More

Income Inequality Makes The Poor More Conservative: Study

First Posted: 10/07/10 06:00 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:00 PM ET

Income

Income inequality makes the poor more conservative -- more likely to support smaller government and actually to perpetuate income inequality, two academics argue in a report released earlier this year.

The report, "Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-Reinforcing Link Between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences" (pdf), authored by Nathan J. Kelly and Peter K. Enns, says income inequality is a self-perpetuating condition: As it increases, public opinion among both the rich and the poor shifts increasingly in its favor (hat tip to Economist's View).

The authors' conclusion, which they say is likely to be "surprising to many readers," is that "both the rich and the poor respond to rising inequality by shifting in a conservative direction." This conservatism includes a desire to cut government programs such as welfare.

Previous studies, the authors say, argued that the poor were not supportive of inequality. But, after analyzing thousands of individual responses to survey questions during the period from 1952 to 2006, the authors have concluded that the push for smaller government actually comes as much from the bottom of society as from the top -- and that it increases as the poor grow increasingly worse off.

Right away the authors address the most obvious challenge to their argument: that the poor aren't actually aware of the degree of inequality in the country. Indeed, as a report last month showed, Americans vastly underestimate wealth inequality and, without realizing it, support a massive redistribution of wealth.

In response, the authors point to survey results from 1987 to 2000 that show that as actual inequality increased, the poor became more aware of wealth differences than the rich. To drive the point home, they put this sentence in italics:

"It is certainly not the case that those at the bottom become more conservative in response to increases in inequality because they do not notice what is actually happening."

(Still, the September report showed there was little variation in perception of inequality across socioeconomic groups.)

The media portrayal of economic growth may help shape public opinion among the poor, the authors say. Citing a previous report, they say that during good economic times (often when inequality increases), media stories focus on individual achievement, influencing the minds of the poor and inciting their opposition to government programs, even when the poor themselves stand to benefit from those programs.

The authors also offer this caveat:

For a variety of reasons, the opinions of the poor may be the most uncertain and thus most susceptible to opinion manipulation. This is an important aspect of the "unequal democracy" perspective that comports with our findings and deserves future research. After all, if the poor and the wealthy update their opinions synchronously because the poor simply follow the rich, this is hardly good news for democracy.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Income inequality makes the poor more conservative -- more likely to support smaller government and actually to perpetuate income inequality, two academics argue in a report released earlier this year...
Income inequality makes the poor more conservative -- more likely to support smaller government and actually to perpetuate income inequality, two academics argue in a report released earlier this year...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 732
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derrik Oates
04:13 AM on 11/07/2010
I used to say why don't the rich see it in their best interest too, if everyone is prosperous!!

The more people with money in the economy, the more they buy.
A healthy and happy workforce is a productive workforce.
The smarter the people, the more innovations we see.
The more people paying taxes, the better the infrastructure. The better the infrastructure, the more efficient the economy.

BUT: that is group think (The Rich), THEY focus on self!! So for a few individuals it would be terrible.
A happier health people means, fear and desperation have less corruptive powers on choice. Desperate fearful people are easier to exploit.
A happier people, less of a need to escape reality with alcohol and drugs
A stable economy means less money for wallstreet brokers, markets too predictable. They make money during volatility,predicting peaks and valleys.
The more innovation, the less that can be made recycling the same stuff, or copying others innovations
Less Crime means, well there are hundreds of industries dependant on that. Lawyers, prisons, military, defense, police, Insurance, healthcare, espionage, Guns.

How I wish it weren't so.
photo
4TJefferson
Promote the General Welfare
09:56 PM on 10/11/2010
Ok. I tried to read this babbling pdf file without any luck. The report is from the Political Science Department of the University of Tennessee. No definition of poor or rich. No real data at all; just formulas. This seems made up.
08:41 AM on 10/12/2010
"No definition of poor or rich. No real data at all; just formulas. This seems made up. "

Since you are such a critical thinker, I'm sure you noticed the multiple CITATIONS....
photo
4TJefferson
Promote the General Welfare
12:24 PM on 10/12/2010
I admit, I am not "elite" educated from Tennessee. On what page?
photo
pdxist
Feel free to copy my avatar! (Or ask me how.)
07:19 PM on 10/11/2010
Thank you for pointing out that the ONLY redistribution of wealth in this country for the last three decades has been TO the wealthy:

"Americans vastly underestimate wealth inequality and, without realizing it, support a massive redistribution of wealth."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:26 PM on 10/11/2010
Krap ! This makes perfect sense !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
01:11 PM on 10/11/2010
understandable ... when folks economic power declines and they feel as if their voices aren't heard in the economic policy front, they rely more and more on the social policy front

two sad truths:

1. politicians know this and exploit the heck out of that vulnerability ( especially, republicans -- knowing full well that they'll collect votes, win elections and vote against the interest of the very folks who put them in office)

2. many who vote "conservative or republican" will trade their econoic interest for social interest (which only keeps them where they are - if not further behind)

sad sad sad ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justadood
Abiding interest in the world
05:56 PM on 10/11/2010
just keep in mind one of the Conservative Credo: "I've got mine, beeeyotch" when you have next to nothing you tend to hold on tighter to what you have--which at times will be seen as a Conservative mindset. Now, this thinking might change if *everybody* were having trouble, but as long as we're getting noses rubbed in it by Reality TV showing the excesses of the Hiltons, Kardashians, etc, the other Conservative Mantra of 'Greed is Good' will continue to be believed...
photo
4TJefferson
Promote the General Welfare
08:17 PM on 10/12/2010
Actually, if you read the "opinion paper" it makes no sense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:58 PM on 10/11/2010
I know the stupider i get the more conservative i am.
08:34 AM on 10/12/2010
That's the real trend!
10:06 AM on 10/11/2010
Why do poor people vote Democrat? A study of Tea Party activist found that they are better educated and wealthier than the average citizen. This study is malarkey. Just because you are poor doesn't mean you want the government to wipe your a**.
jishosan
Average Everyday Everyone
12:24 PM on 10/11/2010
Poor people don't vote Democrat. Poor latinos and blacks vote Democrat. But they don't vote Dem because they are poor. They vote Dem because they do not believe that Republicans are interested in the problems they face specifically. Even affluent blacks and latinos often vote Dem (Cubans being a rare exception). The white poor, especially the larger concentrations in the south and midwest, vote conservative.

While there is greater percentage of poverty in latino and black populations, there are, numerically, far more poor white folks. Who else do you think keeps voting Republican in all the southern and midwest states?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
01:12 PM on 10/11/2010
agreed ...

@freegeg meant white people & the tea party ... some folks think voting and only think white and forget that there is a large voting minority block ; )
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valeskas
catlover/book lover democrat
02:56 PM on 10/11/2010
Who did that study, I did not know teabaggies where that intelligent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scottymac11
Facta non verba
03:20 AM on 10/11/2010
There is an entire network of conservative poopaganda spewing 24/7 across our air waves on TV and radio. A constant blaring of half truths and flat out lies across our corporate owned stations convince weak minded listeners that up is down, Santa Claus is a communist just like the devil and Franklin Roosevelt. They have managed to sell republican'tism as a good ole boys club. They join for the camaraderie not realizing how high the dues are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fightingformyrights
10:10 AM on 10/11/2010
I'm confused. Is this to say that the poor are weak minded? Let us not cast this stereotype over a large portion of the population. Yes, propaganda exists but I agree with the researchers that there almost must be some factor in our social make up that reinforces this ideology. Fox News is the most watched "News" but things like American Idol and Glee out rank their viewership.
jishosan
Average Everyday Everyone
12:32 PM on 10/11/2010
I'll bite on your little snark here. The poor are often disproportionately less educated than those above the poverty line at any level, in either school or trade. The uneducated are often easily manipulated, which has been shown time and again in many sociology studies. Also, in the midwest and south, the poor and uneducated are also often disproportionately evangelical as compared to the rest of the population, thus making them prone to moral plays by those professing to speak from a religious angle. Glenn Becks ratings and his following began to spike greatly after he began proclaiming his "great mission" from God. I'm not saying he wasn't popular with a good deal of people before it, but nothing gets the conservative evangelicals going like End Of The World talk. Comparing people to Nazis, predicting the deaths of tons of people while preaching from revelations. All this stuff gets them all "rapturized" and ready to get brought up to heaven!

Anyway, I'm rambling. The point is, all of this is connected. All of it. Religion, education, unemployment, poverty. Poor, uneducated, superstitious people are easier to manipulate than educated folks, even religious educated folks. Its one reason Republicans are scared to death of a liberal "socialist" plot like universal healthcare surfacing in a form that's effective. The first time government gets it really right in a big way for ALL the poor, their house of cards falls apart.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derrik Oates
03:34 AM on 11/07/2010
When your poor you have less time to thoroughly research things (your usually preoccupied with bills and trying to eat) and often rely on watch you see on TV (ads mostly) and things you hear from others.
While at the same time the poor become desperate, and for some the only thing that keeps them going is their faith. So if some voice comes along echoing your beliefs, your more likely to believe his rhetoric
photo
phread
antiFA and proud of it
10:55 PM on 10/11/2010
Bingo scotty! Propaganda drives the fear that causes the working class to vote against their own self interest...h!tler made masterful use of this technique; just like the repubs are doing now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Bullard
07:33 PM on 10/10/2010
Read the article. It is pure gibberish. Economic double talk. Pythonesque babble. Poor people and the rich become more conservative the more they are unequal. Both want smaller government. Really? So the rich are trying to make more people poor. The authors do a fine job of showing why economists should never be taken seriously. No definitions of rich, poor, conservative or liberal.
08:42 AM on 10/12/2010
"So the rich are trying to make more people poor. The authors do a fine job of showing why economists should never be taken seriously. No definitions of rich, poor, conservative or liberal."

1) That is NOT what the premis of the article was
2) The SOURCES (Also known as CITATIONS, or REFERENCES) are very clearly given.
08:44 AM on 10/12/2010
premise
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Bullard
09:43 PM on 10/12/2010
As I read the entire article I kept wondering what was the agenda behind it. Why was it written? I'm still not certain. As for definitions, you're not really suggesting that I have to read all of the cites and sources are you? These authors have a great future writing legislation. Do economists get paid by the word and syllable?
photo
4TJefferson
Promote the General Welfare
08:19 PM on 10/12/2010
Pure garbage. His sampling is between 1952 & 2006, says enough. He leaves out 1932 - 1948.
04:40 PM on 10/10/2010
I agree with the study but there are reasons why the poor are conservative. About 70% of the US population is white and therefore the majority of poor people are white. Most of the white poor live in states like Alabama, Kentucky, South Carolina, West Virginia. Most poor whites are also evangelical/fundamentalist who tend to be both socially and economically conservative.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
01:13 PM on 10/11/2010
ding ... ding ... ding ... ding ... !!!

happy to be fan #1 & faved : )
04:05 PM on 10/10/2010
Not only do the poor act against their own self interest, but the rich do also. If the elites were as smart as they think they are they would be leaders rather than predators.

We have this little matter of ecological catastrophe hanging over are heads this time. We could make the necessary transitions less painful, but we probably won't. We are just animals. Most of our behavior, rich or poor, is biologically and culturally programed.
01:06 AM on 10/12/2010
I don't fully understand this myself. Less poor means less crime. Less poor means better educated which means better workers. Less poor means more people with money to spend. Really the list could go on, and the rich would benefit from all of it.

People like to say the rich are voting for their interests but I don't think they are. There are probably a few crazy rich people that don't care if the US goes down but I cannot imagine most of them actually think the hole we are in is in any way good for them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derrik Oates
04:06 AM on 11/07/2010
I used to say the same thing!!
The more people with money in the economy, the more they buy.
A healthy and happy workforce is a productive workforce.
The smarter the people, the more innovations we see.
The more people paying taxes, the better the infrastructure. The better the infrastructure, the more efficient the economy.

BUT: that is group think (The Rich), THEY focus on self!! So for a few individuals it would be terrible.
A happier health people means, fear and desperation have less corruptive powers on choice. Desperate fearful people are easier to exploit.
A happier people, less of a need to escape reality with alcohol and drugs
A stable economy means less money for wallstreet brokers, markets too predictable. They make money during volatility,predicting peaks and valleys.
The more innovation, the less that can be made recycling the same stuff, or copying others innovations
Less Crime means, well there are hundreds of industries dependant on that. Lawyers, prisons, military, defense, police, Insurance, healthcare, espionage, Guns.
02:18 PM on 10/10/2010
The Neocons gave up on the middle class 30 years ago. Too many independents. Solution: move them down the income ladder; eliminate their jobs. OK, that worked, check that one off.

The wealthy? Just throw more money at 'em...tax breaks, etc.

The cracker vote? Religion and propaganda seem to be working just fine.

You've captured the top and bottom, and are effectively eliminating the middle. Did I miss anything?
12:54 PM on 10/10/2010
Under the Republican presidencies, taxes for the wealthy were reduced in the belief that money in the hands of the "productive" would spur real prosperity for all. But the "rising tide" that was to lift all boats never arrived. Instead, according to economist Paul Krugman (Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations, Norton), incomes for the wealthiest 1 percent of American families doubled while income for those at the bottom of the economic scale declined. Seventy percent of income growth from 1979 to 1989 was "siphoned off" by the top 1 percent of wage earners. Cuts in social spending programs simultaneously took money out of the hands of the poor, reducing some to destitution, and eclipsing the hope of economic advancement for many more.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1252/is_n16_v121/ai_15737619/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:49 AM on 10/10/2010
These hateful poor people just want their bread crumbs for themselves!

Vote PROGRESSIVE!!
10:48 PM on 10/09/2010
The unmatchable honor and dignity of American culture.
No handouts. Promote the welfare not provide the welfare.