iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Luxury Sales Rebound To Pre-Crisis Levels

COLLEEN BARRY   10/17/10 07:10 PM ET   AP

Luxury Goods

MILAN — The luxury sector is rebounding better-than-expected this year thanks in large part to wealthy Americans replenishing their wardrobes after a year of self-denial and nouveau riche Chinese indulging in a worldwide spending spree, according to a new study released Monday.

Sales of designer clothes, fine leather goods, jewelry, watches and other indulgences around the globe is forecast to surge 10 percent to euro168 billion ($236.7 billion) in 2010, recovering from a disastrous 2009 when sales declined 8 percent to euro153 billion, Bain & Co. said in its annual review of the sector commissioned by Italy's Fondazione Altagamma association of high-end producers.

"It is really impressive how customers have rebounded in their approach to these purchases, in particular in the United States and in Europe," said Bain partner and luxury goods expert Claudia D'Arpizio.

Sales in the U.S. market were up by 12 percent, compared with 6 percent growth in Europe and 22 percent growth in Asia, Bain said.

Leather goods, the only category to hold steady during last year's dramatic declines, is expected to grow by 16 percent to euro43 billion, while apparel, the leading sector, grew by 8 percent to euro45 billion.

The holiday season will solidify the results, and Bain is allowing for a final tally of 9 percent growth for modest increases and 11 percent if shoppers come out strong. Growth will cool in 2011 to 3 percent to 5 percent due to the likely continued lowering of the dollar against the euro and the strength of this year's sales.

Asian luxury sales were powered by China where sales grew by a whopping 30 percent and poising China to become the third largest luxury market in five years. Japan recorded a 1 percent contraction.

But the real story in Asia are the Chinese tourists, who have extended their spending-fueled travels beyond Asia.

"The big surprise of the last few years are the Chinese. ... Now they are very visible in Europe and also the United States. They are traveling all over the world," D'Arpizio said.

Bain figures show luxury goods sales in airports and airlines are expected to total euro16 billion in 2010, a sign that high-end travel is on the uptick. D'Arpizio said that reflected a strong impact from "new" Chinese tourists.

Larger brands are doing better than smaller ones, having had the scale to weather the crisis and invest in new products to draw customers back in. The weakness of smaller brands is expected to lead to a period of consolidation in the sector, with bigger brands buying up smaller ones and forming new groups, D'Arpizio said.

And menswear sales are growing faster than womenswear. Men are the driving luxury sales in emerging markets, with women following, while in mature markets men's shopping habits are starting to mimic that of women, D'Arpizio said. And no longer are men's purchases relegated to special occasion tuxedos or watches.

"We call it the feminization of society. Men are less conservative around fashion, they browse more on the Net to find their favorite brands and production, they are more educated and more knowledgeable," D'Arpizio said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 628
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluepond
person
04:27 PM on 10/19/2010
The rich can't consume enough to help the rest of us. Frankly, I don't care if they keep their bloody cash, it is all they have. We should turn our backs and shun most of them, unless they open their fists and their hearts. We can create our own economy without them. They surely don't need us anymore, having outsourced both production and consumption.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:55 AM on 10/19/2010
Immediately after the invasion of South Korea by North Korea President Truman immediately went to Congress and had across the board tax increases including graduated income, corporate and other taxes. The only regressive tax was the luxury tax.
In 1949, I bought a beautiful bracelet for a pretty girl I was too shy to talk to. I was charged about 15 % tax. The local jeweler explained that this was a tax to help pay for the Korean War. Later, I recognized that this "luxury tax" was intended for the upper income citizens (I was a poor person). People who could afford jewelry, yachts and other luxury items were aske to sacrifice as everyone else.
The American economy actually grew while producing guns There was hardly any borrowing. By 1952 this nation's economy was booming. This age of the "mixed economy" of protected small private enterprise and regulated "natural monopolies" has now been adopted by a Communist dictatorship in China. America retreated to the worst economic system of "financial oligarchy". Employing and producing will subvert printing-borrowing and consuming imported goods every time.
With our present wars, our economy does not grow because of outsourcing, borrowing and not taxing to pay for the costs of war. Of course, such an arrogant, ignorant policy is destroying our nation.
08:00 PM on 10/18/2010
What did you think? They lost money they were investing, so that was a temporary condition. It is not like they lost their jobs and have to live on a couple hundred a week.
You people out there that do not want higher income people to be taxed, might want to rethink your position. Because the bottom line is, they do not give a ((**&^^)) about you but you are helping them out? How is the working for you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH
Ooooo Silly Me
09:39 AM on 10/19/2010
You are spot on in everything you said....that is why I am a fan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:10 PM on 10/18/2010
I'm sure everyone has noticed the meme the right is promoting here; we need the rich more than they need us. Its part of the narrative their media is designed to sell, which is that the rich are better people, and we should be happy for their conspicuous consumption because it helps the poor. The intent is to conceal the power of concentrated wealth to override the public interest.
photo
blondebeblonde
Blondes also prefer gentlemen
03:38 PM on 10/18/2010
Nouveaux riches!

Sunday, October 10, 2010
Pretending to be Rich

A few notes from the co-author of The Millionaire Next Door and author of new book Stop Acting Rich: ...And Start Living Like A Real Millionaire (Amazon.com) in the Washington Post:

* Eighty-six percent of all prestige or luxury makes of motor vehicles are driven by people who are not millionaires.
* Typically, millionaires pay about $16 (including tip) for a haircut.
* Nearly four in 10 millionaires buy wine that costs about $10.
* In the United States, there are nearly three times as many millionaires living in homes with a market value of less than $300,000 than there are living in homes valued at $1 million or more.
* Forget the Manolo Blahnik high-priced shoes. The No. 1 shoe brand worn by millionaire women is Nine West. Their favorite clothing store is Ann Taylor.

Luxury spending is not a true economic indicator of a reviving economy. However, first and business class travel was up 4.3 percent in September, and this has historically been an indicator of an upturn.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
weekendpartier
I need some money!
06:39 PM on 10/18/2010
Yeah that rich dad, poor dad is a load of nonsense! And I totally question the source of your statistics.

SOURCE: Prof. G. William Domhoff, University of California, Santa Cruz, 2010:
http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/

Specifically:
http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

The Wealth Distribution:

In the United States, wealth is highly concentrated in a relatively few hands. As of 2007, the top 1% of households (the upper class) owned 34.6% of all privately held wealth, and the next 19% (the managerial, professional, and small business stratum) had 50.5%, which means that just 20% of the people owned a remarkable 85%, leaving only 15% of the wealth for the bottom 80% (wage and salary workers).

In terms of financial wealth (total net worth minus the value of one's home), the top 1% of households had an even greater share: 42.7%. Table 1 and Figure 1 present further details drawn from the careful work of economist Edward N. Wolff at New York University (2010).”
01:47 PM on 10/19/2010
.
you have to be WRONG !!!

the American principle of economics
is that you have to give all the money to the super-rich
because then they spend it.
.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elenanatx
learn to close read to interpret substance
02:24 PM on 10/18/2010
Many of you that post here are such hypocrites. First you complain about the country becoming socialist with government spending on healthcare and things we need to help our economy and Americans. Now you are jealous of some people who actually make enough money to purchase luxury goods...in other countries mind you...claiming it's not fair because the poor, or recently unemployed and going broke Americans need jobs, help, and etc. If you were to win the lotto or come into a large amount of money for creating some awesome business and hard work, the first thing you'd be doing is…SHOPPING for luxury items yourself, and upgrading your lifestyle! I bet you won't be helping poor folks you don't know, or do know!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:38 PM on 10/18/2010
Speculate about your own life, please.
04:55 PM on 10/19/2010
elenanatx, I would not be going on any shopping spree. I would not buy luxury items. I was fortunate enough to be poor when my children were young, and was lucky I could get no credit. I was forced to realize how much we as a society waste on inconsequential bullchit. I learned that we are inundated with all kinds of subliminal messages to shop, shop, shop. I had no discretionary funds. How lucky I was!

I learned that I didn't need to buy anything except that which I needed. I learned to live as my grandparents and great aunts and uncles lived, people who were young adults during the Great Depression. I learned to live within my income, and not feel the world was passing me by.

I feel sorry for the people who want to keep up with the Joneses, or worse yet, want to become the Joneses.

I am not sucked into the Madison Ave/Corporatist hype. If I want to buy a dvd or book or two, I can. I don't worry about this year's fashions- I go for well-made, durable classic clothes which I can wear year after year.

I love the billionaire Hong Kong banker who owned only one pair of shoes, "because I only have one pair of feet".

I am now rich enough to own only one pair of shoes, like the billionaire. Ha, ha, ha!

It feels super!
01:37 PM on 10/18/2010
Isn't so nice that BIG BUSINESS had made it possible for so many offshore job holders to now afford to vacation in America and buy luxury items, while 15 million Americans can't find a job.

Wake up America

VOTE DEMOCRATIC

and bring the jobs home to America again.
photo
NevadaLib
pwning cons since 2007
12:06 PM on 10/18/2010
this is great news. When the Lamborghini collectible goods store went out of business, I thought it was judgment day.
04:58 PM on 10/19/2010
NevadaLib, ROFL. Fanned and faved. Great sense of humor. :)
zanzy
your micro bio is empty, just like our democracy.
12:00 PM on 10/18/2010
Why don't the wealthy get to work and create jobs, right, to buzy shopping?

The rich can still eat cake, but they need to pay more taxes too. We need to invest in our people and our country. The rich are too buzy eating fancy cupcakes and buy sparkling jewerly, they do not create jobs.
photo
NevadaLib
pwning cons since 2007
12:06 PM on 10/18/2010
cmon, i'm sure it will trickle down somehow.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:40 PM on 10/18/2010
Yeah, they might need maid service.
04:59 PM on 10/19/2010
zanzy, right on! Fanned and faved.
11:26 AM on 10/18/2010
It's the opening scene of the movie called Deja vu. The rich feel comfortable and confident and start consuming on luxury items. Next step: they start to speculate. After all, you've got to find a good home for all your excess money. Next step: Wall Street devise nifty investment products that generate big bonuses and make a few investors rich. Next step: Oops! Those nifty investments were just a little too clever and are now just about to bring the global economy down. Next step: governments step in with trillions to prevent a major Depression. The taxpayers will ultimately be on the hook for this.

My latest blog post at:
http://wp.me/p10mty-69
11:23 AM on 10/18/2010
So rich Asians are spending money, while our country is piss poor. God Bless America.
11:56 AM on 10/18/2010
Correction: Rich Americans are also spending money on "luxuries" again, not us poor folk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jced
I'd love to kiss ya...but, I just washed my hair!!
11:15 AM on 10/18/2010
So happy to hear about the Rich Chinese...
Just try to buy everyday items that say "Made in USA"! Virtually impossible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Midnightrain
Hume was the greatest!
10:41 AM on 10/18/2010
Great! And in the meantime, food shelf usage is up 30% across America. Just dandy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr MOTO
VMFA 112 MAG 41 4th MAW
10:35 AM on 10/18/2010
This is good news! The wealthy always start spending first which is a leading indicator of consumer confidence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:01 AM on 10/18/2010
Oh yeah, I remember that from the trickle down theory too. Now wake up and start using your own brain and common sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr MOTO
VMFA 112 MAG 41 4th MAW
12:38 AM on 10/19/2010
Apple, makers of the iPhone, is a $270 Billion company with 34,000 employees. Launch the iPad in a deliberate 'Demand' campaign during a recession.

Vlasic, makers of pickles, launched a all out 'Supply' campaign with gallon jars of pickles. Filed bankruptcy in January, 2001 - during a recession - and employs 0 people.
11:58 AM on 10/18/2010
My consumer confidence will not be restored until I can start spending, and I would guess the bulk of Americans feel the same.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr MOTO
VMFA 112 MAG 41 4th MAW
12:38 AM on 10/19/2010
Keep the faith, it's coming
10:31 AM on 10/18/2010
The problem we (top earners and payers of 60% of all income taxes) have with paying more tax is how the money is used by the Government. Most of what is taken in is wasted. Cut the size of the Government in half, institute the fair tax and you will see a boom unlike anything the world has seen (assuming the masses have any work ethic left and are willing to push themselves to better their financial situation). It's up to you. This world is full of opportunity. Make wise decisions. Educate yourself. Take the hill.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amanda mariee
12:26 PM on 10/18/2010
...by Government does that include Defense and Homeland Security...two of the biggest spenders?
02:00 PM on 10/18/2010
Yes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
texastrixie
I invented the internet.
01:07 PM on 10/18/2010
Institute a fair tax and the US economy will tank. Although the rich do 30% of consumer consumption in this country, they cannot suddenly take over 75%+, even if they want to. And with a fair tax, the poor and lower middle classes will be wiped out, essentially put into desperate financial circumstances. As to the middle class, they may be more well off (the higher end of middle), or see their prospects drop (the true middle). I have calculated our taxes under every type of fair tax I have ever heard of, and in every case, we pay much, much more in taxes and we are just about "median" in every economic parameter.

How can it help the economy when the poorest among us are hit with a new, gigantic (to them) tax bill. You'll notice that no one is talking about limiting a reimposition of the tax cuts to the first $250k as a "fair tax cut." When it comes to tax cuts, the Repiggies conveniently forget about this "fairness" idea, and say the rich should get to keep their extra tax cuts. That's because this fair business isn't fair (would the rich really be in favor of anything in this country that was truly fair?).