iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Google Avoids Taxes, Uses Scheme That Costs U.S. $60 Billion

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 10/21/10 11:35 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:05 PM ET

Google

Using a complicated system that funnels profits through Ireland and the Netherlands, Google has ducked about $3.1 billion in taxes in the last three years, reports Bloomberg News's Jesse Drucker.

Thanks to the international tax strategy, which assigns income to countries with lenient tax rules and expenses to countries with higher taxes, Google's overseas tax rate is just 2.4 percent, compared to the U.S. corporate income tax rate of 35 percent and the U.K. rate of 28 percent. According to Bloomberg, other technology companies do this as well. An economics professor told Bloomberg that these companies' shenanigans, which have colorful names like "Double Irish" and "Dutch Sandwich," cost the U.S. government, currently mired in a roughly $1.3 trillion deficit, about $60 billion every year.

Google's strategy isn't illegal, but, to borrow a word from Google, it appears somewhat "evil."

Microsoft, Bloomberg says, also makes use of the infamous Double Irish. And the company has blamed the U.S. government: Last year, Microsoft CEO Steven Ballmer threatened to ship employees to other countries if Obama raised taxes on corporations. The longtime corporate strategy is a large-scale version of what can happen in debt-strapped municipalities, when residents simply move elsewhere as their city raises taxes.

A bill, first introduced in 2007, that would reward "patriot employers" who suck it up and keep their operations domestic, has languished in Congress. Barack Obama supported it back when he was running for president, saying, "We can end tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas and give those breaks to companies that create good jobs with decent wages here in America."

Bloomberg has an interactive demonstration of the company's tax strategy.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Using a complicated system that funnels profits through Ireland and the Netherlands, Google has ducked about $3.1 billion in taxes in the last three years, reports Bloomberg News's Jesse Drucker. Tha...
Using a complicated system that funnels profits through Ireland and the Netherlands, Google has ducked about $3.1 billion in taxes in the last three years, reports Bloomberg News's Jesse Drucker. Tha...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,630
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (49 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Longtimeliberal
02:04 PM on 10/29/2010
This is why Republicans support the tax cuts for so called small business. BP this yr is getting a 10 billion dollar tax refund
11:02 PM on 10/26/2010
While i agree this is very wrong, I don't think its fair to try and single Google out. Just like most other companies its trying to maximize profit and return to its shareholders.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mdlawyer2
10:07 AM on 10/25/2010
The difference between a VAT and an income tax. Income can be manipulated to flow anywhere in a multinational organization. Sales of goods and services have a much more definable locus. Multinationals don't need the U.S. for production, but they certainly need the U.S. market for sales. Why don't we have a VAT?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Lauren
GetInstaSite
01:41 PM on 10/24/2010
How long before Google are giving everyone a "Dirty Sanchez" on the house?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kidcat24
Capital is only the fruit of labor. Lincoln
11:47 AM on 10/24/2010
Has another bill been reintroduced?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BHD
The last great Victorian thinker.
10:51 AM on 10/24/2010
OK, so how about that old idea of a flat tax, no deductions no trickery, no loopholes for corporations? 25% after the 1st $5 million on US soil. That's what people making $35,000 a year, so how dare Google or GE complain about paying what their typing pool pays?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mdlawyer2
10:10 AM on 10/25/2010
When you operate in 125 countries, where did the income arise? Tax the sales (VAT) not the income (which is easily moveable, especially with "production" shifting offshore).
10:33 AM on 10/23/2010
a recent article pointed out that, I think the number was near 200, many of the U.S. fortune 500 companies paid no U.S. taxes in 2007 (the latest year the information was available for). Even if the U.S. corporate tax rate was zero these companies still would not hire U.S. workers. Why ? because the can hire someone in China or India for less than $ 1.00 an hour, or whatever it is, a fraction of what the labor cost is in the U.S., with no regulations for clean air, water or land

Its not about the tax rate. Its about the wealthy having most of everything and not being satisfied until they have it all. They want Americans to "owe their soul to the company store"
08:01 PM on 10/23/2010
a very precise truth ! props for posting the real story :)
12:55 AM on 10/23/2010
With all this fancy financing why even bother concern ourselves with whether rich, or whoever else, are getting tax cuts?

http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2010/10/isnt-it-time-you-did-the-dutch-sandwich/
08:01 PM on 10/22/2010
Maddow focused on three multi-national mega-corps that paid an effective tax rate of 00.00%. I'd mention the names, but the moderators will dump the post if I did. Anybody who says we have to lower the rate to be competitive, is ridiculous. What's less than 00.00%?
photo
LightShadow62
The answers are not found in the extremes
04:50 PM on 10/22/2010
Every major corporation take advantage of loop holes.
The reality is that for all the stories about how much corporations pay in taxes the numbers tell a different story. Corporate taxes account for about 12% of total federal revenue (source: usdebtclock.org) and most of the biggest companies pay less than the average working American. Not by percentage but in actual tangible dollars.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
10:18 PM on 10/22/2010
i think that the corporate taxes should go to 0.....the corporation would either keep the money and reinvest it...keep the money and grow stronger in cash reserves (dont we wish the banks had done this) or they pay it to shareholders at which time it is taxed anyway.....attracting corporate headquarters for the whole world would bring jobs with it also. most tax is collected through wages and social security taxes....with only 12% of total federal revenue, we would make that back up in increased wages....
photo
LightShadow62
The answers are not found in the extremes
02:24 AM on 10/23/2010
You actually believe the Chamber of Commerce BS?
02:13 AM on 10/25/2010
You think wrong because you are stuck in the "trickle down" utopia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jspkim
02:59 PM on 10/22/2010
No surprise, Big corporations do NOT pay taxes . They get a way with murder.
02:58 PM on 10/22/2010
Any nation which trusts in the free market will be led to ruin.

-Alexander Hamilton.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
T4
Entreprenuer and financial consultant
02:05 PM on 10/22/2010
interesting - $6 billion in potential taxes from Google and Obama gives $2 trillion in taxpayer funds to the megbanks for billions and a reward for destroying the economy. We do nothing about the banks as they devaste the conomy and put us in credit slavery buttalk about Google. Have we got our priorities right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davwbaird
Brothers and sisters of the same mother
02:53 PM on 10/22/2010
bush set up tarp along with his treasury sec who was the former ceo of goldman's.
photo
LightShadow62
The answers are not found in the extremes
04:52 PM on 10/22/2010
What $2 trillion dollars? Source data please.
01:58 PM on 10/22/2010
oops... my bad...
i just read the article again.. this time with my glasses...
it is 2.4%... wow... they are making away like bandits...
01:56 PM on 10/22/2010
the headline is wrong ...per the article the rate is 22.4% not 2.4% ...
am i missing something?