iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Liu Xiaobo, Top Nobel Prize Contender, Languishes In Chinese Prison

CARA ANNA   10/ 2/10 09:12 PM ET   AP

Liu Xiaobo

BEIJING — When the police came for Liu Xiaobo on a December night nearly two years ago, they didn't tell the dissident author why he was being taken away again. The line in the detention order for his "suspected crime" was left blank.

But Liu and the dozen officers who crowded into his dark Beijing apartment knew the reason. He was hours from releasing Charter 08, the China democracy movement's most comprehensive call yet for peaceful reform. The document would be viewed by the ruling Communist Party as a direct challenge to its 60-year monopoly on political power.

Liu, who over the past two decades had endured stints in prison and re-education camp, looked at the blank detention notice and lost his temper.

"At that moment, I knew the day I was expecting had finally come," his wife, Liu Xia, said recently as she recounted the night of Dec. 8, 2008. Thinking of the Beijing winter, she said she brought him a down coat and cigarettes. The police took the cigarettes away.

Liu was sentenced last Christmas Day to 11 years in prison for subversion. The 54-year old literary critic is now a favorite to win the Nobel Peace Prize – in what would be a major embarrassment to the Chinese government.

He is the best shot the country's dissident movement has had in winning the prestigious award since it began pushing for democratic change after China's authoritarian leaders launched economic, but not political, reforms three decades ago.

Last year the prize was won by President Barack Obama. Other contenders for this year's prize include Zimbabwe Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai.

In an indication of Beijing's unease, China's deputy foreign minister has warned the Nobel Institute not to give the prize to a Chinese dissident, the director of the Norway-based institute said this week. In another sign of official disapproval, an editorial on Thursday in the state-run Global Times newspaper called Liu a radical and separatist.

Chinese police continue to threaten and question some of the more than 300 people who were the first to sign Charter 08, which was co-authored by Liu. Despite the risk, thousands more have signed it since its release.

Charter 08 is an echo of Charter 77, the famous call for human rights in then-Czechoslovakia that led to the 1989 Velvet Revolution that swept away the communist regime. The charter for China calls for more freedoms and an end to the Communist Party's political dominance. "The democratization of Chinese politics can be put off no longer," it says.

Former peace prize winners Archbishop Desmond Tutu, the Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama and Charter 77 co-drafter Vaclav Havel have joined those calling for Liu to get the award. Scholars inside and outside China have mounted letter-writing campaigns on his behalf.

"If I were the Chinese Communist Party, I would free him now. Release him. Now. So you don't have the humiliation and it's good for everyone," said Jean-Philippe Beja, a China scholar at the Paris-based Center for International Studies and Research and a longtime friend of Liu.

The blunt, sometimes earthy Liu is not always liked, even by fellow activists. "He hasn't yet become the kind of inspiring person Mandela is," AIDS activist Wan Yanhai said in a Twitter post this week, referring to the former South African leader, also a Nobel laureate.

But Liu is rare among government critics in China for being well-known not just among the dissident movement but among the wider public too.

"Across the spectrum, Chinese intellectuals and students have high respect for Liu Xiaobo," said Andrew Nathan, a professor at Columbia University in New York who once sponsored Liu as a visiting scholar. "The award of the prize ... would be viewed by most as an act friendly to China."

It was not the same when the Tibet-born Dalai Lama was awarded the peace prize in 1989. Not just the Chinese government but some of the public too were angry over the win by the exiled Buddhist leader – regarded as a traitor by officialdom for his calls for more autonomy for Tibet.

Liu first drew attention in 1986, when he criticized Chinese writers' "childish" obsession with the Nobel Prize. Two years later, he became a visiting scholar in Oslo, where the peace prize is awarded.

There, in his first time outside China, his writings became more political.

"Perhaps my personality means that I'll crash into brick walls wherever I go," Liu wrote from Oslo to Geremie Barme, a China scholar at Australian National University. "I can accept it all, even if in the end I crack my skull open."

Liu cut short a visiting scholar stint at Columbia University months later to join the Tiananmen Square protests in Beijing in 1989. He and three other older activists famously persuaded students to peacefully leave the square hours before the deadly June 4 crackdown.

"I remember clearly the difficulty and pain Liu Xiaobo and his comrades-in-arms – raised as they had been with the most radical type of an education – experienced in reaching this decision, one which only later was understood to have saved the lives of several hundred students," Xu Youyu, a professor with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, recently wrote in a public letter supporting Liu for the peace prize.

Liu went to prison after the crackdown and was released in early 1991 because he had repented and "performed major meritorious services," state media said at the time, without elaborating.

The bloody Tiananmen experience made Liu less radical, said Zhou Duo, a friend on the square.

"He used to be impetuous, but he changed a lot after June 4," Zhou said. "He became more rational and mild. He criticized the Communist Party, but he preferred having good exchanges between government and the opposition about politics and democracy."

Still, five years later Liu was sent to a re-education camp for three years for co-writing an open letter that demanded the impeachment of then-President Jiang Zemin.

Liu emerged from that sentence in 1999 to find the Internet age. He resisted the new medium of communication at first, but eventually called the Internet "God's present to China."

Now Liu only writes a diary and letters to his wife, which she keeps private. His family can visit him in prison, but they can't talk about his case or world events, and officials stand by taking notes.

His wife said the couple had never imagined Liu winning the peace prize.

"I can always predict when bad things are about to happen," she said, "but I can never totally believe that good things can become a reality."

___

Associated Press writer Isolda Morillo contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BEIJING — When the police came for Liu Xiaobo on a December night nearly two years ago, they didn't tell the dissident author why he was being taken away again. The line in the detention order f...
BEIJING — When the police came for Liu Xiaobo on a December night nearly two years ago, they didn't tell the dissident author why he was being taken away again. The line in the detention order f...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 382
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
04:08 AM on 10/08/2010
Speaking as a Hong Kong Chinese, I think this man is a hero.

Any Chinese posting on here who is against what this man is about -- and what he stands for -- should be ashamed of themselves.

You people are so brainwashed by nationalism and the lies of the Chinese government you can no longer see right from wrong.
photo
Pod-gers
Jeremy Lin = Game Change
11:42 AM on 10/04/2010
Liu is just another idealist caught up in the US's covert, and not so covert, scheme to take down the Communist party of China, or any other country, with a democratically elected socialist government, such as Honduras, and most recently Equdor. I feel sorry for him.

But, no, he does not deserve a Nobel, and yes, China is right, don't abuse the Nobel to incite individuals to treason.
01:32 PM on 10/06/2010
So where is the evidence that Liu is an agent of the greater American scheme of global covert coup d'etat operations against socialist and communist countries? Who whsipered this into your ear Mao Ze Dong?

Alright but by some flit of fantasy I'll take it that you can prove your paranoid theory of American global domination. Now who in the hell told you that China now holds free and fair elections?

Yes Liu's idealism of freedom of speech manifested in a criticism of his country's government is tantamount to the incitement of treason. Meanwhile, you have an account registered with The Huffington Post.

Is bipolar personality disorder a genetic inherited in your family?
04:09 AM on 10/07/2010
Pod-ger is correct that Liu Xiaobo is an agent of the United States. Under our own law (FARA), financial sponsorship by foreign power, in part or whole, substantiates foreign agent status.

Evidence of Liu Xiaobo taking several hundred thousand dollars from the US government is available in the NED's own China grant publication.

Now, how would we feel if China paid someone to advocate abolition of the US constitution? Give him the Nobel Peace Prize?
01:41 PM on 10/06/2010
Ah right, so where's the evidence that Liu is another idealist pawn in the great American game of conducting cover operations against socialist/communist governments? Who whispered this into your ear Mao Ze Dong?

Alright but by flit of fantasy I'll take it that you can prove there's some element of American machination behind Liu's idealism. Now since you are saying that the Communist Party of CHina is democratically elected, where in the h*ll are the free and fair elections in China?

Yes Liu's idealism of freedom of speech manifested as crticism of the government is equivalent to the incitement of freedom. Meanwhile, you have an account registered to (of all websites) the Huffington Post.

Is bipolar personality disorder a genetically inherited condition in your family?
12:17 AM on 10/04/2010
http://uhrp.org/
http://www.falunhr.org/
12:41 AM on 10/04/2010
Hey falun, have you read the caption of this thread? It is not a free to spam thread.
01:14 AM on 10/04/2010
That's great coming from the ultimate spammer. Just look at this thread, all I see are angry pro-Chinese government posts from you. I'm actually Jewish but nice try.
01:26 PM on 10/04/2010
Oh my! m2b, I did not realize you were a cultist.

Welcome to the real world.
06:31 PM on 10/04/2010
No, I'm not a cultist, what made you think that? lol!
12:13 AM on 10/04/2010
This man is a hero.
02:19 AM on 10/04/2010
I'm sure Benedict Arnold was a hero to the Brits too; he was no hero to Americans.

A little off track, but David Sassoon and his 8 sons were also heroes to the British Empire, and honored as great men by the Jewish folks. Not so much by the Chinese.

It depends on your viewpoint.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anitaj
08:12 AM on 10/04/2010
Spies who are caught are rarely on anyone's hero list.
09:48 AM on 10/04/2010
Zhuubaajie , it seems that you don't like Liu. yes, i agree with your -- it depends on your viewpoint. then, what is yours. is Liu a traior or separatist?a chinese is waiting for you answer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
09:22 PM on 10/03/2010
Liu Xiaobo is an international HERO.

He deserves a Nobel Prize many times over.

It takes enormous courage to stand up to an abusive regime.

Trading with China is like investing in apartheid South Africa.

Don't buy Chinese products.
09:48 PM on 10/03/2010
Silly rantings of a xenophobe. China for over 20 years had been a major benefactors to most Americans, shipping over hundreds of billions of well made, affordable goods to keep inflation low, and recycling of most of those trade dollars in the form of dirt cheap loans to keep American interest rates low. America could have done a lot with that largesse - health care reforms, better education, etc., while the economy was strong. But the Beltway pols totally screwed up, and wasted the opportunity. Now with the 2008 financial debacle, America needs China even more to tide the nation over, until the economic malaise subsides.
12:00 AM on 10/04/2010
Blah blah blah, do you even know what you're talking about? Your rant is surely insulting to the millions of Chinese that experience horrific human rights abuse and hardship from the government on a regular basis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
09:20 PM on 10/03/2010
Be AWARE-
This thread is filled with Chinese tro11ing.
Zhuubaajie- is all over every post about China and is obviously NOT one blogger.
12:01 AM on 10/04/2010
Yeah, I noticed and have taken the bait already. I've gotta stop getting sucked into the troll trap!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anitaj
08:18 AM on 10/04/2010
... none of whom seem to have a real grasp of English.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff Forsythe
09:01 PM on 10/03/2010
If one would like to understand the Chinese Communist Party better, one may go on line and read The Nine Commentaries. Thank you.
09:19 PM on 10/03/2010
Just ignore the faluns - they have been ruled as an evil cult in China and had been trying to retaliate since. Any movement led by a leader that claims he is the superior to Jesus Christ is inherently suspect.
12:04 AM on 10/04/2010
Yes, they have been ruled out as an evil cult by the Chinese Government. How sad one cannot practice their religion in China without this happening to them.

http://falunhr.org/te/index.php
08:55 PM on 10/03/2010
I will assert again that clearly the ruling elites of China have decided (wisely perhaps) ONE PARTY RULE is the best system for China in its current stage of development ($4000 per capita GDP, still less than 1/10th that of the U.S.).

To play leapfrog, which is the ONLY way China has any hope of staying with the centuries long comprehensive advantage accumulated by developed nations, China's govt. has imposed a social contract of "bearing the burdens of 3 generations in one, and doing the work of 2 generations in one." No multiparty obstructionism is or should be allowed to stand in the way of development.

That is clearly the view from Beijing. There of course continues to be lots of lively debate about the wisdom thereof, as in by the 70 million bloggers in China debating the wisdom of "pushi jiazhi" (universal values) today.
08:45 PM on 10/03/2010
At the end of the day, the debate still goes back to the legitimacy of one party rule. One argument in Rowingtech's post, "The difference between democracy and totalitarianism is this . . . ."

I think it is rather useless to argue whether today's China is "totalitarian", or just compare the "specs" of one system against another on paper. The only meaningful comparison has to be couched against the goal against which is being sought, and compare how the two "systems" are being executed in demographically comparable nations. Towards that end, probably the only meaningful country to compare with is INDIA, in terms of starting point, stage of development, population size, etc.

How does that compare? Does India do better by virtue of the fact that it is the world's largest democracy? Does multiple party politics give India a leg up on China in ANY measure of performance?

Life expectancy, infant mortality rate, literacy rate, GDP per capita, infrastructure (high speed rail, anybody?), number of college grads especially in science and engineering, mastery of science and technology and ability to drive down cost (competitiveness), no. of patents filed, military capabilities, etc., and the list can go on for as long as you want.

China today has a GDP 4 times that of India, even though the two started out at about the same place after WW II. The only reasonable explanation is one party efficiency, period.
04:34 PM on 10/03/2010
The ruling elites of every nation on earth today are charged with best protecting the security and prosperity of their own nation and its people. For example, America's ruling elites choose to have 700 military bases around the globe, and to write-off the killing of myriad innocent civilians (which goes on today unabated) around the world as incidental, and part of the cost of Americans' peace of mind.

Put in that context, there is nothing exceptional about a martyr or two sitting in jail in China. They are still alive, aren't they?

America is hardly the high horse rider to claim any moral superiority.

China has its unique needs. The population is large, the resources are limited, and outside forces are hostile. Yet the Chicoms had been more than dedicated to improve the lot of all Chinese, and the results speak much louder than words. To date, there are few sciences and technology in which China is not proficient or starting to get proficient, and driving down costs along the way - which means that China under Chicoms has finally found a platform for sustained growth that can last for at least another 100 years. It is an empirical fact that China could not have done it if China was a multi-party democracy for the past 60 years. Thus any unreasonable threat to one party rule should indeed be dealt - UNTIL the nation is ready to go multiparty ($25,000 per capita GDP).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anitaj
08:08 PM on 10/03/2010
"The ruling elites of every nation on earth today are charged with best protecting the security and prosperity of their own nation and its people."

This assumes that the ruling elites subscribe to a "noblesse oblige" philosophy.

Many seem to be more of the "Social Darwinism" school of thought.
05:35 AM on 10/04/2010
Ah yes, and who would make that decision that the Chinese people are "ready"? Why, of course, the single party dictatorship of parasitic imperialists calling themselves a "communist" party. How sickening. Let the Chinese people have their freedoms--to petition their government for a redress of grievances without political persecution, to worship in whatever way they desire without political interference, to reject Chinese imperialism which has committed a cultural genocide against the Tibetan people and seeks imperial influence in Africa, and to select their own way of conducting economic policies which protect collective freedom and individual sovereignty. The Chinese trolls who apologetically write in defense of the murderous regime in Beijing will have their comeuppance, and when they do, a burst of freedom and liberation will be heard so loudly the world will take note.
03:12 PM on 10/04/2010
The goal of any political system cannot be that system itself. The system is there to serve the interest of the people. The people are best served by a selected group of elites who do know better - that IS the system the world over. The way they are selected might differ, but no country can or should be run by a mob, especially the easily swayed mobs that are so prevalent in China (sad to say). Beijing clearly believes, with objective evidence being how their one party system outdistances ALL OTHER SYSTEMS in the world today in terms of delivering better lives to an erstwhile mostly illiterate and dirt poor, overpopulated country, that staying one-party is the best choice. And it appears to be a wise choice, objectly looking at China compared to India.
06:49 PM on 10/04/2010
Wow, excellent post, fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
02:18 PM on 10/03/2010
Not a word from the US State Department, Secretary Clinton or fellow recipient President Obama. Probably trying through back channels. Wouldn’t want to make a public stink about it. The Chinese might get mad. So much for standing up for life, liberty and happiness, and against flagrant human rights violations in China. The US has turned over it’s moral compass to the Bank of China.
03:30 PM on 10/03/2010
The reason is clear - they know the truth.

What is the truth? Again the U.S. government would not tell us. The choices could include that Liu was a paid person, and the Chicoms offered to open the evidence.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anitaj
08:23 AM on 10/04/2010
"They must find it hard to take Truth for authority who have so long mistaken Authority for Truth." ---Gerald Massey
01:45 PM on 10/06/2010
From foaming to babbling, your posts are getting more and more incoherent. The fact that they are allegedly silent about Liu's imprisonment now means they fear speaking out the real truth of Liu's imprisonment? What are you even babbling on about how are the two logically connected? And how do you even know that they know "the truth"? Judging by the US government's track record on the Dalai Lama, I'd say the don't have anything to hide they'll critisize the imprisonment as a violation of fundamental human rights.
03:43 PM on 10/03/2010
that maybe true. but again when american committed vast human rights violations to themselves and to other countries like middle east and afghanistan, it must be very hard to stand up.
01:42 PM on 10/03/2010
Things happen in life for a reason. It is not going to be "proven" to Western standards until those US Govt. papers are unsealed years from now. But most in China view the TAM affair as an earlier version of an attempt by the CIA and other alphabet soup agencies at a color revolution in China, and I personally agree with them.

To think that so many Chinese around the globe had been DUPED into supporting a foreign funded "movement" that could have seen China ripped into 28 pieces (the way the West wants it), I think the expression is "qin tong chou kuai" (friend regret enemy happy, or something like that).

As other posters point out, today, after seeing with their own eyes how the erstwhile "min yun" ("people's movement") leaders (or were they paid provocateurs?all turn up with great jobs and careers in the west, many of them becoming rich themselves through the prosperity of China - Chai, Ling; Li, Lu; and others - it is not surprising that MOST Chinese, both in and outside China, are much more CIRCUMSPECT where it comes to rooting to these so called "min zhu dou shi" (democracy gladiators - translated literally).
02:15 PM on 10/03/2010
The representation of June 4th as a movement influenced by outsiders is - simply put - flat out wrong. This isn't a debate - what happened was fact and the only one disputing that is the Chinese government's propaganda machine.
1) The movement was conceived and (initially) entirely funded by Chinese students and Beijing residents. Although there was some foreign money towards the end of the protests (especially from Hong Kong), the vast majority of the funding was from Chinese in China. You make it sound like foreigners had anything to do with this movement besides (during its latter stages) donating a little bit of money. You're incorrect.
2) The aim of the movement was never to "rip China into 28 pieces." The aims of the movement were an end to corruption and inflation/wage stagnation as well as political reform (Democracy).
3) If you think people like Li Lu and Chai Ling are living it up in the West, think again. How would you like to never be able to see your family or anyone else you loved EVER again? People like Chai Ling are still to this day working to fight against some of the injustices, and they are still the butt of misinformed, ignorant slander like yours wherever they go.
02:29 PM on 10/03/2010
Actually you are the one who is misinformed. Li Lu has visited China many many times. As a matter of fact, he is in China right now as I type these words, he is on a high profile trip along with Warren Buffet. And if you read the article about Shen Tong, you would know he already visited China years ago.
02:29 PM on 10/03/2010
Those are not "facts" - those are explanations given by those who still want to paint TAM as some sort of holy miracle for their own personal reasons. At the end of the day, since the U.S. govt. would not unseal the relevant documents, nobody can actually PROVE whether it was a color revolution attempt. Given the track record since the founding of New China, most Chinese around the world today believes it to be so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
02:23 PM on 10/03/2010
Things always happen in China for a reason. Like imprisoning the parents whose dead children where crushed under sub standard Chinese Government constructed schools for the audacity to complain about it and suggest the Chinese Government was responsible. can you say favored nation trading status?
03:40 PM on 10/03/2010
"Most favored nation" status is a misnomer. It actually means only normal status - and that allowed American companies to make over $80 Billion in profits in China last year and growing. Trade is a two way street.
12:02 PM on 10/03/2010
Are there any shared cultural values among Americans and Chinese?
02:06 PM on 10/03/2010
What does the df stand for? Is that what you call yourself?

If you have to ask the question, it is clear you do not know anything about Chinese. Just look at the schools where there are a substantial population of American Chinese, and see how there is little school violence, where the students are polite and they work hard, where the parent a re supportive and respect (and don't abuse) the teachers, where the test scores are typically 15% higher than other schools. The Chinese feel shame and do not care to be a burden on others, and they loathe to rely on the state for welfare.

Those are just some of the values that carry over even after people travel oceans all over the world, and do not diminish because these are ingrained in the culture. If they are not shared with Americans, they should be.
03:38 PM on 10/03/2010
In fact, the Chinese are more Yankee than most Americans today - thrifty, resourceful, never say die (stubborn as a mule - and the more you say its impossible, the more I'll show you).

Is that enough shared cultural value fer ya? I think it is more like Americans have lost it through decades of the soft life, and it might be a good idea for America to learn its original values from the Chinese, and that's the truth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
moutonnoir
iconoclastic demagoguery
10:12 PM on 10/03/2010
while i disagree strongly with some or all of your political suggestions in this thread, I agree with this social analysis.

are you chinese?
01:55 PM on 10/06/2010
Wow what a great thesis for a conspiracy theory novel. Unfortunately, your post is just that a conspiracy theory made up of a pastiche of allegations, disinformation and exaggeration.

Where's the proof that the Chinese are more Americans than Americans? Who told you this, Mao Ze Dong? And how do you measure this? Where do you get the idea that thriftiness and resourcefulness are American values? Shouldn't it be individualism and consumerism? How is perseverance better exemplified by Chinese than Americans? Where the top universities located, China or the US? Which country has the bigger economy?

The truth is this: ideally (and personally) Americans have as much to learn from Chinese as the Chinese from Americans. But since you are a yellow supremacist, it's a one-way street where the Chinese are the fountainhead of knowledge and everybody else, the receiver of wisdom. Scary to know that you think like the Fuhrer.
11:43 AM on 10/03/2010
I'd like to understand China better. Is there any literature that came from China that has universal positive appeal? Can someone point me to it of there is any?
11:44 AM on 10/03/2010
And I don't mean, on how to conquer and fight and play statecraft.
02:10 PM on 10/03/2010
Looking at what you write, it looks like a lost cause. It'd be tough for someone with your mindset to understand, because it does not sound like you even want to.

THINK - with top universities in the U.S. trying to devise schemes to turn away Chinese students because there are too many of them (even though each and every one there is duly qualified and got there through hard work, not through being alumni's pogeny like white folks), you KNOW there are more than enough "universal positive appeal" there under the skin.
11:41 AM on 10/03/2010
Quote

"“If you ever see an angry Chinese person ever truly lose 'face' it's best to stand well back in any circumstances,it s difficult to grasp in western terms but it s an uncontrollable emotional outpouring like a 'fit of passion' and leads to a lot of vioIence here.Its a precursor to lot of crime,this sense of humilation and despair a total loss of control of actions.For example the students who crack under exam/teacher pressure and kiII their teachers..another horrific scenario that happens here.Sadly suicide is the lost common outcome.'Face' an ,recognition and respect are what keeps China a relatively civic and peaceful place.Crossing the line in abuse and 'disrespect' can make you an enemy for life..or worse.”"