More

U.S. Election Global Reaction: World Watches, Speculates On Impact

CHRISTOPHER TORCHIA   11/ 3/10 01:11 PM ET   AP

Us Elections World Reaction Global

ISTANBUL — Euphoria swept the world after the election of President Obama, a symbol of hope and yearning for compromise after years of war and resentment toward his predecessor's style and policies. Today, after an electoral rebuke at home, Obama is still popular among America's traditional allies, but his star power among Muslims – a focus of his international outreach – is fading.

American unhappiness with Obama and the government, evident in the staggering blow to incumbents in midterm elections Tuesday, stems largely from concern about the weak U.S. economy, suggesting there will be a basic continuity in U.S. foreign policy.

Still, Obama departs this week on a 10-day, four-country trip to Asia, his longest foreign trip as president, and pundits will keep a close watch for any signs that his weaker position at home is recalibrating his approach abroad. The Afghan war, Mideast peace efforts, Iran's nuclear activities, climate change and the prospect of a currency war rank among global challenges – with trade and finance topping the agenda at summits of world leaders in South Korea and Japan this month.

Democrats lost the U.S. House to resurgent Republicans and suffered setbacks in the Senate, an outcome that will make it harder for Obama, faced with a divided government, to push his policies. Some in China fear an escalation of conflict over trade issues if the president seeks to deflect tougher Republican criticism of economic recovery plans.

"It is easier to accuse China of making that mess," said Xiong Zhiyong, a professor at China Foreign Affairs University who specializes in U.S.-China relations.

There is uncertainty, too, in the Middle East, where some Israelis believe he will have less leverage over them because of his party's electoral losses. Many Israelis mistrust Obama, pointing to pressure on them to renew a slowdown on settlement construction as evidence that the United States is favoring the Palestinian side in its role as mediator.

Obama's legislative achievements, which include an economic stimulus bill and a landmark health care measure, failed to dissipate frustration fueled by a sense that he has lost the electrifying power to inspire that he displayed as a candidate.

Yet in many countries, his call for multilateralism, which runs parallel to a decline in American diplomatic and economic clout, remains a welcome departure from the era of President Bush, whose two-term presidency was largely defined by the war in Iraq and the divisive debates on which it hinged. Obama's brand has done much to repair America's tarnished image, some citizens believe, even if concrete results have been lacking.

"People around the world were expecting him to be God," said Mehmet Onol, a 29-year-old manager at the Istanbul branch of a New York-based consulting firm. "The great expectations are what make his term seem to be a disappointment."

A summer survey by the German Marshall Fund in the United States found that 78 percent of respondents in the European Union approved of how Obama was handling international policy, a slight dip from last year. The same study showed Obama's approval plunging by nearly half to 28 percent in Turkey, reflecting traditional anti-American sentiment in a predominantly Muslim country that is a NATO ally. Opposition to the Iraq war was fierce in Turkey, whose parliament denied permission to U.S. troops to use bases on its soil in the invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.

Similarly, a survey by the Pew Global Attitudes Project, released in June, found that Obama's approval ratings were generally positive outside the Muslim world, although not quite as high as in 2009. However, the poll found that in Egypt, the percentage of Muslims expressing confidence in Obama fell 10 percent to 31 percent over the same period; from 33 percent to 23 percent in Turkey; and from 13 percent to eight percent among Pakistani Muslims.

For many Muslims, American policies do not differ markedly from one president to the next, and represent the hegemonic designs of a Western superpower, or even a vendetta against Islam. Obama has presided over the drawdown of U.S. forces in Iraq, a plan set in motion by Bush, but a troop surge in Afghanistan and obstacles to a deal between Israel and the Palestinians appear to have undermined outreach to Muslims, embodied in his "new beginning" speech in Cairo last year.

"I don't respect Obama any longer since he's done nothing for peace," said Raheela Nawaz. a 25-year-old housewife in the Pakistani city of Multan. She asserted that American drone attacks on suspected Taliban and al-Qaida targets in Pakistani tribal areas were "increasing hate against America."

On his trip to Asia, Obama will visit India, where Bush was popular for ending a three-decade ban on civilian nuclear trade that was slapped on the country after its first atomic test in 1974. Analysts anticipated closer cooperation on defense purchases and technology, but little if any changes in the alliance as a result of the American election.

"Notwithstanding the extreme partisanship in the United States on political issues, on foreign policy there is still a fair amount of cohesion," said Prof. Kanti Bajpai, professor of international politics at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University.

U.S. policy aside, Obama's extraordinary personal journey was a key part of what enthralled the world, for a time at least. People were ecstatic in Kenya, where his father was born. In this month's Asia tour, he will likely get a warm welcome in Indonesia, where he lived as a child. Obama is popular in Brazil, where half the population is black, and in him they continue to see inspiration although Latin America's biggest nation has few blacks in top political posts.

As a candidate, Obama attracted 200,000 cheering fans at a speech in front of Berlin's Victory Column, and he won the Nobel Peace Prize after less than a year in office because of the belief that he had strengthened international cooperation. Critics deemed the award to be premature, and even Obama expressed surprise at the honor, amid a growing sense that the international promise of his presidency could not possibly fulfill the lofty expectations of his fans.

Whether Obama encouraged that sense of promise to win office, or whether it sprang up around him, is a point of debate. In Europe, meanwhile, there is a sense of bewilderment as much at the divisive, logjam culture of U.S. politics.

"People here still don't quite understand American politics, the idea of political majorities, Congress or the U.S. Constitution," said Steven Fielding, director of the Center for British Politics at the University of Nottingham. "Obama is seen as the president and all-powerful."

___

Associated Press writers Erol Israfil in Istanbul, Paisley Dodds in London, Mary Lane in Berlin, Munir Ahmed in Islamabad, Nirmala George in New Delhi and Tini Tran in Beijing contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ISTANBUL — Euphoria swept the world after the election of President Obama, a symbol of hope and yearning for compromise after years of war and resentment toward his predecessor's style and polic...
ISTANBUL — Euphoria swept the world after the election of President Obama, a symbol of hope and yearning for compromise after years of war and resentment toward his predecessor's style and polic...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:33 PM on 11/03/2010
The last 10 years have been a foreign policy disaster for the United States. Not only have we attacked one country needlessly, we've tortured, practiced rendition and most recently demanded that Europe keep on buying our weapons or we'll pull out of NATO. What's been their reaction? The French and the British just signed a mutual defense pact which will usurp NATO and the Germans want in. I'm not even going to get started on China's concern about American Imperialism or Japan's demands that we close our military bases.

On the civilian front we've done just as poorly and last night we just re-elected the party the entire world hates? Not even the UK's David Cameron wants anything to do with the Republicans and he's a Conservative!?!

Clearly, we need to stop with this American Exceptionalism garbage because the only people who believe it anymore are running across the desert from Mexico.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
02:21 PM on 11/03/2010
O's foreign policy is virtually a duplication of Bush's foreign policy. The newly elected teabaggers will love it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BcemXAHA
Yerushalaim shel zahav
06:51 AM on 11/08/2010
In your worldview tea party members = Republicans?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
10:45 AM on 11/08/2010
The one are scoundrels, the other are cowards.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nualak
01:57 PM on 11/03/2010
Don't be too sure that that many people are disappointed in Obama. Funny enough, not a word has been mentioned to-day about the billions of dollars poured into certain candidates election by who knows who. Rand Paul, in the last couple of week's got $1.5 m from the Chamber of Commerce and $3.5m from Karl Roves political action committee, which, thanks to the John Roberts Supreme Court allows unlimited money to be poured in by Corporations and not have to identify themselves. Do you really think the Corporations area doing it for the good of America or is it "pay it forward" for all those who got the money to push for legislation to benefit the Corporations.
A couple of day's ago, Ronald Reagan's former Secretary of Finance pointed out that at the end of Reagan's term, the top 1% in the country were worth $8 trillion. To-day, the same 1% are worth over $40 trillion. How does your paycheck compare with theirs, or their tax rates. Remember GE paid no income tax last year, even though they had trillions of dollars in profit.
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
10:42 AM on 11/03/2010
The audacity of hope has been trampled under elephants feet, foreign policy can expect a similar fate if they can find the means, but President Obama will resist any negative change.
10:38 AM on 11/03/2010
One can only hope.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
11:53 AM on 11/03/2010
He does have the veto.
10:26 AM on 11/03/2010
The media in Germany predicts Obama will have to do so much to desparately trying to create some jobs there will be little time for foreign policy. And they say the USA will not take any measures regarding climate change or take steps to environmental protection. Magazine Der Spiegel writes, the only winner today is Wall Street.
10:17 AM on 11/03/2010
You mean Bush's foreign policy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
10:11 AM on 11/03/2010
During the previous regime, the foreign policy was in a shattered condition. President by dint of his singular ability bought about an Unique change that none could deny the fact.

He contributed to normalize the strenuous relationship with Russia though with China the relationship only is dwindling.

With European countries, it is going good. With Muslim countries, he managed to bridge a devastated gap in the shortest possible time.

However, with the advent of the change in congress it will definitely have an impact. It is expected that American Foreign Policy if left as it is by congress and not interfered will avert the adverse impact of Russia, China and the Muslim world.

Any change or meddling with the present US Foreign Policy with any negative intent by congress will have a devastating impact that may affect nascent recovering of US economy.
02:04 PM on 11/03/2010
We don't have "regimes" in the United States, we have elected governments
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
03:54 PM on 11/05/2010
Hi! My Friend JerryLevy thank you for your comment on FACTISFACT'S comment.

FACTISFACT has gone through your comment and request you to consult the dictionary and send him the meaning of 'regime' as soon as possible.

However, thank you once again. Take Care.
10:08 AM on 11/03/2010
Definitely, there'll be a change. It will become worse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
10:06 AM on 11/03/2010
It won't effect foreign policy. Teabaggers don't even know what a foreign policy is.
photo
b1rd67
Secular Humanist for Reason, Ethics and Justice.
09:57 AM on 11/03/2010
If conservatives push for a tougher stance agaisnt China, I'll support that but I think the Chamber of Commerce will call in thier markers and any policy changes will only go to help US compaines continue to buy Chinese products for very low prices. In other words, they will try to address the currency issue so the dollar has good buying power in China (more poison plasitc baby toys and tainted dog food that we can all buy with our credit cards... YEAH!) but they will not address the loss of manufacturing jobs to to Asia because outsourcing/offshoring makes the CoC members even richer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
06:57 PM on 11/04/2010
Exactly - fanned. Would it be too much to hope for that Obama would start making domestic affairs a priority? Perhaps tax imports more in order to increase maufacturing in our country? And definitely increase the cost to U.S. companies who have outsourced their labor and built factories in other countries?

We could sure use the jobs new factories would bring -
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craigy6
09:49 AM on 11/03/2010
I really cannot wait until January so that my fellow Americans can see how much damage they have just done. We spent two years slowing the recession, helping Americans, and rekindling our relationships with foreign countries that Bush and the cons destroyed. This is so sad.

And to think that we actually had Israel and Palestine at the table working towards peaceful coexistence. Well, it was good while it lasted.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:46 AM on 11/03/2010
i like the part where obama ki//s a bunch of yemen civilians,

and then a yemeni citizen sends us some b ombs in the mail.
09:35 AM on 11/03/2010
"...such as forcing him to adopt a stronger pro-Israel position and a tougher stand against China in trade and currency issues..." He has already been doing that. Obama has stuck to implementing Bush's foreign policy from day 1 of his presidency.
09:31 AM on 11/03/2010
"special interests"......what a depressing phraze

Big Business and Israel has even more of a strangehold to the detriment of american interests.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:35 AM on 11/03/2010
Only in your mind...Israel holds no more a stranehold than the Oil Lobbies which defend Arab interests in the Mideast..something you guys never want to acknowledge. You just hate the fact that the majority of Americans support Israel and we don't give in to European Anti-semitism and Muslim world hatred of Jews that is prevalent in their media and culture.
12:42 PM on 11/03/2010
Buddy, I know for a fact that Israel is not entirely made up of Likud Members and not all Jews are Likud Members. There are Arab Israelis as Well. Just because some people don't like the Likud policies does not mean that they hate Jews.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BcemXAHA
Yerushalaim shel zahav
06:55 AM on 11/08/2010
Boy, you just obsess over Israel, day in day out, don't you just.