iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Robert Edwards Wins Nobel Prize: British Test-Tube Baby Pioneer Awarded Medicine Nobel

MALCOLM RITTER and KARL RITTER   10/ 4/10 10:08 PM ET   AP

Robert Edwards Nobel Prize

NEW YORK — The Nobel Prize in medicine went to a man whose work led to the first test tube baby, an achievement that helped bring 4 million infants into the world and raised challenging new questions about human reproduction.

Robert Edwards of Britain, now an 85-year-old professor emeritus at the University of Cambridge, lived to see the far-reaching ramifications of his hugely controversial early research.

"Today, Robert Edwards' vision is a reality and brings joy to infertile people all over the world," the Nobel Committee said in Stockholm. It began with the birth on July 25, 1978, of the first test-tube baby, Louise Brown, to a couple who had been trying to conceive for nine years.

With in vitro fertilization, or IVF, an egg is removed from a woman, mixed with sperm in a laboratory, allowed to divide for four or five days, then implanted in the womb to grow into a baby. Today the odds of a couple having a baby after a single cycle of IVF treatment are about 1 in 5, roughly the same odds as a fertile couple trying to have children naturally.

Edwards and research partner Patrick Steptoe, who died in 1988, faced opposition to their IVF experiments. Some religious leaders called it morally wrong. Some government officials thought it more important to limit fertility than treat infertility, and some scientists were worried about the safety of embryos.

"In retrospect, it is amazing that Edwards not only was able to respond to the continued criticism of IVF, but that he also remained so persistent and unperturbed in fulfilling his scientific vision," the Nobel Committee said.

Society still wrestles with issues that arose from his work, such as:

_ Is it appropriate to obtain stem cells from embryos – embryos created through IVF? Some people object because the embryos are destroyed to get the cells.

_ Should women who donate eggs be paid? The Vatican's top bioethics official, Monsignor Ignacio Carrasco de Paula, said Monday that Edwards opened "a new and important chapter in the field of human reproduction." But he also said IVF is responsible for the destruction of embryos and the creation of a "market" in donor eggs.

_ Should there be an age limit on women using IVF? In 2006, a 67-year-old Spanish woman made headlines when she gave birth after using the technology to conceive twins. The uproar continued when she herself died only two years later.

Even so, Edwards' research deserves a Nobel, said bioethicist Laurie Zoloth of Northwestern University. "For millions of families, it created the possibility of a truly joyful and extraordinary event."

William Ledger, head of reproductive medicine at Sheffield University, said, "The only sadness is that Patrick Steptoe has not lived to see this day because it was always a joint team effort."

The Nobel is not given posthumously. It was not immediately clear why it took so long to honor such groundbreaking research. Initially, there was concern about the health of test-tube babies, "so it was, of course, very, very important that Louise Brown was healthy and that subsequent babies also were healthy," prize committee member Christer Hoog said.

Despite the absence of Steptoe, committee secretary Goran Hansson said Edwards "deserves a Nobel Prize on his own" because he made the fundamental discoveries that made IVF therapy possible.

A statement from Bourn Hall in Cambridge, England, the world's first IVF clinic, which was founded by the two researchers, said Edwards was too ill to give interviews.

"I spoke to his wife, and she was delighted. And she was sure he would be delighted, too," Hansson told reporters in Stockholm after announcing the $1.5 million (10 million kronor) award.

Lori B. Andrews of the Chicago-Kent College of Law says making embryos in a lab created a host of ethical issues that have never been fully resolved.

For one thing, clinics routinely fertilize more eggs than are implanted, at least at first. The resulting extra embryos can be frozen for storage, Andrews noted, but couples can change their minds about what they want to do with them.

These days, she said, a child can have up to five parents: the sperm donor, the egg donor, a surrogate mother who brings the child to term in her womb, and the couple intending to raise the child.

Some laws say the legal mother is the woman who gives birth, but nowadays "we can no longer depend on biology to determine the mother," Andrews said.

As for surrogate mothers, "I think there's ethical issues any time we mix human reproduction and cash payments," Zoloth said. "What does it mean to mix human reproduction and a buyer and a seller and a parent and a child in the same discussion?"

In Bristol, England, Louise Brown, the first IVF success, is now 32. In a statement issued by the Bourn Hall clinic, she said she and her mother are "so glad that one of the pioneers of IVF has been given the recognition he deserves." Brown gave birth in 2007 to a son who was conceived naturally.

Johanna Nannung is a Stockholm woman who has a personal reason to praise the award. Her daughter, Olivia, was born after she and her husband underwent four years of IVF treatments.

"It was incredible. Olivia is the most wonderful and fantastic thing that has ever happened to me. In my life I have always seen myself with a family and children. It's worth more than everything," she said.

The medicine award was the first of the 2010 Nobels to be announced. It will be followed by physics on Tuesday, chemistry on Wednesday, literature on Thursday, the peace prize on Friday and economics on Monday Oct. 11.

Candidates for the physics prize are hard to predict given the wide latitude of subjects encompassed by the award. But that does not stop experts from guessing, often by looking at winners of other physics honors, like Israel's Wolf Prize. Several Wolf Prize winners have later won the Nobel Prize.

This year, the Wolf physics award was shared by U.S. professor John F. Clauser, Alain Aspect of France and Anton Zeilinger of Austria for their work in quantum physics.

The most popular choices in a poll by the American Institute of Physics were Nick Holonyak, Shuji Nakamura and Robert Hall for the development of the LED laser.

Thomson Reuters, which analyzes high-impact scientific papers to make predictions, singled out U.S. researchers Charles Bennett, Lyman Page and David Spergel for discoveries derived from a NASA spacecraft on the age and composition of the universe.

___

Karl Ritter reported from Stockholm. Associated Press writers Louise Nordstrom in Stockholm, Medical Writer Maria Cheng and Raphael G. Satter in London contributed to this report.

___

Online

http://www.nobelprize.org

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

NEW YORK — The Nobel Prize in medicine went to a man whose work led to the first test tube baby, an achievement that helped bring 4 million infants into the world and raised challenging new ques...
NEW YORK — The Nobel Prize in medicine went to a man whose work led to the first test tube baby, an achievement that helped bring 4 million infants into the world and raised challenging new ques...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 79
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Writeonwater
Let's be critical of rhetoric
01:44 AM on 10/12/2010
I can't grant as much credence to the Nobel Prize as I would if they righted a wrong of theirs in granting only Otto Hahn the chemist the prize for her groundbreaking work in splitting the atom. Einstein also recognized this blatant omission http://www.angelfire.com/anime2/100import/meitner.html . It is not to late for posthumous honers. It is as important now because many places women are still not allowed education and opportunity. It might go a long way to change peoples mind if they knew it was a woman who split the atom. Poor Otto didn't know WTF happened.

http://www.essortment.com/all/lisemeitner_rqob.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbmetzger
07:18 PM on 10/04/2010
Nobel Prize For IVF Baby Pioneer
His discovery has led to the birth of four million babies, and offered hope to the 1 in 6 couples who struggle with infertility. Now British scientist Robert Edwards - the man who pioneered IVF treatment - has received the Nobel Prize for Medicine. http://www.newslook.com/videos/255274-nobel-prize-for-ivf-baby-pioneer?autoplay=true
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LonosCurse
Some may never live, but the crazy never die
04:53 PM on 10/04/2010
All that work won't fly with the new Republican majority.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
veggiehead
01:27 PM on 10/04/2010
Yeah! I have two beautiful babies today thanks to his research. It truly is a miracle. And, I am so saddened by all of the negativity on this board. I have a suggestion for all of those people complaining of overpopulation, but I will keep it myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
01:30 PM on 10/04/2010
They are very confused - its okay for people like the Duggars to overpopulate and have their kids raising their other kids, and overpopulate more than IVF people would ever be able to do - just cost wise its impractical becuse they do it the natural way. Also all the welfare moms with six kids from different dads walking around thats all good. Its all the fault of less than 2% of the world's parents - i.e the infertile ones who choose to have kids when they can actually afford it and in a stable situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
veggiehead
01:35 PM on 10/04/2010
Thank you!! Well said. F &F!
01:22 PM on 10/04/2010
A well deserved Nobel. Professor Edwards allowed countless couples to become parents which is a priceless miracle. This man is a hero to humanity. Unfortunately, after President Obama won the Nobel for work of literally one month in office reading teleprompters, the Nobel has lost virtually all of its value except the check that comes with it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:56 PM on 10/04/2010
Because 6.8 billion people aren't enough. But women like Nadya Suleman and physicians like Michael Kamrava are helping to fix that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
12:58 PM on 10/04/2010
Nadya Suleman is one extreme example. Most of the kids in orphanages etc are the result of a two parent conception (the natural way) and the parents were unfit to have the children. Many kids are also born to parents who are not able to look after them properly. There are many moms roaming the streets with 6 kids from six different dads - its harder to do it the IVF way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
01:02 PM on 10/04/2010
Nadya Suleman is also the result of a media culture that rewards irresponsible parenting. Have lots of kids, either as a single parent or a two parent situation or a multi parent situation and get a reality tv show, lots of press and sponsorships.

The Goselins, The latest TLC family. The Duggars etc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Internationalopinion
12:26 PM on 10/04/2010
He certainly deserved the award for making such a difference in people's life by bringing the joy of a child! The people that think he is responsible for overpopulation are retarded big time as IVF is meanly used in the western societies where the population is actually falling in numbers not growing! The problems of overpopulation is only in third world countries like India, or china( which btw has been under control over the years by allowing only one child per couple). Also Indian couples get money from the government after each year they didn't have a child. It's a tough problem but it is certainly not a problem because of Dr. Edwards' IVF!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
12:40 PM on 10/04/2010
Sorry theres plenty of overpopulation in Western societies too. Many kids are born to parents who either just didn't use contraception or who are barely in a relationship and then decide to make multiple offspring. But either way IVF definitely doesn't cause overpopulation. Its lack of contraception and bad family planning.
photo
CoastalNC
Good thoughts create good things
12:02 PM on 10/04/2010
Congrats to you Robert Edwards and your well deserved honor. As a female who struggled for 9 years to adopt because of infertility problems I know you have been a God send to many couples.
11:29 AM on 10/04/2010
People are starving because the planet is overpopulated and he gets a Nobel for this? It should be illegal!
11:50 AM on 10/04/2010
So because someone with no resources decides to have eight kids, that should preclude me from having one? Nice.
photo
CoastalNC
Good thoughts create good things
12:03 PM on 10/04/2010
How thoughtful of you....I assume you either do not want children or don't have fertility issues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kennyfasugbe
11:18 AM on 10/04/2010
Really? It took this noble man this long to be recognized for something that has become a part of life for this long?
11:07 AM on 10/04/2010
Usually this would be an outstanding achievement and worthy accomplishment. But since our village id ee ut claimed the prize it has completely lost any and all integrity or honor to those who so honorably deserve it. Just as he has descreated the walls of the WH, to which it may have to be torn down or at the very least gutted to the studs, he has rendered this prize useless.
11:51 AM on 10/04/2010
I assume you're referring to Obama. So just FYI, the Nobel Peace Prize and the Prize for Medicine are two completely different things. A little information goes a long way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ejay579
MURKA! Numba one 4 EVA!
11:17 PM on 10/04/2010
I didn't realize the Village Idiot from Crawford won any prize?
10:49 AM on 10/04/2010
Wonder if Octomom will send him a Thank you card?
photo
Aquest
No one here is exactly what they appear.
10:43 AM on 10/04/2010
I know that in-vitro fertilization is a big thing but, on the other hand, overpopulation is the cause for most, if not all, the world's problems.

In addition, I always wonder about 'Christians' who use this. Do they ever consider that their inability to have children may be God's will?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
12:30 PM on 10/04/2010
Most people overpopulating are the ones doing it the natural way. Adoption agencies are not filled to the brim with IVF babies, maybe those people who conceive solely because they don't bother with contraception or within three months of meeting someone should reconsider
10:34 AM on 10/04/2010
Do we not have a population explosion going on right now that all but guarantees plagues, pestilence, wars, and shortages of every natural resource without the scientific intervention…maybe it would be a better idea to go the other way to slow down the population growth…that would be worthy of a prize I am sure…
photo
CoastalNC
Good thoughts create good things
12:10 PM on 10/04/2010
It isn't the infertile causing the population growth issues....you should look towards those who have half a dozen babies without being married and with different dads...or people who have baby after baby after baby because God wants them to....those of us with fertility issues are lucky if we can manage to have/adopt one, sometimes two children.
09:19 AM on 10/04/2010
Thank you for adding to the population problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
09:25 AM on 10/04/2010
Very few people can actually afford IVF. The problem with overpopulation is due to lack of contraception and inadequate family planningg. People having too many kids before they can afford them or are in stable relationships. The adoption agencies are not filled with IVF babies
10:24 AM on 10/04/2010
I'm pretty sure you can blame the population problem on the 90% of people who don't need ART to have children. I'm assuming that you opted not to have children because of said problem. Oh I forget, only the infertile are responsible for keeping this in check and for adopting all the accidental and abandoned children of the irresponsible and fertile. My children will all be on purpose, thank you very much for your concern.