More

Progressive Rep. Maurice Hinchey Faces Tough Re-Election Race, Aided By Influx Of Outside Spending


First Posted: 10/25/10 05:38 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:05 PM ET

Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D), first elected to Congress in 1992, hasn't seen a tough re-election battle since 1994, the year of the Republican revolution that swept so many Democrats out of power. He has been a solid progressive in Congress, voting for health care reform and the stimulus. But this year, he is facing a serious challenge from Republican George Phillips and a well-funded advertising blitz from conservative independent expenditure organizations, making the race tighter than many Democrats would like to see it.

"They're targeting the race because they know when Congressman Hinchey is re-elected, he's someone who's going to stand up to corporate greed, and he's somebody who's going to stand up for middle-class families," said Hinchey spokesman Michael Morosi. "He's not going to sit there [and back] special tax loopholes for big corporations. He's going to stand up for working people, and they want a candidate who's going to support tax cuts for outsourcers."

Hinchey is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was an outspoken opponent of the Iraq invasion in 2003 and was one of just a handful of lawmakers who signed on to Rep. Dennis Kucinich's (D-Ohio) resolution to impeach President Bush.

"The billionaires and corporate special interests have gone all in this year," said Hinchey in a statement to The Huffington Post. "They're spending unlimited amounts of cash to challenge Democrats in every way and everywhere. They know very well that if they are successful in establishing a new majority in Congress, they'll make every penny of their upfront investment back through less regulation of Wall Street, privatization of Social Security, more special interests tax loopholes, and fewer rules to protect our environment and public health."

In the past couple of weeks, the conservative group American Crossroads dropped $300,000 into New York's 22nd congressional district in opposition to Hinchey. Now, Phillips has more cash on hand than the Democratic incumbent, and his campaign acknowledges that the outside money has definitely helped.

"We couldn't afford to do any TV, just a little bit of radio and direct mail," said Phillips communications director Jazz Shaw. "So I think anything that brings up some of the negatives about Maurice Hinchey's dismal performance on the economy was good for us. We didn't get to have any say in that because these people... never contacted us, we never contacted them... Lots of people watch TV, so yeah, I think it probably has opened up some people's eyes to some things they might not have considered."

John McNulty, assistant professor of political science at Binghamton University, said that TV ads in NY-22 are "dirt cheap," so the American Crossroad investment could be a significant factor in the race.

American Crossroads has also received a significant amount of funding from the natural gas industry, and a major issue in the race is whether to allow natural gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale Formation. Phillips supports the drilling, and Hinchey has urged stricter oversight. He has introduced the FRAC Act, which would require natural gas drilling companies to disclose the chemicals they use in hydraulic fracturing, for example, and ensure they comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act.

The Hinchey campaign and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) are circulating an internal poll done by Abacus Associates showing the Democratic lawmaker with a double-digit lead. Shaw said the poll oversampled Democrats. An internal poll for the Phillips campaign about a month ago put the two men in a dead heat, and the political website Real Clear Politics recently changed NY-22 from "likely Democratic" to "leans Democratic."

"Knowing he's losing momentum, Democrats sent Bill Clinton and other party leaders in to stump for him," said National Republican Congressional Committee Spokesman Tony Mazzola in a statement to The Huffington Post, referring to Hinchey's campaign rally with Clinton earlier this month. "It's a race that is becoming more and more competitive, and given Hinchey's loyal support for Speaker Pelosi's tax-and-spend agenda, it is a race to watch as we edge closer to Election Day."

"I don't think anybody knew this was a race until Clinton came here," said McNulty. "Bill Clinton didn't come up upstate New York to see the leaves change. He's here because Hinchey saw an internal poll that scared him half to death, and he brought Clinton up here to basically try to mobilize college kids and just generally get the base out -- and maybe alert people that Hinchey's in a real race here. Clinton, to his credit, did a good job with that."

In 2008, Phillips lost to Hinchey by a two-to-one margin. But this year, his campaign is arguing that the political environment has done a complete 180-degree flip.

Shaw pointed to increased Democratic turnout and excitement for President Obama, in addition to the fact that President Bush was so unpopular, as a reason that Phillips lost so heavily in 2008.

"Even though Maurice Hinchey is trying desperately to do so, it's kind of hard to keep blaming George W. Bush and the Republican-controlled majority after all this time," said Shaw. "I think people have noticed, well, you're in charge now, and things aren't any better. So the wave seems likely to rock the water in the bowl; if it goes one way, it eventually goes the other way."

Both privately and publicly, Democrats say they believe Hinchey will still be able to win. But the congressman has been calling fellow Democratic lawmakers and trying to shore up funds.

"What we have is a situation where we didn't expect a massive $300,000 ad buy that came at the last minute from this third-party group, and in order to make sure we have the resources to compete and ensure that they couldn't pull a fast one on this campaign, we had to reach out to as many people as possible to make sure we have all the funds we need," said Morosi.

He added that while the influx of outside spending on the conservative side -- very little has been done on the Democratic side, with the exception of some funds from the DCCC -- has forced the campaign to focus more on advertising, ultimately it "hasn't changed the dynamic of this race in a fundamental way."

Hinchey joins other progressive Democratic incumbents such as Rep. Barney Frank (Mass.) and Raul Grijalva (Ariz.) in unusually competitive races this year. As The Huffington Post previously reported, several Democrats in swing districts are trying to buck the tide, showing that they can win a tough race by standing up for core progressive values.

Clinton has been making several appearances on behalf of Democrats in upstate New York, with Rep. John Hall's (D) campaign announcing on Monday that the former president will be campaigning with him at a rally on Saturday. Democrats controlled 27 out of 29 districts in the state (before Eric Massa stepped down from NY-29, which now remains vacant), with many wins coming in traditionally Republican, or tough swing, districts upstate in 2008.

"You had a lot of Democrats elected in 2006, and either elected or re-elected in 2008, who are in very very marginal districts," said McNulty. "So when these guys suddenly don't have a wind at their back, i.e. massive disapproval for the Republican president, they're at the least very very vulnerable."

UPDATE: Morosi sent in a statement in response to the difference in cash on hand: "The reason our cash on hand number seems low is because we have already purchased the bulk of our paid communications. Phillips, on the other hand, has not. With just eight days to go the cash on hand figures don't tell much of a story unless you consider what has already been purchased."

*************************

What's happening in your district? The Huffington Post wants to know about all the campaign ads, debates, town halls, mailings, shenanigans, and other interesting campaign news happening by you. E-mail us any tips, videos, audio files, and photos to election@huffingtonpost.com.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D), first elected to Congress in 1992, hasn't seen a tough re-election battle since 1994, the year of the Republican revolution that swept so many Democrats out of power. He has ...
Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D), first elected to Congress in 1992, hasn't seen a tough re-election battle since 1994, the year of the Republican revolution that swept so many Democrats out of power. He has ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
08:18 PM on 10/25/2010
It looks like the old adage, "We have the best government money can buy." is going to be truer than ever--assuming the Christian Fundamentaliban T-B@ggerz win.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
juzcuz
07:58 PM on 10/25/2010
I had to search for what state Hinchey was representing & running in; New York this guy sounds like he could do you proud, UNLIKE the likes of PalaMEANo who likes sex with Palamino horses. Vote this Dem in and the other joke out. It's time to get serious now - laughing at the teaKKK for several months, but now it's time to vote with brains and vote democrat, juzcuz!
kmichal2000
just netflix Burzynski
07:36 PM on 10/25/2010
The libs will soon write articles with titles like "Voters' free choice threatens progressive rep"
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jwredd
11:44 PM on 10/25/2010
Why so many "undisclosed" donations to the GOP this time around? Not a concern or have you not seen the numbers?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eyeitall
goosh how gullible some folks are
07:21 PM on 10/25/2010
but it is OK for outside sources to be funding the likes of Harry Ried ha ha ha typical dem/left progressive bs
07:15 PM on 10/25/2010
This doesn't look like the new, fresh face of the democratic party lol....why doesn't this old guy retire!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
juzcuz
08:00 PM on 10/25/2010
read what he's done for NY and our country and maybe you'll understand why he hangs in there - for the betterment of our country. Does your name derive from slyFox-idiot-channel?
10:43 PM on 10/25/2010
like getting disbarred?
"for the betterment of the country"...you own mean the betterment of his wife's political career and his own legacy?
07:03 PM on 10/25/2010
Is it strange to you how Dems keep ranting that corporations don't pay enough taxes while so many of them (top of my head, Google and Microsoft) are run by libs and work as hard as they can to pay very little taxes?

Hypocrites? I say YES. If they weren't, they would be offering to pay MORE taxes, like the Dems demand, right?

Google, Like Microsoft, Saves Billions Through Tax Havens--Google Pays Only 2.4% in Corporate Taxes

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2371335,00.asp
06:59 PM on 10/25/2010
Uhhh....could he possibly lose because the people don't like what he's doing? Oh right, let me guess libs, if you guys lose it's because the elections were stolen or the voters are uninformed. It could NEVEEER be because the people dont like the liberal agenda.
jerseyjoe99982002
less government means more in my pocket
06:40 PM on 10/25/2010
He will lose because the people have had enough of his liberal socialist agenda. It has nothing to do with tv commercials. It has everything to do with the fact that he is an incumbent liberal, who only knows how to spend money.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
juzcuz
08:03 PM on 10/25/2010
both llfutrell & jerseyjoe need to read AAKAlan's comments - maybe they'll learn something other than just their own agenda. Many comments have been from NYorkers who know what this gentleman has done for their state. Other comments don't know a thing about much.
06:28 PM on 10/25/2010
And then there's Biden who says that $2 Billion is being spent on ads-which only goes to show that he has no idea what a million or billinon is! It could be a bajillion dollars and he wouldn't know! That's what you get with the elitist Democratic crowd that has never been responsible for a budget or bottom line! LOL! I cannot wait until these dimocrats are outta there!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jwredd
11:58 PM on 10/25/2010
He's right. Do you need someone to prove it or do you have a googler? You need to get a better command of numbers if you want people to think your party is the fiscally sensible one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AAKAlan
Web Developer, photographer, artist, old fart.
06:27 PM on 10/25/2010
I am proud to say that Maurice is my congressman. He has been an excellent congressman. He has voted straight Progressive for many years, supports all the right things and has brought home a lot of Federal business to this mixed farming/high tech region. He has always been available. His door is always open. He doesn't use surrogates, he does the outreach personally.

It would be a terrible shame if Maurice were voted out of office by a young right-wing nut from Endwell who has no experience, but is dedicated to destroying the social safety net and supporting the rich at every opportunity.

If you can help him, please do. His campaign site is at: http://www.hincheyforcongress.org/

No, I have no connection to his campaign. I just can't bear to see a talented and dedicated Progressive go down in the year of the Tea Party.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Texanbybirth
Embarrassing Socialists from coast to coast
06:18 PM on 10/25/2010
He's not too happy with outside money if it's not union outside money.
10:44 PM on 10/25/2010
hahaha exactly!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jwredd
12:00 AM on 10/26/2010
Union donations are transparent. Have you seen the numbers on undisclosed contributions to the GOP?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HEB3
06:16 PM on 10/25/2010
Yes this is America, the voice of the people is heard !! or not. The corporations and special interest voice is louder. It is time to change the way we accept money and campaign. The voice of the people should be the only voice. It is absoluetly disgusting.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MartyJo
If the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off.
06:13 PM on 10/25/2010
Elections bought by the neobaggerz in the US. Can't run on their own merits because they don't have any merits, so we'll buy the da.mn elections!
07:02 PM on 10/25/2010
"Run on their own merits"....hello pot, meet kettle. We sure dont hear many Dems running on what the Dems have managed to do over the last few years. Many of them are running away from Obama and what he has done. Instead of attack ads, why arent all the Dems ads proudly saying "look what I've done over the last two years. Look what I voted for. Look what the Democrats have done"....if the agenda is so wildly liked by the people?
05:55 PM on 10/25/2010
So basically not many are donating to democrat election bids, going to be a sad day for libs in November!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AAKAlan
Web Developer, photographer, artist, old fart.
06:34 PM on 10/25/2010
You're so wrong. I've donated to Maurice Hinchey at least three times, so far, and will again, as needed.

What Dems don't have is Karl Rove's secret, anonymous, corporate money to spread around. His money comes from organizations like the natural gas industry, who wants Hinchey out for his go-slow approach to drilling in the Marcellus Shale. Pennsylvania, just a few miles from here, didn't go slow and now they're suffering gas fires, explosions, terrible water-table pollution and more such evils. Maurice just wants to be sure we don't destroy the Southern Tier in our greed to get our hands on gas companies' money.

So they give millions to that enemy of democracy, Karl Rove (you know, the one who bashed gays for eight years when his race-baiting didn't work any more), to buy New York State for the gas that lies beneath the ground.

Hinchey is a target because he did, and does, the right thing.

It's pretty sad that people like you don't care if the land that America sits on is destroyed.

It's the knee-jerk, buzzword, conservatives like you who don't give a d@mn about anything but putting more money in the pockets of the rich.

I guess you hope to be one of them one day. Good luck. But don't hold your breath..
07:22 PM on 10/25/2010
I was going to reply to Mr(s). Cherry Koolaid but you've said everything so much better! Thank you!
11:04 PM on 10/25/2010
ahh class warfare. let me guess, you're a public sector worker?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:49 PM on 10/25/2010
"Even though Maurice Hinchey is trying desperately to do so, it's kind of hard to keep blaming George W. Bush and the Republican-controlled majority after all this time," said Shaw. "I think people have noticed, well, you're in charge now, and things aren't any better."

Actually, I have the impression that the House has passed some very progressive measures when Democrats ruled. It's that$#^*&Senate that's the problem for progressives.

Just an opinion, which I'm too lazy to Google to validate. :-)