iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gap Gets Rid Of New Logo

First Posted: 10/12/2010 8:35 am Updated: 05/25/2011 6:00 pm

By Emily Fredrix, Associated Press Marketing Writer

NEW YORK (AP) -- Gap is back to blue.

The casualwear chain will keep its decades-old white-on-navy blue logo after all. The move comes just one week after the company swapped it online for a new logo without saying a word. The new logo irritated fans, spurring them to complain about it online.

Gap North America president Marka Hansen said in a statement late Monday that the San Francisco-based company realized how much people liked the old logo after they put up the new one, a white background with black letters and a little blue box. She also says Gap didn't handle the change correctly and missed a chance to have shoppers offer input until it was too late.

"There may be a time to evolve our logo, but if and when that time comes, we'll handle it in a different way," Hansen said, adding that the project was not the right one to offer up to "crowd sourcing."


Crowd sourcing the new logo, or allowing fans to help design a new one, was the company's original solution to the issue of quelling consumer confusion. Marketers are increasingly letting fans help or fully make decisions, including PepsiCo Inc.'s Doritos brand having fans create and vote on Super Bowl commercials. But a logo change left up to the crowd is much more rare.

Tell us what you think and scroll down to keep reading!

Quick Poll

Are you happy Gap dropped its new logo?

YES! It was terrible.

NO! I kind of liked it...

The new logo was still live on the website Monday, one week after the company swapped it in on gap.com. Confused fans took to Twitter, Facebook and tech blogs to complain. The company stood by the new logo, saying it would roll it out in stores and advertising next month.

The company plans to return the original logo to the website on Tuesday and is moving as quickly as it can, spokeswoman Louise Callagy said.

Gap announced the change on its Facebook page, where it has more than 700,000 fans. The old blue logo was never removed from the page.

"We've heard loud and clear that you don't like the new logo. We've learned a lot from the feedback. We only want what's best for the brand and our customers," the company said.

Fans reacted quickly and seemed relieved. One responded: "Thanks for listening. The blue box logo is truly classic. We love it as it is." Others wondered why it was even swapped out in the first place.

Originally the company had wanted the new logo to coincide with what it says was its updated image, including having more modern designs of jeans, pants and other clothing.

The company got itself into a jam by putting out the new logo without explaining the change, said Tony Spaeth, president of Identityworks, a consulting firm in Rye, N.Y. It had a reason for the change, but missed a key chance to share it with fans until it was too late.

Spaeth said he was surprised the company decided so quickly to return to the blue logo, but said it was right to admit it made a mistake both in putting up the logo and then reacting by suggesting fans help with the decision.

Logos are key to brands because they convey meaning and are something fans feel connected to. Spaeth said fans might be appeased now, but investors, competitors, and even potential employees may still be scratching their head that the company made such a mistake with something so important.

There probably will not be much long-term damage to the brand.

"They really were in big trouble," he said. "And now they have some breathing space."

Although fans be warned: The blue box will turn red for the holidays, as it has done for years.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST STYLE

Filed by Hilary Moss  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 120
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
03:50 PM on 12/01/2010
Tell Marka Hansen that the new one was lousy and the old one was well designed. Surprised that the overall lean was tasteful. Yeehah America!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
isis
Job 39:5 - Who has sent out the wild ass free?
08:27 PM on 10/29/2010
I had a family member who worked for Gap and they were a decent employer with very good benefits.
photo
moose and squirrel
Very soon we would both be completely twisted...
06:30 PM on 10/14/2010
Lousy logo. looks like a chemical company. same font as American Apparel. didnt the ad execs notice???
12:35 AM on 10/14/2010
They say there is no such thing as bad publicity. "Indie thinker" might be right that it was just a publicity stunt. I heard someone on the radio say that it looked like a financial firm logo. I can kind of see that. Do you think it was a publicity stunt, and if not, did you like the logo. I created a survey to get peoples thoughts. Check it out if you want to vote http://www.interaskit.com/viewPublicPoll.php?PollID=666
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnaBohemia
Ask a Latina
08:21 PM on 10/13/2010
GAP shares are down. No one I know cares what GAP does with their logos OR their stores.
02:41 PM on 10/13/2010
"Many industries have made good use of the intrinsic belief that blue represents constancy, quality and achievement. It is the #1 choice for use in corporate branding and identification. The constant challenge of such pervasive use of the color is to keep it looking fresh." Color: Messages and Meanings by Leatrice Eiseman
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drjay79
11:16 AM on 10/13/2010
So Gap is making so much money they had extra to spend on a new logo?
photo
playsindirt
So much dirt, so little time.
08:45 AM on 10/13/2010
I know I'm going to get hammered for this comment but I live in the midwest and I used to by my kids GAP all the time. When they hit middle school, they refused to wear the brand because they said it stood for "gay and proud." They're now ymen and still won't wear GAP. GAP has had problems for a while now and you have to wonder if this could be part of the problem. I know it's stupid but kids have a HUGE impact on the retail market. Food for thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drjay79
11:14 AM on 10/13/2010
Time to set your kids down for a talk.
photo
playsindirt
So much dirt, so little time.
11:34 AM on 10/13/2010
Oh we had the talk and today he has a lot of gay friends and it's a non-issue thankfully. But when he was a 12-year-old and he came home from middle school freaking out because he wore a GAP hoodie to school and got taunted for it we did stop buying GAP merchandise.
photo
MarsAmbassador
Per angusta ad augusta
01:08 AM on 10/13/2010
Talk about creating a straw man. They threaten to push someone out of a boat, they decide not to and the people thank them for saving their life. Ridiculous. What an obvious ploy. Create brand defense by threatening to change it, thus renewing brand loyalty in apathetic consumer base. I saw through their smokescreen after reading the article headline, for crying out loud.
09:32 PM on 10/12/2010
I apologize for my comment at 9:31 PM. Put it in the wrong thread.
09:31 PM on 10/12/2010
Read what Ritholz writes. Keep a copy, it's that good.

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/10/why-foreclosure-fraud-is-so-dangerous-to-property-rights/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Indie thinker
07:23 PM on 10/12/2010
This all seems like a very clever publicity stunt. Wow...cheap advertisement. The Gap knew that that logo was too cheesy looking.
photo
MarsAmbassador
Per angusta ad augusta
01:08 AM on 10/13/2010
Totally
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmeaki
06:15 PM on 10/12/2010
"The new logo irritated fans, spurring them to complain about it online."

Get an effing life!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:35 PM on 10/12/2010
The Gap THRIVES on SWEATSHOP LABOR in India.

Workers/Slaves are being paid .39 cents per hour and putting in 16 hour days 7 days a week and NO OVER-TIME PAID.

Enjoy your new garment at the expense of the plight of others.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:28 PM on 10/12/2010
Don't wear clothes showing the brand name/label... you're being turned into a walking ad and paying for it, not paid for it.