iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dan Coats For Filibuster Reform: Incoming GOP Senator Embraces Change


First Posted: 11/07/10 05:38 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Indiana's Senator-elect Dan Coats is endorsing filibuster reform, becoming one of the few Republicans to back a legislative proposal to change the way the Senate works.

"I think, at the very least, we need to remove the 60-vote rule for bringing a bill to the floor and actually debating it and voting on it," he said in an interview on Sunday on Fox News. "The American people deserve that we are transparent with them, that we take one item at a time, that we register our yeas and register our nays, and be accountable to the American people for what we've done. It's been too much gathering everything at the end and throwing it into one big package."

"There's just too much need for moving forward with action to address our serious economic situation and a number of other issues to not go forward on that basis," he added. "So I'm going to work to try to streamline the situation and move things forward."

WATCH:

What Coats supports, as he also told NPR last week, is removing the ability to filibuster the motion to proceed.

But as Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress noted, Coats' proposal would not get rid of the 60-vote filibuster completely. "Present Senate rules permit senators to filibuster both the beginning and the end of debate on most bills," wrote Millhiser. "Coats' proposal would eliminate pre-debate filibusters, but still give senators an opportunity to filibuster before a bill can receive a final up-or-down vote. Nevertheless, because the Senate's rules also allow the minority to force up to 30 hours of delay every time a filibuster is broken, Coats' proposal would be a meaningful step towards eliminating a minority's power to delay virtually all Senate business into oblivion.

Changing the rules of the Senate is tough. In fact, it takes the votes of 67 senators. But the new Congress has a window of opportunity on this issue. As Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), a proponent of filibuster reform, has pointed out, each new Congress has the ability to change its rules with the approval of just 51 votes. Therefore, in January, the Senate has perhaps its best chance for procedural reform.

Republicans have generally resisted filibuster reform. A recent survey conducted by the Democratic-affiliated Public Policy Polling found that 64 percent of the public supports filibuster reform.

President Obama also said, prior to the elections, that he supports changing the filibuster threshold. "If all you have to do is muster 40 people to say no, how do you foster an atmosphere in which [consensus is reached]," added Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, noting that Obama supported reform whether or not Democrats retained the majority in Congress.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Indiana's Senator-elect Dan Coats is endorsing filibuster reform, becoming one of the few Republicans to back a legislative proposal to change the way the Senate works. "I think, at the...
WASHINGTON -- Indiana's Senator-elect Dan Coats is endorsing filibuster reform, becoming one of the few Republicans to back a legislative proposal to change the way the Senate works. "I think, at the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,132
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (53 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennis Yuen
12:17 PM on 11/10/2010
A GOP for filibuster reform? Or reform of any kind? What a rarity!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wooper
02:00 PM on 11/09/2010
As the Republicans regain power but not a supermajority, I'm not surprised that they want to change the filibuster rules. After all, if the Republicans regain control of the Senate they will be the ones block by Democratic filibusters when they try to ram through their threocratic initiatives in their attempt to legislate their version of morality.

I do agree that the filibuster rules hinder the efficiency of the Senate, but for the Republicans to suddenly want to relax the rules is nothing more than an attempt to make it easier for them to pass legislation they may now have the opportunity to pass after using the filibuster, or the threat of, to block anything and everything the Obama administration has pursued.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rasheed Kalifani Knowles
Nun ya
06:09 PM on 11/08/2010
Ohh, watch this backfire now that the Repugnants have the House. Wow...oh..wow.

GOP=Sadists DEMS=Masochists.

We the People = Unwilling participants;Cases of traumatic abuse.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
05:21 PM on 11/08/2010
Of course he wants to change the filibuster now. He foresees a Con majority in a couple years and doesn't want the Dems to do to the Cons what the Cons did to Dems.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rebecca Borchers
04:19 AM on 11/14/2010
The Dems don't have the spine to block bill after bill like the Repubs do, filibuster reform only favors the Dems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ctizzie
04:39 AM on 11/14/2010
I'm starting to think the "Democrats lack a spine" argument - in general - is just how liberals reconcile the fact that the Democratic Party is more aligned with Republicans than they want to believe.

How many times are we going to blame Democratic Party foibles on their lack of intestinal fortitude before we realize that maybe - just maybe - when Democrats give tax breaks to the wealthiest 1%, vote to go to war in Iraq, refuse to prosecute brazen torturers who operated in all of our names, etc... it's because they aren't actually opposed to these things?

Just a thought... I know it's not necessarily the point of your particular post - I just see this "Democrats don't have a spine" comment a lot on HP. :)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abgesq2000
Indie with no reason to vote TP/GOP
05:20 PM on 11/08/2010
All you have to do is think back two years when IN went for President Obama. He knows that he can't be looney or pretend to be looney all the time. He also knows good well a move like this will likely find favor with some of the independents that voted for him and President Obama. It's a smart political move. But hey, with our country being "taken back" by those who would rather have minorities living at the margins, I'll take any baby step I can get from that group.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gunthli
05:02 PM on 11/08/2010
Thank you Senator Coats - a sane Republican - who knew they even existed! Go and push that to your party's agenda. Get rid of the filibuster now and forever. It's not even in the Constitution - it's just a made up Senate procedural rule!
04:18 PM on 11/08/2010
oh sure, now that the GOP is poised to be in the majority in 2012 they want to change it.. how stupid would that be for the dems? well.. we know the sorry answer to that unfortunately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dimplezzz2002
Education is a subversive activity. Be subversive.
04:11 PM on 11/08/2010
Wow! OMG!!! A Repub who can actually think for himself? What a rarity!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StevieRae
Neutralize "being primaried" by voting
04:00 PM on 11/08/2010
Reid better start working his caucus to use the minimum 51 votes to change rules with the new Congressional session. While Coats may be supporting it now, McConnell's leadership team hasn't gotten to him about his action jeopardizing committee assignments. Like all the "newbies" they will soon learn about the BIG LEAGUES.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:28 PM on 11/08/2010
I'd bet 50 bucks to a crackerjack box that he'd have been singing a different tune if he'd been serving during the last 2 years.
photo
FoxIslander
Fox Island...no relation to Fox News
03:25 PM on 11/08/2010
wow...I actually agree w/ a republican. I'll hold my breath for it tho...
If the filibuster cannot be eliminated, then at least make the minority stand at the podium for a few hours.
03:18 PM on 11/08/2010
of course, the republicans are only okay with this when they have the majority - but this is one of the few times that I agree.

America has too much work to do for these silly games! kill the filibuster!

If you think the same as I do, I ask you to look at http://nolabels.org/about-us/declaration/ and help me recreate bipartisanship in America.
photo
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
03:00 PM on 11/08/2010
Looks like the Rally to Restore Sanity worked;
given the results of the Midterm elections.
photo
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
03:30 PM on 11/08/2010
I was asked what I consider crazy, but for some reason that post was deleted before I could reply; so here it is:

Crazy is spending $Trillion dollars to keep unemployment below 8%;
then when it climbs to 10%, and settles in at 9.6%, proposing we need to spend even more and go further into debt.

Crazy is passing a "Health Reform" bill to help bring both the cost of health care and the deficit down, when the new law dramatically expands both the number of people covered and what they are covered for. When insurance rates go up and companies plan on dropping insurance coverage, we're told the new law wasn't popular because Obama didn't explain it well enough.

Crazy is electing as president someone who has absolutely no executive experience; then acting surprised when he looks like he's getting on the job training.
05:30 PM on 11/08/2010
Crazy is believing the ppl who destroyed the economy with unfunded tax cuts, deregulation of the financial markets, two unfunded wars will fix the broken economy! But considering these same ppl elected George Bush twice, who's suprised!
photo
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
09:34 PM on 11/08/2010
"Crazy is believing the ppl who destroyed the economy with unfunded tax cuts"
Although I agree there should have been a cut in spending to complement the tax cuts, that isn't what destroyed the economy.
"deregulation of the financial markets..."
That would be both parties. Clinton is as guilty as Bush.
Where Clinton is more culpable is in pushing sub-prime loans that was at the heart of the housing collapse that was the catalyst of the financial crisis.

But there is a new crop of GOP in Congress, who claim to have learned their lesson about spending; obviously the Dems haven't learned that lesson yet, even after their "shellacking".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vesaversa1
Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.
02:45 PM on 11/08/2010
Hell no ! What go's around come around.It's the Dem's time to obstruct now .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fiibias
good fame but by virtue
07:51 PM on 11/09/2010
Anyhow, deep quota that matters.
photo
tippisheadrun
Get 2 birds stoned at once
02:06 PM on 11/08/2010
Coats supports it now but wait until he's been back in D.C. for five minutes - then ask him how he feels. I figure it will take about 5 min. for him to line up, drink the kool-aid & start talking tea party.