More

Social Security COLA 2011: Cost Of Living Adjustment Not Coming

STEPHEN OHLEMACHER   10/15/10 09:05 PM ET   AP

Social Security Cola
Stella Wehrly, left, speaks during an interview as her husband Hank Wehrly looks on, at the St. Andrews Estates North retirement community, Monday, Oct. 11, 2010 in Boca Raton, Fla. Seniors prepared to cut back on everything from food to charitable donations to whiskey as the news spread Monday that they will have to wait until at least 2012 to see their Social Security checks increase. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee)

WASHINGTON — Another year without an increase in Social Security retirement and disability benefits is creating a political backlash that has President Barack Obama and Democrats pushing to give a $250 bonus to each of the program's 58 million recipients.

The Social Security Administration said Friday inflation has been too low since the last increase in 2009 to warrant a raise for 2011. The announcement marks only the second year without an increase since automatic adjustments for inflation were adopted in 1975. This year was the first.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi promised to schedule a vote after the Nov. 2 election on a bill to provide one-time $250 payments to Social Security recipients. Obama endorsed the payment, which would be similar to one included in his economic recovery package last year.

Obama had pushed for a second payment last fall, but the proposal failed in the Senate when a dozen Democrats joined Republicans on a procedural vote to block it. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Friday that in the post-election session "I will be working hard to gain Senate passage for a proposal that ensures that America's seniors are treated fairly."

Michael Steel, a spokesman for House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio, said that if Democrats were serious about a bonus, they would have voted on it before lawmakers went home to campaign for re-election.

Barbara Kennelly, a former Democratic congresswoman from Connecticut, applauded Pelosi's promise to vote on the payments. But, she said, she doesn't understand why Congress didn't vote on the bill before recessing for an election in which Democrats are in danger of losing their majorities in both the House and Senate.

"I just don't understand it," said Kennelly, now president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. "I don't care, Republican or Democrat, they say they care about the senior vote. They could've done it."

Annual cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs, are automatically set each year by an inflation measure that was adopted by Congress in the 1970s. Friday's announcement was triggered by the Labor Department's release of inflation numbers for September. The report showed that consumer prices are still lower than they were two years ago, when the last COLA was awarded.

The increase for 2009 was 5.8 percent, the largest in 27 years. It was triggered by a sharp but short-lived spike in energy prices to above $4 a gallon in the summer of 2008. When the price of gasoline later fell – to below $2 a gallon – so did the overall inflation rate. Seniors, however, kept their increase in benefits.

"They received a nearly 6 percent COLA for inflation that no longer really existed," said Andrew Biggs, a former deputy commissioner at the Social Security Administration and now a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. "It looks bad, but they're actually not being treated unfairly."

By law, the next increase in benefits won't come until consumer prices as a whole rise above what they were in the summer of 2008. The trustees who oversee Social Security project that will happen next year. They predict the increase at the start of 2012 will be 1.2 percent.

A little more than 58.7 million retirees, disabled Americans and surviving spouses and minor children of enrollees receive Social Security or Supplemental Security Income. Social Security was the primary source of income for 64 percent of retirees who got benefits in 2008.

The average Social Security benefit: $1,072 a month.

Social Security is supported by a 6.2 percent payroll tax – paid by both workers and employers – on wages up to $106,800. Because there is no COLA, that amount will remain unchanged for 2011.

The absence of inflation will be of small comfort to many older Americans whose savings and home values haven't recovered from the recession.

"They are absolutely livid that Congress has bailed out banks, bailed out Wall Street, bailed out big car manufacturers and they didn't get a COLA," said Mary Johnson, a policy analyst for the Senior Citizens League. "Their costs are going up, and they cannot understand the government's measure of inflation. They feel it's rigged."

Betty Dizik, a retired tax preparer and social worker from Tamarac, Fla., said an increase in benefits would help her pay for medicine she can no longer afford to treat her kidney disease. At 83, her only source of income is a $1,200 monthly payment from Social Security.

"I think seniors are going to be upset because gas has gone up, food has gone up, things in the store are expensive to buy," Dizik said. "Let's face it, prices are rising and I don't know how they do the cost of living."

Claire Edelman of Monroe Township, N.J., said she was so hard up that at the age of 83 she applied for a temporary job as a census taker for the 2010 Census. She didn't get the job, so she gets by on a small pension from her job with the state and a monthly Social Security payment of $1,060.

"I can't understand why the Congress hasn't seen that there's been an increase in everything," Edelman said. "They say that nothing went up last year?" she added. "What's the matter with them?" ___

Online: http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cola/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Another year without an increase in Social Security retirement and disability benefits is creating a political backlash that has President Barack Obama and Democrats pushing to give...
WASHINGTON — Another year without an increase in Social Security retirement and disability benefits is creating a political backlash that has President Barack Obama and Democrats pushing to give...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 839
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Cacey 12:39 PM on 10/15/2010
This is especially damaging to those seniors on social security who, no longer being able to afford the high cost of living in the US, have opted to move abroad to live a decent life. Add to this the declining value of the dollar and it has been truly damaging for the litterally hundreds of thousands of olderAmericans living abroad. The irony is that most don't rely on Meidicare but on local medical care  Read More...
05:53 PM on 12/08/2010
NOW, I'm saying this to the middle aged and elderly, they "celebrated" Pearl Harbor Day, yesterday and cut off a measley $250.00 today; that's money that could have paid for ONE of your prescriptions, or maybe 1/3 of your heating bill. What do they think of Pearl Harbor? or Vietnam, for those in my age group? THAT'S WHAT THEY REALLY THINK OF YOU!!! LEARN NEW TRICKS, CENSURE THE TEA PARTY .
3 m
08:57 AM on 12/01/2010
OIC congress is getting a $3,000 a year cost of living raise but seniors cannot get the customary 2.1 percent on a average SS income of 990 a month, lets see a whole 10 a month but NO.

Obama spends 1 million dollars a week to feed lunch to the white house, only the best. He just spent how many billion taking how many thousands overseas a day? But senior do not get a raise because we got a large one two years ago? So basically that was a lie as they are taking it back.

People.... Obama wants us dead. Raising SS to 69 years old hoping we are before we get what we have worked for, cutting Medicare which is the worst insurance in the United States and now being forced to pay for prescriptions by the IRS or have our checks garnished. Yes the IRS now in charge of all medical insurance when the new law goes in affect. Its time to stop this insanity. We need to exert our consitutional rights to revolt. Nothing less will work.
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
09:30 AM on 10/18/2010
What it amounts to is that they don't want to pay us back for stealing what we worked for and gave them in good faith.
More fools we.
Nonetheless, They are playing with the lives of a very large block of citizens at their peril.
It doesn't matter if our votes don't count or if they do.
Using SS & SSI as a political football is really playing with fire.
They've ripped US off enough.
This BS with the deficit commission only concentrating on the most helpless in a broken society and then the Dems promising to deal with it "when they are re-elected" sounds like another "Charlie Brown and Lucy with the football" moment; like the Public Option.

The gov has already wrecked Medicare and Medicaid by privatizing them so you can't even find doctors to take it anymore.
Now, they put all the things we have to spend the $$ we live on into an actuarial table which excludes them from the COLA.
Sweet, HUH?

But, somehow, there's always another COLA for congress....they just work so hard, you know. Last year, while we didn't get anything but a sharp stick in the eye, Congress gave themselves another $5000.00 a year for "inflation".

I think the whole thing just shows how little our government cares about ANY of it's citizens
09:09 AM on 12/01/2010
And concerning this $250 Stimulus. Its not going to happen just like last year. They waited until May to vote it down. Seniors waited 6 months hoping to get this some to eat, pay their utilities etc..

We are being murdered plain and simple. What is happening to seniors is a crime. More and more people are walking around without teeth in pain as there is no dental coverage anywhere for seniors anymore and everything has gone up, but we do not get even a few dollars a month. Something is horribly wrong.

Why are they picking on the people who paid for them to be where they are today? I am glad I am at the last of my days, and the young now who think its all so far away, wake up and start fighting for us oldies now, as you are us in a minute or so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
12:48 AM on 10/17/2010
We simply cannot let the old people get in the way of shiny new weapons systems. There's an entire third world out there that needs to submit to the Empire.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pyro
Fire in the kilns, lets fill all empty bowls.
09:28 PM on 10/16/2010
No cost of living increase last year. No cost of living increase this year.

Also, they are doing reviews all of a sudden on the disabled. Lawyers doctors and judges already decided our disability cases. Many years ago for many, including myself. But still a review. Maybe I got better? Maybe I've learned some new tricks, like how to wash dishes in a restaurant with my feet? Oh wait, I can't stand for more than a hour at a time. No matter, maybe someone will hire me dig ditches on my knees.

This is disgusting what they are doing. They are terrifying the most helpless in our society. I'm coming to loath these people. They are acting like monsters.
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
09:33 AM on 10/18/2010
No surprised since SSI comes out of tax revenues and since they sent all the jobs overseas.....................
If Reagan could throw the mentally disable out in the streets to fend for themselves, why no the physically disabled? And Obama admires Reagan so very much,you know.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pyro
Fire in the kilns, lets fill all empty bowls.
11:12 AM on 10/18/2010
There is no one left to vote for. I give up.
06:47 PM on 10/16/2010
Help Karl Rove Save America’s Billionaires and Millionaires !

Help The Republican Party Save Those Poor Billionaires

Yes, Billionaires are Suffering Today -

Their poor kids can’t afford that 5th Lambergini,

They can’t buy their eleventh Vacation Home,

Or that 40th $10,000 suit

and the 30th $50,000 gown is now much too expensive.

Please Help a starving Billionaire Today by voting Republican

Remember Caviar ain’t cheap.

* * Please send this message all over the internet !

Howard Scott Pearlman
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
idisVA
06:13 PM on 10/16/2010
COLA or no COLA, Texas Republican candidate Bill Flores said you will work until you are 70.
He said but don't blame him because it was all a mistake..you see had a 'headache' when he said it. Republicans never cease to amaze.
========================================================
Rep Chet Edwards (D-Tex.), one of the most endangered House Democrats in the land, got a much-needed break this week when Bill Flores, his GOP rival, first suggested he'd be open to raising the Social Security retirement age to 70 and then sought to explain away his remarks by saying he had been suffering from "a headache" when he made them.
05:32 PM on 10/16/2010
Quick Answers to Questions about Social Security: # 10 of 10 questions:

Developed to accompany, Social Security Finances: Social Security Brief #34, August 5, 2010 National Academy of Social Insurance:

10.How is Social Security different from a Ponzi scheme?

The perpetrator of a Ponzi scheme lies to investors. Social Security is open and transparent. Its trustees update the 75-year projections every year to assess its future. Unlike the rest of the government, it cannot deficit spend. It is a model of planning and fiscal responsibility. As an intergenerational compact in which each generation of workers helps to support themselves, their predecessors, and those who will come after, it is the opposite of a Ponzi scheme.

http://www.nasi.org/research/2010/quick-answers-common-questions-about-social-security
05:30 PM on 10/16/2010
Quick Answers to Questions about Social Security: # 8, & 9 of 10 questions:

Developed to accompany, Social Security Finances: Social Security Brief #34, August 5, 2010 National Academy of Social Insurance:

8. Social Security is going to spend more money this year on benefits than it will collect in taxes. Doesn’t that mean the system is going broke?

No. Unlike the early 1980s, and despite the current deep recession, Social Security is continuing to build reserves for the future through interest on its reserves. The reserves are projected to increase from $2.5 trillion at the end of 2009 to $2.6 trillion by the end of 2010. As in previous recessions, with more people out of work or retiring earlier than planned, contributions from wages decline while benefit payments increase. The program is responding in a counter-cyclical way, as it was designed to do. Social Security is not going broke. It will weather this recession.


9. Everybody talks about how Social Security was saved in 1983. Didn’t they know that baby boomers would retire and the system would run in the red again?

Yes. The 1983 amendments addressed an urgent short-term financing problem. Those amendments also improved the long-term financial picture, but did not do the entire job.
05:27 PM on 10/16/2010
Quick Answers to Questions about Social Security: # 7 of 10 questions:

Developed to accompany, Social Security Finances: Social Security Brief #34, August 5, 2010 National Academy of Social Insurance:

7.Suppose I think I can do a better job than Social Security by keeping my payroll taxes and investing them myself? What’s wrong with that?

First, if you fail, you become a ward of the State and others will have to pay for your improvidence and for any consequent needs of your family. Second, you would need a great deal of savings to buy an annuity (a private insurance policy giving you guaranteed monthly payments) worth as much as a typical Social Security benefit. For example, to buy an annuity at age 62 that would match the average retirement benefit ($1,170 in 2010), keep up with inflation, and continue to pay your widowed spouse, you would need to pay about $385,000 up front in a lump sum (TSP 2010). In addition, if you had young children, you would need to buy over $450,000 in life insurance and over $450,000 in disability insurance at age 30 to match Social Security’s family protections (Nichols 2008). Very few people are able to amass those savings because most risks in our economy are beyond the control of individual workers. Third, Social Security is valuable because it is insurance. Savings can’t pool risks like insurance does. Finally, Social Security is secure. It has never missed a payment and is immune to market risks.
05:24 PM on 10/16/2010
Quick Answers to Questions about Social Security: 5&6 of 10 questions:

Developed to accompany, Social Security Finances: Social Security Brief #34, August 5, 2010 National Academy of Social Insurance:

5-Wasn’t the money in the trust fund used to pay for other things, like tax cuts and wars?

The Treasury bonds held by the Social Security trust funds represent a loan to the rest of the government. The bonds also represent a firm obligation for the General Fund to pay the money back when it is needed to pay benefits. The question highlights the fact that the current federal budget deficit is due to a severe imbalance in the General Fund, not in Social Security funds.

6.Are Social Security benefits paid to undocumented immigrants (“illegal aliens”)?

No. Undocumented immigrants are not eligible for Social Security benefits. Only citizens and legal residents are eligible.
07:37 PM on 10/16/2010
Thank you, carolina919. You should send question #5 and the answer to Sharon Angle's staff since she quoted the usual myth about the General Fund to Harry Reid.
07:51 PM on 10/16/2010
As a matter of fact, I think I will. But it sort of bothers me more that Democrats and what's left of the moderate Republicans in this country aren't quick to respond. If you like the Soc Sec brief from NASI you might also like to see how the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities "graphs" the various elements of our debt. Right now we're converting the "share" of our debt into that equation that purports to show the debt burden per capita....It really is a pretty "telling" picture... http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036
05:21 PM on 10/16/2010
Quick Answers to Questions about Social Security: 3&4 of 10 questions:

Developed to accompany, Social Security Finances: Social Security Brief #34, August 5, 2010 National Academy of Social Insurance:

3.Will anybody who is under 50 years old ever get Social Security benefits?

Yes, they will. In the unlikely case that Congress did not act in the next 25 years, Social Security would still pay all scheduled benefits until 2037 and it could pay about three-fourths of benefits thereafter. With minor changes, it will pay all benefits for the next 75 years.

4.Why should rich people get Social Security benefits? Why not keep it just for people who need it?

First, the genius of Social Security is that it is NOT based on a test of means. You don’t have to prove you have low income and few assets in order to get it. Programs based on a means test discourage savings because the more you save, the less you get from the program. Second, Social Security is not welfare – it is insurance. Workers and their employers buy coverage through their contributions. When an insured event occurs – disability, retirement, or death of the worker – the program pays benefits to the insured person or their survivors. Third, denying benefits to the very rich would have a minimal impact on SocSec finances – ... would make it more like welfare. Finally, benefits paid to high-income people are subject to income taxes that come back to Social Security.
05:18 PM on 10/16/2010
It will only get worse for Seniors. The GOP is committed to Foreign corporations and $$$ interests. They have zero interest in seniors or the sagging middle class. They care ONLY about their personal wallets. They are committed to destroying the people so that they alone can profit. They want to abolish social security, medicare, minimum wage and create a new slave society and they pray we all will die younger so that no one need insurance nor help.

Shame on the GOP for what they have turned into in these last 15 years. They are now the most disgusting group I have yet to see.

Ms Snowe that you remain a member of this party establishes that you now lack a conscience as well and can no longer be regarded as moderate or reasonable
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HopeR
10:25 PM on 10/16/2010
Let's call the GOP IT from now on and make them what they should be in our minds: faceless, nameless, shameless and egregious scrooges who will eventually reap what they sow. Some day they will have to die also.

Alex Spanos who is on the Fortune 500 list now sits with Alzheimer's in his home in Stockton, CA. My cousin was friends with his sister whom he disinherited because she did not marry a Greek. He made his money off of poor Mexican illegal immigrants way back in the 60s. They paid him for their lunches and with that money, he went and bought them the food that is rotting out in back of supermarkets. He gave them scraps. And now Alex Spanos sits with his mind wandering and his eyes vacant! No one is immune to Karma. NO ONE!
05:15 PM on 10/16/2010
Quick Answers to Common Questions about Social Security: 1&2 of 10

Developed to accompany, Social Security Finances: Findings of the 2010 Trustees Report
Social Security Brief #34, August 5, 2010 National Academy of Social Insurance:

1- Isn’t all the money in the trust fund just worthless IOUs?

No. The $2.5 trillion held by the Social Security trust fund is invested in special U.S. Treasury bonds. In world financial markets, Treasury bonds are considered a very safe investment.

2.People live a lot longer than they did when Social Security was created in 1935. Why not raise the age for getting benefits to 70 to keep the system financially sound?

Increasing the age to 70 saves about a third of the money needed to balance income and outgo over the long term (Reno & Lavery 2009). Some cautions about that policy are: (a) low income workers, those in physically demanding jobs and some minority populations have shorter life expectancies; (b) it is not clear that jobs will be available for millions more workers in their late 60s; (c) it is a benefit cut for all, and one that particularly affects groups that rely heavily on Social Security. It would cut benefits for today’s 25 year-olds by about 19% (Weller 2005).
-fourths of benefits thereafter. With minor changes, Social Security will pay all benefits for the next 75 years.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
11:08 PM on 10/16/2010
...' 1- Isn’t all the money in the trust fund just worthless IOUs?

No. The $2.5 trillion held by the Social Security trust fund is invested in special U.S. Treasury bonds. In world financial markets, Treasury bonds are considered a very safe investment...'
There is not any monetary value for the 2.5 trillion in 'special' US bonds. No one can buy any of those bonds... they can't be traded. The $2.5 trillion is a promise made by the US govt that they will raise that money some how..even if they need to raise taxes to pay for it.
SS and medicare have approx $$100 trillion of these unfunded promises.
05:08 PM on 10/16/2010
As Daniel Patrick Moynihan so aptly observed: "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."

For all the "heat" being generated in this discussion perhaps now might be a good time to start with some facts. There's a "user friendly", comprehesive and highly readable document that should be required reading for all of us. Check out Social Security Brief #34,
Developed to accompany the report, Social Security Finances: Findings of the 2010 Trustees -a Report published just this year on August 5, 2010 by The National Academy of Social Insurance which is a nonpartisan organization made up of the nation's leading experts on social insurance.

http://www.nasi.org/research/2010/quick-answers-common-questions-about-social-security