More

Rand Paul And Jack Conway Face Off On Spending Cuts, Education (VIDEO)


First Posted: 10/11/10 10:44 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:00 PM ET

Kentucky Senate hopefuls Jack Conway and Rand Paul faced off in their second debate Monday night, sparring on spending cuts, education, tax cuts and the role of the federal government in general. Approximately 600 people gathered in a Northern Kentucky University auditorium for the hour-long event, during which each candidate frequently accused the other of distorting his record.

SPENDING CUTS: Democrats have frequently challenged Republicans to name spending cuts to match their slash-the-deficit rhetoric, and one of the first questions of the debate challenged Paul and Conway to name three specific ways they would cut spending if elected. Paul said he supported a balanced-budget amendment, a "compromise from Republicans and Democrats that the entire budget is open" -- meaning all programs are on the table for potential cuts -- repealing the unspent TARP and stimulus funds, and eliminating waste from earmarks.

Conway countered that Paul's solutions "won't help us in the short term," pointing out that passing a balanced-budget amendment could take years. "We have to get about the business of actually balancing budgets," said Conway. "Now here's an area where Rand Paul talks the talk, but he hasn't walked the walk." Conway said he would allow Medicare to purchase in bulk, work to close "offshore tax loopholes and special interest provisions" that allow corporations to ship jobs overseas, and institute pay-as-you-go rules.

The questioner then challenged Paul to be more specific about what cuts are needed to help balance the budget. Paul pointed to $200 billion leftover in the TARP fund and $100 billion in the stimulus. He said that he would make "private workers and federal workers' salaries comparable. We currently pay twice as much to federal workers as we pay to private workers. ... That saves $47 billion a year. Let's also shrink the federal workforce." (The federal government, however, has argued that its employees make "on average 22 percent less than workers in similar private-sector jobs.")

WATCH:

TAX CUTS: Conway said he supported extending the Bush tax cuts and the estate tax. He also accused Paul of abolishing the federal Department of Agriculture, a charge the Republican denied. Paul accused Conway of flip flopping on his tax positions. In their first debate, which took place on Fox News Sunday, Paul also backed extending the Bush tax cuts, saying they wouldn't be a "cost to government."

WATCH:

SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE: Paul said that in the future, there "will have to be changes made" to Social Security and Medicare -- although not for current recipients. "We cannot stick our heads in the sand and do the same old same old," said Paul. He then took a direct swipe at Conway -- who owns a racehorse -- by saying, "Ultimately, maybe people who own a race horse or maybe people who have millions of dollars might have to pay more of the cost." Conway responded, "Rand Paul, I am sick and tired of you putting forward something so callous and acting like it's courageous. ... I don't know what he just proposed there. He talked about a race horse, but he either said he's for means-testing Medicare or he's proposing one heck of an increase in the Medicare tax."

WATCH:

NATIONAL SECURITY: Paul said that the United States should go to war "reluctantly" and "constitutionally," noting the country has not officially declared war since World War II. He said he would have voted against the Iraq war but for the invasion of Afghanistan. He called for a "national debate on how long is too long" in occupying countries. Conway said Afghanistan was the "right war" but said he didn't think President Obama made the case strong enough for the surge there.

WATCH:

EDUCATION: Conway went after Paul for his calls to abolish the Department of Education. "We need to stand up and help some of our failing schools," he said. "But I'm not -- I'm not -- for being callous and eliminating the federal Department of Education." Paul called President Bush's signature No Child Left Behind program a failure and said he is opposed to "Washington dictating" what local classrooms do. "We need to make control of our schools more local," he said. "Now some would throw up their arms and say, 'Oh my goodness, he's going to get rid of federal involvement.' There still might be student loans done at the federal level, but the thing is, should we have more control at the federal level, or less?" Conway responded by hitting Paul for saying there "might" still be federal loans, saying he would never support doing away with them.

WATCH:

*************************

The Huffington Post wants to know about all the campaign ads, debates, town halls, mailings, shenanigans, and other interesting campaign news happening by you. E-mail any tips, videos, audio, and photos to election@huffingtonpost.com.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Kentucky Senate hopefuls Jack Conway and Rand Paul faced off in their second debate Monday night, sparring on spending cuts, education, tax cuts and the role of the federal government in general. Appr...
Kentucky Senate hopefuls Jack Conway and Rand Paul faced off in their second debate Monday night, sparring on spending cuts, education, tax cuts and the role of the federal government in general. Appr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,302
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (64 total)
  1 of 17  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
murphthesurf3 10:59 PM on 10/11/2010
Just watched all of the excerpts....both comport themselves well and represent their positions with certitude and glibly.

But Paul is hog tied by his libertarian values (just as his father is) and he gets tangled up when he tries to apply its values and fundamental principles to a government structure which stands in opposition to those values and principles.

Conway also has his  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
05:59 PM on 10/13/2010
My friends say what you may in support or against to me Paul is a goof and does not make the minimum standard of the rank and status he is competing for. Not his fault it is the same case all over of GOP candidates. They do not know anything of the national issues and problems least of all they come to debate on subjects that seems to them to have fallen from the sky. What a hopeless case.

This person Paul does not understand Spending cut, tax cut, balanced budget, national security, and social security. Not only that he even could not answer to the queries raised by Journalists and his opponent but kept on repeating all nonsense like a parrot. Then what for people would vote for him to see his oily face. They would not vote for a person to see in the congress who is not fit for such a post I am sure.
03:20 PM on 10/14/2010
He understands that the status quo is unsustainable...that is more than enough to qualify him for the Senate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
08:51 PM on 10/14/2010
Hi! My Friend murpack thank you for your comment on FACTISFACT'S comment.

FACTISFACT has gone through your comment and said your opinion is only your right have and he appreciates you have one.

however, thank you once again. Take care.
02:01 PM on 10/13/2010
Help Rand Paul Save America's Billionaires and Millionaires !

Help The Republican Party Save Those Poor Billionaires

Yes, Billionaires are Suffering Today -

Their poor kids can't afford that 5th Lambergini,

They can't buy their eleventh Vacation Home,

Or that 40th $10,000 suit

and the 30th $50,000 gown is now much too expensive.

Please Help a starving Billionaire Today by voting Republican

Remember Caviar ain't cheap.

* * Please send this message all over the internet !

Howard Scott Pearlman
11:23 AM on 10/13/2010
Again, I go to the polls and am forced to vote for the lesser of two evils. I will be really glad when I can vote again for someone I believe in and want to be in office. I didn't vote for Obama because I knew it was going to be the same stuff, different party. It's hard to bring myself to vote for someone who thinks people are addicted to marijuana and is not at all who I want in office. However, you compare it to Rand Paul, who else can I vote for???

My mom always warned me that you might get what you want and it might be worse than what you had. It's unbelievable that this is my choice to replace that idiot Bunning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BarbaraTodish
10:35 AM on 10/13/2010
It would be hard to find even a few representatives, senators or even local politicians that got voted into their positions that were free from ANY co-optation! In order to even become a CANDIDATE for office they have mostly all been groomed, recruited, vetted. Unsure of the order that this takes place, if anyone knows for sure or if it varies, I would like to know. ie recruited then groomed then vetted, vetted recruited, then groomed, perhaps it is exponentially infinite groomed, groomed, vetted, recruited vetted, groomed, etc.lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IFany
move forward or die
01:23 AM on 10/13/2010
If Kentucky thinks it's poor now send this clown to the senate and you are doomed to continue to be poor. If your schools are not the greatest now elect Paul and the be even less so. For in everything he for is everything that in the end will hurt you, not the rich or the corporation, but you
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
KriTiKiT
Says"play nice"
09:55 PM on 10/12/2010
think about it... National health care would centralize the records for patients and we would be able to pin point environmental factors for cancers and weird illnesses, they would be able to slow down work IN THE NAME OF SAFETY. abolish schools you don't have people who can trace the root cause, if you cut federal wages no smart people would be inspectors for the mining industry and they mining industry would have to pay a geologist more for there work... the EPA would be able to regulate ground water, they want to pillage this country for a 70% profit margin... Ron and Rand are the worst kind of libertarians, they are the ones that don't care about people, they don't care about the environment... Just watch once they get there way they will move to the rick folks gated sanctuary and sell all land investments for mining and drilling and vanish from the government, they are the SHYLOCKs WORKING FOR THE CORPORATE MAFIA.
there antiwar positions are no different than there anti 14 amendment views, they don't want the federal government to step in on "private property rights"... they don't care about the individual the individual is different and should be evaluated as such, they don't believe we are all born as EQUAL CITIZENS...
if they where the constitutionalists they would defend citizens from the tyranny of the rich corporation.
11:07 PM on 10/12/2010
GREAT analysis. Paul's defense of BP after the spill was perfect evidence of what you are describing.

The Libertarians' "personal liberty" is just the trojan horse by which corporations try to roll back regulations that protect the people from corporate amoral rapacious behavior.
12:20 AM on 10/13/2010
We were born as equal, but we all change from there. If I decided I want to work my tail off 60-70 hours a week and really try to get ahead, does someone who is only willing to work 40 hours a week and probably not put same effort into the job while on the clock deserve to have the same level of prosperity that I do?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IFany
move forward or die
01:14 AM on 10/13/2010
The point that you have to work those many hours to get ahead is what's obscene. What people want is a quality of life not slavery. You seem to missed the point that this nation has been not corporate interest above people interest, That the quality of life for each and every citizen is important. You have the right to work yourself till your drop if that;s what you want to do, but it cannot become a mandate for the entire nation
09:21 PM on 10/12/2010
I guess Paul feels he is going to Washington with a lot of power !..............LOL...........clueless
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
08:13 PM on 10/12/2010
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/210904

Early in his campaign, Dr. Paul, the son of the uncompromising libertarian hero Ron Paul, denounced Medicare as "socialized medicine." But this spring, when confronted with the idea of reducing Medicare payments to doctors like himself — half of his patients are on Medicare — he balked. This candidate, a man ostensibly so against government power in all its forms that he wants to gut the Americans With Disabilities Act and abolish the departments of Education and Energy, was unwilling to reduce his own government compensation, for a very logical reason. "Physicians," he said, "should be allowed to make a comfortable living."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
08:06 PM on 10/12/2010
When you count the cost to taxpayers of pensions and other perks federal employees get, the make much more than private sector workers. The 22% less is only take home pay, and so it is a crock.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
08:16 PM on 10/12/2010
Most Federal workers live in expensive cities like DC, NYC or LA because that's where the Federal government is. Nearly all Federal jobs require a college degree, and many require graduate degrees.

Comparing high school graduates in Topeka to MPAs and Phds in DC is ridiculous. A GS-12 can barely afford a one-bedroom apartment in DC, since the average cost is $250k.
09:06 PM on 10/12/2010
Can a GS-12 receive the same or greater total compensation in the private sector, if so then fine, if not, let the cutting begin!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
KriTiKiT
Says"play nice"
10:03 PM on 10/12/2010
think about it... National health care would centralize the records for patients and we would be able to pin point environmental factors for cancers and weird illnesses, they would be able to slow down work IN THE NAME OF SAFETY. abolish schools you don't have people who can trace the root cause, if you cut federal wages no smart people would be inspectors for the mining industry and they mining industry would have to pay a geologist more for there work... the EPA would be able to regulate ground water, they want to pillage this country for a 70% profit margin... Ron and Rand are the worst kind of libertarians, they are the ones that don't care about people, they don't care about the environment... Just watch once they get there way they will move to the rick folks gated sanctuary and sell all land investments for mining and drilling and vanish from the government, they are the SHYLOCKs WORKING FOR THE CORPORATE MAFIA.
there antiwar positions are no different than there anti 14 amendment views, they don't want the federal government to step in on "private property rights"... they don't care about the individual the individual is different and should be evaluated as such, they don't believe we are all born as EQUAL CITIZENS...
if they where the constitutionalists they would defend citizens from the tyranny of the rich corporation.
07:46 PM on 10/12/2010
Where does Rand Paul get his numbers? I am a federal employee with a Ph.D., and I make way below 120K/year, which he says is the average annual salary for a federal employee. You'd think that with so much education, I'd be earning higher than the average federal employee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
08:09 PM on 10/12/2010
You get a pension, right? You get a lot of other benefits from working for the federal government, right?

Are they free to the taxpayer?

The answer is h*^}} no. I rest my case.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
08:16 PM on 10/12/2010
So, because private companies have eviscerated the middle class the answer is to burn down the public employees?
08:41 PM on 10/12/2010
Actually no, I don't get a pension. I have a 401K retirement plan that I contribute to but pensions were fazed out by the time I started working for the govt.

It's bizarre to rest your case when you haven't even answered the basic question that I posed.
07:34 PM on 10/12/2010
Anybody think that we have twice as many FBI agents as we need? Will the opponents of illegal immigration be happier if we cut the number of people providing enforcement in half?

Security lines at the airport too short? Let's cut the TSA workers by half.

Are we catching too MUCH e coli? Let's cut back the USDA inspectors.

Libertarian small government at work for you....
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
08:20 PM on 10/12/2010
60% of Federal workers, not counting contractors or military, work for DoD or VA. Add in the FBI, CIA, DHS and many in DoT and you have the vast majority of Federal workers dealing directly with the "War on Terror".

Bush tried to get rid of civil servants by hiring more expensive contractors, which really just diverted profits to the entrepreneurs away from the workers, saving the government nothing and handing vital security functions to companies like Blackwater.

I'm sure it's fun to bash Federal workers, but how happy will you be with cut-rate air traffic controllers, food inspectors and SEC regulators?
10:34 PM on 10/12/2010
Fan # 435. Very well said.
09:50 AM on 10/13/2010
Agencies you mentioned above can be reduced as well. In fact they can have the biggest haircut as far as I am concerned. But you seem to think that many of these time card punchers within the Fed system provide value, when in fact they do not.
09:09 PM on 10/12/2010
Anybody think that we have twice as many FBI agents as we need?
Yes

Let's cut the TSA workers by half.
Yes

Let's cut back the USDA inspectors.
Yes
10:35 PM on 10/12/2010
Move to Yemen or Somalia. You'd love the lean government there.
07:30 PM on 10/12/2010
The last time you went to renew your driver's license, did you feel the line was too short, and did you wish that there were only half the number of employees so that your wait would be twice as long? That is exactly what Rand Paul is advocating for every government service.

Every government agency has a mission of service. Every agency is the size that it is now because that is the best approximation of the size needed to provide the service to the constituents, within a reasonable budget. If you reduce the size of the workforce, you will reduce the ability of the agency to deliver the service and to fulfill the mission for which it exists.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
08:25 PM on 10/12/2010
If you start messing with the Federal government, you will lose many of the best employees who can find jobs elsewhere. This means those who inspect your food, guard the borders, control the air traffic, train the military, and arrest and prosecute interstate criminals.

Remember that the Internet was a government project and probably the most lucrative invention of the last 50 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr Anonymous
Mumpsimus, I am not entertained!
07:12 PM on 10/12/2010
If republicans are about creating jobs, why is he trying to get rid of them?
07:38 PM on 10/12/2010
Who knows?
But it sure sounds better than passing a $26 billion plan to save teacher’s jobs, invite a teacher(Amanda VanNess) to a special one day session as the House passes the bill, have her stand next to President Obama as he signed the bill in the Oval Office and end up getting laid off after 6 weeks.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703927504575540433878595318.html#articleTabs%3Darticle
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
08:25 PM on 10/12/2010
The only jobs that Republican tax cuts will create are in India and China.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
armyof14USA
Blind Trust and Loyalty are lethal combo.
05:52 PM on 10/12/2010
If Ran Paul, wants to cut federal workforce, he would considered cutting the defense budget, social security, medicare and medicate budgets because these programs are federally funded and employed thousand to administer these programs. Is this what Rand Paul is suggesting?
09:10 PM on 10/12/2010
Yes, I think he is actually. Pretty awesome!
Javalation
Laughing in a Daydream
05:42 PM on 10/12/2010
A streaker is a man who is unafraid of displaying his shortcomings to the world.