iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Secret Donations Could Haunt 2012

First Posted: 10/13/10 04:04 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:00 PM ET

Money

Republicans, buoyed this fall by freelance groups spending secret donations on TV ads, should fear what comes next: an especially vicious GOP presidential race in 2012 fueled, ironically, by that same kind of cash.

In other words, the Swift Boaters of '04 could be back in '12 -- this time torpedoing potential Republican nominees -- while President Obama can stay safely ashore.

Hard-core conservative "independent" money, roaming the landscape for contenders to attack, could play havoc; so, too, could hidden money from the left, moving by stealth to cripple electable candidates.

"All of the infrastructure of these shadow parties will be established and in place," said Evan Tracey of the Campaign Media Analysis Group. "They'll be tempted to pick a side, pick a candidate, and get involved."

For now, the Supreme Court rulings on campaign finance have done what they were expected to do: give Republicans a huge boost -- nearly a 9-1 cash advantage in independent spending, according to Tracey.

Corporations are funneling money into trade associations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce -- a fact that President Obama is noting at every campaign stop.

But the bulk of the action -- and money -- tends to involve individual, high-rolling conservative donors who stayed away from the action in 2006 and 2008.

Now they are back, and in greater numbers, according to a top campaign-finance lawyer, who declined to be named because he may advise a candidate.

There are questions about whether high rollers, secret or not, would want to get involved in GOP intramurals -- even at presidential level. "These are guys who want to be in the inner circle," said the lawyer. "If you're 'independent,' you have to stay on the outside."

No one expects Karl Rove, the hub of the wheel of independent GOP spending, to choose sides in the GOP primary early on -- let alone lead an independent campaign for or against a presidential contender.

But many of the donors -- and others -- may well feel differently. Conservative cash supporting Tea Party candidates will see no reason to rest once the congressional campaign has ended -- and the more established contenders may hope that friends will defend them.

"I could see a Mormon-Harvard-Bain Capital coalition getting out there to defend Mitt Romney even before he is attacked," said Tracey. It's a potential gold mine for an enterprising "independent" consultant. (I wouldn't be surprised if some guy with a Power Point isn't on his way to Boston even as I write.)

Still, most of the freelance -- and freewheeling -- cash will be of the attack variety, making the points that the candidate himself cannot make, or afford to be seen making.

The most infamous example is President George W. Bush. Given his own military record, he didn't dare attack Sen. John F. Kerry on that score.

That's what the Swift Boat ads were for in 2004. In 2012, there will be oceans of cash, mostly from "undisclosed" donors, available for Republicans to swift-boat each other.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Republicans, buoyed this fall by freelance groups spending secret donations on TV ads, should fear what comes next: an especially vicious GOP presidential race in 2012 fueled, ironically, by that same...
Republicans, buoyed this fall by freelance groups spending secret donations on TV ads, should fear what comes next: an especially vicious GOP presidential race in 2012 fueled, ironically, by that same...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,277
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
02:41 PM on 10/14/2010
I'm starting a market that trades in candidate derivatives. "Naked shorts" are encouraged.
photo
Core-Sample
Not on the rug, man....
11:28 AM on 10/14/2010
The only thing new about this is that it's on the news. GOP = corrupt, secret donations. Always has.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
10:57 AM on 10/14/2010
The whole idea of throwing money at our candidates seems to cheapen our political system ultimately every American that votes is in control that election day, but here is the real influence of foreign money contributions if it gets turned into a donor benefiting the candidate, in other words sending jobs to that country for cheap labor, that turns into idol factories and no jobs in America!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Progress08
I've come to regard you as people I've met
10:55 AM on 10/14/2010
We pledge allegiance to the profit and to the exceses for which it stands
One business plan under Reagan, unpenetrable with equality and rights for us alone

Well, at least Wall Street dodged a bullet. When the molotovs fly they'll fly into chamber of commerce windows first.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
10:43 AM on 10/14/2010
why is this different than it has always been? so the unions get a pass and now others play by their rules and this is news? 2012 will be its own stimulus package for tv and radio. we will really need it by then.
photo
Buford2k10
Hair today, gone tomorrow
10:23 AM on 10/14/2010
Where are the checks and balances in our government? Will the next Congress do something about the Supreme Court's obviously incorrect Citizen's United decision? That decision should be the most talked about in ALL of the campaigns happening right now. Are the American people so duped by the insane rhetoric of both parties? Where is the media? Where are those talking heads, with the fact checkers? The dumbing down of America has been successful, thanks to anti-education republican party. The tea partiers are really pushing the anti-education agenda. I'm sorry America, I have not been there to defend and defeat the enemy from within.
photo
M33TBallz
IMHO, SYPH
10:31 AM on 10/14/2010
The "check" is in the "balance" owned by unscrupulous campaigners.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MadMoll
10:43 AM on 10/14/2010
The check got lost in the mail.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
samtee
Shankapotomus.
10:10 AM on 10/14/2010
Welcome aboard Howard. I've always enjoyed your to-the-point analysis. Glad you are here.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
02:46 PM on 10/14/2010
Right, he's a keeper, true "fair and balanced". I've criticized HuffPost for lack of experienced political analysts, too much Progressive advocacy, wonder if they actually heard me. Good catch HuffPost.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nana-anne
just trying to make sense of the senseless
10:03 AM on 10/14/2010
Howard Fineman has so much more vetted info than anyone making comment on this story. His opinions are based on his thorough research and verification of fact. The Supreme Court decision is coming back to bite the conservative pro justices in the robes and to pollute the political process on both sides of the isle. When Corporations with or without foreign ties, can influence an election it screams fraud, even with the SC's imprimatur. It does not make Americans sleep easier knowing that elections can be bought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
10:06 AM on 10/14/2010
nana....agreed...F&F....read my TWO posts on this page.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:03 AM on 10/14/2010
First, its great to see Howard Fineman working for the Huffington Post. Congratulations Howard! Your article on political contributions from behind the curtain is right on target. The GOP freakos on the Supreme Court are stacking the deck against the Democratic Party and in the short run the GOP are the clear winners financially. But it could certainly backfire on them and hopefully it will. America is about the completely ruin their future if they vote Republican in a couple of weeks. But since they only listen to Fox News, they are like mushrooms, all in the dark! Sad, how this once great country is rapidly turning into a third world country right before our very eyes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
11:01 AM on 10/14/2010
SCOTUS stacked the deck against the American voter, period.

We no longer have much of a say in anything. No pay, no play.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark A Campbell
11:21 AM on 10/14/2010
"GOP freakos...."

"America is about the completely ruin their future [sic] if they vote Republican..."

"But since they only listen to Fox News, they are like mushrooms, all in the dark!"

Is this what passes for legitimate comment on this site?
03:38 PM on 10/14/2010
Well, .. yes! This forum is but a microcosm of the self-anointed, omniscient intelligentsia in print. Aren't you impressed? [sic]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaseyBabes
10:00 AM on 10/14/2010
Indeed, contributions from furtive sources to both political parties is/are a serious problem. Whether it be from foreigners outside of the USA,s borders or from within,the focus seems to be from outside. This is short sighted. Focus should also include monies gleaned from foreign workers within the country, particularly, specifically, from those undocumented workers paying Union dues to maintain their employment. There's the rub, as Unions give exclusively to Democratic candidates through their aggressively active political action offices functioning in large respects from funds of illegal immigrants. How to determine this? Merely check the employment roles of SEIU as one example.

Independent and a Tea Party supporter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oldchef
Former Executive Chef, tr0ll watcher
11:26 AM on 10/14/2010
Unions list their donors, small amounts from actual working people. Where's your proof of "functioning in large respects from funds of illegal immigrants"? Are you suggesting that unions are all or mostly illegal immigrants? Cite proofs please about SEIU. I think you're watching too much FAUX News.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaseyBabes
08:44 AM on 10/15/2010
To borrow a phrase from chief adviser to the President, Axelrod, "prove they're not."

Gee, FAUX News, how profound.
MarkInTexas
Moderate is the new liberal.
09:59 AM on 10/14/2010
Our government has been bought and paid for. "We The People" is but a quaint memory of a bygone era.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
10:10 AM on 10/14/2010
MarklnTexas...agreed F&F... "The best Govt. Corporations can buy"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaseyBabes
10:11 AM on 10/14/2010
Ditto. F&F.
photo
Ragnar Danneskjold
Defender of Liberty
09:57 AM on 10/14/2010
Obama, the KING of secret donors had over 3 million of them in 2008 and he did not disclose them. This is just more evidence the Democrats hate competition on a level playing field. Epic FAIL. Is this the best you've got?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Majestry
Every man is the artisan of his own fortune
10:21 AM on 10/14/2010
Yes, those secret donations of less than $200.
photo
Ragnar Danneskjold
Defender of Liberty
10:38 AM on 10/14/2010
How many of those $200 donations were made by straws inserted by one donor?
photo
M33TBallz
IMHO, SYPH
10:27 AM on 10/14/2010
"Epic fail", thats CHAN talk. Makes a person appear very adolescent when used in a forum such as this.
photo
Ragnar Danneskjold
Defender of Liberty
10:38 AM on 10/14/2010
And how do you feel about the use of "Teabagger"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:52 AM on 10/14/2010
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs has been leading the charge against the Chamber, citing what he called "the spirit of disclosure" when telling CBS' Mark Knoller this earlier this week:

"I think it's important when you don't know - when you don't know who those people are, when you don't know what their agenda is. I think as the president has said that it is a threat very fundamentally to our democracy."

But what makes it so infuriating to watch Gibbs make this argument is that Gibbs himself -- back in 2003 and 2004 -- was heavily involved in exactly the same kind of anonymous-funded negative campaign the Chamber is running now, when the brand-new advocacy group for which he was the spokesman invoked the same excuses as the Chamber is invoking now to conceal its donors.

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/10/13/gibbs/index.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
09:48 AM on 10/14/2010
January 21, 2010 will go down as a dark day in history of American democracy, and its decline. The editors of the New York Times did not exaggerate when they wrote that Supreme Court decision that day "strikes at the heart of democracy" by having "paved the way for corporations to use their vast treasuries to overwhelm elections and intimidate elected officials into doing their bidding" -- more explicitly, for permitting corporate managers to do so, since current laws permit them to spend shareholder money without consent.
Nor does Michael Waldman, executive director of the Brennan Center for Justice at N.Y.U. School of Law, exaggerate when he writes that this exercise of the radical judicial activism that the rightwing claims to deplore "matches or exceeds Bush v. Gore in ideological or partisan overreaching by the court. In that case, the court reached into political process to hand the election to one candidate. Today it reached into political process to hand unprecedented power to corporations."

The Court was split, with the four reactionary judges (misleadingly called "conservative") joined by Justice Kennedy in a 5-4 decision. Chief Justice Roberts selected a case that could easily have been settled on narrow grounds, and maneuvered the Court into using it for a far-reaching decision that overturned precedents going back a century that restrict corporate contributions to federal campaigns.

the decision permits corporate managers to buy elections directly, instead of using more complex indirect means,
Chomsky”
MarkInTexas
Moderate is the new liberal.
09:56 AM on 10/14/2010
Good point about the "reactionary" judges. A true conservative would not have ruled that way. Labels such as conservative or liberal lost their orginal meaning years ago.
10:09 AM on 10/14/2010
If any of us think that the bumbling of the oath to Obama by Roberts was unintentional, we have lost our minds. It was a direct sign to the right, that no matter, there would never be another black president to worry about, and that he personally would take this President down. He has accomplished part of it. I think he is reprehensible. There is no love lost between the two. I just hope Obama can weather this storm.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wollstonecraft
Self-described liberal, and proud of it.
10:18 AM on 10/14/2010
Fanned, muck-raker. This is a terrific comment. Please keep them coming.