iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Nancy Pelosi: We'll Tie The GOP To Corporate Cash 'Like Doggy-Doo Stuck On Your Shoe'


First Posted: 10/06/10 11:15 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:55 PM ET

With less than a month until the election, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is urging her fellow Democrats to highlight the ties between Republicans and corporate interests and aggressively respond to attacks by Republicans that attempt to portray the Democratic Party as out of touch with the economic concerns of voters.

In an interview with The Huffington Post on Tuesday, Pelosi said she was unsure how much help Democrats will get from outside political groups that the Supreme Court has ruled can spend without limit on federal elections, and House Democratic candidates have grown increasingly nervous as corporate money pours into district after district, while union money and help from environmental and women's rights groups has been much more restrained.

"Certainly I don't know that, going into the election, there was any plan to do so," Pelosi said when asked if liberal groups might be airing television ads backing Democrats. Corporate groups have been on the air since 2009 battering Democrats. "I hope so. I hope so. I hope so," said Pelosi.

The influx of corporate money on behalf of the GOP will make it harder to hold the House, Pelosi said. "Absent this, we were really pretty confident about winning the election. We still are. But this makes it harder," she said.

Republican-affiliated outside groups have already committed to spend at least $200 million in 2010. Liberal groups, according to a document being circulated among Democrats, have committed to spend just over $7 million.

Much of that is being spent on mailing and ground work, however, leaving the GOP with dominance of the airwaves.

"Somebody said to me, 'You can survive being outspent eight to one.' I said, 'Just as long as the one is there. Eight to one? Okay. Eight to nothing? No, I don't think so,'" Pelosi said.

If Democrats can't match them in spending, said Pelosi, the party would tar Republicans by connecting them to corporate cash. "Of course, they all have euphemistic terms, "For Seniors" or "For Prosperity," or whatever it is, but really it's just cover," she said.

"Whenever you get hit with an overwhelming weight, you have to jujitsu it. So we want to turn it against them... I want to tattoo them right on to the Republican candidate," she said, smacking her hand for emphasis. "Big oil, big banks, big health insurance: We're going to tattoo you with that, so it's like doggy-doo stuck on your shoe. Wherever you go, people will know."

Pelosi also responded to a new memo circulated by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on Tuesday, which instructs Republican candidates to portray the GOP as the party of "paychecks" and Democrats as the party of "food stamps." In the memo, Gingrich said that in June, "more food stamps were distributed by the government than ever before in American history. ... You can use this vivid contrast between the record of the Pelosi-Reid Democratic Congress and the last time the Republican Party took control of Congress to powerfully illustrate the difference for every American between the Democratic Party of food stamps and the Republican Party of paychecks."

"God bless them for being true to who they are," Pelosi responded. "They just can't resist the urge to stomp on poor people. They drove the country into a terrible ditch. The President and the Congress are trying to pull us out. The economists tell us that if we hadn't acted the way -- in the federal initiatives from the Congress and others, that we would have 8.5 million more people unemployed. That unemployment would be 14.5 percent, the deficit would be huge -- even huger than it is."

She scoffed at the fact that they wanted to have a "food stamp fight," saying that when the government is working to pull the country out of what could have been a depression, more people will need food stamp assistance until they get back on their feet. Additionally, she added, food stamps infuse more money into the economy as people spend them.

"They [Republicans] would rather give a tax cut to the richest people in America that will increase the deficit by $700 billion than food to people who need help, that will create jobs," she said. "That's the difference between the two parties. This is really, I think, showing their worst side. Let's have a fight over food stamps? Food stamp fight! It's really sad."

Pelosi also brushed aside Gingrich, saying, "Let me just say this: One of these days, in the far future, when I'm not Speaker anymore, I will be irrelevant."

*************************

What's happening in your district? The Huffington Post wants to know about all the campaign ads, debates, town halls, mailings, shenanigans, and other interesting campaign news happening by you. E-mail us any tips, videos, audio files, and photos to election@huffingtonpost.com.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
With less than a month until the election, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is urging her fellow Democrats to highlight the ties between Republicans and corporate interests and aggressively respo...
With less than a month until the election, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is urging her fellow Democrats to highlight the ties between Republicans and corporate interests and aggressively respo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,480
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (69 total)
07:46 PM on 10/13/2010
I think this administration is realizing that this modus operandi is now in full backfire.
04:21 AM on 10/08/2010
Pelosi, of course, has accepted campaign contributions from said villains this year and in the past, as have most of her Democratic colleagues. Pelosi's campaign committee, for example, took $2,500 from AFLAC's political action committee on April 13. But she's not giving the money back just because she thinks the sources are immoral and villainous.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
10:15 PM on 10/07/2010
Oh, Nancy. When you doo the voodoo that you doo, doo you spew about the doo-doo on their shooes? You doo too.

Keep dooin' it.
05:57 PM on 10/07/2010
Perhaps the Speaker should have members of both parties investigated. Oh, wait, that would be detrimental to her campaign. God forbid a politician be fair, unbiased, and reasonable. Eject this moron before she hands our country over to anyone else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:24 PM on 10/07/2010
She is the top of the pile...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Overlie
02:07 PM on 10/07/2010
Nancy Pelosi say we get more bang for the buck with food stamps and that for every
dollar in food stamps put out we get $1.79 back into the economy. Now tell me 'zackly
how that works? Ifs thats the case we should all be swiming in prosperity!
And they say Christine O'Donnell is nuts!
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
05:59 PM on 10/07/2010
Increased retail sales from disposable income stimulates the economy. Food stamps and unemployment go right back into the economy. Disposable income = consumer spending + increased local, state and federal revenue in taxes collected from taxes on goods and paycheck deductions from everyone along the chain who has a job to provide goods and services.

Unlike tax breaks or other breaks to the rich who often bank the money, people receiving aid can't do that, so the money circulates.
09:15 PM on 10/07/2010
It won't work with this crowd. They've convinced themselves to vote for right-wing trust fund babies who have no concept of what it actually takes to make a living. The funny thing is, that's the argument they use against Democrats, who actually work for a living.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Changeizgood
10:35 AM on 10/07/2010
SOCIAL SECURITY HEARING ON C-SPAN.ORG AND THE WIDENING OF ASSETS AND RETIREMENT.

Social Security is safe 100% for the next 29 years and they are getting to the bottom of who is trying to crack our piggie bank.
How the security will be able to provice a "comfortable retirement for seniors.
Bernie Sanders said under NO circumstances will he support the raising of retirement age or lowering of benefits or PRIVATIZATION OF PUBLIC SECURITY NET.
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
02:20 PM on 10/07/2010
"Social Security is safe 100% for the next 29 years and they are getting to the bottom of who is trying to crack our piggie bank."

Yeah, well Bernie Madoff paid off pretty good at the beginning too. The problem is that - like Bernie's Ponzi scheme - social security is actuarially unsound.

In 29 years ALL RESERVES WILL BE EXHAUSTED - used up paying off the SS for the baby-boomers (some of whom won't even have had the good grace to die before the 29 years are up). That leaves NO RESERVES WHATEVER for those becoming eligible for SS in 29 years - people who will have paid in to the system for decades. Sure, money will still be coming in - from those who continue to work - but it won't fund anything like the current level of benefits.

Actuarially unsound is actuarially unsound. There isn't a state insurance commissioner in the country that would let an insurance company with similar numbers sell annuities in their state. Anyone who believes otherwise doesn't understand the basics of accounting..
08:17 AM on 10/07/2010
The Dems have spent millions, they have energized everybody and everything that can be energized this year, they have denigrated and attacked any and all of their opponents with every dirty, dishonest smear they can come up with. They have shot their bolt. This is as good as it will get for the Dems. They are now in the "eye" and now the OTHER side of the eyewall is about to hit.....
photo
panamarine
My opinion is only an opinion
02:18 PM on 10/07/2010
EPLURIBUSUNUM1:
I think you just described your Republican (Tea bagging) Party to a "T". !!!! Can't wait to see all of your Republican candidates return to obscurity afterwards, and deservedely so.”

That's my response to what you wrote in your post at 8:17 a.m. today, see your post again here:
..........................
"The Dems have spent millions, they have energized everybody and everything that can be energized this year, they have denigrated and attacked any and all of their opponents with every dirty, dishonest smear they can come up with. They have shot their bolt. This is as good as it will get for the Dems. They are now in the "eye" and now the OTHER side of the eyewall is about to hit.....
06:02 PM on 10/07/2010
Wow, that's a typical "I know you are but what am I" response. Are you going to stick out your tongue and thumb your nose now? I am looking forward to the day the conservatives take this country back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisr266
And in the end, the love you take ...
03:21 AM on 10/07/2010
Brass ovaries this woman has. We could use a few more like her in congress.
04:12 AM on 10/08/2010
she is so beholden to the healthcare industry its sickening. Look at all the money pharma has given to your party. You think healthcare reform is anything but more money for pharma?
marilyn 63
LEVEL ONE NETWORKER
02:30 AM on 10/07/2010
these clearly thoroughly bankrupt rethugs already have stepped into into poop.. make them own their stink Nancy. they disrespect you every day. they are nasty and don't deserve any respect.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
luvobama
Hospice volunteer...
03:09 AM on 10/07/2010
I like your words!!

Fanned!
photo
smitty101
Tell Vlad I can be more flexible after the electio
02:33 PM on 10/07/2010
Nancy is doggy-doo stuck on your shoe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whyus
San Francisco native
10:47 PM on 10/06/2010
Nancy's terrific. I'm so proud of her. She is unafraid, tenacious, and for the people. She's also attractive and seems like she'd be a wonderful mother and grandmother. She's from My Fair City, too!
06:05 PM on 10/07/2010
When I met her in 2007, she was a prudish and pompous *itch. She has zero respect for military and even less respect for the average citizen.
marilyn 63
LEVEL ONE NETWORKER
08:20 PM on 10/07/2010
that's exactly how any sane person would have treated a haughty foaming at the mouth tea-republican and i don't blame her and that military thing. sounds phony Republicans don't have much respect for the military. they hardly join. but pretend to love the troops!! and are always defunding military bills or saying NO!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emma richmond
10:41 PM on 10/06/2010
NANCY PELOIS IS ONE GREAT POWERFUL SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, AND NOT AFRAID TO KICK BUTT, SHE'S NOT FIGHTING FOR POWER, SHE HAVE POWER. WE AGREE WITH FAN 1245.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MIVOTE
Adds wisdom to knowledge
10:44 PM on 10/06/2010
Thanks...#135 for you. ;-)
thebuzzmanisone
you say micro i say give me another brew
11:32 PM on 10/06/2010
shhhhh it got loud for a second there
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fb0252
10:07 PM on 10/06/2010
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reed be great democratic leaders. We vote democratic!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
End of an ERROR 2013
10:17 PM on 10/06/2010
I think (soon to be ex) Senator Reid would prefer if you spelled his name correctly........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MIVOTE
Adds wisdom to knowledge
10:43 PM on 10/06/2010
I think I'll take your apology on November 3.
11:02 PM on 10/06/2010
Even the democratic senators and congressment don't think they are great leaders. Why do you think they are campaigning AGAINST the Pelosi/Reid/Obama trio????
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
11:28 PM on 10/06/2010
Because they do as they're told by their corporate masters.
11:40 AM on 10/07/2010
Because some states/districts have accepted the corporate brainwashing by the GOP and force some politicians to tailor their message in such a fashion. Progress is coming though like it or not, and the era of shipping our jobs and wealth overseas is coming to a close, no matter how the Republican party tries to stop us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:56 PM on 10/06/2010
Hey TParty/trollies/Republicans ..please Name one GOP president who ever made the government smaller.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
10:00 PM on 10/06/2010
Ike!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MIVOTE
Adds wisdom to knowledge
10:16 PM on 10/06/2010
he put the tax on you...hope they tax you like that again! and they will.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Tommygun264
2Q2BSTR8
11:37 PM on 10/06/2010
Yeah, and he made the top tax bracket 92%. Let's get back to the good old days of Ike's tax rates.
11:05 PM on 10/06/2010
A properly conservative republican president with a 40 seat majority in the house, and fillibuster proof majority in the senate- I can GUARANTEE you there would be smaller government. The minor detail that you seem to avoid is that the president can not, on his own, affect budget and size of government. There is this annoying thing called the constitution that vests budgetary powers with congress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JudgeMoonbox
09:55 PM on 10/06/2010
And we should remind people that much of the corporate cash is denominated in pounds and euros. For all the Republican talk that campaign contributions are "free speech," they didn't come to Bill Clinton's defense when he was caught "listening" to what foreign contributors had to "say." I think turnabout is fair play.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
11:32 PM on 10/06/2010
Don't forget rials, yen, rubles and yuan.