More

What Obama's Post-Eelection Presidency Could Look Like

BEN FELLER   10/24/10 05:37 PM ET   AP

Obama Agenda

WASHINGTON — Preparing for political life after a bruising election, President Barack Obama will put greater emphasis on fiscal discipline, a nod to a nation sick of spending and to a Congress poised to become more Republican, conservative and determined to stop him.

He is already giving clues about how he will govern in the last two years of his term.

Obama will try to make gains on deficit reduction, education and energy. He will enforce his health care and financial overhauls and try to protect them from repeal should Republicans win control of Capitol Hill. He will use executive authority when blocked by Congress, and steel for scrutiny and investigations if the GOP is in charge.

While trying to save money, Obama will have to decide whether to bend to Republican and growing Democratic pressure to extend Bush-era tax cuts, even for the wealthy, that expire at year's end. Obama wants to extend them for people making less than $200,000 and married couples making less than $250,000, but a broader extension is gaining favor with an increasing number of Democrats.

Moving to the fore will be a more serious focus on how to balance the federal budget and pay for the programs that keep sinking the country into debt.

In other times, that discussion might seem like dry, Washington talk. Not now. People are fed up with federal spending, particularly as many remain jobless.

The White House refuses to talk about how the president will have to adjust his style or goals if power in Congress tilts right, for fear of undermining what Obama is still campaigning hard to do: keeping Democrats in power. There is no conceding as Obama recruits voters and rallies supporters all the way to Nov. 2.

Yet if polls and analysts are on target, Republicans are poised to win big, possibly taking control of the House and gaining seats in the Senate, where Obama's party already lacks the votes to overcome bill-killing delay tactics. Obama probably will operate in an environment with even fewer moderate Republicans.

The president has signaled that at the start of the new year, he will speak more directly to the country about the financial choices ahead. "If we're going to get serious about the deficit, then we're going to have to look at everything: entitlements, defense spending, revenues. ... And that's going to be a tough conversation," he said.

It's one that will be framed by a bipartisan debt commission, whose ideas this December will give Obama political cover on where to suggest unpopular cuts.

Obama says the most frustrating part of his presidency is that he had to keep spending money and adding to the deficit in his first six months in office "to save the economy." He has from the start called deficit reduction a goal, but one that had to get bumped in favor of sparking the economy.

Almost 60 percent of likely voters now say cutting the yearly budget shortfall is the priority, even if that means the government can't spend on new education programs, develop alternative energy sources or enact his health care overhaul or alternative energy policies, an Associated Press-GfK poll found.

Obama defends the huge economic stimulus plan and the bailout of U.S. automakers, and doesn't blame people for getting tired of all the spending. But he does accuse Republicans of showing a lack of genuineness about fixing the systemic problems that have driven up the debt long before he won the White House.

And there rests the true trouble.

Even though Obama and the Republicans ostensibly share the goals of reducing debt and creating jobs, they disagree fundamentally on their approaches. That problem appears to be worsened by the lack of a serious working relationship among the leaders. If divided government simply leads to more division over the budget and economy, newly empowered Republicans and a Democratic president seeking re-election may both pay the price.

"It's going to be very hard to find common ground," said James Thurber, a professor of government at American University. "To a certain extent, (Obama's) strategy depends on the strategy of majority of the House, and what can be found in the Senate, where's he's basically going to be deadlocked."

House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio said if Obama and his team are going to work with the new Congress, then they must accept the end of government stimulus efforts as a means for creating jobs. Boehner and fellow Republicans have outlined a plan for governing that includes deep spending cuts and a repeal of Obama's health care law, among other changes. Boehner is likely to ascend to House speaker if his party wins a majority.

"They're going to have to signal some kind of willingness to work with Republicans to cut spending," Boehner told The Associated Press. "Cutting government spending is what the American people want, and it's an approach neither party has tried yet."

The federal deficit was a near-record $1.3 trillion for the just-completed budget year.

Obama may succeed in getting Republican support for trade pacts on a new education law that insists on school reforms. He will go for an immigration overhaul and energy legislation, but have to accept smaller, piece-by-piece results. Capping of greenhouse gas emissions, for one, seems to be going nowhere.

"It's a very different reality for the president for the next two years, which is not to say that nothing gets done," said Norman Ornstein, a political scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. "Even in a rancorous and nasty environment, it seems to me there may some areas of opportunity."

Either real compromise or political pressures may pull Obama and enough Republicans together to get some priorities done. President Bill Clinton managed to rebound and work with Republicans after they swept into office in 1994, teaming up on welfare and balanced-budget legislation.

Never to be ignored are the core Democrats who helped get Obama elected and who, in some cases, are disgruntled about the pace of progress. "He's got to be careful to manage his base," said Ann Crigler, a professor of political science at the University of Southern California. "His election is going to start Nov. 3."

(This version CORRECTS deficit.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Preparing for political life after a bruising election, President Barack Obama will put greater emphasis on fiscal discipline, a nod to a nation sick of spending and to a Congress p...
WASHINGTON — Preparing for political life after a bruising election, President Barack Obama will put greater emphasis on fiscal discipline, a nod to a nation sick of spending and to a Congress p...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 413
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
12:52 PM on 10/25/2010
What the (expletive) kind of article is this, AP? This article assumes a lot. It does not for one instant deal with a hypothetical that the Democrats can win. What is AP trying to do, to make us expect to lose? Why would they be doing this unless it is to continue what they have done in elections passed, which is to steal elections across the country? As long as we rely on computers, then it makes it relatively easy to steal votes. What are we going to do if there is evidence again that elections were stolen? We can't let cheaters win.

http://blackboxvoting.org/
http://www.maxim.com/archive/archive.html?tag=michael+connell
http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/NewHampshireVoteFraud.htm
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0411/S00072.htm
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/06/14/4508182-sc-dem-protests-greene-victory-alleges-voting-irregularities
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/11/270405/-More-Than-Voting-Irregularity-Comes-to-Mind
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/27423.html
http://www.mysterypollster.com/main/2004/11/the_freeman_pap.html
http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/gop-steals-7-million-obama-votes-ag-mukasey-looks-other-way/article2646.html
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/10/professor-epic-hack-voting-system/
12:34 PM on 10/25/2010
What the (expletive) kind of article is this, AP? This article assumes a lot. It does not for one instant deal with a hypotheticalWhat is it trying to do, to expect to lose? Why would they be doing this unless they continue what they have done in elections passed, but to steal elections across the country? As long as we rely on computers, then it makes it relatively easy to steal votes. What are we going to do if there is evidence again that elections were stolen?

http://blackboxvoting.org/
http://www.maxim.com/archive/archive.html?tag=michael+connell
http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/NewHampshireVoteFraud.htm
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0411/S00072.htm
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/06/14/4508182-sc-dem-protests-greene-victory-alleges-voting-irregularities
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/11/270405/-More-Than-Voting-Irregularity-Comes-to-Mind
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/27423.html
http://www.mysterypollster.com/main/2004/11/the_freeman_pap.html
http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/gop-steals-7-million-obama-votes-ag-mukasey-looks-other-way/article2646.html
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/10/professor-epic-hack-voting-system/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karen McCaughan
09:50 AM on 10/25/2010
How about handling the "Great Divergence?" Tax those folks a wee bit more....
05:19 AM on 10/25/2010
What Republicans refuse to recognize is that most direct Obama spending is effectively one-off and has relatively little impact on the deficit over the medium to longer term. The main culprits are tax cuts (mainly Bush, but a bit of Obama) and unfunded entitlements. Massive cuts in general (discretionary and non-security) expenditure desired by the Republicans could even have a negative impact on the deficit to the degree that they slow or derail recovery.
photo
Alan Sutovsky
http://www.culturaldiplomat.com
01:04 AM on 10/25/2010
A great "What if" article! What if?!, now that's...news?!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:01 AM on 10/25/2010
At the next SOTU, I wonder if any freshman congresspeople will be wearing colonial garb festooned with teabags.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forman
11:28 PM on 10/24/2010
here's one way to save big bucks: END THE WARS!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:02 AM on 10/25/2010
#36.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terri autorino
10:57 PM on 10/24/2010
What has Boehner done for Ohio or America?... besides say "HELL NO" for the past two years? Republicans "stand for" unethical acts such as diverting water away from family farms and leaving them in ruins. The Reps closed their eyes while off shore drilling "monitoring" became a "porn party". They encourage, and have been, outsourcing American jobs and then blame Dems for not creating more jobs.
Boehner admittedly gave campaign funds to a Nazi "fan", Iott, which is a slap in the face to our country and it's veterans.
The GOP/"Gutted Old Party" is made up of dangerous clowns who make a mockery of the way they do their jobs with their UN-AMERICAN "Just Say No"/Super Majority/Jokers Wild" voting methods.
They do not hide the fact that they want to "redo"/screw up Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid and change "laws" regarding minimum wage requirements and they EVEN want to take away a woman's right to have an abortion. Their goal is to tear down progress. They do not deserve your vote.
10:27 PM on 10/26/2010
Boehner's ardent obstructionism has only added to American's problems, NOT helped us in any way-shape-or form!

The young man running against him in Ohio probably has less than a snow ball's chance, but he seems like a great guy! Boehner has been in DC much too long already!
10:51 PM on 10/24/2010
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
10:01 PM on 10/24/2010
I read another article that said Obama would concentrate on writing the rules after the health care reform and Wall Street reform bills passed. Legislation is one thing but the legislation has to be turned into clear regulation so the regulatory agencies can act on them. It will be a consuming effort to make regulations tough enough to accomplish real reform but not so onerous they weigh down the industry. President Obama will fight Republican plans to cut the entire Department of Education or the EPA. Perhaps the Republicans can agree on some defense spending cuts proposed by Gates. They likely have more Draconian cuts in mind and being Republicans they would love to slash entitlements while giving tax breaks to the wealthy.
oilfield
small manufacturing business owner
11:44 PM on 10/24/2010
still having to write the rules is why it is so unpopular!
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
09:47 PM on 10/24/2010
" 'They're going to have to signal some kind of willingness to work with Republicans to cut spending,' Boehner told The Associated Press. 'Cutting government spending is what the American people want, and it's an approach neither party has tried yet.' "

The military, Mr. Boehner. Let's start right there.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ncmom54
10:05 PM on 10/24/2010
yes!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Changeizgood
08:30 PM on 10/24/2010
It's NOT the President's bills. It's the corporate political Chamber of Commerce flunkies, bringing these bad amendments, and bills to the floor. The only way to get the bills Americans want is to rely on the Dems who at least work for citzens' rights and protections.

If Republicans really cared about anything besides privatising Soc Security, giving more tax cuts on the tab, and repealing a bill, instead of fixing the health care bill right, Don't you think in all the two years, they would have had time to prepare one?

Noooo, not these guys. They have time for luncheons with banksters, tanning booths and golf, but no time to figure a plan for American workers in 2 whole years.

And they want the keys back?!

Huh, NO, you are still to crazy for power. You still don't have any solutions, except the same ones that got US 13 trillion on the credit card. 2 years IS NOT LONG ENOUGH TO BECOME A FISCAL CONSERVATIVE. YOU STILL HAVE THE SAME CROOKS.

How We gonna get accountability, with the same foxes guarding the hen houses with all that chicken feed. The are giving the grain to Wall St and Overseas markets, and leaving American families to go screw ourselves, if they get back in.

MARK MY WORDS.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
redstateblues69
09:42 PM on 10/24/2010
I can't wait to vote all Dem. Everyone I know is voting Dem.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RED BONE
NDN to the Bone
10:36 PM on 10/24/2010
I did, except for one indy
08:21 PM on 10/24/2010
Remeber: If the republicans win America will have a lot more homeless families.
In this video you will see the true colors of the republican how are they willing to help the middle class.
And remeber this law already exist for those who have more than one home.

www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary/clip.php?appid=595230185
08:21 PM on 10/24/2010
well this is confusing to me. The democrats had control of both houses, but could not get much accomplished when one guy won a seat, Scott Brown. Now the republican will be able to do whatever they want because they gain control of the house. How does this work? I don't get it?
Don't the democrats have a lot more Scott Browns on their side?
01:05 AM on 10/25/2010
It works because the Repubs march in lockstep. Nobody need think, let alone decide what's good for the country. Just obey party leadership, which is passing down fiats from big business. They also have huge funding from business and the wealthy.

The Dems, on the other hand, wouldn't know party discipline from a hole in the wall. It's a good thing that many of them actually think for themselves and vote their consciences, as men and women of integrity must do, but it makes for a divided party, not a united front like that of the Republicans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Changeizgood
08:13 PM on 10/24/2010
E L E C T I O N election, not Eelection. See what NO child left behind did.