iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

California Governor: Two New Polls Confirm Brown Rebound

Brown Whitman

First Posted: 10/05/10 09:55 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:55 PM ET

Two new automated surveys on the California governors race confirm that Democrat Jerry Brown now narrowly leads Republican Meg Whitman by a narrow margin. Other new surveys released over the last 24 hours show Richard Blumenthal's lead holding in Connecticut, reconfirm the razor close margin in the Illinois Senate race and present something of a puzzle on the Ohio governor's race.

In California, the latest automated poll from SurveyUSA shows Brown leading by four percentage points (47% to 43%), while an update from Rasmussen Reports has Brown ahead by five (49% to 44%).

While the new surveys show the usual random variation, a clear shift in the data is evident: Over three weeks in late August and early September, five surveys (all but one automated) showed Whitman holding modest single-point advantages and winning between 47% and 51% of the vote. The seven surveys conducted since September 15, however, (including four using live interviewers) all show Whitman with less than 44% of the vote. While our standard trend estimate now shows Brown leading narrowly (46.2% to 44.6%), our more sensitive trend lines appear to more accurately capture the recent data and show Brown leading seven percentage points (48.8% to 41.8%).

2010-10-05-Blumenthal-CAGovSens.png

The new SurveyUSA result for the California Senate race shows Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer leading Republican challenger Carly Fiorina by three points (46% to 43%), a slightly narrower margin than her roughly four-point lead on our standard trend lines (47.9% to 43.5%). Still, Boxer has now held at least a nominal lead on ten California surveys conducted since September 11.

A new automated survey in Connecticut by the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling (PPP) shows Democratic Senate candidate Richard Blumenthal leading Republican Linda McMahon by 12 percentage points (53% to 41%). That margin is considerably better than two recent surveys by Quinnipiac University and Rasmussen Reports that showed Blumenthal leading by only 3 and 5 points respectively, though a recently released internal Blumenthal campaign poll had him ahead by 12. Our standard trend line splits the difference and shows the Democrat leading by nearly seven (50.8% to 44.2%).

While the most recent surveys show significant McMahon gaining after the August 10 primary, it is not clear whether she has continued to close the gap since Labor Day.

A new Suffolk University poll confirms the very close contest in the Illinois Senate race, showing Republican Mark Kirk at 42% and Democrat Alexi Giannoulias at 41%. Our trend estimate shows Kirk with a virtually meaningless one point edge (40.2% to 39.3%). The Illinois Senate race is currently the closest in the nation.

Just out this morning, a new head scratcher from Quinnipiac University in Ohio. They find incumbent Democratic Governor Ted Strickland trailing Republican challenger John Kasich by 9 percentage points (50% to 41%), a considerably closer margin than the outlier 17-point margin they reported in mid September, but still better than average for Kasich than most other recent Ohio polls. Surveys conducted over the last two weeks by the University of Cincinnati, Fox News/Pulse, Reuters/Ipsos and CBS/New York Times have shown Kasich leading by just 1 to 4 percentage points, although a Rasmussen poll released last week put Kasich up by 9.

The recent pattern in the Ohio data resembles the trends in California. Ohio polls gave Kasich mostly double-digit leads a month ago, but narrow single digit margins more recently. While our standard trend estimate shows Kasich with an eight point lead (49.5% to 41.5%), our more sensitive chart, showing Kasich leading by less than 3 points (45.1% to 42.5%), looks like a better fit for the more recent data.

2010-10-05-Blumenthal-OHGovSens.png

Finally, the wide variation in Ohio's "likely voter" surveys is similar to results we have seen on new national surveys in the last 24 hours measuring the "generic" U.S. House vote (the question that asks voters if prefer the Democrat or Republican House candidate in their district). Yesterday, Rasmussen Reports released new data showing Republicans leading by Rasmussen's narrowest margin so far in 2010, just 3 points (45% to 42%), while Gallup published new results based on two different likely voter models from the same survey showing the Republicans leading by either 13 points (53% to 40%) or 18 (56% to 38%). Meanwhile, a new survey out this morning from ABC News and The Washington Post puts the margin at 6 points (49% to 43%).

So what is a "likely voter" exactly and why are these results so different? I will be taking a closer look this week at HuffPost Pollster. Stay tuned.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Two new automated surveys on the California governors race confirm that Democrat Jerry Brown now narrowly leads Republican Meg Whitman by a narrow margin. Other new surveys released over the last 24 h...
Two new automated surveys on the California governors race confirm that Democrat Jerry Brown now narrowly leads Republican Meg Whitman by a narrow margin. Other new surveys released over the last 24 h...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,545
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (80 total)
11:11 PM on 10/26/2010
When are California going to wake up! Just look at what he really did as Gov, then as Mayor, very sad and then as attorney Gen. I'm moving if he wins and taking my business with me. History says it all. I can't believe he'd get any votes. I really don't care Ca is the worst state, sorry to say. Too many laws, taxes. It's look but don't touch, the average family has a hard time just spending the day at a state park! Give me a break.
04:22 PM on 10/18/2010
Successful business people are focused on making a profit... and that's good! But profit is not the business of government. No recruiter would hire Meg Whitman to be governor. She only has profit-based experience.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jaborine
No tea for me
02:56 PM on 10/18/2010
We are down to the wire. Will California Voters stop the billionaire and millionaire juggernauts from playing a cruel game designed for bored rich people which will threaten our Democracy?

Or, will the poor and middle class citizens rise to the occasion and yet again save the thoughtless
dabblers in politics from a Bush like slide into economic chaos and voter discontent.

For information on reg. to vote online go immediately to. Vote.

www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sito
02:07 PM on 10/18/2010
Whitman says she is an outsider come to change things. We HAD an outsider Republican promising to change things. His name was ARNOLD! and what changed? NOTHING!
All Meg promises is to make war on working people in unions, her natural enemy.
09:03 PM on 10/14/2010
"...narrowly leads Republican Meg Whitman by a narrow margin." Who writes this crap? Somebody needs to buy this guy a thesaurus.
thatgirljd
It must be really easy to be a liberal!
08:11 PM on 10/10/2010
When Bush was president, my life was going pretty good. The dems took over congress in 2007 and ruined everything!
photo
ZappaFreak
In pedal-depressed panchromatic resonance...on tap
02:16 PM on 10/11/2010
Next time...pay attention and you'll see who really got you there...

Don't mean that to be smug, it's just an observation. Your complacency is what allowed that to happen.

ZF
photo
LeFlaneur
does nuance.
08:38 PM on 10/11/2010
When Bush was president, my life was going pretty well, and it's going well now too. But I don't limit my thinking to pure self interest. I also know I need to think of the welfare of others, and of the future of this country. I'm voting Democratic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gustavo Rejivik
02:22 AM on 10/09/2010
Paragraph after paragraph about the Polls and illegal housekeepers but nothing about these candidate positions on the issues. Brown has a 30yrs history in Government office yet the Huff Po and other Media outlets tell us nothing about him.

Thank you Gloria All-red for impacting 2 GOP Governor's in a row with your National Enquirer style slander. There are 20 million illegals in this country yet somehow she was able to find the one who worked for Meg Whitman. It's disgusting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uggg
01:55 PM on 10/09/2010
He is the one that started CA on its way to bankruptcy
photo
Juero
we're living in a fool's paradise
02:26 AM on 10/10/2010
Untrue, not factual, incorrect, what more can I say.
04:44 PM on 10/10/2010
A lie. From Wikipedia: "His fiscal restraint resulted in one of the biggest budget surpluses in state history." He also refused the perks of office and lived in a modest apartment instead of the governor's mansion, and was driven to work in an economy car instead of a limousine.
photo
ZappaFreak
In pedal-depressed panchromatic resonance...on tap
02:22 PM on 10/11/2010
You wouldn't read it anyway. What difference would it make? Meg Whitman has no real interest in the people of California...just the power that comes with being the Governor. Who knows what she could do for all her rich friends if she can become Governor???

And how much has Whitman spent in personal cash on getting herself elected? Is that a fair playing field for any opposing candidate? Thank God its someone who can counter that money with and alternative to EBay Government. Can you not see the attempt to literally buy the governorship? Wake up...

Your post just shows how open minded you are willing to be...which is not much by most standards.

ZF
09:47 AM on 10/08/2010
Don't forget to figure in a 5% GOP edge with computer voting systems. Add in the GOP "stop the Democratic voters" program of intimidation and bogus voter challenges plus malfunctioning/inadequate voting mechines in Democratic districts.
It's just like in the Senate: Democrats need a super majority to break even. Fortunately they often get it due to the fact that a majority of people agree with their philosophy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:01 AM on 10/08/2010
Putting Jerry Brown back in charge of California is worse than putting Joseph Hazlewood back in charge of the Exxon Valdez. He was a monumental failure as governor. Is this the best that the dems have to offer??
photo
ZappaFreak
In pedal-depressed panchromatic resonance...on tap
02:31 PM on 10/11/2010
We Dems could offer up Bozo the Clown and it would still be a better choice than what the GNOP has to offer up in the way of Whitman...sorry.

NEWS FLASH from FZ NUZWERKS: California GNOP candidate for Governor Meg Whitman plans to outsource California State Jobs to Mexico as soon as she is elected. California drivers are being reminded when you they go to renew your Driver's license at the CA license center, be sure to be multi-lingual. The new state workers will speak very little English...and they'll be irate because Whitman tends to treat lower classes of people badly. Film on our 11pm broadcast, featuring some broad doing the news...

Back to you Ralph!

My EBAY Bid: I bid $130 million that she stays home...bidding ends in 24 hours! LOL!!!

ZF
11:17 PM on 10/26/2010
that is the biggest bunch of bs I've ever read, where do you get this stuff? Don't answer, you so out of it. Must be from the 60's or a lid college student. Please give me a break.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Monrocsol
Bible is a fairy tale book
01:56 PM on 10/26/2010
Better than Octopus face Meg.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Winthorpe
Need a fourth for squash
05:44 AM on 10/08/2010
Hopefully it's harder to buy the California governorship than a World Series championship.
04:05 AM on 10/08/2010
oh my, if that photo of her doesn't say, "what, me worry"?

meg alfred e. "bay" whitman
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jameskatt
03:43 AM on 10/08/2010
Meg Whitman is trying to BUY the election by spending an UNGODLY 140 MILLION DOLLARS on it. She lies. She treats her lowly workers like garbage. She will treat California's workers the same.
thatgirljd
It must be really easy to be a liberal!
08:13 PM on 10/10/2010
She paid a maid $23 , thats pretty darn good! She spent her own money so she wouldnt have to spend anyone elses. I think that makes perfect sense,think about it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aeuropeanvoice
the dog ate my micro-bio,sorry
08:00 AM on 11/02/2010
Are you saying she rejected other people's money?
If she didn't your whole argumentation is flawed as it would then mean that she only ADDS her fortune tot other people's money.
Which she does.So tell us why you are trying to spin the facts ?
02:45 AM on 10/08/2010
pray. Save our country from these people. Dems do ok, we show our gratitude by busting our butts to do what's best. Obama too.
07:42 AM on 10/08/2010
See this is the problem with progressives...the enormous ego.....best for who? you? Trust me it is only in your minds that it is "what is best"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:02 AM on 10/08/2010
Just trust them. Dems are "enlightened" and know better than the rest of us.

Only through blind faith in liberal leaders will we ever be free...
photo
lobewan
All I know is that first you've got to get mad
02:41 AM on 10/08/2010
I'm sure others have commented regarding this, but, in addition to all the other absurd/insulting/arrogant/mendacious/hypocritical aspects of Meg Whitman's new hobby (that is, having any interest in anything having to do with that thing the little people do called "voting" ), in addition to all that, this calculation should tell you quite a bit about Whitman's opinion of the political process, and the price-tag she places on Californians, in particular.

If I recall properly, Whitman announced her candidacy February 10, 2009. Since that time, campaign finance reports indicate that she has spent a bit over $140 MILLION dollars placing bids on the election she feels is up for auction.

That's a huge amount of money, but it needs some context before one can appreciate just how obscene this really is. Today is October 7. That means there have been about 600 days since she announced her candidacy.

$140 Million / 600 days = $233,333 EVERY each day - each *24 hours*. Almost a quarter of a million dollars, every day. That's nearly $10,000 *each hour*.

How long does it take for *you* to make a quarter of a million dollars? More than a day?

To my mind, when a message needs a hammer this big, it has very little authentic value. This is treating the election of a Governor like Madison Avenue introducing a new brand of cola that needs "name recognition and market share."
02:50 AM on 10/08/2010
this means to me that she personally thinks that CA needs her as gov over Brown so much that it's worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. I know it's socialistic of me, but I do think of the thousands of Americans that die each yr for lack of health insurance...I think of all the tremendous good even one day of that money could have done for people if she chose to do the good deed of giving it to charity that day instead of thinking Californians needed her and only her so much that the money was better spent running for Gov.
She doesn't think that. So then we are left that she just wants to be Govenor really badly. How arrogant.
I don't know where i get my views but money at this high amount just seems useless to the individual...its meant to do good works with. A million dollars means nothing to her and doens't change her lifestyle at all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
afgail
Wise and strong.
02:41 AM on 10/08/2010
Schwartzeneger was without experience but had good intentions. Still did a lousy job. Whitman has been disdainful of her simplest civic duty to vote. Worse yet has no discernible good intentions. She is driven by vanity and a lust for power. Californians may be slightly daffy about former CEO's, but they are not masochists. Whitman is a major political disaster just waiting to happen.
02:54 AM on 10/08/2010
and Brown is a tested, sane, and known entity. My guess is that if you disagree with his politics you still wouldnt' feel he was scary or crazy or incompetant and would ruin your state. So the choice would seem clear to me regardless of politics. With these strange fringe candidates we should forget about D or R next to different names and just think "the untested millionaire who has reactionary politics, does not deign to vote, hires illegals then says she's against that" vs the known public servant who cares about his state. Sometimes there are good things about being a political insider. Brown.
thatgirljd
It must be really easy to be a liberal!
08:17 PM on 10/10/2010
Not alot Arnold could do with all the dems in the way. They vote down everything! All they want to do is give away money to special interests.