More

Henry Kissinger: Vietnam Failures 'We Did To Ourselves'

ROBERT BURNS   09/29/10 05:41 PM ET   AP

Kissinger Vietnam

WASHINGTON — Henry Kissinger, who helped steer Vietnam policy during the war's darkest years, said Wednesday he is convinced that "most of what went wrong in Vietnam we did to ourselves" – beginning with underestimating the tenacity of North Vietnamese leaders.

Offering a somber assessment of the conflict, which ended in 1975 with the humiliating fall of Saigon, Kissinger lamented the anguish that engulfed a generation of Americans as the war dragged on.

And he said the core problem for the U.S. was that its central objective of preserving an independent, viable South Vietnamese state was unachievable – and that the U.S. adversary was unbending.

"America wanted compromise," he said. "Hanoi wanted victory."

Kissinger spoke at a State Department conference on the history of U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia. The department in recent months has published a series of reports, based on newly declassified documents, covering U.S. decision-making on Vietnam in the final years of the war.

Kissinger was national security adviser and secretary of state under President Richard M. Nixon and continued in the role of chief diplomat during the administration of President Gerald R. Ford.

In introducing Kissinger, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton – who opposed the war as a college student and has written that she held contradictory feelings about expressing her opposition – spoke in broad terms about how the conflict influenced her generation's view of the world.

"Like everyone in those days, I had friends who enlisted – male friends who enlisted – were drafted, resisted, or became conscientious objectors; many long, painful, anguished conversations," she said. "And yet, the lessons of that era continue to inform the decisions we make."

Kissinger offered a more personal, extensive assessment of the war that killed more than 58,000 U.S. servicemen.

He said he regretted that what should have been straightforward disagreements over the U.S. approach to Vietnam became "transmuted into a moral issue – first about the moral adequacy of American foreign policy altogether and then into the moral adequacy of America."

"To me, the tragedy of the Vietnam war was not that there were disagreements – that was inevitable, given the complexity of the (conflict) – but that the faith of Americans in each other became destroyed in the process," he said.

He called himself "absolutely unreconstructed" on that point.

"I believe that most of what went wrong in Vietnam we did to ourselves," he said, adding, "I would have preferred another outcome – at least another outcome that was not so intimately related to the way that we tore ourselves apart."

In hindsight, Kissinger said, it is clear just how steadfast the North Vietnamese communists were in their goal of unification of the North and the South, having defeated their French colonial rulers in 1954.

Historians are coming to the same conclusion.

In his account of the conflict, "Vietnam: The History of an Unwinnable War, 1945-1975," military historian John Prados wrote, "The (North) had a well-defined goal – reunification of the country – and an absolute belief in its cause."

Kissinger credited his North Vietnamese adversary in the peace negotiations – Le Duc Tho – with skillfully and faithfully carrying out his government's instructions to outmaneuver the Americans.

"He operated on us like a surgeon with a scalpel – with enormous skill," Kissinger said.

Washington and Hanoi signed a peace accord in January 1973, and Kissinger and Tho were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace prize that year for their role in the negotiation. Tho declined the award.

The peace accords provided a way out of Vietnam for the U.S., but it left South Vietnam vulnerable to a communist takeover.

"We knew it was a precarious agreement," Kissinger said, and that the conflict was not really over. But Washington also was convinced that the South Vietnamese could hold off the communists, barring an all-out invasion.

Kissinger joked that his long negotiating sessions with Tho took a heavy and lasting toll.

"I would look a lot better if I had never met him," he said.

A flavor of the negotiating difficulties is revealed in a newly declassified transcript of a meeting between Kissinger and Tho in Paris on May 21, 1973, in which they discussed problems implementing the peace accords.

"We have been meeting for only 45 minutes and already you have totally confused us," Kissinger told Tho.

To which Tho replied: "No, you are not confused yourself. You make the problem confused."

___

Online:

Most recent volume of State Department reports on Vietnam: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2010/09/147900.htm

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Henry Kissinger, who helped steer Vietnam policy during the war's darkest years, said Wednesday he is convinced that "most of what went wrong in Vietnam we did to ourselves" –...
WASHINGTON — Henry Kissinger, who helped steer Vietnam policy during the war's darkest years, said Wednesday he is convinced that "most of what went wrong in Vietnam we did to ourselves" –...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 769
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Jannsmoor 07:50 PM on 09/29/2010
The overwhelming majority of Americans have no idea of how many civilians were killed in that useless war - somewhere between 2 million and 4 million, and a large number of those by Americans.
Yet somehow, Kissinger, one of the architects of the war, thinks it is unfortunate it became a moral issue. How does the slaughter of human beings ever NOT become a moral issue?
It is always amazing that those  Read More...
10:44 PM on 10/03/2010
I regret that no one has arrested this war criminal in the last 40 years. Even Pinochet faced the courts in the end.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CAdawn
Love a liberal
12:33 PM on 10/01/2010
No, Henry, we didn't do it to ourselves. You did it, along with Westmoreland & McNamara. I wonder if you realize just how much you & the other two are h8td by those of us who remember, like it was yesterday, what you did. Did Kent State even raise your eyebrows? I dare not type anymore or I will be banned from hp. But, you get the drift.
11:58 AM on 10/01/2010
Not one of the three Presidents involved, Kennedy, Johnson or Nixon (all dead now), ever apologized to the American people for leading the country into a financially ruinous war which killed over 58,000 American soldiers for nothing.
photo
SamSeven
You're either with Humanity or you're not.
11:49 AM on 10/01/2010
This guy should be jail for all his war crimes. American justice is such a mess guys like him can walk around in broad daylight undermining the US. He also formed the Trilateral Commission, the grand pooba of the Bilderburg Group and Council of Foriegn Relations, all treasonous organizations.
10:59 AM on 10/01/2010
The US needs to stop stepping into parts of the world where we're not wanted. We've spent so much of our treasure needlessly while so many young Americans have died for corporate greed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacobomorales
09:46 AM on 10/01/2010
So you admit you were a failure? That you participated in one of America's most brutal and dumbest periods for what reason, money, attention, ego, flattery?
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
08:44 AM on 10/01/2010
"the core problem for the U.S. was that its central objective of preserving an independent, viable South Vietnamese state was unachievable"

He knew that back then, and did nothing other than kiIIing miIlions of Vietnamese people, including carpet bombing. Kissinger is a 2ionist war criminal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:35 AM on 10/01/2010
We have learned nothing from the Vietnam war. We are still waging wars we can not and will not win. What are we hoping to win in Afghanistan beside a tactical position in that region? We are killing thousands for what? The religious infighting will go on, true democracy is unlikely (we have lost true democracy here in the U.S. how can we create it elsewhere?) and the region is progressively becoming more unstable. So what have we learned and what will we win?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:06 AM on 10/01/2010
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
01:33 AM on 10/01/2010
How about just admitting we had no real interest there in the first place?

Kissinger has a lot to answer for.

Let's hope there is a just God.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacobomorales
09:47 AM on 10/01/2010
Just a God will be good enough.
12:32 AM on 10/01/2010
No kidding. It doesn't take a AA, B.S. / B.A., Masters or a doctorate degree to figure that out. You fight a war with politics first, you get Vietnam. It's a prime example of why limited warfare does not work. But you don't need Vietnam to figure that out. Just check your history. That's why we're losing in Afghanistan too. Same chit different place. Same type of tactics. Same type of political handicaps.

YOU CAN'T WIN WITH POLITICS FIRST!

Screw what the ramifications are if you step on the toes of those "allies", "friendly" and/or "neutral" countries of which the "enemy" is utilizing. We did the same with Laos, Cambodia, and even North Vietnam as we are doing with Pakistan. Iran isn't an issue as big as some Neo-Cons and Jews are trying to make us believe. We can isolate and slowly bleed them (as we did with Japan) easily with our old bases in the region, naval forces, and with our newly acquired ones in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Winner's make the rules. Losers suck on their thumb and cry foul.

If the target is the jugular, why strike the ankles?
photo
evangelicalchimp
And the Lord said "poof"
08:35 PM on 09/30/2010
henry, henry.......that's the devil calling.....he's got a nice warm spot all made up for you.........take your time, there's no hurry......

we'll keep a light on for you
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
06:17 PM on 09/30/2010
"the core problem for the U.S. was that its central objective of preserving an independent, viable South Vietnamese state was unachievable"

He knew that back then, and did nothing other than kiIIing millions of Vietnamese people, including carpet bombing. Kissinger is a 2ionist war criminal.
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
06:14 PM on 09/30/2010
Henry Kissinger is such an hypocritical 2ionist war criminal. "America wanted compromise" What kind of compromise other than surrender their national aspirations of Vietnamese unity?
photo
philhellene
Far Left and Proud of It!
05:57 PM on 09/30/2010
It never fails.

Why is it that many these gun-ho militarists and their claque of cheering dupes do not have the guts to be honest while in office? But, once out of office, they all of a sudden "get religion" and confess that the opposition they so reviled was correct after all.