iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

FTC Scolds Google For Taking Personal Emails--But Doesn't Punish The Giant

MICHAEL LIEDTKE   10/27/10 06:19 PM ET   AP

Google Ftc

NEW YORK — The Federal Trade Commission is scolding Google Inc. without punishing the Internet search leader for collecting e-mails, passwords and other personal information transmitted over unsecured wireless networks.

In a two-page letter released Wednesday, the regulatory agency expressed its displeasure with Google for allowing potentially sensitive information to be scooped up for several years before management realized it. It took an inquiry from German regulators earlier this year for Google to realize it had been inadvertently pulling and storing information from wireless networks as its cars took photos of neighborhoods around the world for its "Street View" mapping service.

The activity outraged some privacy watchdogs who believed Google's activity may have violated laws against unauthorized wiretapping. It also triggered the attention of legal authorities in several of the more than 30 countries where Google's cars were snooping through Wi-Fi networks.

Although Google apologized for intruding, it has steadfastly insisted that it didn't break any laws because it got the data from Wi-Fi systems that should have been protected with passwords. That lack of security left the networks open to anyone passing by with the right equipment. Google's Street View cars no longer are equipped to detect Wi-Fi networks.

The FTC said it closed its investigation without any further action against Google because it's satisfied with a series of measures that the company announced last week in an effort to improve its internal privacy controls.

Consumer Watchdog, a group that has been among the most strident critics of Google's so-called "Wi-Spy" incident, called FTC's resolution "premature and wrong." It also suggested that Google's lobbyists may have swayed the outcome of the inquiry. The company has spent $3.9 million on lobbying activities so far this year and has met with the FTC on variety of topics, according to company disclosures.

"At a minimum, the public deserved a full report about Google's abuses from the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection," said John Simpson, who oversees a Consumer Watchdog project monitoring Google.

In a statement, Google said it welcomed the FTC's findings.

The company's collection of Wi-Fi information remains under investigation in the U.S. by a coalition of state attorneys general. Italy on Wednesday became the latest of several countries outside the U.S. to open investigations into whether Google's surveillance of Wi-Fi systems broke their laws.

Google says it gathered about 600 gigabytes of data -- enough to fill about six floors of an academic library -- and wants to delete all the information as soon it's cleared in all the affected countries. So far, it has only purged the information it picked up in Ireland, Denmark, Austria and Hong Kong.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

NEW YORK — The Federal Trade Commission is scolding Google Inc. without punishing the Internet search leader for collecting e-mails, passwords and other personal information transmitted over uns...
NEW YORK — The Federal Trade Commission is scolding Google Inc. without punishing the Internet search leader for collecting e-mails, passwords and other personal information transmitted over uns...
Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
06:45 PM on 10/29/2010
All of the Administration's Department's have a single standing rule. You under no circumstances prosecute a Corporation whose head holds a powerful Bilderberg membership.

Herr Schmidt holds that membership.
12:32 AM on 10/30/2010
Or, perhaps, it was a completely innocent mistake. If you understand what Google was trying to do, that theory makes a lot of sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarianSentient
Omnium Bonum Est
01:37 AM on 11/04/2010
Point.
03:38 PM on 10/28/2010
As far as I'm concerned, Google did a public service. Everything they collected was sent in the clear over the air. Maybe this will get people to lock up their routers. Heck, even the cheep no-name router I bought had instructions in it on how to enable security. It was the only piece of paper in the box, but was also included in PDF form. The manual was a PDF only.

I'm not sure how anyone could call this "wiretapping", as the owners of the Wi-Fi information did not secure their networks. If I enlarge a copy of my bank statement and tape it to my window, do I get to sue someone for reading it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Lauren
GetInstaSite
05:54 PM on 10/28/2010
You really don't have a strong argument blaming the victims.

Google were snooping with specialised equipment and custom software, so it is more accurate to compare them to rifling through your bins looking for your bank statements.

Stop trying to justify their shameless spying with your warped reasoning, it only encourages others with no morals.
06:11 PM on 10/29/2010
It is a really trivial thing to secure a wireless network. The companies who make the routers make is so easy it's not even funny. If you have an open network, you're opening yourself up to your data being snooped. You don't need special hardware, a laptop with wireless and any (free) packet capture software will do the trick. Should they have stored the data? No. But JavaServant's analogy was much more close to reality than yours. The only difference is that by storing it, they didn't just look at the bank statement pasted to the window, they whipped out their smartphone and took a picture of it so they had a permanent copy.
11:31 AM on 11/10/2010
You can rifle through my bins all day if you want--because I "secure" my bank-statements by shredding them. You can easily blame the victim on this because they didn't encrypt their wireless networks, which takes all over ten seconds to do.

And it is completely legal to go through other peoples trash on the street corner. That is essentially what Google did, if you want to get technical, and laws cannot be made ex-post-facto, so there is pretty much no wrong doing. An overt corporate "woops" was made.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:55 AM on 10/28/2010
Why am I not surprised? Funny how Obama wants to convince us that he is keeping his promises to the middle class but keeps having big money chronies as his advisors (Smtih, Summers)
12:34 AM on 10/30/2010
What are you talking about? Your whining has nothing to do with the story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarianSentient
Omnium Bonum Est
01:38 AM on 11/04/2010
Also point.
10:24 AM on 10/28/2010
FCC: Ok, we'll have to pretend to be upset
Google: We understand, it's ok
FCC: Great, when can you send the latest batch of personal information on every living sole on Earth?
Google: Soon, when can you pass some more legislation giving us a ride on anything egregious we do in the future?
FCC: Congress handles that. Just channel tons of cash to one of their PACs. It's all cool.
12:37 AM on 10/30/2010
Okay, so let me get this strait: Google has access to *billions* of profiles of real people which they could illegally access for some sort of theoretical nefarious deed. But instead of doing that, they're going to illegally read the email of a *few thousand* folks with unencrypted routers?

That's a bit absurd.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarianSentient
Omnium Bonum Est
01:39 AM on 11/04/2010
Also also point.
09:44 AM on 10/28/2010
The government punishing a corporation for crimes? Not in this country.