iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Foreclosure Paperwork Scandal 'Same Process' That Fed The Housing Bubble

Foreclosure

First Posted: 10/04/10 06:33 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:55 PM ET

The paperwork scandal that has prompted several banks to halt evictions and review their foreclosure procedures is reminiscent of the predatory lending scheme that inflated the housing bubble.

"It's the same process, falsifying documents to make them look acceptable to someone," said Tom Domonoske, a lawyer and consumer advocate in Virginia. "They're falsifying foreclosure documents so judges will look at them and say, 'Here's an affidavit. It's signed.'"

Domonoske represents Virginia and Donald Naill, who unwittingly found themselves in an exploding mortgage after refinancing in 2006. "I figured they had my taxes, my Social Security number, that they knew everything," Naill told HuffPost last year. She and her husband live on Ordinary Road in Mineral, Va.

The broker who put the Naills in their "stated income" adjustable loan, on which the interest rate and monthly payment jumped dramatically after two years, admitted in a sworn deposition last fall that the loan application was bogus. "It was a stated deal on this particular one, so -- and again, the Naills knew that we was doing a stated deal," the broker said. "So, and of course, we always -- I always, anyway, told my client that, 'If you're getting a stated deal, you know we're stating your income. So you all need to make sure that you're going to be able to abide by making your monthly payment.'"

Several of the nation's largest banks have announced in the last two weeks that they are halting evictions and investigating their foreclosure procedures after employees at "foreclosure mill" law firms admitted in sworn depositions that they never verified information in potentially hundreds of thousands of foreclosure documents.

The bogus loans and bad foreclosure paperwork are both the result of Wall Street's massive appetite for mortgages during the housing bubble, experts say, as banks repackaged mortgages as asset-backed securities and sold them to investors. As mortgages repeatedly changed hands, servicers in many instances lost track of who owned them. In states where foreclosures need a court's approval, servicers now find themselves unable to prove they have a legal right to foreclose.

"The birth of the securitization concept has created both problems," said Jim Kowalski, a foreclosure defense attorney in Florida. "It created a beast that needed to be fed at the front end with sloppy originated loans and a huge beast at the back end with those loans going through the foreclosure process."

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) also pointed to securitization in a video explaining the foreclosure paperwork scandal. "Securitizing mortgages was originally a way to take the cost of a mortgage off of a banks' books. From 2005 onward, the securitization chain went out of control and Wall Street wanted as many mortgages as it could get as quickly as possible and as cheaply as possible. In order to allow it to pull out more fees at every link in the chain, these subprime lenders, trusts and banks decided to cut as many costs as possible including the cost of record keeping," Grayson said.

"Obviously the banks do not want to grapple with the consequences of trillions of dollars of securitized mortgages having no legal standing to foreclose, so they have simply created a system where they use foreclosure mill law firms whose business is to forge documents showing or purporting to show they have the legal right to foreclose."

As for the Naills, Domonoske said that their foreclosure, which he is fighting as a contract attorney for the Virginia Legal Aid Justice Center, is not an example of the foreclosure paperwork scandal. But the fact that their servicer, GMAC, suspended foreclosures in 23 states, may help the Naills' case. "Unless and until GMAC Mortgage fixes the problems in its foreclosure process," wrote Domonoske in a Sep. 28 filing, "this Court should allow the legal issues before it to be decided before allowing GMAC Mortgage to engage in this foreclosure."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The paperwork scandal that has prompted several banks to halt evictions and review their foreclosure procedures is reminiscent of the predatory lending scheme that inflated the housing bubble. "It's ...
The paperwork scandal that has prompted several banks to halt evictions and review their foreclosure procedures is reminiscent of the predatory lending scheme that inflated the housing bubble. "It's ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 561
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:00 AM on 10/14/2010
The people in the story could be me. GMAC has lied, lost paperwork, threatened me with interest rates as high as 12%. I have tried to re-finance to a non-adjustable loan for over 3 years with no luck. I tried to pay them a lump sum of cash to have my loan recast with a lower payment and they refused. all this because I knew my employment was in jeopardy. when I finally lost a lot of my income, they started pouncing on me with more threats. I discovered I was lied to by the mortgage rep. The loan was sold twice within six months of signing. This has consumed my life for 5 years now with no hope in site. Finally it is getting some press. Please don't let this issue die because economic experts say that this halt in foreclosures with prolong the housing slump. And take my advice; if you are going to buy a house take your own attorney to the signing. Banks can no longer be trusted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taninthesummer
Left of center moderate independent
10:05 PM on 10/07/2010
President Obama,

You MUST NOT abandon the American middle class! This is your moment to raise your reasoned, yet passionate voice, in our favor. Please, do not allow the banks to take control of this situation. They are not worthy. We are.
03:24 PM on 10/06/2010
At least senators and house members seem to be responding to this. Here is another interesting read about California lawmakers more specifically: http://bit.ly/9xNnvT
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hswanson2
Could you work if farmers didn't
08:11 PM on 10/05/2010
Everyone should make sure their bank owns their mortgage and can prove it. Call it TARP for the people. And for those who will scream about how wrong this is - don't you think the bank would stick it to you if they could (if not then you have never been charged $35 for overdrawing your account $.10)
04:56 PM on 10/05/2010
What is it they call this in the movie industry?  The back end. 

Incidentally, these mortgages were sold to investment banks that going back a decade bought them for a dime, diced them up into a thousand parts they claimed would be worth a dollar down the road, put each of those parts in each of a thousand securties that contained fragments of other similar parts of mortgages with similarly overstated values, had a corrupt US gov't official certify their fraudulent value, and dumped them through their 1000s of overseas affiliates on consumers who thought they were buying conservative savings bonds for their kids' education funds or their own retirements that would yield 5 or 6%, but never did.  THAT is why, aside from the 800 billion we put to the bailout, we have had to put another trillion to the bailout of the European economies. 

These houses that the consumer banks are now trying to foreclose on, have literally paid off millions of dollars to a handful of investment bankers, and once the consumer banks have possession of them again, they will be re-sold and re-cycled right back through the same process of fraud that we bought them out of in the first place.

So how can anyone reasonably claim that these mortgages have not been paid off?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BonnieDoon
Fool me once...
03:38 PM on 10/05/2010
hamsteronwheel posted this link this morning:

http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/07/david-stern-djsp-foreclosure-fannie-freddie

It is an eye-opening, shocking must read. Send it to everyone you know.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USNDC
Smartest President ever ? ... not even close.
02:53 PM on 10/05/2010
Not one !

Where are the Wall Street prosecutions ?

Where is the Federal Government ? ... where is the DOJ ? ... where is Barack Obama ?

They are silent ... they refuse to engage ... and they refuse to intervene.

Why ? ... because all roads lead back to Rome !

Our corrupt career politician's finger prints are all over this scandal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcelo Munoz
03:46 PM on 10/05/2010
Agree 100%. Yet more proof that a far-off centralized government is not responsive to Americans where they live.
04:46 PM on 10/05/2010
You are singing the song I've been singing since Barack Obama took office and smacked those of us who voted for him up-side the head by putting Geithner in the Treasury and making Geithner's puppet master, Paulson, his closest advisor...oh, and then stocking the White House with no fewer than 20 Goldman Sachs-affiliated staffers.

This is the first time in American history that such a sacking of the people has been accomplished by so few and no one has been held personally repsonsible for it.  Well, the most likely candidates for the big house are hands down:  Richard Fuld and Ken Lewis.

Let's haul one criminal in and see what he has to tell us about the rest.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USNDC
Smartest President ever ? ... not even close.
10:22 AM on 10/06/2010
I want their corrupt career politician friends as well ... Republicans & Democrats !
12:10 PM on 10/05/2010
Those homeowners borrowing money they knew they couldn't pay back are as guilty as those doing the lending.  Everybody was in it for the money.

Unfortunately many that were not over exposed as long as they had a job, are paying for the guilty ones above. 

I have been through this housing bubble many years ago in TX.  Every single weekend hoards of people traveled north of Dallas to look at spec homes for sale.  The intent was to buy those homes and hold them for a bit and resell them to make a quick buck.  This was back in the 70s and early 80s.  It was crazy. 

When we applied for a loan for our second house which was during this housing bubble, the bank used didn't even care about any of our debts.  There was 4 or 5 lines where we needed to fill out those debts but they said to skip it.  They admitted freely to us they had money to lend and we were going to get it no matter what.  We both had jobs.  At the time we felt they were sound jobs.  The house was pushing our limits and we would push our limits even further with several big purchases within a year. 

Looking back we were foolish.  We should have stayed in the smaller house which had a very small mortgage and was virtually finished.  We didn't leverage ourselves too much, but still it was more than we should have in case something went wrong which it did. 

The housing bubble burst when Carter policies and his lack of ability to deal with Iran plunged the country into a recession.  We just plain lucked out and got out Dallas before housing fell too far.  Before that bust, you could sell a home in 1 week.  After the bust, it took us 2 mos.  That seems like a dream now, doesn't it?  We never overextended again.  We lived on one income in the event of another recession.  I would rather live small and be comfortable, rather than large and be uncomfortable. 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndyFem
12:34 PM on 10/05/2010
"The intent was to buy those homes and hold them for a bit and resell them to make a quick buck."

verycold.....Not true.....many, if not most, buyers were first-time-buyers who saw the chance to be able to move their families out of an apartment...and into a home...and become a permanent part of the community.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:07 PM on 10/05/2010
Oh, please.  The 1970s Texas real estate bubble was due to oil speculation,   Remember the OPEC oil embargo in 1973?  When OPEC stopped delivering oil to any country that had aided Israel in the 1967 war?.  Texas was making money hand over fist when imports dried up.  Then, when the embargo ended after Reagan was elected, TX real estate prices crashed because the Texas oil industry crashed.

If you're saying that Carter caused the OPEC oil embargo, that's just a little bit of a stretch.  Carter wasn't president in 1967.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:38 AM on 10/05/2010
Wed Aug. 4, 2010 12:01 AM PDT

"...Now they were up against one of Florida's biggest foreclosure law firms: Founded by multimillionaire attorney David J. Stern, it controlled one-fifth of the state's booming market in foreclosure-related services. Ice had a strong hunch that Stern's operation was up to something, and that night she found her smoking gun."
.

"While the mortgage fiasco has so far cost American homeowners an estimated $7 trillion in lost equity, it has made Stern (no relation to NBA commissioner David J. Stern) fabulously rich. His $15 million, 16,000-square-foot mansion occupies a corner lot in a private island community on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. It is featured on a water-taxi tour of the area's grandest estates, along with the abodes of Jay Leno and billionaire Blockbuster founder Wayne Huizenga, as well as the former residence of Desi Arnaz and Lucille Ball. (Last year, Stern snapped up his next-door neighbor's property for $8 million and tore down the house to make way for a tennis court.) Docked outside is Misunderstood, Stern's 130-foot, jet-propelled Mangusta yacht—a $20 million-plus replacement for his previous 108-foot Mangusta. He also owns four Ferraris, four Porsches, two Mercedes-Benzes, and a Bugatti—a high-end Italian brand with models costing north of $1 million a pop."

http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/07/david-stern-djsp-foreclosure-fannie-freddie
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BonnieDoon
Fool me once...
03:43 PM on 10/05/2010
Thank you for the link.

It is a must read and should be sent to everyone to expose the shenanigans being ignored by the Regulators and Courts.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
11:33 AM on 10/05/2010
Let me understand how HuffPost-think works:

First people borrow money they know they can't pay back, but it's not their fault, the lender shouldn't have given it to them.

Then the lenders try to get some of their money back by selling the house, their right by law, and now it's their fault if the paperwork is not right?

It's hard for me to sympathize with big banks, but you're forcing me into it.
photo
Richard Zombeck
HuffPost Blogger
12:00 PM on 10/05/2010
What's interesting in your comment (along with the lack of thought) is the assumption on your part that everyone bought beyond their means. Most people didn't. The majority of people losing their homes are people who were scammed by ludicrous contracts Elizabeth Warren couldn't even make sense of. The argument you're trying to start here is rooted in something other than reality. Try reading a little bit of the news, find out what's really happening, and then make an informed comment.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
12:21 PM on 10/05/2010
It's a nice opinion, one that conveniently blames Wall Street.
Credit card companies also have ridiculous unreadable contracts. So they are at fault for everyone who defaults on their credit card debt? Absurd.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
09:26 PM on 10/05/2010
And by "news", I assume you mean HuffPost? Not a bit of actual news here, only advocacy. It's the Progressive version of Fox News. I doubt you'll see this post, they don't like the truth.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
12:07 PM on 10/05/2010
How many people bought a house they could afford at the time only to lose jobs, or have health care costs hit them, or just have their wages stagnate for a decade while every bill doubles?

When I bought my house 10 years ago, the mortgage company cleared me for way more than I knew I could pay back. I ended up only taking 2/3 of what they offered, and still had trouble.

It is all a scam by the big banks and I don't think the real problem was the bad mortgages but the fact that they were bundled and leveraged by the big banks, so when one went bad, 20 of 50 or maybe 100 were in trouble because it was used for further leverage. This is some kind of a massive pyramid scheme.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
12:19 PM on 10/05/2010
The housing crash caused the recession, not vice-versa. Unemployment did not cause the housing crash; the crash caused today's unemployment.

The real cause was: housing prices got too high and fell slightly, putting mortgages underwater. If that didn't happen there wouldn't be any foreclosures, people who couldn't pay would just sell, pay off the mortgage, maybe make a profit.

That's constantly happened over the last 50 years: people lose their house because they lose their jobs, but it doesn't get foreclosed. It can only happen if the selling price is less than the mortgage, which has never happened before, not nationally.

The cause was not Wall St or unscrupulous lenders. The cause was housing prices getting too high, relative to wages. Eventually they had to fall, and that meant disaster.

The reason housing prices got too high was because Greenspan kept interest rates too low. He deserves the most blame.
11:18 AM on 10/05/2010
What most people are missing here is this:

If we let foreclosures happen (as they should) we will be punishing the idiots that bought too much house AND the "evil" Banks that helped perpetuate all of this.

The people will take a loss (and rightfully so), but they can rent. It sucks, and they're credit will take a hit, but they'll learn a BIG lesson and live to fight another day.

The banks will get a bunch of houses worth LESS, not to mention being stuck with the responsibility to sell them.

Also, the Government (the willing 3rd party in all of this) will see decreasing Property Tax Revenue. Which is the only reason they're trying to "prop up" the market anyway.

The winners in all of this are the renters, and people who were personally responsible, didn't go chasing bubbles, and did a modicum of research.

Pretty simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charweb
02:03 PM on 10/05/2010
Which Government is trying to prop up the market in order to stop decreasing property taxes? The federal government actually receives less revenue when property taxes, at the state and local level, increase, due to IRS deductions for those taxes (all other factors such as income held equal). And I don't see any States trying to "prop up" the market.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcelo Munoz
03:58 PM on 10/05/2010
I think edstate didn't differentiate between Federal and Local governments. The Federal Government is trying to keep prices artificially high to help their banker friends and make sure all those that werent' qualified for a home but bough one through Freddie won't see their value decline in hopes of not losing their vote.
04:44 PM on 10/05/2010
The Feds don't want to have to bail out the states. And they are very very close to doing that right now.

Never mind that a large % of the "stimulus" went to exactly that: State Bureaucracies.
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage against stupidity
11:17 AM on 10/05/2010
VOTE! Democrats are the best we have right now. VOTE, VOTE VOTE! Supress Boehner, and the Tea Party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcelo Munoz
03:58 PM on 10/05/2010
You are very mistaken.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:08 AM on 10/05/2010
"Paul Buchheit, from DePaul University, revealed, "From 1980 to 2006 the richest 1% of America tripled their after-tax percentage of our nation's total income, while the bottom 90% have seen their share drop over 20%." Robert Freeman added, "Between 2002 and 2006, it was even worse: an astounding three-quarters of all the economy's growth was captured by the top 1%."

Due to this, the United States already had the highest inequality of wealth in the industrialized world prior to the financial crisis. Since the crisis, which has hit the average worker much harder than CEOs, the gap between the top one percent and the remaining 99% of the US population has grown to a record high. The economic top one percent of the population now owns over 70% of all financial assets, an all time record.

As mentioned before, just look at the first full year of the crisis when workers lost an average of 25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point clear, 400 people have more wealth than 155 million people combined.

Meanwhile, 2009 was a record-breaking year for Wall Street bonuses, as firms issued $150 billion to their executives. 100% of these bonuses are a direct result of our tax dollars,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:13 AM on 10/05/2010
Meanwhile, 2009 was a record-breaking year for Wall Street bonuses, as firms issued $150 billion to their executives. 100% of these bonuses are a direct result of our tax dollars, so if we used this money to create jobs, instead of giving them to a handful of top executives, we could have paid an annual salary of $30,000 to 5 million people.

So while US workers are now working more hours and have become dramatically more productive and profitable, our pay is actually declining and all the dramatic increases in wealth are going straight into the pockets of the Economic Elite.

If our income had kept pace with compensation distribution rates established in the early 1970s, we would all be making at least three times as much as we are currently making. How different would your life be if you were making $120,000 a year, instead of $40,000?

So it should come as no surprise to see that we now have the highest inequality of wealth in the industrialized world and the highest inequality of wealth in our nation's history. The backbone of America, a hard working middle class that has made our country a world leader, has been devastated.

http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/145705
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen1p
10:41 AM on 10/05/2010
Kentucky just filed a RICO class action against Citigroup, Inc. and Ally Financial, Inc (GMAC.)

"“RICO comes in because the fraud didn’t just happen piecemeal,” Heather Boone McKeever, a Lexington, Kentucky-based lawyer for the homeowners, said in a phone interview today. “This is organized crime by people in suits, but it is still organized crime. They created a very thorough plan.”"
-Bloomberg News
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:22 PM on 10/05/2010
Your statement in your first paragraph seems to be counterdicted by your quote in the second.

Which is it? Did the State of Kentucky file a RICO action? Or did a private attorney located in Kentucky file a RICO action?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen1p
10:56 PM on 10/05/2010
I should have said, "IN Kentucky."

Read and weep you f***ing bankers.
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=168144
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:41 AM on 10/05/2010
meanwhile at goldman sachs let's see what blankfein, and his masters of our universe minions, takes home in BONUSES

9/21/10

Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs, took home $125 million in cash bonuses over the past decade, Bloomberg reports.

Shareholders, however, haven't been quite so lucky.

Even though Goldman has outperformed its peers over Blankfein's tenure, Bloomberg points out that one-year certificates of deposit and 10-year Treasury bonds purchased in September 2000 beat Goldman's total return over the same period. The logic behind lavish CEO pay depends on maximizing returns for shareholders, but Bloomberg notes that the S&P 500 Financials Index, which includes 80 companies, has dropped 49 percent in the past ten years.

Blankfein, who paid $26 million in 2008 for a condo in the Robert Stern-designed 15 Central Park West building in Manhattan, and who last month sold his previous apartment at 941 Park Avenue for $12.15 million...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/21/lloyd-blankfein-compensati­on_n_73313­2.html