iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House Overwhelmingly Passes Trade Sanctions Bill Targeted At China

China Sanctions

First Posted: 09/30/10 12:20 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:55 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House has approved legislation that would allow the U.S. to seek trade sanctions against China and other nations for manipulating their currency to gain trade advantages.

The 348-79 vote Wednesday sends the measure to the Senate, where its prospects are unclear. Senate supporters hope to get a vote on a similar proposal after Congress returns following the November congressional elections.

Supporters said the bill would allow the Obama administration to pressure China on an issue that they say has led to the loss of more than 2 million manufacturing jobs in the U.S. over the past decade.

The vote came as lawmakers scrambled to wrap up unfinished business so they can hit the campaign trail with a little over a month before the Nov. 2 elections. Polls show that the state of the economy and an unemployment rate that remains stuck at 9.6 percent are the top concerns of voters.

The measure was passed by a wide margin with 99 Republicans joining Democrats to vote yes. Those in opposition included 74 Republicans and five Democrats.

Supporters said the size of the vote should send a strong message to Beijing that Washington will not tolerate currency manipulation and other trade practices viewed as unfair to American workers.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that in 20 years America's trade deficit with China has gone from $5 billion annually to $5 billion every week, an imbalance she said demanded action by Congress to protect American jobs.

"We do this because 1 million American jobs could be created if the Chinese government took its thumb off the scale and allowed its currency to respond to market forces," she said in a speech on the House floor.

American manufacturers contend that China's currency is undervalued by as much as 40 percent against the dollar. That makes Chinese products cheaper and more competitive in the United States and American products more expensive in China.

The legislation would allow the imposition of stiff sanctions on Chinese imports. It would expand the definition of improper government subsidies to include a government's manipulation of its currency to gain trade advantages. Currently, the Commerce Department does not consider currency manipulation as a government subsidy for which it can impose trade sanctions.

During the House debate, supporters cited studies that they said show the legislation would boost American exports and create more manufacturing jobs in this country.

"Some credible estimates are that we could return a million American jobs to this country," said Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., in urging support for the legislation. "We can either take bold steps or we can take baby steps."

Opponents said the legislation would boost the cost of clothing, toys and other goods that American consumers buy and also ran the risk of sparking retaliation by China against American exports.

"The available evidence is that the price of many of these Chinese goods will go up 10 percent, a pair of shoes that a mother needs for her child to go to school ... toys at Christmas, all become more expensive," said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas.

Supporters rejected that argument, saying it is critical in hard economic times to protect U.S. jobs.

"Without a job, you can't buy goods at any price. This bill is about jobs," said Ways and Means Committee Chairman Sander Levin, D-Mich.

Passage of the proposal was cleared when Levin led an effort to craft a compromise proposal that supporters believe will be better able to withstand a challenge before the World Trade Organization, the Geneva-based group that oversees the rules of world trade.

Before the House vote, Chinese officials in Beijing reiterated that they support exchange rate flexibility but offered no new indications that they plan to accelerate the revaluation of their currency, the yuan.

In June, Beijing promised a more flexible exchange rate but since that time the yuan has risen by only about 2 percent in value against the dollar.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told Congress earlier this month that the administration stands ready to find a more effective strategy for pressuring China. He said the administration is not only focused on the currency issue but on such topics as rampant copyright piracy of U.S. products and various barriers the Chinese have erected to U.S. goods.

In a statement, the Treasury Department said, "Today's vote clearly shows lawmakers have serious concerns about this issue. The president and Secretary Geithner share those concerns. They have said repeatedly that China needs to allow a significant, sustained appreciation over time."

The administration has not taken a position on whether it will support the House bill. But trade experts said they believed the administration will use its passage as a way to pressure Beijing to accelerate its appreciation efforts.

President Barack Obama raised the currency issue in a meeting with Chinese officials last week in New York. He is expected to pursue the issue in November at the summit of the Group of 20 major economies in South Korea.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who is pushing a similar China currency bill in the Senate, said after the House vote that he will work to get a Senate vote on his bill during a lame-duck session of Congress after the November elections.

"The Chinese ought to be aware that Congress is serious about confronting their currency manipulation," Schumer said in a statement.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House has approved legislation that would allow the U.S. to seek trade sanctions against China and other nations for manipulating their currency to gain trade advantages. The...
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House has approved legislation that would allow the U.S. to seek trade sanctions against China and other nations for manipulating their currency to gain trade advantages. The...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,679
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (75 total)
12:15 AM on 11/07/2010
Good.
04:59 PM on 10/01/2010
We've been supporting and bottomlining our corporations for too long, hoping they will grace us with jobs, to satisfy to polity, so we don't rock the boat(vote). Let them stand on their own merit! We need a stable currency.
Newsflash -- China's not the only one manipulating their currency. The problem is, it turns out that ole' timey Mercantilists (China) are just better at currency manipulation than Neo-Fascists.

When it comes to BIG Govt, you have a better chance rolling the dice with Autocratic rulers, hoping for benevolence, than 'democratic' BIG Gov't. That's guaranteed bankruptcy, all the while watching our civil liberties get flushed too.

Then again, we could have small government, acting only within preset constraints, a sensible and fair currency that doesn't favor WallSt./Bankers/Corporatist scum, and just work together.
01:03 PM on 10/01/2010
We need more than this..
05:04 AM on 10/02/2010
A war with China?
02:32 AM on 10/01/2010
I highly recommend reading Senator Dorgan's book "Take this Job and Ship It". It will open your eyes to how this economic downturn is really playing out. And what caused it in the first place. So now Congress wants to get tough on China. What a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
capitaldysfunction
White male never voted Republican
10:23 PM on 09/30/2010
74 Republicans and 5 Democrats in the House believe in outsourcing jobs and free but not fair trade. In the senate on Tuesday, by the way, a Republican-led filibuster killed the bill to stop the outsourcing of jobs.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/29/AR2010092906471.html?wpisrc=nl_headline

Welcome to the first round of the election being held 31 days from today. Democrats, including President Obama, are coming after the America-hating Republicans o n the campaign trail. Let those who want Americans to starve so they can win elections taste the reality of their message. Vote Democrat!
09:59 PM on 09/30/2010
Is the U.S. negotiating from a position of strength here? When was the last time sanctions worked against anyone, let alone a roaring economy like China with emerging alternative markets in every continent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:06 AM on 10/01/2010
It was the hoepy changey COC and their followers in NAFTA who mislead others into believing China would improve its human rights record and play fair with trade!

Most Americans knew better!
06:01 PM on 10/01/2010
If China flinches to these trade sanctions within the next 15 years I would be surprised, unless the EU, Asia and South America join in and reinforce the restrictions... they're doing way too nicely-thank-you now and might just dig in and prevail.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ferretseeker
08:27 PM on 09/30/2010
The problem is, progressives don't seem to direct their efforts in a focused way, nor get a succint, resounding message across. Let's look at jobs.

The US Chamber of Commerce has strongly opposed two job-creating bills--the Currency bill and the Insourcing bill, yet the Chamber and opposition (mostly Republicans) have not been held accountable.

Our country is being sold to communist China by the DC Plutocrats (exploiting Chinese workers and the environment in the process). This is a profound economic and national security risk to America. Why can't this message be communicated effectively at the rally? The public can easily get their minds around this simple theme--"Stop the Sellout of America to China by Republicans!"

I propose the rally target the premises of the US Chamber of Commerce--located directly across from the White House. I'm sure the union contingent of the rally would strongly support this. Each and every Congressperson who opposed the two bills should be named aloud.

So you've got a march...now get a cohesive, sexy message, and something to fire up the union guys.
05:02 PM on 09/30/2010
Who does China think they are? AMERICA?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Enroh Mot
Veritas Lux Mea
06:55 PM on 10/01/2010
Corporate States of America....they're catching up.
photo
LogicalMathMan
Math, Finance, English, Business Instructor
02:34 PM on 09/30/2010
Last night, PBS hosted the ex-financial director of Hong Kong who reiterated that last year over $81 billion dollars was spent by US corporations in manufacturing facilities in China with the prospect of greater investment in the future. Between this and China's bankrolling of our economy to the tune of about $300 billion per year, this legislation is akin to asking your landlord for a rent reduction because you lost your job.
04:24 PM on 09/30/2010
China's currency manipulation is tied directly to their purchasing US Treasuries. They need to buy US dollars to keep their currency down, but they buy so many that the only place they can park them is in Treasuries. This is doing nothing but making us less competitive against China in every country of the world. China is not doing it to be nice.

Every manufacturing job we lose to China results in a whole wack of other manufacturing dependent jobs. Take a walk through the "Rust Belt" and compare it with 20-30 years ago and you'll see the impact loss of manufacturing is really having. Keeping jobs and technology in America is far more valuable to our economic growth than cheap debt and consumer goods from China.
photo
LogicalMathMan
Math, Finance, English, Business Instructor
07:16 PM on 09/30/2010
I agree James, which is why voters should be sufficiently enraged at our reps in Congress who voted against imposing a 'tax' on corporations who ship jobs overseas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mwilbur137
Political Junkie/Intellectual Elitist
02:00 PM on 09/30/2010
What I find to be amusing is that we’re all sitting here talking about US/Chinese relations in all of this when the real culprit for all of this is not China, but the Corporations who build their factories in China who, if this passes an anything actually gets done about it, will just move their factories to I don’t know, lets say, Vietnam or Singapore, if their profit margins start being disrupted from producing in China.

The era of nations is coming to a close. Refusing to understand this and act accordingly is why we fail.
04:29 PM on 09/30/2010
It's only party true, some companies are moving to China simply because the Chinese government is subsidizing them to move jobs (giving them offers they can't refuse) and technology from America to China. It has no impact on the end price in the US after shipping and such, in fact some automated Chinese-made goods will be more expensive than American-made goods. Vietnam or Singapore only have limited capability to do this because their economies are too small to coordinate a wide-scale effort. That's why our trade deficit with China jumped exponentially when the same products could have been made in Mexico and sold to American consumers for cheaper.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:46 AM on 10/01/2010
Yep!
04:32 PM on 09/30/2010
The LED industry is a pretty good example of an industry where American-made products are cheaper than those from China. The only reason they would consider moving to China is because of ridiculous subsidies the Chinese government is offering them to pack-up and leave America. There's an excellent article on the subject:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/15/AR2010091507173.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mwilbur137
Political Junkie/Intellectual Elitist
04:43 PM on 09/30/2010
Interesting, both comments. Thank you for the information, I will check out the article posted.

But the fact remains, ultimately, it is the Corporations choice to go to China to produce its goods to incease their profit margins. It always comes down to profit over people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GPTP
01:42 PM on 09/30/2010
To be honest, few jobs will come back to US even Chinese currency is reevaluated. Most jobs lost to China are the labor intensive, low technology jobs. Rising Yuan will move these jobs to some to other third world countries instead of coming back home.You Americans should focus on High tech sectors where Chinese are not able to compete, such MEMS, Semiconductor, Nano technology, Bio technology and Green Energy. Let your kids study Math and Science instead of Women study!

I am a Chinese national and lived in America for about 2 years. The time I spent in US was very pleasant. God bless America.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:42 AM on 10/01/2010
As far as labor goes China is about as low as you can go, so your idea to move to, "other" third world countries does not contain much merit!

Where would they move these jobs? India? Africa? ' Women study? LOL! ???

Trade policy does need attention. Too much currency rigging and subsidies protecting low wage workers! We should also enact policy to withhold technology that has gone with those jobs!

I love the Chinese arts and culture, its the policies we have agreed to, [or someone has agreed to that need a second look!]

http://247wallst.com/2010/06/22/chinas-unions-paint-foreign-manufacturers-into-a-corner/

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2008-01/09/content_6379854.htm

In Africa; http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/64599/nicolas-van-de-walle/trade-unions-and-the-coming-of-democracy-in-africa

Iraq; http://upsidedownworld.org/iraqiunions.htm
05:18 PM on 10/01/2010
Ni Hao GPTP. ZhongGuo hen mei. MeiGuo hen F**ked.

China is a beautiful country, but it's not a place where any American laborer would like to work. In the meantime, US students who are trying to study in the sciences have to deal with rising tuition rates because parents keep letting kids take on student loans for worthless liberal art degrees which will never pay for themselves. Those subsidized loans are paid for by selling our debt to China. As a result, we inflate the M2, making our economy more vulnerable, our 'public' universities more expensive. We then have to drop out and compete in a languid economy. If our Gov't wanted to 'stimulate' something, they can start with our appetite for real work, not 'gimme' work.

MaPo DoFu vs Osso Bucco! They both came from simple and cheap means. MaPo DoFu is still dirt cheap and quite delish. But go into a fancy Italian restaurant in the US and you'll break the bank getting high-class 'bone marrow soup'. with 'Wine' (read: whine).
photo
mmsuki
Fine; I evolved, you didn't.
12:49 PM on 09/30/2010
So 74 repubs and 5 dinos voted against this.

Just 2 days ago in the Senate, every republican voted against a bill that would heavily tax any US company that sent jobs overseas and reward with tax breaks any US company that brought jobs back into our country.
Why do repubs hate America so much?
photo
Mark Andre
If we cannot smash something, then blog!
03:20 PM on 11/07/2010
Here is a little reality for you, what the Huff and MSNBC forgot to tell you, the reasons why and why Obama is going to make it worse:

What The Top U.S. Companies Pay In Taxes
Christopher Helman, 04.01.10, 03:00 PM EDT

…But it's the tax benefit of overseas operations that is the biggest reason why multinationals end up with lower tax rates than the rest of us. It only makes sense that multinationals "put costs in high-tax countries and profits in low-tax countries," says Scott Hodge, president of the Tax Foundation. Those low-tax countries are almost anywhere but the U.S. "When you add in state taxes, the U.S. has the highest tax burden among industrialized countries," says Hodge. In contrast, China's rate is just 25%; Ireland's is 12.5%.

Corporations are getting smarter, not just about doing more business in low-tax countries, but in moving their more valuable assets there as well. That means setting up overseas subsidiaries, then transferring to them ownership of long-lived, often intangible but highly profitable assets, like patents and software…

http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/01/ge-exxon-walmart-business-washington-corporate-taxes.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bert Juneau
12:48 PM on 09/30/2010
Put a 50% tarriff on Chinese goods and a 50% tax on all imported oil and stop the flow of wealth out of the US.
12:46 PM on 09/30/2010
Many commentators expect the appreciation of the yuan to force China to invest more in US Treasury bonds. I believe it will have the opposite effect as their past investment motives have not been fully understood.

These speculations ignore the fact that China is the major foreign purchaser of U.S. Treasuries because of its exchange rate policy.

The historical data shows that China’s exchange rate policy was complemented by China’s ownership of U.S. Treasury securities, more than some economists will admit.

You might be interested in this article in The Wall Street Challenger:
http://thewallstreetchallenger.com/Index/Yuan_Appreciation_Implications.htm
12:36 PM on 09/30/2010
Why is it so hard to understand that there is a difference between putting pressure on China and passing a bill that says "we will probably, at some point, get mad at you China, and you won't like that, so please act in our interest at or demands, please?"

This stuff is handled behind the scenes, I dont get why people want to get excited over a pointless statement with no teeth or tangible effect. People on here are seriously too easily influenced by words.