iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Google Cars Drive Themselves, In Traffic

DANIEL WAGNER   10/11/10 08:24 AM ET   AP

Google

WASHINGTON — Google Inc. is road-testing cars that steer, stop and start without a human driver, the company says.

The goal is to "help prevent traffic accidents, free up people's time and reduce carbon emissions" through ride sharing and "the new 'highway trains of tomorrow,'" project leader Sebastian Thrun wrote Saturday on Google's corporate blog.

The cars are never unmanned, Thrun wrote. He said a backup driver is always behind the wheel to monitor the software.

It's not the first signal that Google wants to change how people get from place to place. In a speech Sept. 29 at the TechCrunch "Disrupt" conference, Google CEO Eric Schmidt said "your car should drive itself. It just makes sense."

"It's a bug that cars were invented before computers," Schmidt said.

The cars have traveled a total of 140,000 miles on major California roads without much human intervention, according to Google's corporate blog.

The Mountain View, Calif.-based technology giant has sent seven test cars a total of 1,000 miles without a human touching the controls at all, the New York Times reported. The newspaper published a report on the cars earlier Sunday.

The cars know speed limits, traffic patterns and road maps, Thrun's posting says. They use video cameras, radar sensors and lasers to detect other cars.

Driving between Northern California and Southern California, the cars have navigated San Francisco's curvy Lombard Street, Los Angeles' Hollywood Boulevard and the cliff-hugging Pacific Coast Highway, the blog says.

Engineers consider the cars safer because they react more quickly than humans, the New York Times said. It said Google has not revealed how it hopes to profit from the research.

The company is flush with cash, though, and pushing numerous projects such as the cars that are unrelated to its core business, said Rob Enderle, principal analyst with the Enderle Group in San Jose, Calif.

"The word 'focus' is a word Google has never learned," Enderle said, pointing to projects involving electricity distribution, vehicle design and artificial intelligence. He said cars that can drive themselves would allow commuters more time to surf the web, something Google would encourage.

Still, Enderle said, industry leaders such as Volkswagen and Intel Corp. are working on similar technology. He said "driverless" vehicles will make computers more like the robots imagined in the 1920s, rather than the tabletop data processors we use today.

The blog says the technology is being developed by scientists who were involved in an earlier set of unmanned car races organized by the government's Defense Advance Research Projects Agency.

____

AP Technology Writer Michael Liedtke in San Francisco contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

WASHINGTON — Google Inc. is road-testing cars that steer, stop and start without a human driver, the company says. The goal is to "help prevent traffic accidents, free up people's time and redu...
WASHINGTON — Google Inc. is road-testing cars that steer, stop and start without a human driver, the company says. The goal is to "help prevent traffic accidents, free up people's time and redu...
Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 161
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
timqueeney
Thrills and guffaws and chills
12:59 PM on 10/15/2010
Evidently Google has solved the reliability issue by adding a "Control, Alt, Delete" button to the dashboard. Car only takes 10 to 20 seconds to reboot. So you'd only cover about 2,300 feet in the 20 seconds before the car was fully back under control again.

www.timqueeney.com "Flexing the Bounds of Accuracy"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilray
50,000 Screaming Fans (Ignore that other number)
11:34 PM on 10/12/2010
Google, you can drive my car.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ts2U1mkfz4
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilray
50,000 Screaming Fans (Ignore that other number)
10:59 PM on 10/12/2010
Let's hear the haters also known as fanboys say how this isn't something special, how it was copied from Apple, how should stick to their search engine cause that's all they're good at.

This is awesome. This is a game changer. I'll tell you how. Okay let me just skip to the biggest one first. Once Google proves their system, people who normally shouldn't drive will be able to use a car. Mainly I am talking seniors. But that could include anyone with low vision or a condition that may affect driving such as diabetes.

Previously when they talked about driverless cars they talked about cars on special tracks, etc. Google is changing the game by using existing roads. If their system works it will also have some negative effects. Anyone who's job is driving may be impacted. You could have driverless cabs. There is another potential negative effect depending on how you see it. I am certain that Google intends to sell this system as a centralized transportation system. If all the car manufacturers get on board here is the downside. They will probably be able to control your car. The upside of the downside is that high speed chases endangering people's lives will become a thing of the past. This Google system may also be a godsend in emergency situations. This could send Google to the top of the technological heap. Although, I don't see what it has to do with organizing information.
11:05 PM on 10/12/2010
Amen - i just hope they will allow my new iphone app to run in the car "Fuzz Alert" http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/fuzz-alert-pro/id387628030?mt=8

Officer i swear i wasn't speeding it was my "lead foot " droid..
cheers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abuja19
06:00 PM on 10/12/2010
Sounds cool I guess, but I kinda like the actual task of driving. Thanks away, Google.
02:41 PM on 10/12/2010
Wow. That's impressive.
06:05 PM on 10/11/2010
We created a visual summary of the New York Times article. Check it out and feel free to share.
http://www.blog.imagethink.net/line-by-line/2010/10/11/text-twice-as-much-while-driving.html
05:42 PM on 10/11/2010
This has much more chance of working in the USA than Europe. In America the norm is an automatic, the roads are wider, clearer, more lanes, no roundabouts and Google Maps is much more accurate. Europe and elsewhere is a bit of a different ball game. The software would really need to be up to scratch - there seem to be many factors that could make this a disaster. I'm willing to be proven wrong though.
01:47 PM on 10/11/2010
Also, with the use of Google map technology, the car can automatically take a left turn at the intersection, drive 1/2 mile, pull a U-turn and drive back through the same intersection to the driveway 25 yards on the right.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:50 AM on 10/11/2010
each and every google 'driver' who allowed some other system to drive their car should be cited for reckless driving. every exec who knew of this program, and helped to facilitate reckless driving should be cited also.
practice on private property if you wish, dont break the law.
no i am not a luddite
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilray
50,000 Screaming Fans (Ignore that other number)
11:01 PM on 10/12/2010
It was cruise control.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:09 PM on 10/10/2010
.....and then Skynet became self aware........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abuja19
06:00 PM on 10/12/2010
And it was up to John Connor to save us all.
10:23 PM on 10/10/2010
Pure genius. Yet another reason we will all be subjects of the Google empire one day.

Kidding aside, this is amazing especially for the elderly or people with handicaps to get around and, of course, cut down on accidents from drunk drivers as they can just sit in the back and be driven home instead of the drunk driving and taking out a family of five.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
metalborg
currently alive
08:21 PM on 10/10/2010
Right now rush hour traffic is filled with cars carrying one person. I don't know how cars carrying no people will be more efficient. Autonomous cars are not the future, however safer they may be. The expensive of manufacture and repair of such vehicles is not worth the small number of possible passengers. An airplane is a very complex and expensive piece of equipment, even without computer control, but has a very large capacity for passengers over its lifetime.Europe is filled with fast small cars because of better driver training.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeremy Petzold
08:38 PM on 10/10/2010
huh?

Autonomous cars would be driving people, they would not be empty.

And as the article states:

1)they can be made lighter due to the greater safety, saving energy.
2)more can be on the road, thus a greater use of the existing infrastructure, saving land and energy.
3) the increased safty means less cost to teh economy for traffic accidents and loss of life or hospital costs to save the lives of those who are in accidents.

These are the future.
07:45 PM on 10/10/2010
Finally we can catch some extra zzzs on the way to work.
07:37 PM on 10/10/2010
I would like to see how these vehicles would operate in LA traffic
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeremy Petzold
08:39 PM on 10/10/2010
likely they would operate fine since LA traffic is more bumper to bumper than San Fransisco which is a lot more dynamic maneuvers.
06:48 PM on 10/10/2010
Will it be able to drive my ******* with 250kmh on German Autobahn without scaring the heII out of the kids?