More

U.S. Gets Another Month To Revive Mideast Peace Talks

SALAH NASRAWI   10/ 9/10 12:16 AM ET   AP

Mideast Peace Talks

SIRTE, Libya — Arab ministers agreed Friday to give the United States another month to try to persuade Israel to renew curbs on West Bank settlement construction and keep Mideast peace talks from collapsing.

The one-month grace period followed a frantic effort by the Obama administration to broker a compromise as the sides faced rising friction over the stalemate. Underscoring the potential for violence, Israeli troops killed two senior Hamas militants in the West Bank.

The Palestinians have said they won't return to the negotiating table unless Israel renews its moratorium on new construction in West Bank settlements, which expired last week after 10 months. Israel has refused to resinstate the moratorium, though it is considering compromises.

"The Israeli government was given the choice between peace and settlements, and it has chosen settlements," chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said. "It (Israel) alone bears the responsibility for this."

Foreign ministers from the 22-member Arab League warned Israel of the dangerous consequences of continuing settlement construction in the Palestinian territories and east Jerusalem – lands the Palestinians claim for a future state.

"We support the Palestinian president's position calling for a complete halt of all settlement activities in order to resume negotiation," the Arab League's deputy Ahmad Bin Helli said as he read a statement issued after the ministerial meeting.

But the ministers also said they would resume meetings in a month to study alternatives and decide on next steps, giving the United States some breathing room.

The Israeli government had no immediate comment.

Officials in Washington said the Arab League has made clear its support for continued U.S. efforts to create the conditions necessary for resuming peace negotiations.

"We appreciate the Arab League's statement of support for our efforts to create conditions that will allow direct talks to move forward," said State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley. "We will continue to work with the parties, and all our international partners, to advance negotiations toward a two-state solution and encourage the parties to take constructive actions toward that end."

Direct U.S.-backed negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians began on Sept. 2, following several months of indirect contacts, then stalled over the settlement dispute.

Aides have said Abbas wants to avoid the impression that he is quitting talks, and instead sought to buy more time for U.S. diplomacy. "The U.S. effort should continue to safeguard what remains of the peace process," senior Abbas aide Nabil Abu Rdeneh said.

Delegates who were at Friday's meeting said the ministers made their decision after Abbas explained that he faced stiff opposition to returning to the peace talks in the Palestinian territories. They also said some of Friday's discussions centered on the need to delay a final decision until U.S. congressional elections in early November so the Obama administration would not face as much political pressure.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and special Mideast envoy George Mitchell called Arab leaders throughout the week, urging them to persuade the Palestinians not to walk away from the talks.

Friday's statement came despite a proposal by moderate Arab nations led by Egypt and Jordan for Abbas to return to indirect talks.

Some hard-line Arab states, including Syria, opposed any attempt to go back to the talks.

"I cannot see any benefit from this meeting," said Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem, who stayed away from the meeting and sent instead Syria's envoy to the Arab League.

Lebanon boycotted the discussions altogether because of a dispute with Libya.

The two Hamas gunmen, killed in a raid in the West Bank city of Hebron, were involved in the shooting deaths of four Israelis near the city on Aug. 31, just as new Israeli-Palestinian peace talks were getting under way, the Israeli military said. Media aligned with Hamas in the Gaza Strip also said the men were behind the Hebron shooting.

Soldiers with jeeps and an armored bulldozer surrounded the militants' hideout before dawn. The military said the men rebuffed calls to surrender and began shooting at the troops outside. The soldiers then returned fire, killing both militants, the military said.

__

Associated Press Writer Matthew Lee in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,015
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
omobob 10:55 AM on 10/09/2010
The unfortunate truth is that all the king’s horses and all the king's men will not deter Netanyahu and the IDF from the ultimate conclusion of an avowed a single Jewish Homeland. The Arab Leader who have sent Secretary of State Clinton in to negotiate are most worried that the Palestinian refugees will wind up in their countries. The sad truth is not even Arab Leaders care enough about the Palestinians  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hypocrites are Watching
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
03:50 PM on 11/04/2010
Look am I just insane or just plain stupid (maybe just brain damaged naivety [is my bet]) to think would it be so bad to just sit down ask what we all as a people need/can do to stop this!!!?!??!? To get everyone involved no matter how small their voice! You wanna talk bravery that would be brave and courageous, much more than the bomb or the ArmaLite yet peace seems to be a dirty word. I know I lived in Belfast for many years and some people just don’t want peace they want death and as long as we let those who govern us throw stones at others it is never going to stop. I just cant take all this killing any more it is making me sick I feel it eating away at my spirit little by little and I am a vegetarian pacifist I can only imagine what this is doing to people of a more (how do I say) aggressive disposition!! Sure I get angry even frustrated but I couldn’t see my self killing anyone. There are far worse and better punishments when punishment is needed. But I’m sure my voice will by drowned in the tumult of those clamoring for blood. And those who are calling me wuss (and far worse). I wait and see what we shall become…..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred303
Let's Be Friends ^_^
04:34 PM on 10/12/2010
Palestinian people have right to resist occupation. in all of its forms..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
06:01 PM on 10/12/2010
So do "indians." Should they start suicide bombings and rocket fire?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred303
Let's Be Friends ^_^
07:01 PM on 10/12/2010
This is about "The Apartheid State Of Israel " not Indians , stay with me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soma99
11:11 PM on 11/03/2010
Indians did for 300-400 years, well they did not have bombs or rockets back then. Europeans had to kill off 99% of them before the were shut up. Excellent analogy, though, what was done to them was despicable as well. I highly doubt it could have been done in the internet age because it contradicts good morals.
12:23 PM on 10/12/2010
Welcome to history class.

Just read below. What a bunch of nonsense.

If you don't want to talk peace, project backwards into history.

Israel needs new leadership, NOW!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
06:55 PM on 10/11/2010
The "Palestinians" who sometimes claim descent from Canaanites, and other times from Philistines, etc. speak only ARABIC at home! Arabic appeared in the Holy Land in 638 AD with the Arab conquest. And yet Jews in Israel do not speak Arabic, but rather Hebrew, the last existing Canaanite language!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:19 AM on 10/12/2010
And Catholic priests speak Latin. I suppose every one of them must be a true-blooded Roman.
05:47 PM on 10/11/2010
After the war, the determination of Holocaust survivors to reach Palestine led to large scale illegal Jewish migration to Palestine. British efforts to block the migration led to violent resistance by the Zionist underground.

Illegal immigrants detained by the British Government were imprisoned in camps on Cyprus. The immigrants had no citizenship and could not be returned to any country. Those imprisoned included a large number of children and orphans.

From October 1946, the British Government, under the 'severest pressure' from the USA, relented and allowed 1,500 Jewish migrants a month into Palestine.[15] . The gesture was in deference to the recommendations of the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry.[16] Half of those admitted came from the prison camps for illegal immigrants in Cyprus due to fears that a growing Jewish presence in Cyprus would lead to an uprising there.[17]

The Provisional Council of Israel's first constitutional act was a Proclamation that "All legislation resulting from the British Government's White Paper of May, 1939, will at midnight tonight become null and void. This includes the immigration provisions as well as the land transfer regulations of February, 1940."[18]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
05:58 PM on 10/11/2010
Actually, it was Britain who broke international law by passing the 1939 WHite Paper in 1939. Churchill stood up in Parliament and called it "perfidy." The League of Nations was quite clear:

*Article 6.*

"The Administration of Palestine (Britain), while ensuring that the rights and
position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall
FACILITATE Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall
ENCOURAGE, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article
4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste
lands not required for public purposes."

So the so-called "illegal immigration" of Jews, after 1939, so rendered by Britain's unilateral decision to take a 180 degree turn to appease the Arabs, was actually illegal.
06:19 PM on 10/11/2010
The 1939 White Paper can be seen as a disgusting piece of antisemitism attempting to appease the Nazis.
05:37 PM on 10/11/2010
Over the last few days some leftists have argued that the Sykes–Picot Agreement displaces, or renders nul, the Balfour Declaration that promised what is now modern Israel AND Jordan as a Jewish Homeland.
That is false as evidenced below:

The Sykes–Picot Agreement does nothing to displace the Balfour Agreement and, in fact, secret papers released in 1974 confirm this.

"The Sykes–Picot Agreement of 1916 was a secret agreement between the governments of the UK and France, with the assent of Imperial Russia, defining their respective spheres of influence and control in Western Asia after the expected downfall of the Ottoman Empire during World War I.

"IT WAS LARGELY A TRADE AGREEMENT with a large area set aside for indirect control through an Arab state or a confederation of Arab states."

It proposed that an area much larger than present day Israel be an "Allied Concession" of international control including Imperial Russia.

"Great Britain and France - Italy subsequently agreeing - committed themselves to an international administration of Palestine in consultation with Russia, who was an ally at that time . . . A new feature was brought into the case in November 1917, when Mr Balfour, with the authority of the War Cabinet, issued his famous declaration to the Zionists that Palestine 'should be the national home of the Jewish people"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
06:01 PM on 10/11/2010
The agreement of 1916 between allies was rendered irrelevant by the creation of the League of Nations after the war, which decided to adopt and incorporate the British Balfour declaration of 1917 in the Palestine Mandate creating the Jewish National Home there.
06:14 PM on 10/11/2010
The British Balfour Declaration? A colonial entity that is using another colonial enity (zionism) for control of Middle Eastern resources, is baseless. Its like the British writing a law before they colonized north america, that all land to the West is Britain, words can say anything
05:33 PM on 10/11/2010
TClaudiusDrusus
In addition to the use of white phosphorus on densely populated civilian areas,

~
Selective MORAL history is the only strong suit the leftist has.

White phosphorus is NOT an illegal weapon, but its use is restricted to non-human targets.

To suggest that warfare can be conducted w/o civilian casualties is naive and a common leftist tactic to condemn Israel. For ex., they would never consider criticizing Palestinians and Islamists who PURPOSEFULLY target civilians, yet accidental civilians casualties, or accidental phosphorus burns caused by the LEGITIMATE conduction of warfare by Jews is repeatedly condemned as if it was purposeful!

GOT HYPOCRISY?
05:45 PM on 10/11/2010
"but its use is restricted to non-human targets"

I guess Palestinians are not humans?
05:51 PM on 10/11/2010
There is no evidence that humans were targeted. Accidental burns did occur. The key is that Hamas has fired 2 white phosphorus rockets into Israel, TARGETING NON-MILITARY

Where is YOUR condemnation of this obviously illegal use of white phosphorus? I predict the typical leftist response of DENIAL deflection and more one-sided condemnation of the Jewish people.
05:30 PM on 10/11/2010
In 1923 over 70% of the British Mandate of Palestine, as promised as a Jewish Homeland was carved off and given to the Palestinian peoples for an Arab state.

The modern state of Jordan is the original Palestinian state. Jews were forbidden from immigrating to those Biblical lands. Now the Arabs want to take a further chunk off of the land promised to Jews for yet another Racially Pure Arab State.
05:42 PM on 10/11/2010
To your previous responses that I can't post to:

Just because Realpolitik exists, doesn't validate it on an ethical level in any way. And considering laws are continuously being broken to further Realpolitik, makes it doubly disturbing.

As for Israel - any person has the right to live and call home the place they were born, regardless of who they are. That includes both Israelis and Palestinians. So - work it out and start sharing your toys. Children.
06:01 PM on 10/11/2010
You need to check your profile. I already responded to that post.

I could add here that I used the words REAL POLITICS, not "Realpolitik" to suggest that your naive Utopian POV did not reflect the real Machiavelli world out there.

"any person has the right to live and call home the place they were born "
I have no issue with this. The KEY is that, just because one was born in "Palistine" does NOT MEAN that they can DEMAND that no Jews live there.

Can you see the difference? Jews and Arabs living side by side in the same state .....

~
......oh wait! that already happens in Israel.

As long as the Arabs can accept their Jewish neighbors and stop trying to destroy the Jewish state, stop the terrorism and the targeting of Jewish civilians, children, discos, wedding parties......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
06:06 PM on 10/11/2010
Who said so?Every nation has the right to determine who is a citizens, and who isn't. My being born in a German refugee camp did not confer German citizenship upon me. By contrast, a friend of mine born in Italy to holocaust survivors, and who later, like me was brought to the USA as a small child, was 22 years later arrested in Italy, where he was on his honeymoon vacation after getting married here in the US, for not having registered for the Italian army, and was lucky to have previously served in Vietnam, or he might have spent a stretch in a military jail.
EVery country has its own citizenship laws, and just being born in someplace does not automatically give you the right to either be a citizen, or even to remain . THat's up to each individual sovereign state to decide.
Michael II
Neither the one, nor the only
04:15 AM on 10/12/2010
Keep fighting those battles of 1923 and 1947, T.

Meanwhile, back in 2010, French foreign minister Kouchner echoed the opinion of many of Israel's allies only a few days ago: "direct talks required Israel to commit to international law, a settlement halt, opening all crossings into Gaza and an end to Israeli military incursions into Area A under the PA's jurisdiction".

Monsieur Kouchner is a prominent Jew.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StCuthbert
Anytime the mods are ready...
04:40 PM on 10/11/2010
The "poor innocent suffering" Palestinians just rejected another offer to negotiate.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3967850,00.html
04:45 PM on 10/11/2010
her comes another clown.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:50 PM on 10/11/2010
One is punching out and the next is punching in. They have to keep a rotating shift for their employers.
06:24 PM on 10/11/2010
e_xcuse me M0derator_S. this comment is a bl_atant p_ersonal a_ttack, so obviously should be removed
03:35 PM on 10/11/2010
jpost.com today:

Palestinians quash PM's offer for renewed building freeze
By JPOST.COM STAFF
10/11/2010 19:11


Senior PA negotiator Saeb Erekat rejects tying "racist demands of Netanyahu" renewed with settlement building freeze, Abbas spokesman also refuses to accept offer out of hand.
Senior Palestinian Authority negotiator Saeb Erekat on Monday stated that the Palestinian Authority unreservedly rejected Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's offer of a renewed building freeze in the West Bank in exchange for PA recognition of Israel as the Jewish national home.

"We forcefully reject all these Israeli games," said Erekat. "The racist demands of Netanyahu cannot be tied to the request to cease building in the settlements for the purpose of establishing a state."



A spokesman for PA President Mahmoud Abbas also rejected Netanyahu's offer to extend the settlement freeze in the territories for the PA's recognition of Israel as the national state of the Jewish people.

"The topic of the Jewishness of the state is not connected at all to the issue [of the building freeze]," the spokesman said Monday.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
namdlogd
03:49 PM on 10/11/2010
Yeah, lol, good luck with that. Go ahead and tell the world that Israel isn't Jewish. You people crack me up.
05:12 PM on 10/11/2010
Just what is so wrong with the idea of a Jewish homeland, a safe place free from the thousands of years of persecution and prejudice?

What is wrong with recognition that Israel is the Jewish homeland?

What is wrong with granting safety, legitimacy, and peace to Jews?
05:44 PM on 10/11/2010
At least start calling yourselves a theocracy. The majority of your population can't vote due to religious differences.
05:55 PM on 10/11/2010
The problem is the zionists dont represent jews, and that present day Israel was on land already inhabited by a race of people that were of different religions but lived peacefully. The european zionists ethnically cleansed the land of the native population to pave way for their colonial state. Present day, to block the natives off their land, the state of Israel only wants jews to immigrate into Israel. Theres many things wrong
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
namdlogd
02:58 PM on 10/11/2010
This morning upon opening the Knesset winter session. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday he would renew a temporary halt of settlement construction in the West Bank in exchange for Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state.

Your move. Try not to squander this as well.
03:07 PM on 10/11/2010
The problem is "Israel as a Jewish state" try again
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
namdlogd
03:19 PM on 10/11/2010
Nope, don't need to. The actuality of that statement has never been in question for anyone but terrorists. Might just be our last best offer. Say the words. Or don't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StCuthbert
Anytime the mods are ready...
04:41 PM on 10/11/2010
Yep, that's the problem. Palestinians can have a Palestinian state, but Jews can't have a Jewish state. I love that hypocrisy, it's so blatant.
03:09 PM on 10/11/2010
Total non sense and the world knows it.

It's a complete showboat, knowing that such recognition would not allow the right of return of Palestinians.

He said he would "consider discussions about a renewed halt", that's vey different.

Haaretz today:

Meanwhile, Kadima Chairwoman Tzipi Livni criticized Netanyahu for his "lack of leadership" during her speech before the Knesset.

"You refuse to pay a political price [for the peace process]… If your main interest is the coalition, you will not be able to make the right decisions," said Livni.

Livni also blamed Netanyahu for eroding Israel's international status. "You have turned Israel into a weak, fearful state which is losing its friends in the world, which defies the leader of the free world, the source of its strength."

"Perhaps you have led Israel to this position out of weakness, due to your inability to make a decision and take a stand," said Livni.


Take your Israeli propoganda elsewhere please namdlogd
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
namdlogd
03:17 PM on 10/11/2010
Your type of rhetoric and non support of any process whatsoever is the sole reason Palestinians live in squalor, are unable to fulfill any reasonable sane secure peaceful destiny, and are made absolutely crazy, insane and destitute. You and people like you who's only voice is one of violent insurrection to any plan Israel comes up with is transparent. You are hate mongers, You are terrorists, and You, and people like you are the problem. And the world knows it.
05:31 PM on 10/11/2010
If you don't like the Israeli government, wait a little and there will be another election.

The point is that there have been many governments over the years, leftist, centrist and right, BUT, the Palestinians have chosen war, terrorism, intifada and delegitimization THROUGHOUT.

Not only that, but no matter the government, the leftist has consistently condemned Israel while supporting Palestinian targeting of civilians as justifiable asymmetrical warfare.

So pretending that the current problem is the only thing that stands in the way of peace is not only FALSE, but a carefully planned part of the continued effort to delegitimize the Jewish state.

Shame
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
namdlogd
02:57 PM on 10/11/2010
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday he would renew a temporary halt of settlement construction in the West Bank in exchange for Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/10/11/israel.settlement.freeze/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soma99
03:04 PM on 10/11/2010
Since they declared it in 2005 what more does he want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
namdlogd
03:08 PM on 10/11/2010
Hamas. Obviously.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:39 PM on 10/11/2010
He also said that 9-11 was good for Israel.
02:49 PM on 10/11/2010
It is pretty sad that the only arguments that prozionist make are, Judea and Samaria,their logic then indicates that Iran should control what is now Israel, because the Persian empire ruled the land of what is now Israel. Guess they didnt think about that
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
namdlogd
03:00 PM on 10/11/2010
Not before we did they didn't.
03:06 PM on 10/11/2010
What? So you do belive Iran should control Israel because thats what your logic indicates
03:40 PM on 10/11/2010
Randy, I see you are going toe to toe with this comedian again. What is even funnier is him quoting biblical and archeological precedents. A little bit above his pay grade. Save your energy for an intelligent poster.
03:45 PM on 10/11/2010
I know, but for him to quote the bible and archeological finds shows everyone how ridiculous his position is. Thats his premise for ethnically cleansing and expelling a race of people, the Bible and Archoelogical evidence that could mean anything
01:37 PM on 10/11/2010
"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonialization, or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands."

-- Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, November 15, 1998.

"Everybody has to move, run and grab as many (Palestinian) hilltops as they can to enlarge the (Jewish) settlements because everything we take now will stay ours...Everything we don't grab will go to them."
-- Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of the Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, Nov. 15, 1998.

"Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the State of Israel on trial."

-- Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, 25 March, 2001 quoted in BBC News Online
01:30 PM on 10/11/2010
The USA should offer nothing to Israel.

Recognize the PA at the UN as a state.

That will work.
01:38 PM on 10/11/2010
then who will help with the dirty work?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
01:47 PM on 10/11/2010
I hope the UN is ready to fund it forever, because without Israeli help, it will be a failure. And if any rockets come from its territory, that will be war and Israel will simply recapture it again, as it did from Jordan in the first place.
01:51 PM on 10/11/2010
There you go jgarbuz, recapturing land you don't have any right to again.

You are living proof that Israel will only stop fighting and stealing land unless the world forces it to.