iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitch McConnell Challenges Obama With Bold Speech

AP/The Huffington Post   CHARLES BABINGTON First Posted: 11/04/10 03:54 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

Mitch Mcconnell

WASHINGTON -- Barely an hour after President Barack Obama invited congressional Republicans to post-election talks to work together on major issues, the Senate's GOP leader had a blunt message: His party's main goal is denying Obama re-election.

In a sign that combat and the 2012 elections rather than compromise could mark the next two years, Sen. Mitch McConnell on Thursday called for Senate votes to repeal or erode Obama's signature health care law, to cut spending and to shrink government.

"The only way to do all these things it is to put someone in the White House who won't veto any of these things," McConnell said in a speech to the conservative Heritage Foundation.

The Senate Republican leader's confrontational tone was in sharp contrast to the posture Obama took Wednesday in the face of a new GOP-controlled House and Republican gains in the Senate. Obama followed up Thursday morning by inviting Republican and Democratic congressional leaders for talks on Nov. 18 and challenging his own Cabinet to make Washington work better.

"I want us to talk substantively about how we can move the American people's agenda forward," Obama said of the upcoming meeting with lawmakers. "It's not just going to be a photo op."

The meeting in two weeks will be watched for any indication of compromise between Obama and Congress' Republican leaders, House Speaker-in-waiting John Boehner and McConnell. They will be joined by the top Democrats in Congress, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

WATCH: TalkingPointsMemo highlighted the contrasts between Obama's conciliatory speech and McConnell's blatantly partisan aims

Obama said Thursday, "It's clear that the voters sent a message, which is that they want us to focus on the economy and jobs."

Still, there are major differences between the two parties, including the GOP emphasis on tax-cutting, and Obama made that clear on Wednesday.

"From 2001 to 2009, we cut taxes pretty significantly," Obama said, "and we just didn't see the kind of expansion that is going to be necessary" to create jobs.

Obama and, to some degree, Republican leaders did signal they might reach accords on a few issues, such as energy. Obama has abandoned his proposed cap-and-trade system for trying to reduce greenhouse gases, which Republicans sharply opposed. But he said the two parties might reach compromises on other fronts, such as promoting electric cars, nuclear power, energy efficiency and "energy independence."

But McConnell on Thursday indicated that the road to agreements is more like a one-way street.

"If the administration wants cooperation, it will have to begin to move in our direction," McConnell said.

And he spelled out a strategy for undermining Obama's health care law, calling for repeated votes to repeal the measure.

"But we can't expect the president to sign it," he said. "So we'll also have to work, in the House, on denying funds for implementation, and, in the Senate, on votes against its most egregious provisions."

Obama said there should be bipartisan agreement on a plan to give businesses a tax break by letting them accelerate the depreciation of some equipment.

But those are relatively minor issues in the federal universe. The array of Republican and Democratic postelection news conferences Wednesday gave virtually no hint about how Obama and the next Congress might tackle major issues such as immigration or Medicare's long-term viability.

Leaders in both parties talked about cutting spending. But there was barely a word about cutting big programs that consume so much of the federal budget, such as Social Security, Medicare and the military.

Obama hinted that he might be willing to extend Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans for a year or two but not make them permanent, as Republicans have advocated.

Republicans, meanwhile, spoke of working with Democrats only in vague terms. Mostly, they seemed defiant.

McConnell was unapologetic for the unified resistance of the Republican Party to Obama initiatives over the past two years.

"By sticking together in principled opposition to policies we viewed as harmful, we made it perfectly clear to the American people where we stood," he said. "And we gave voters a real choice on Election Day."

He also vowed to continue to keep the administration in check by using congressional hearings to oversee executive branch actions.

"Through oversight we'll also keep a spotlight on the various agencies the administration will now use to advance through regulation what it can't through legislation," he said.

Reid, D-Nev., said that in light of the election, "Republicans must take the responsibility to solve the problems of ordinary Americans," although he added, "people expect us to work together."

Big clashes seem inevitable.

On the health care law, Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters, "We have to do everything we can to try to repeal this bill and replace it with commonsense reforms that'll bring down the cost of health insurance."

Obama, whose veto powers would seem to make repeal impossible, defended the law's main provisions at length.

"When I talk to a woman from New Hampshire who doesn't have to mortgage her house because she got cancer and is seeking treatment, but now is able to get health insurance; when I talk to parents who are relieved that their child with a preexisting condition can now stay on their policy" until age 26, "or the small businesses that are now taking advantage of the tax credits that are provided, then I say to myself, this was the right thing to do," Obama said.

He also rejected claims that he spent too much money to stimulate the economy, bail out banks and shore up automakers at the recession's height. Republicans hammered all those programs in the elections.

"We've stabilized the economy," Obama said. "We've got job growth in the private sectors. But people all across America aren't feeling that progress. They don't see it."

WATCH: TalkingPointsMemo highlighted the contrasts between Obama's conciliatory speech and McConnell's blatantly partisan aims

--

In his speech, McConnell said he planned to target Senate Democrats:

"I think the most interesting thing to watch in the next Congress is how many Democrats start voting with us," McConnell said.


"Every one of the 23 Democrats up [for re-election] in the next cycle has a clear understanding of what happened Tuesday," he said. "I think we have major opportunities for bipartisan coalitions to support what we want to do."

He also directly challenged Obama:

"As I see it, the White House has a choice: they can change course, or they can double down on a vision of government that the American people have roundly rejected. If they choose the former, they'll find a partner in Republicans. If they don't, we will have more disagreements ahead."
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Barely an hour after President Barack Obama invited congressional Republicans to post-election talks to work together on major issues, the Senate's GOP leader had a blunt message: His pa...
WASHINGTON -- Barely an hour after President Barack Obama invited congressional Republicans to post-election talks to work together on major issues, the Senate's GOP leader had a blunt message: His pa...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12,585
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (297 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyrose777
08:18 PM on 11/30/2010
I agree, Mitch McConnell should be impeached (is it possible to impeach a Senator?). He should not get one more dime of the taxpayer's money just to open his mouth to say "NO" to everything and anything that would move our country forward.He needs to do his job for the people he is was elected to represent. He has zero compassion for the folks in Ky unless you are among the upper 2% of the economic sector. There couldn't be that many in Ky, so I guess he has friends in high places all over the country. My motto is "Run the Turtle Out!'
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:35 AM on 11/11/2010
Senator Turtle is a scary Senator !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ken Maddox
This time abolish the GOP WealthCare programs!
03:52 PM on 11/09/2010
In my limited capacity to do so, I call for the resignation of Sen. Mitch McConnell. His public statement, that he is now unwilling to participate in the governing of our nation, disqualifies him from serving in the US Senate.
His stated purpose of intent to discredit, defeat, and/or remove the current president is not the duties for which he was elected.
Mitch McConnell has made public his intentions of abandoning the people and state of Kentucky.
He has sold Kentucky for a few gold coin and for the power his ego demands. Mitch McConnell has no power or will to refuse the demands placed upon him by the Corporate interests that sponsor him.
Mitch McConnell should resign immediately from the US Senate, and allow the Governor of Kentucky to select a true representative of Kentucky.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:58 PM on 11/09/2010
YES!! Thank you. Every time I hear that statement, I think about our tax dollars that are paying this guy and we'll be paying his retirement and health care until the day he dies.

maybe we should recuit Alan Grayson to get this going!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AntonioSaucedo
02:43 PM on 11/07/2010
But MM's 'unbold' and expressionless face renders it moot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jonesll
05:24 AM on 11/07/2010
Senator McConnell wants to reduce the size of the federal deficit? Well he can start by returning all of the federal subsidies that his state gets, which apparently along with some other red states get more back then they contribute. Kentucky gets $1.51 cents back for every tax dollar they send to Washington. What’s up with that? It’s not like Kentucky is the epicenter for national security or technological development.


10 Biggest Receivers of Federal Dollars for every $1.00 they are taxed.
1. New Mexico $2.03
2. Mississippi $2.02
3. Alaska $1.84
4. Louisiana $1.78
5. West Virginia $1.76
6. North Dakota $1.68
7. Alabama $1.66
8. South Dakota $1.53
9. Kentucky $1.51
10. Virginia $1.51
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:03 PM on 11/09/2010
He can return his salary and benefits since Jan 09 too!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JUSTIANA RIGHT
12:04 PM on 11/11/2010
Well, seeing as how I am originally from Mississippi and bought my mom a house down there two years ago(yeah, I know. Her location choice) I would really like to know where they are putting all of that extra money, because it is not in roads, which are completely pock-marked with holes, at least in mostly urban areas; it is not in transportation, which is sparse, and pitiful(not even running on weekends). It's not in the schools, that mostly look run-down, it's not in the colleges. They were trying to force several to merge and give up space. It's not in tech...there is none. Oh there is this HUGE beautiful hospital in my mom's neighborhood, that doesn't welcome people on medicare. It's not in the police force, which are corrupt and crime is rampant. Gee, where is that extra money?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:39 AM on 11/07/2010
Brave talk, Mr Senate MINORITY leader.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith Reavis
01:18 AM on 11/07/2010
I now have a voodoo doll that represents Mitch McConnell. If it works at all, his testicles should start becoming necrotic and eventually rot and fall off. I wonder if he will even notice. Maybe I should have cursed something he really loves and made him lose his wallet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
10:28 AM on 11/07/2010
Nice try Keith but you can't loose (testicles) what you never had.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jonesll
08:35 PM on 11/06/2010
4,314,113 people reside in the state of Kentucky,…..and your best is McConnell and Paul.

Somebody needs to put down the bourbon.
01:25 AM on 11/07/2010
What kind of people live in Kentucky?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
01202009
06:24 PM on 11/06/2010
I have a question for Senator McConnell (I’ve also asked this of Senator-elect Rand Paul): You want to shrink government? You want to get the deficit (that the GOP made) reduced? When is your state going to stop taking my tax dollars to pay your state’s bills? Why don’t you shrink Kentucky’s budget?

BTW, those who play with fire are at a high risk of getting burned. Instead of deciding what your job is (to sink the president) why don’t you ask your constituents if they wouldn’t like a little bit of governing and statesman ship out of your sorry asshat?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow
06:04 PM on 11/06/2010
McConnell needs to be out-ed next time around!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
01202009
06:42 PM on 11/06/2010
As what?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScapeGoat
Facts are stubborn things. Science Rocks!
12:25 AM on 11/07/2010
a mor-on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lorelei Shark
progressive activist
05:38 PM on 11/06/2010
It's so clear what's coming - more of the same obstructionist politics. We WILL have a double dip recession - if not a depression in many parts of the country. People will be even more desperate than they are now. Then the GOP will say - the only way to get things done is to elect a Republican President. But - we did that already and that's how we got into this mess to begin with. :-(
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeverleeC
Part of the Left-Base Lost
10:26 AM on 11/07/2010
In Nevada we already have a depression, with almost 15% unemployment--25% if you count those who have stopped looking or are way underemployed now. Thank the Gods, whomever they may be, that the Senate is still in the hands, though not strong enough, of the Democrats. What has the GOP brought us but war, recession, and obstruction? I hope two more years of them will penetrate the good sense of the voters, and dump them fast and hard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
04:32 PM on 11/06/2010
Tbaggers are rejoicing their Pyrrhic victory and PUMA's are revolting, concede, all of you are
voters tools for Freedoms works...Armey is full of happiness,,,
03:07 PM on 11/06/2010
Gotta love that Republican dictionary. Outright obstruction and clapping your hands over your ears saying nah, nah, nah, nah, nah nah becomes: sticking together in principled opposition.
Obama bends over backwards saying pretty please and that translates as: Ramming it down your throat.
02:51 PM on 11/06/2010
Social Security and Medicare would have to be drastically reduced or eliminated. Military spending wouldn't be immune either and that means less benefits for veterans. Shrinking the government sounds good until you realize they mean less social programs for you but continued government funded corporate welfare because regardless of what they tell you, markets aren't free. Without government interventions and outright subsidies corporations couldn't compete in world markets. What it all boils down to is higher payroll taxes and a lower standard of living for average Americans. If that's what you truly want, then by all means, vote Republican.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow
03:51 PM on 11/06/2010
Absolutely! Could not have said it better!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
01202009
06:27 PM on 11/06/2010
F&F. We could solve a lot of problems by starting to close foreign bases and selling off the property.
02:50 PM on 11/06/2010
What never ceases to amaze me is the ease with which Republicans manage to bamboozle people into voting against their own best interests. They campaign on a simplistic platform of cutting taxes, reducing spending, eliminating regulations, reducing the debt, free markets and smaller government. It all sounds good until you peel back the veneer and look at the broader picture. They cling to the discredited notion that if you drastically reduce taxes on corporations and the very wealthy this will magically manifest in the famous Trickle Down effect whereby jobs and good times will rain down on the masses. In reality the rich get fatter portfolios to pass onto their heirs minus the "death tax" of course, while corporations, with their increased profit margins reward shareholders but slash benefits, cut jobs and reduce wages. Reducing government spending sounds easy until you realize that means shrinking state subsidies and eliminating social safety nets. States relie on the subsidies to balance their budgets so they must eliminate jobs, slash benefits, retirement funds, eliminate funding for state parks, environmental protection, etc. and reduce local revenue sharing. Both must then raise taxes to meet their obligations. There's less money to fund state universities, public schools, teachers, policemen, firemen, libraries, etc. Eliminating government oversight means giving corporations can pollute with impugnity and de-fraud small time investors by gambling with retirement funds. Reducing the federal debt sounds like a no-brainer until you accept the fact that spending cuts alone won't do the trick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeverleeC
Part of the Left-Base Lost
10:31 AM on 11/07/2010
This is a perfect analysis of what would happen should we follow the GOP plan of eliminating most of the government.

FANNNED/FAVED.