iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Meg Whitman's Campaign Rocked With More Domestic Drama As Ex-Nanny Backs Up Housekeeper

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 10/06/10 12:54 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:55 PM ET

Meg Whitman Nanny Drama

Jill Armstrong, a former full-time nanny for Meg Whitman's family, came to the defense of another onetime member of the GOP gubernatorial candidate's household staff on Tuesday.

Nicky Diaz, who is Mexican and is not a citizen of the United States, recently charged that Whitman employed her as a housekeeper for nearly a decade despite knowing that she was in the country illegally.

While Whitman has strongly denied the allegations and has accused Democratic rival Jerry Brown of facilitating the controversy, Armstrong told the San Francisco Chronicle that she believes Diaz's claim because she "know[s] the family" and "what it was like."

"I set up her apartment. I did the unpacking," and other jobs to get the place ready for the children, Armstrong said.


But she described Whitman as "cheap" and said she was surprised when her boss at first balked at paying the agreed salary - arguing that Armstrong didn't "deserve" it because she wasn't yet working full-time as a nanny.

Armstrong said she was also surprised to hear Whitman's explanation last week that her husband did not recall receiving a letter from the Social Security Administration in 2003 that asked the Whitmans to double-check their information on Diaz because the information on file did not match the agency's records.

"[Whitman's husband Griff] Harsh would not forget something like that," Armstrong said. "He had his thumb on everything."

Armstrong told the Chronicle -- which confirmed she was hired to work for the former eBay CEO during the summer of 1998 -- that she decided to quit her job after just two months because she couldn't take it anymore.

"I had enough," she said in an interview, describing trouble getting paid what she believed she was owed, and challenges in dealing with household chores and in supervising Whitman's two young sons.

Whitman's camp dismissed Armstrong's allegations as baseless and suggested they warranted no merit.

Nevertheless, it didn't take long before California Democrats took aim at the controversy. A statement issued by the Los Angeles County Democratic Party on Tuesday night said:

And what may be the most accurate description by Armstrong is when she told the Chronicle that Whitman viewed domestic help as "disposable." Diaz said last Wednesday in describing her own situation, "I felt like she was throwing me away like a piece of garbage."

"We don't know how many other former Whitman nannies are out there, but what is clear is how poorly Whitman treats her employees and that she refuses to take responsibility for her actions," said Eric C. Bauman, who chairs the local organization. "Whitman has been forced to settle lawsuits for making insider stock deals and for shoving a female employee. With 'Nannygate,' it will be obvious to the majority of Californians that Whitman is unfit as an employer and is unfit to be California's Governor."

The Los Angeles Times reports:

Armstrong, a Democrat, said she has had no contact with Brown's campaign. After hearing about Diaz Santillan's story, she said, she contacted the Santa Clara County Democratic Party and asked how she could publicize her story. A party official told her they would "take care of it," and Armstrong was contacted by a reporter from the San Francisco Chronicle, which published her account Tuesday.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Jill Armstrong, a former full-time nanny for Meg Whitman's family, came to the defense of another onetime member of the GOP gubernatorial candidate's household staff on Tuesday. Nicky Diaz, who is Me...
Jill Armstrong, a former full-time nanny for Meg Whitman's family, came to the defense of another onetime member of the GOP gubernatorial candidate's household staff on Tuesday. Nicky Diaz, who is Me...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,691
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (138 total)
02:13 AM on 10/24/2010
I think this is the truth: Whitman may be a powerful entrepreneur and CEO, but she's a lousy human being. She will unable to dictate in Sacramento, the way she did at eBay, where, not coincidentally, she was widely disliked. Those of us who have used eBay much know that her business was among the most autocratic, rude and ruthless we've ever encountered, adjusting terms frequently to squeeze as many dollars out of its customers as possible. Many regular eBayers HATE eBay. Simply put, she is a heartless, ruthless corporate goon.

One thing is clear, California cannot be run like a corporation, especially the way SHE runs a corporation, and she would make a BAD governor for the state of California.
01:58 PM on 10/11/2010
Help Meg Whitman Save America's Billionaires and Millionaires !

Help The Republican Party Save Those Poor Billionaires

Yes, Billionaires are Suffering Today -

Their poor kids can't afford that 5th Lambergini,

They can't buy their eleventh Vacation Home,

Or that 40th $10,000 suit

and the 30th $50,000 gown is now much too expensive.

Please Help a starving Billionaire Today by voting Republican

Remember Caviar ain't cheap.

* * Please send this message all over the internet !

Howard Scott Pearlman
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Joann Vallo
Gun Control is Pro Life
06:06 PM on 10/10/2010
Wow, a few days ago the meg hirlings had at least 1 or 2 fans. Today? O
So hard to tell they are being paid, lol...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
turnleft4progress
What value is generosity through God's coercion.
05:20 PM on 10/10/2010
ONCE AND FOR ALL MEG IS NOT A WHORE. MEG IS CLEARLY A JOHN, AND WHAT IS OFFENSIVE IS SHE THINKS I'M A WHORE. I'M NOT FOR SALE.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Speakman
Silicon Valley-based writer and law scholar.
02:52 PM on 10/10/2010
Dear CA Republican Party:
You can put a blond wig and lipstick on a Emperor Palpatine all you want - but you can't change the fact she's a member of the Sith. Hide the younglings and vote for Brown.
graciesgra
retired h.s. teacher from NY
09:30 PM on 10/09/2010
So we see a lot of people on this site with one or two fans who have probably been hired to promote Meg Whitman, saying good things about her and bad things about Jerry Brown, and who do we want to call whores? In spite of what you newly minted posters are claiming, the employee may have earned $23 an hour, but while she worked 40 hours a week she only got paid for 15, so she really didn't earn $23 an hour. Second, Meg and her husband knew early on that Nikki was illegal. The letter from SS proves that. Her husband signed it, but then Meg threw him under the bus and blamed him for it. It's NEVER her fault, is it..

Why does Meg want to be governor so badly? Can it be for other ways of getting money that we peons don't understand? Or is it just the power? After all, CA is a very big state. And she already does have a lot of money. $140 million is probably just a drop in the bucket to Meg. I mean, she couldn't even be bothered to vote for over 28 years, so clearly voting, government and elections don't really mean much to her. This is just another notch in her gun belt. Or, maybe she's thinking she would like to be president some day and this is just the first step. Do those of you in the other 49 states really want her?
02:15 PM on 10/10/2010
So we see a lot of people on this site with one or two fans who have probably been hired to promote Jerry Brown, saying good things about him and bad things about Meg Whitman, and who do we want to call whores?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
turnleft4progress
What value is generosity through God's coercion.
05:16 PM on 10/10/2010
Agreed. Everyone has it wrong. Meg is not a Whore. She a John. She's the one paying for your vote. What? Now thats an insult. How dare she treat me like a whore.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Joann Vallo
Gun Control is Pro Life
06:05 PM on 10/10/2010
And then there are the megglings who don't even have one fan, lol...
01:07 AM on 10/11/2010
“Second, Meg and her husband knew early on that Nikki was illegal. The letter from SS proves that”.

No, the letter does not prove that.

Taken from the letter Social Security sent to them;

“It (the letter) is not a basis, in and of itself, to take any adverse actions against your employee, such as laying off, suspending, firing, or discriminating against the individual”.

“Moreover, this letter makes no statement about your employee’s immigration status”.

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0930_gloria_3.pdf

Besides, California currently has an unemployment rate of 12.4% in addition to a 20.7 billion dollar 'budget problem’. We seem to have bigger fish to fry than where the housekeeper came from, unless we should go after Senator Feinstein as well.

http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/politics/illegal-housekeepers-politics/?print=true
graciesgra
retired h.s. teacher from NY
01:15 PM on 10/13/2010
I disagaree with you. The letter from SS informed them that the name and number didn't match. That's pretty revealing when you have a foreign born worker.

I think the difference between Feinstein and Whitman is that Whitman chose to make illegal immigration a cornerstone of her platform for governor. That's why it's a bigger deal for her.

The only reason you want to claim that we have bigger fish to fry in CA is that this really is a big problem for Whitman. Of course you'd like to brush it aside; that's what people always want to do when it's hurting their candidate. They try to minimize it. Yes, we do have other problems in CA but I think we're capable of talking about more than one issue at a time. At least I know that I am.
05:34 PM on 10/09/2010
Geee... Jerry Brown or Meg Whitman.... Hmmmmm..... My money is on Meg Whitman! She only helped one illegal be here and she paid her pretty well, while Jerry Brown made it possible and desireable for thousands of illegals to be here and want to be here and he still would! And most of his illegals are poor and under paid and may even be on our tab! Meg saw the light and she is the way! Go Meg Go! Vote for Meg Whitman! We can't afford to have a failled Jerry Brown as governer again! He was tossed out once - so keep him out! Go Meg Go!!!
06:00 AM on 10/10/2010
the woman who shipped thousands of jobs out of Cali and spent over 100 million dollars on a campaign, lambasted companies who hired illegals while knowingly hiring an illegal and not even wanting to pay her help at all. This is the woman you support and want to represent you. That shows just who you are and where you want to take this country. Jerry Brown did not ship away jobs, he did not hire anybody illegal and then turn around and deny it and lie about it. I hope people wake and see where this country will go if Republicans get back into any majority role. We how deadly and devastating they are as the minority.
03:25 PM on 10/10/2010
Nicky was paid significantly above the pay curve for a housekeeper. She worked for Meg for 9 years and only now is she claiming that she was paid for a 15 hour week instead of an 18 hour week. Why did she not leave many years ago if she was not being paid the right amount? Most americans know that this is nothing more than propaganda spun from Jerry Brown's camp.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeLawson
Still to the Left, still Right for it
12:15 PM on 10/10/2010
NICE POST MEG! Seriously, Brown is not failed governor, he was a great governor, a great mayor and a great leader for California. I've met him. I've stood in line and sat with him on Southwest flights to LA before. Yes, Southwest, the airline that Meg would NEVER sink to flying on, while Brown is a fiscally conservative person who saw no problem whatsoever flying it with us unwashed masses. Picture Lady Meg sitting on Southwest, or jostling for a seat or place in line with the rest of us little people. It would never happen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vickie803
04:40 PM on 10/09/2010
Are we supposed to believe this self-admitted felon is prancing around with Gloria Allred without Jerry Brown's campaign paying her? Why is she being escorted around by a pricy attorney instead of being deported?
06:07 AM on 10/10/2010
I guess you have not been around long enough to know that she still have some rights here anyways. Now lets see if you have any skills.
If you are caught driving a car with a person transporting cocaine, you will go to prison as an accessory.
If you give your friend or any a gun to go kill another person you will be charged also.
If you hide and help a murderer to escape you will be charged also; you are aiding and abetting a crime.
In all the above cases as long as you are a part of a crime, you will be held responsible.
Now lets see, Meg hired an illegal for several years and did not pay the illegal as agreed. Seem to me she not only aided and abetted the commission of a crime but also breached a contract and lies publicly about it. Ooops I drew the conclusions. I know you have little reasoning abilities so I did it for you.
graciesgra
retired h.s. teacher from NY
02:28 PM on 10/13/2010
Love your name. Finally figured it out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeLawson
Still to the Left, still Right for it
12:18 PM on 10/10/2010
Funny, Vickie.... you're new around here, and it seems you've got a pretty strong opinion about the lying illegal, but nothing to say about going after the employer of the lying illegal. It always seems to come out that the people screaming the most about illegal immigrants have been benefiting from their work for years and years. They scream about the workers, but hire them to do their dirty work. Meg gets to claim "she didn't know" when the SS Admin clearly shows she DID know, but you have only concern for why the worker isn't deported instead of Meg being prosecuted. Why is that?
03:08 PM on 10/10/2010
How about you use some critical thinking for a change? Let’s look at the facts shall we? Meg hired her through an employment agency? What does this imply? It certainly does not imply that she intentionally tried to hire an illegal. A reasonable person would expect the agency to perform its due diligence in the screening process. When it was confirmed without a doubt that she was an illegal she was let go. Shame on Jerry Brown for trying to exploit the less fortunate for his own political gain.
07:53 PM on 10/10/2010
fan and favved!
04:36 PM on 10/09/2010
So an ex-disgruntled employee is bad mouthing her former employer who is running for political office? Say it isn't so! Come on people, this is so predictable, and I guarantee you the lefties tracked her down as well.

The truth is we don't have a clue what really went down. It doesn't matter to the those who report it - if it hurts their opponent then release the info... The sheeple will eat it up. If you believe that all of this is fact then you're a mindless sheep. BAAAHH! BAHAHAHAHAHAAAA! BAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA!
06:10 AM on 10/10/2010
You listen to Fox, Beck, Palin, Limbaugh etc , the source of all lies! Even with a document from the IRS, signed by the husband does not mean anything to you, does it? No, you are wrong. We have more than a clue what happened. There is evidence of what happened.
>>>if it hurts their opponent then release the info...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeLawson
Still to the Left, still Right for it
12:21 PM on 10/10/2010
Indeed, the sheeple like Munsey do eat it up. Say it ain't so that yet another rich Republican trying to buy their way into office spending over 100 million dollars to get a job that pays $200k or so a year, has been exposed as having employed, KNOWINGLY, an illegal immigrant, and then lies about knowing the worker wasn't legally here, for NINE YEARS, with notice upon notice from the IRS that the worker's records didn't match. You seem to gloss over that party, Munsey.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:34 PM on 10/09/2010
You people have got this comment about Whitman all wrong.

W H O R E

Woman Hiring Only Renegade Employees
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vickie803
04:42 PM on 10/09/2010
She is a W H O R E who paid the illegal bum over $20 per hour. A lot of Americans don't make the money this little frownie faced criminal got.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeLawson
Still to the Left, still Right for it
12:22 PM on 10/10/2010
Vickie, maybe you'd like to go to work for Meg. I understand she has an opening that pays $23 an hour.
12:28 PM on 10/09/2010
So bottom line is that Brown's campaign supports criminals and is against victims. So goes the types who had no problem with criminals like Rangel sponsoring gigantic Healthcare reform bills that get signed by a President who doesn't spare a second to read it or has any clue what's in it. My vote goes with Whitman and those interested in honoring immigrants who enter the United States legally and work hard to contribute to the nation that they newly call home. My vote does not go to those who wish to cheapen the sacrifices and efforts of those who have been interested in honest, hard work.
Yes for those who get things done for themselves and for their neighbors. That's the United States that I want.
No to socialists who sit around, expect and wait for somebody else to do things for them. France, Canada and Italy can keep them.
12:15 PM on 10/09/2010
God, to be that wealthy and yet be so petty and miserly. Poetic justice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vickie803
04:38 PM on 10/09/2010
The whiny little thief and felon was paid well.
06:13 AM on 10/10/2010
Where is your proof that she stole something and committed a felony?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeLawson
Still to the Left, still Right for it
12:24 PM on 10/10/2010
The "whiny little thief's" boss was notified with the IRS multiple times, verified by signatures from her husband, that her SS# did not appear to be valid, yet Meg did nothing about it until it became a campaign liability. How did you miss that part of the story, Miss Vickie?
12:10 PM on 10/09/2010
Check into her personal taxes! Whitman only pays $ 8500.00 on her huge estate in Hillsborough, CA.
12:38 PM on 10/09/2010
We can thank Jerry Brown for letting Proposition 13 enable Whitman to do that.
In California, that's sometimes part of the legacy of Brown-out.
But to be fair, it's not right to raise property taxes so high that senior citizens, who are on fixed incomes, get evicted. It's also curious to let property taxes make home ownership essentially a myth, with the government the new landlord for all.
Now, how about having the President report the fair market rental value of his present dig as taxable income? Speaking of being miserly, how come he has almost no history of contributions to charitable causes?
Whitman's isn't too bad. She's just a business woman who pays fair market value for things. If we send $15000+ taxes for every K-12 public education student, we should get $15,000+ value to each of those students. Instead, the military's $10,000 hammers and $million toilets might be great bargains.
graciesgra
retired h.s. teacher from NY
09:59 PM on 10/09/2010
Here's the first article that came up when I googled Prop 13 and I can't find Jerry Brown's name mentioned once.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_13_(1978)

This was proposed by two men, Jarvis and Gann and got onto the ballot via the ballot initiative process and I think the people of CA were hoodwinked because they were told that older people would then not lose their homes. Well, there were other ways they could have saved their homes. But, no, this also benefitted businesses which often tend not to get sold as often as homes and so are still paying very low taxes.

Unfortunately it is young people who are paying the high taxes on new homes or homes that they have just bought. Jerry Brown may have been governor, but he wasn't instrumental in bringing this about, so you can't blame it on him. I was againt it then because I could see the damage it would do and I am against it now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeLawson
Still to the Left, still Right for it
12:26 PM on 10/10/2010
Lung, how much are you and these other shiny-new posters defending Meg all of a sudden on HuffPo getting paid by her? What is with the lies about Brown and Prop 13?
10:12 PM on 10/08/2010
Whitman can't win, she just can't. She's not qualified to be Governor! While in charge of Ebay, things were restructured and user fees shot up drastically. Plus, she's an ugly woman....literally, she's got a receding hairline and is unpleasant looking. I am no way affiliated with Jerry Brown's campaign for Governor, maybe she could use my comments as political ammo.
graciesgra
retired h.s. teacher from NY
10:01 PM on 10/09/2010
I will not vote for Whitman, either, but I don't think her looks should ever be a part of this discussion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SouthernJewel
That All Important I-4 Corridor in Central FL
12:55 PM on 10/10/2010
@graciesgra
I agree...one's personal appearance shouldn't play into this discussion.

@Reptileman...the obvious fact for not voting for Whitman is because the woman plain and simple didn't care enough about the USA or CA to vote for 28 years.
09:43 PM on 10/08/2010
When did the country go from considering educated men and women to be our best leaders to considering people who've made a lot of money to be our most educated and moral men and women?

Meg could be exposed as having flogged her housekeepers and I wouldn't really be all that surprised.
09:58 PM on 10/08/2010
When money became "god".
graciesgra
retired h.s. teacher from NY
10:02 PM on 10/09/2010
Or that having good looks, a la Sarah Palin, should be a deciding factor?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SouthernJewel
That All Important I-4 Corridor in Central FL
12:55 PM on 10/10/2010
@graciesgra
Agreeing with you once again.