL corporate profits and bonuses should get taxed at 75% for any amount over 1M.
Hey it would cut down the deficit and then the GOP would not have anything to whine about, oh that would be so worth it.
iridium53
Semper Fi
07:16 PM on 09/26/2010
Taxpayers don't own 20% of Citi. Obama owns 20% of the company.

20% of any company is enough to stop this kind of payment to executives.

But, quite predictably, instead of Obama acting on behalf of the American taxpayer and demanding they use that money to pay back their loan, Obama acts on behalf of the executives of a big bank and lets them increase their pay.

How many times and how many ways does Obama have to show he's acting on behalf of the executives of big banks and Wall Street before people will understand the depth of his dedication to banksters?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LogicNotEmotion
Less than 20% of Americans are liberal
03:05 AM on 09/27/2010
The people on this site have been brainwashed to believe that wall street = republicans. They don't have the mental capacity to understand that Obama and progressives are the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gleitz05
Old people are allowed to be cranky.
08:24 AM on 09/27/2010
The biggest recipients of wall street money goes to repubs. The collapse of wall street and the banks was a result of the repubs in power at the time, not us progressives. We're the ones who want regulations to prevent this from happening again. And if we're so brainwashed on this site, then why do you bother to post here? Your lack of "logic" is better suited to your GOP friends.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gleitz05
Old people are allowed to be cranky.
08:18 AM on 09/27/2010
How silly. Obama didn't use the money from his pocket. The taxpayers own about 17% of the company, not 20%. If the Prez was working on behalf of Wall Street and the banks, then why would he want regulations put on them?
photo
quoveritas
Surgeon General warns: too much truth can cause...
06:30 PM on 09/26/2010
Hey America! Had enough?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
06:15 PM on 09/26/2010
No one should do business with this bank, protest instead.  While they have the audacity to rub it in our faces we in turn can take action and ignore them.  But you know people, most are not concerned or even care.  
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bllnsinchnge
peace, markets, freedom
05:57 PM on 09/26/2010
IRS helping make Citi look actually even better: Citigroup Inc. will keep $38 billion of tax benefits that it could have been forced to write down as the U.S. starts selling its 34 percent stake in the bank, after the IRS ruled the sale doesn't constitute a change in ownership.
The IRS on Dec. 11 exempted Citigroup and other companies that sold stakes to the government such as General Motors Co. and Fannie Mae from a rule meant to prevent tax abuses in corporate takeovers. Citigroup will retain the right to deduct losses against future taxes.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/6773525.html
10:35 PM on 09/26/2010
The rule is designed for a situation where a large profitable Company acquires a loss-making money with substantial tax assets (NOLs Carryforwards). They want to prevent people from making such an acquisition just for the purpose of harvesting tax assets (i.e. the acquirer could offset its own profit with some of these Carryforwards).

This is no the case with Citi, besides the government has less than a majority. This transaction also does not trigger a Change of Control under any of the bond indentures or credit agreements.