iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Researchers Found 40-Fold Increase In Carcinogenic Compounds In Gulf

Oil Spill

First Posted: 09/30/10 05:55 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:55 PM ET

Researchers testing the waters off Louisiana in June found hugely elevated levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, some of which are known carcinogens.

The researchers from Oregon State University say that a device taking samples just off the shore of Louisiana's Grande Isle registered a 40-fold increase in PAHs between May and June.

What's worse is that the sampling device was specifically designed to measure the fraction of PAHs in the environment that could make their way through a biological membrane.

"This is a measure of what would enter into an organism," said Kim Anderson, an OSU professor of environmental and molecular toxicology.

"There was a huge increase of PAHs that are bio-available to the organisms -- and that means they can essentially be uptaken by organisms throughout the food chain."

Anderson said that water samples taken off the Mississippi, Alabama and Florida coasts -- as well as air samples taken along the coast -- also showed elevated levels of PAHs, but not nearly of the same magnitude.

Samples from July were lost; Anderson is now testing samples taken in August. The operative question is how many of the PAHs have biodegraded in the interim. BP's blowout sent somewhere between 4 and 5 million barrels of oil into the Gulf's waters between April 20 and July 15.

PAHs are a class of more than 100 hydrocarbon pollutants; 17 get particular attention because exposure can have harmful health effects.

Anderson said that almost every one of those 17 particularly toxic compounds experienced the 40-fold increase that the entire class did.

"This would be the largest PAH change I've seen in over a decade of doing this," she told HuffPost.

Anderson said different organisms -- be they plankton, fish, shellfish or humans -- have different exposure risks to PAHs in the water; and they also have different capacities to metabolize the PAHs.

So just how many of these toxic compounds actually ended up in the food chain was beyond her area of research, she said.

She did not issue any warning to consumers, noting: "The USDA is testing the seafood and I would presume that they've ensured that what's on the market is safe to eat."

Anderson said that based on the findings of other researchers, she suspects that the abundant use of dispersants by BP increased the bioavailability of the PAHs in this case.

Back in late July, I reported that scientists had tentatively found signs of an oil-and-dispersant mix under the shells of tiny blue crab larvae in the Gulf. At that point it appeared to be an indication that dispersants had broken up the oil into toxic droplets so tiny that they can easily enter the food chain. But two months later, those researchers have yet to finalize their conclusions. So the question remains an open one.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Researchers testing the waters off Louisiana in June found hugely elevated levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, some of which are known carcinogens. The researchers from Oregon State ...
Researchers testing the waters off Louisiana in June found hugely elevated levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, some of which are known carcinogens. The researchers from Oregon State ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,123
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bjo
01:20 AM on 10/03/2010
Why on earth would this scientist presume that the USDA has ensured what's on the market is safe to eat?????? Scientists like evidence and it's beyond me what evidence she has to back up her presumption. It's such a ludicrous statement that it must have been sarcastic, although sarcasm doesn't make much sense in the context.
05:04 PM on 10/02/2010
There is a media blackout of what is going on in the gulf. There are real solutions to safely clean up the spill and they are being purposefully blocked. It is in all truth and honesty a conspiracy. Just look at the facts. It is sick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bjo
01:20 AM on 10/03/2010
Agreed. It is beyond sick - it is utterly venal.
12:42 PM on 10/02/2010
Nalco - a criminal corporation that has supplied highly toxic Corexit 9500 to the Queen's corporation to poison all life in the Gulf States. Prosecute! Off with their heads.
whitebeach
Hey, buddy, can you spare a micro-bio?
01:09 PM on 10/02/2010
And yet all life in the Gulf States isn't poisoned. Balloon, meet pin.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
03:17 PM on 10/18/2010
I suppose you expect these chemicals to act instantly. Even fairly lethal poisons like mercury typically take weeks, months or even years to do their work. Pinhe@d, meet logic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paladine
07:59 PM on 10/01/2010
Of late, I'vwe had 2 obessions: the Gulf Oil disaster and family genology. Who would have guessed the two would collide? They have. I am Canadian, I've traced my ancestors back to the Chauvin brothers who mapped the mouth of the Mississippi and were among the founders of New Orleans and Louisiana.

So, I read of the beauty, the pristine waters, the virgin land...and then I read this...what a difference 300 yrs makes. We are so barbaric.
whitebeach
Hey, buddy, can you spare a micro-bio?
01:14 AM on 10/02/2010
If you've read much about the early French explorations and colonization of Louisiana, you know those efforts were full of ironies. For example, the first colony set up by d'Iberville, the "Mississippi" colony, around what is now Biloxi, suffered near starvation on beaches where they could have waded into the water and practically walked on fish, but considered this fare too low and dangerous and preferred to wait for barrels of rancid salt meat brought from France in rare and perpetually late supply ships.


Yes, we are barbaric. But it's partly because we stand on the shoulders of our ancestor barbarians.

Possibly with your interests you've read the five-volume history of French colonial Louisiana by Marcel Giraud. If not, I recommend it. It's pretty dry at times and filled with citations of official records and correspondence, but it paints a portrait devoid of the romantic notions most of us have caught from movies and novels and lesser historians.
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
03:50 AM on 10/02/2010
I grew up in Biloxi and went from elementary to high school in Louisiana. We got a good dose of Louisiana history as part of the curriculum. Our last field trip in junior high school was to Longfellow Evangelina State Park near New Iberia. This is near the heart of cajun country and bayous and swamps abound in the area. See: http://www.stateparks.com/longfellowevangeline.html

Nearby is the wonderful Avery Island where E.A. McIlhenny worked to continue his families salt, pepper and wildlife refuge: http://www.tabasco.com/main.cfm. While E.A McIlhenny worked to preserve the threatened snowy egret, a Louisiana beauty, he coincidentally helped rescue the alligator, persecuted for their leathery skins. I haven't seen it since it was struck by hurricane Rita in 2005. The Gulf states used to be such a heaven on earth for growing up.

BTW, Whitebeach below. If you are recommending Detin, Panama City and further east, you are really not recommending the area hit hardest by this blow out. People in the affected areas who go into the water are experiencing some really bad stuff, according to Riki Ott and many others. if there is oil, or you don't see any sealife that is unoiled, don't go in the water.
whitebeach
Hey, buddy, can you spare a micro-bio?
01:23 PM on 10/02/2010
Hey, snowy. You're right that I'm not recommending coastal Louisiana as a destination for ordinary tourist types, but since you know the area, you should also understand why that is so. There are hardly any beaches that anybody would call by that name and hardly any tourist accommodations on the coast. One reason is that there's hardly any "coast" in the traditional sense, just low-lying land merging gradually to swamp to wetland to sea. Probably the main exception is Grand Isle, which has an actual beach a few miles long (subject to the next hurricane or simply to continuing erosion), but again as you know, GI is a pretty downscale destination, visited mainly by sport fishermen and by local south Louisiana families down for the day or the weekend. OTOH, is someone is prepared to rough it a bit and to hire a local guide with a boat, this is a fascinating part of the world.

BTW, though, the beaches on GI reopened weeks and weeks ago, and I've yet to hear of anyone experiencing any "really bad stuff." Riki Ott makes a living selling books about "really bad stuff" and seems to think that every place on earth is just like Prince William Sound. Her work on the Gulf so far is pretty pathetic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paladine
06:29 PM on 10/02/2010
thanks so much for the links...:)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:28 PM on 10/01/2010
God, I wish I could just turn and walk away from it all.
Why do I have to care?
It isn't fair.
I just want to play in the water, swim some, walk the beach, and enjoy life.
Sometimes I hate having a sense of the truth. Tell me a lie I can believe.
What a world we live in.

So often these days I am reminded of Joseph Campbell's wonderful documentary with Bill Moyers, called The Power of Myth, where Campbell postulated that in the big picture we are in a point in time where we are a culture of humanity that is devoid of an overarching mythology - we are searching for a collective bottom line.
No kidding.

Wake me up in a hundred years, then maybe we will have pulled something together.
I think we, humanity, are in the middle of so many changes that we don't have a sense of self. People, WAKE UP!
whitebeach
Hey, buddy, can you spare a micro-bio?
01:19 AM on 10/02/2010
Go down to the Gulf. Go to Destin or Alabama Shores or Panama City Beach or Santa Rosa Island or even the WPA-built and Katrina-battered coast of Mississippi. Play in the water, swim some, walk the beach, and enjoy life. It's right there. It hasn't been destroyed. It won't destroy you. Why wait a hundred years? Wake up now.
04:23 PM on 10/01/2010
I'm sure the USDA is telling us what is safe, just like the EPA said about breathing around ground zero right after that attack.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
g-moi
Let's GoGreen. We Can Do It.
12:54 PM on 10/01/2010
Let's stop polluting our environment
Let's get off fossil fuels
Let's ride our bicycles more
Let's eat less meat and fish
Let's push our representatives to subsidize green technologies
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
motoGpifupleez
watching with amusement
11:08 AM on 10/01/2010
I shall wait for the "analysis" of James Inhofe.

He's my "go to guy" on all things environmental.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CindyinAtl
05:41 PM on 10/01/2010
The Republican Senator from OK? Surely you jest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
garymc8
We got OBL- not gop
11:05 AM on 10/01/2010
Put a fork in gulf coat shrimp. They are done for the next 100 years. The south, with little regard for public safety, will deny it and become the cancer capital of the world. Too bad most are not educated enough to figure it out or have health insurance to diagnose it. But the proud Texans will swear there is nothing wrong with gulf coast shrimp or beach house rentals on the Carcinogenic Coast.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:39 AM on 10/01/2010
If you think this chemical is only going to affect the Gulf and it's seafood industry, you're being naive. They've reported large fish kills up the East Coast. I wouldn't eat Atlantic seafood right now either.
11:58 AM on 10/01/2010
agreed
whitebeach
Hey, buddy, can you spare a micro-bio?
11:46 AM on 10/01/2010
Same old alarmist screech. Now it's that the shrimp are done for "for the next 100 years." What's the matter, you were one of those howling that the Gulf was dead forever and just can't stand that it hasn't turned out that way? A hundred years is your fallback position?
12:00 PM on 10/01/2010
i am conservative......and i will not be eating food from the gulf.......yes 100 years is over the top but 10 or 15 years maybe
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:06 PM on 10/01/2010
The Gulf is going to be a dead zone for a long time, longer than a decade. Corexit sunk with the oil to the bottom coating the deep scattering layer....poisoning the food chain from the bottom up, the entire ecosystem has been destroyed. How many years ago was the Exxon Valdez? That ecosystem has not be restored.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:24 AM on 10/01/2010
Is OSU one of the universities that BP hired to do "testing" and "help" with this matter. I know LSU and Texas were two...but there were two more universities I think that were more than happy to aid and abet these criminals.
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
03:41 PM on 10/01/2010
UT's and OSU's wealth is oil based. Texas A&M - part of the Permanent Universtiy Fund as well. UT's wealth came from its own lands, deemed worthless at the time, from millions of acres in West Texas.So the question I have is why we have to pay tuition to attend UT or A&M. Don't you know it's because UT doesn't get as much profit from its oil royalties as it should. Just like third world countries and state governments like Texas and Louisiana. And what it gets goes into the PUF and both these institutions pour lots of money into technological and financial chairs. Poof, there goes the money for Texas school children.

I sure someone will go to great effort to say that the situation is much more complicated than this, but it really isn't. UT does split
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
04:03 PM on 10/01/2010
the money with A&M; just not equally.
10:07 AM on 10/01/2010
The question remains an open one? Try this for size: sit in a bathtub with oil and dispersants for 5 months, do you think any of it would soak into your body...
10:01 AM on 10/01/2010
I've never been crazy about eating seafood from the Gulf because of all the pollution from the oil industry and the crud that washes down from the Mississippi river. Now it's even worse.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RudyHaugeneder
09:43 AM on 10/01/2010
Good food. Bad food. Healthy marine life. Infected marine life.
Questions, questions, questions.
Will we ever know the truth? Will McDonalds keep providing minimal, very minimal, health insurance options to its employees.
Questions, questions, questions.
Will we ever know the truth?
Better yet, who to believe?
Questions, questions, questions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oMeoMi
04:37 PM on 10/01/2010
No real question that there are about 6.8 billion of us and we are making a mess of things.

No real question that we play a role in empowering oil-tarded multi-national corporations with their profit seeking behaviors and environmental ignorance.

No real question that we could change - and better do it soon.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluevalentine
09:41 AM on 10/01/2010
When data is LOST, there is a cover-up in action.
I wonder if we will hear a word from the CDC on the need to avoid fish??? Nada, only that we need to run for a flu vaccine that has not been tested.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:13 AM on 10/01/2010
Bingo!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Equinator
Shovels manure daily
09:28 AM on 10/01/2010
Samples in July were lost? How many independent labs are testing the samples? One?

All labs are not created equal.
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
05:44 PM on 10/01/2010
Guess they didn't find the samples for June and August soon enough to disappear them.