More

California Accepts Offer For 11 State Properties

Civic Center

JUDY LIN   10/11/10 10:01 PM ET   AP

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The state announced Monday it is selling 24 government office buildings – including the Ronald Reagan State Building in Los Angeles and the San Francisco Civic Center – to a group of private investors for $2.3 billion.

Ron Diedrich, acting director of the California Department of General Services, announced it selected the offer from California First LLC, a partnership led by a Texas real estate firm and an Orange County private equity firm.

About $1 billion of the sale will be used to pay off bonds on the buildings, leaving more than $1.2 billion to go into the state's general fund.

"After an extensive review of more than 300 bids that were received, I have determined that this offer presents the best value for the state," Diedrich said in a statement. "This sale will allow us to bring in desperately needed revenues and free the state from the ongoing costs and risks of owning real estate."

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and lawmakers included the sale as part of the state budget last week. The Republican governor said California had received solid offers to sell the 24 buildings on 11 parcels and then rent that space back for 20 years at market rates.

It's unclear how the current deal will work out for taxpayers over the long run, but there have been concerns.

The Associated Press reported earlier this year that the deal would end up costing the state $5.2 billion in rent over 20 years, perhaps saddling taxpayers with costs beyond whatever the state would net from the sale. Three of the properties already are paid off, while four others were expected to be paid off in the next five years.

The nonpartisan legislative analyst's office also warned that selling the properties then renting back the space could cost the state an additional $1.5 billion, based on a 35-year projection. And a study by Beacon Economics reached a similar conclusion by looking at a 30-year period.

That study was commissioned by the Service Employees International Union Local 1000, the largest state employee union.

The Legislature will have 30 days to review the sale but cannot make any changes because of a provision in the budget package passed last year that authorized the sale.

Legislation introduced this year that would have given oversight of the matter to lawmakers was killed in committee.

The state said it received more than 300 offers to purchase the buildings back in April. A second round of offers came in May, 11 of which exceeded the state's $2 billion estimate.

Some of those buildings being sold include the attorney general's office and the California Emergency Management Agency in Sacramento, the Elihu M. Harris building in Oakland, and the Judge Joseph A. Rattigan building in Santa Rosa. The portfolio includes 7.3 million square feet of office space, which amounts to about 2 1/2 times the Empire State Building's floor space.

Diedrich said the department recommended California First LLC based on the buyer's financial capabilities and the terms of its offer. The consortium is led by Hines, a privately owned real estate firm headquartered in Houston, and Antarctic Capital Real Estate LLC an international private equity firm.

Antarctic Capital Real Estate was listed as a venture between California real estate veteran Rich Mayor of Spyglass Realty Partners and Chandra Patel of Antarctica Capital, which is headquartered in Irvine.

"California First LLC is pleased and proud to have been selected to be the steward of a number of the state's assets," said Colin Shepherd, Hines senior vice president, in a written statement. "Our purchase price represents fair market value and exceeds the state's initial anticipation of net proceeds."

The investors will put up 40 percent of the purchase price and the remainder will be financed through loans.

Mayor, who led the offer, said the group will work with state employee unions so workers can keep their jobs as the state transfers ownership to a private owner. He said the state has the ability to buy back the buildings at any time.

At least one competing bidder is asking lawmakers to reconsider the deal.

John Stoecker, financial adviser to the California Municipal Finance Authority, a joint powers authority created to finance economic development, said his group's bid would have issued tax-exempt bonds to finance the deal and allowed the properties to revert back to the state after a 20-year lease had expired.

He said his group's offer would have also generated hundreds of millions of dollars more for the state than California First.

"We were just surprised that the state chose to go in this direction when you compare the authority's bid, which kept buildings in the public domain," Stoecker said. "We're just confused why the state would let it go into private hands."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The state announced Monday it is selling 24 government office buildings – including the Ronald Reagan State Building in Los Angeles and the San Francisco Civic Center ...
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The state announced Monday it is selling 24 government office buildings – including the Ronald Reagan State Building in Los Angeles and the San Francisco Civic Center ...
Filed by Anna Almendrala  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerryfromcalifornia
I can't get past mods
10:41 AM on 10/14/2010
Someone please buy the Reagan building and CHANGE THE NAME.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
05:03 PM on 10/13/2010
What's next? Privatizing the beaches??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
05:00 PM on 10/13/2010
LOL Way to go. Does the deal include all the buildings (e.g. City Hall), too?

In other words we sell them so that we can rent them in the future.
11:44 AM on 10/13/2010
The remainder of State and Federal Buildings are being sold from the inside out.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Skepticat
Supporting skeptical felines everywhere
08:28 AM on 10/13/2010
Once upon a time (before 1978) California had the 9th most prosperous economy in the world. Then along came prop 13. Foolish citizens - and gutless elected wonders from BOTH parties were unable to either live (unrealistically) on frozen income, or willing to slash popular services, or willing to get a myopic proposition repealed. The trainwreck was 30+ years in the making - and the people alas did it to themselves. For an idea of the future look at crony capitalism in the collapsed USSR as resources created by the citizens were sold to pals of the politicians at fire sale prices. For a pretty accurate assessment of future trends It would probably be worth putting ideologies on the shelf and reading Naomi Klein's the Shock Doctrine.
11:33 AM on 10/14/2010
in the mid 1980's California had either the 3rd or 4th greatest GDP
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nebris
Auteur and Guru
06:26 AM on 10/13/2010
Welcome to The Corporate State
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KellyRyan
A micro-bio for one who has none.
05:15 PM on 10/12/2010
Add to this the closed door meetings to sell the Del Mar Fairgrounds and race track to the city of Del Mar for $120M. This property is estimated at between $800M to $1B.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mij13
They only call it class war when we fight back.
09:14 AM on 10/13/2010
That was very bad politics, and thankfully, it's not going to go through.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:17 PM on 10/12/2010
Stupid stupid stupid.
03:53 PM on 10/12/2010
is this a joke?
09:56 PM on 10/12/2010
No.It's a start.Deal with it.
08:04 AM on 10/13/2010
Forgive me if I'm misreading hostility into your short post but, the start of what, Corwin? And, what exactly is it that we're supposed to "deal" with? The taxpayers of this State own those properties, not Arnold Schwarzenegger or the legislature and we weren't informed or consulted about the sale of significant public assets to private entities. Am I understanding correctly that you don't see a problem with that?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tulsey
I was Bill Hicks.
02:45 PM on 10/12/2010
When the state is sold outright, you will be required to pay a franchise fee to use the word "California", or call yourself a "Californian".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tulsey
I was Bill Hicks.
02:41 PM on 10/12/2010
The corporatists that rammed this deal through will be long gone by the time the damage is determined, a little going away present from Arnie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Hull
Democratic Socialist
01:55 PM on 10/12/2010
Naomi Klien in Shock Doctrine talks about how Free Market economic theory ends with a state cannibalizing itself to private companies. Here is exhibit A. We are selling properties we own free and clear as taxpayers so we can pay rent on them?
This should be illegal. And may be. I say, take the money, have the next AG look at the deal, put everybody in jail and keep the loot.
08:10 AM on 10/13/2010
F&F.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ionakr
01:27 PM on 10/12/2010
It is wrong - totally wrong. Now you have to deal with a landlord who will rent to you at an very high rate or kick you out. What are they thinking? But that's right - they are not. Now you have made some rich man even richer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Callah
just another Northern Californian
01:18 PM on 10/12/2010
This is so wrong....in so many ways I can't list here, because I would be at it all day long!
What California needs to do is legalize, stop arresting and jailing people for victimless crimes, and work on "creating revenue" with business ventures, such as Liqueur/Pot stores, establish state run businesses that produce "something" plus put people to work, build solar power stations in the eastern part of the state that produces power that can be sold to residence,reorganize state government to actually "function" with people who do their jobs, and bring back CETA type positions and stop outsourcing our jobs. But no, that would make sense....right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Callah
just another Northern Californian
01:29 PM on 10/12/2010
Also, stop making misdemeanor crimes go to court three or four time before the issue is resolved. They need Magistrate Courts for traffic/victimless/misdemeanor crimes and you go to court once, and leave the felonies to the Superior Courts. Create a bigger community service program for the Magistrate Courts to use,as well as fines and tickets.
We need to rebuild California, to be a "Green" state with solar/wind, alternative materials housing to replace the crap we have all over the state. We need to create electric car/trolley systems everywhere that run on solar or bio-diesel.
But no, they say, " Let's sell off State Property and have to rent it back"....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RyanCSmith
Locke for people, Hobbes for corporations
12:55 PM on 10/12/2010
That's a really bad deal. We're going to be paying more for it over the next 20 years than we are getting out of the sale.