More

FBI Director Pushes To Expand Telecom Wiretap Laws

PETE YOST   10/ 6/10 07:49 PM ET   AP

Fbi Wiretap Laws

WASHINGTON — FBI Director Robert Mueller on Wednesday called for changes in federal law to help his agents with surveillance of communications in anti-terrorism and other criminal investigations.

At a conference of intelligence experts, Mueller said that in some instances communications companies are unable to provide electronic communications the FBI seeks in response to court orders.

His comments came as the Obama administration considers proposals that would require service providers to make the plain text of encrypted conversations – over the phone, computer or e-mail – readily available to law enforcement.

The FBI's general counsel has said proposed changes would not expand law enforcement authority, but privacy advocates disagree.

Mueller said some people have suggested there is an inherent tension between protecting national security and preserving civil liberties.

"I disagree," he said. "We have a right to privacy, but we also have a right to ride the subways without the threat of bombings. ... It is a question of balance."

"If we safeguard our civil liberties, but leave our country vulnerable to a terrorist attack, we have lost. If we protect America from terrorism but sacrifice civil liberties, we have also lost," he said.

Gregory T. Nojeim, who is with an Internet privacy group, said that backdoors built into communications applications to facilitate FBI access will be exploited by hackers and ID thieves and will make the public less secure.

"We're in the middle of Cybersecurity Awareness Month and the FBI is proposing anti-cybersecurity," said Nojeim, director of the Project on Freedom, Security and Technology at the Center for Democracy and Technology.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — FBI Director Robert Mueller on Wednesday called for changes in federal law to help his agents with surveillance of communications in anti-terrorism and other criminal investigations...
WASHINGTON — FBI Director Robert Mueller on Wednesday called for changes in federal law to help his agents with surveillance of communications in anti-terrorism and other criminal investigations...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 239
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeteLeS
11:49 AM on 10/09/2010
There are so many other ways of tracking terrorist, wire taping is just one of the many. With the government so corrupted these days to allow the FBI to determine the "balance" between civil liberties and security is in my opinion national suicide. If the FBI is convinced that this person or that group are doing something, then they can get permission to tap. On the other hand, if the FBI uses the wiretaping just to keep track of people for no reason, then no, I don't agree. The idea of this is very Orwellian to me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justan Olfrend
Liberal, Progressive, Independent, American
10:32 PM on 10/09/2010
It is a shame that the Republican beat down of Americans trust in Government and its leaders have brought us to the point where the governed are almost ungovernable. We have real problems and yet almost no one trusts the Government with the authority to maintain our safety. Paradoxical. That fence must be mended if they ever expect to gain enough trust in ordinary citizens so that they don't end up chancing dumb leads that mostly end in angry citizens rather than spending that time chasing the real bad guys.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
avg american
It's about jobs, jobs, jobs...
11:30 AM on 10/08/2010
Since big corp and big oil are purchasing our government officials, thanks to Citizens United, it's not such a small step to imagine a corp flexing their muscle and using our federal law enforcement for whatever they might need.
Kinda like how the FDA, EPA, etc. basically enforce for the benefit of big corp and not the safety of the community.

With our corrupt judicial system, I am repulsed at the thought of giving the government this specific power.

I do not believe anyone went to jail in our government for the illegal wiretapping during the Bush years, too. So, we are talking about giving our government, that isn't held accountable to any liable extent, basically unchecked power.


Uhhhh...In a word, no. Besides the obvious WT??, Our founding fathers would be rolling over in their graves at the thought.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justan Olfrend
Liberal, Progressive, Independent, American
10:33 PM on 10/09/2010
Lord help us.
03:11 PM on 10/07/2010
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will guard the guards themselves? The FBI has violated the law concerning warrantless wire taps consistently ever since the Orwellian named Patriot Law was enacted. Why give even more power to an organization that has proven itself unable to abide by restrictions in place to prevent abuse of power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kris Bui
01:03 PM on 10/07/2010
Gregory T. Nojeim, who is with an Internet privacy group, said that backdoors built into communications applications to facilitate FBI access will be exploited by hackers and ID thieves and will make the public less secure.

----EXACTLY
12:40 PM on 10/07/2010
Thank you obama
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YMBM
12:12 PM on 10/07/2010
I agree 100 percent with wiretaping on internet!
05:22 PM on 10/09/2010
Your power of reasoning is stunning. May your computer be tapped, recorded, ripped off and corrupted and may you be blackmailed with your own information ASAP.
11:33 AM on 10/07/2010
This FBI Director has come a long way from being a public servant down to being just another J Edgar Hoover building his own bureaucratic empire out of the remains of what used to be commonly accepted as inalienable rights.

He cares nothing for the national integrity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:09 AM on 10/07/2010
When will people see that all of this is about funding security, not national security?
photo
oneyippie
Leaning far to your left
10:43 AM on 10/07/2010
These people are our employees. Employers are allowed to "spy" on their employees, not the other way around. So let's open up all the FBI files to public view. Let's have open government that was promised but never delivered. And while we're at it, we should be able to "spy" on our elected politicians while they are working for us. Nothing they do should be secret.

Then thing would change very fast...
10:16 AM on 10/07/2010
Obama is to the right of Dick Cheney on civil liberties. This is just more proof.
11:34 AM on 10/07/2010
Except that Dick Cheney has always been fairly consistent.

The more we see of Obama, the less we find there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Garner
10:16 AM on 10/07/2010
The same FBI that couldn't catch the anthrax guy and blamed it on a dead man in spite of scant evidence? The same FBI that told the world a security guard bombed the olympics in Atlanta? And dont forget completely wiffing on 9-11.What's next? An FBI proctologist to really dig deep? Anyone remember their original profile of the unabomber? A white man working for airlines? How'd that work out, they had to release his manifesto and was only caught when his brother turned him in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:56 AM on 10/07/2010
Amazing. This post garners around 200 comments while some lame article on Christine "I AM NOT A WITCH" O'Donnell captures almost 4000. That speaks volumes... we really like the distractions, don't we?
01:54 PM on 10/07/2010
Well, some of us are here...aren't we?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tercio
Say NO to War.
07:27 AM on 10/09/2010
It wasn't that easy to find.
09:55 AM on 10/07/2010
Bring all military back from overseas. Close all overseas bases. Make peace, not war. Terrorist threat will vanish. Vast sums of money will be saved. Or you can have more of Afghanistan, terrorism, surveillance, military, death, kill, bomb.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kris Bui
01:06 PM on 10/07/2010
I'll take the first, please.
09:53 AM on 10/07/2010
Wire tap the CIA and FBI. I'd like to know exactly what they are using my money for.
(No particular conspiracy in mind, I just think turnabout is fair play. So guys, what do you have to hide?)
09:38 AM on 10/07/2010
It is becoming increasingly clear that the real and ominous divide in this country is between the governing class and the governed, not the right and left.
And I say “governing class” advisedly. It is not just the party that happens to be in power at any given time; there is a far stronger bond between all politicians and the special interests that they truly represent than between any one party and their base.
09:51 AM on 10/07/2010
Try 'political class'.
10:13 AM on 10/07/2010
I see your point but still prefer “governing”.
To me “political” includes those amongst the governed who still believe that taking an active part in national political activity is relevant in an age where the governing class is beholden to multi-national special interests.