iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

2012 Could Be Worse For Democrats Than 2010

CHARLES BABINGTON   11/ 9/10 05:03 PM ET   AP

2012 Democrats

WASHINGTON — Last week's election was bad for Democrats. The next one could be worse. Senate Democrats running in 2012 will be trying to hold their jobs in states where Republicans just scored major congressional and gubernatorial victories – Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, New Mexico and Virginia.

The Democrats' problems don't end with senators.

President Barack Obama carried those states in 2008, and he will need most of them to win re-election in two years. But this time they all will have Republican governors. These GOP governors can try to inhibit the president's policies and campaign operations. They also can help steer next year's once-a-decade House redistricting process in the GOP's favor.

Moreover, Democrats must defend Senate seats in hotly contested Missouri, and in four states that Obama has little chance of winning, assuming he even tries: North Dakota, Nebraska, West Virginia and Montana.

"The 2012 Senate landscape shows a daunting picture for the Democrats," said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, chairman of the GOP's Senate campaign committee. "They're not only defending twice as many seats as Republicans, but a number of them are in states where the Obama-Reid agenda is deeply unpopular."

Harry Reid of Nevada is the Senate majority leader.

The 2012 Senate map is much kinder to Republicans, who must defend 10 seats to the Democrats' 23. Except for Republican Sen. Scott Brown, who will fight an uphill re-election battle in Massachusetts, the GOP probably will be favored to keep the Senate seats it now holds.

Of course, countless things can happen between now and the next election, and Democrats might do extremely well in 2012. Obama could bounce back from midterm setbacks just as President Bill Clinton did in 1996, when he easily won re-election after Democrats lost the House and Senate two years earlier. The slow economic recovery could quicken, with a rise in employment.

Obama's spot at the top of the ticket also could help Democratic candidates spur turnout among liberals, minorities and young voters. But it might hurt candidates in states where Obama appears unpopular, such as West Virginia. Democratic Gov. Joe Manchin won a tough Senate race there last week to succeed the late Robert C. Byrd, but he must seek a full six-year term in 2012.

Democrats will try to win back some of the 60 House seats they lost to Republicans last week, but several factors will work against them. Republicans won gubernatorial and state legislative races in dozens of states. That will give them total or substantial control of the often partisan redrawing of House districts that will occur next year, following the latest U.S. Census. It's likely to result in several new GOP-leaning districts in states such as Texas at the expense of Democratic-leaning districts in the Rust Belt.

Democrats may find it especially hard to win back Southern seats lost last week by white Democrats, who are becoming almost extinct in much of the former Confederacy. And if Speaker Nancy Pelosi remains her party's House leader, Republicans will tell voters that Democrats did not learn their lesson from the 2010 election and need more convincing.

In the new Congress in January, Democrats will hold a 53-47 edge in the Senate. A mere handful of losses in the next election would put Republicans in control.

Democratic spokesman Eric Schultz said it's too early to count anyone out. "Republican overconfidence ran deep this cycle, too," he said, "but we proved that strong candidates running aggressive campaigns can beat expectations."

Still, an early state-by-state look at 2012 races shows the magnitude of Democrats' challenges.

In Pennsylvania, Democratic Sen. Bob Casey will seek a second term in a state that just elected Republicans to replace Democrats for governor, senator and five House seats. Sen. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, 74, will run or retire in a state that just ousted his Democratic colleague, Sen. Russ Feingold, and switched the governor's office and both legislative chambers from Democratic control to Republican.

Florida Sen. Bill Nelson will face voters who elected a Republican governor and kept the other U.S. Senate seat in GOP hands. The same thing happened in Ohio, where Sen. Sherrod Brown will seek a second term. Obama won both those states in 2008, and they will be fiercely contested again.

Sen. Jon Tester of Montana, who narrowly won his first term in 2006, will run again in a state that has gone Republican in all but two presidential elections since 1948.

In Nebraska, Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson likely will seek a third term in a state that Obama lost by 15 percentage points. Nelson, perhaps the Senate's most conservative Democrat, caught a break when GOP Gov. Dave Heineman said he would not run for Senate. But another potentially strong challenger, Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning, may jump in.

Democratic Sens. Jim Webb of Virginia and Claire McCaskill of Missouri could face rematches in their bids for a second term in 2012. Republicans scored impressive victories in both those states last week.

Former Virginia Gov. and Sen. George Allen, whom Webb narrowly beat four years ago, might run again. The same goes for former Sen. Jim Talent of Missouri, who lost to McCaskill in a close contest.

Other Democratic senators facing re-election in states that just gave big victories to Republicans include Debbie Stabenow of Michigan and Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico.

Few states are more daunting for Democrats than North Dakota, which last voted for a Democratic presidential nominee in 1964. Nonetheless, Democrat Kent Conrad has won a remarkable five Senate elections there, and presumably will try again in 2012. He's lucky that popular GOP Gov. John Hoeven just grabbed the open seat being vacated by Democratic Sen. Byron Dorgan. But another viable Republican might step up.

Not all the problems fall on Democrats. In Maine, centrist Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe has proven a savvy campaigner. But tea party activists just elevated Paul LePage to the governor's office, and the libertarian-leaning conservatives may try to knock off Snowe in the 2012 Republican primary.

In Nevada, a toss-up state in recent elections, Republican Sen. John Ensign is dogged by a staff-and-sex scandal. Re-election may prove tough for him, and Republicans might seek another nominee.

Perhaps no Senate contest will inspire Democrats more than Massachusetts, where they are burning to take back the seat long held by liberal hero Edward M. Kennedy. The state leans heavily Democratic. But Brown stunned the political establishment in the January special election, and it's possible he has more magic up his Republican sleeve.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Last week's election was bad for Democrats. The next one could be worse. Senate Democrats running in 2012 will be trying to hold their jobs in states where Republicans just scored m...
WASHINGTON — Last week's election was bad for Democrats. The next one could be worse. Senate Democrats running in 2012 will be trying to hold their jobs in states where Republicans just scored m...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,744
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
jerryatthebeach
Till Death Do You Barrier Island...
10:25 AM on 11/13/2010
Got Heath ???
09:14 AM on 11/13/2010
I find it ironic that everyone, especially the middle class right now are being taxed for the most part without their knowledge. With these QE programs that are happening right now who do you think is paying the freight? As they print up new money and our money is worth less every day does that not effect the poor and middle class more than the rich as a hidden tax on our money? Hidden tax because government and large institutions are the ones to gain from this.
I remember first quarter of this year the dollars value lost 10%, at that rate it's a 40% tax annually on all besides what is paid IRS from taxpayers. To say there are middle class tax cuts of a few percent proposed well yahooo what about the 40% we were charged through the hidden tax of printing money out of nothing?
We need to get a president that will be honest and abolish the fractional banking system and put this country back on the gold standard, that would benefit the ever shrinking middle class and make the big banks get cut down to size as they would be much more careful if there were real consequences to their actions rather than rewards and bailouts to let then continue this ponzi scheme.
How about a canidate that would take those steps , put an end to these "cycles" and let our money actually be come worth more every year.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:50 AM on 11/15/2010
Wow, wonderful insight! And yes, that hidden 40% is a killer!
05:21 PM on 11/11/2010
Please don't tell me we are going to have daily polls for the next two years. What ever happened to HP's stand against polls, anyway.? As for 2012, maybe we should see what happens when the new kids show their true colors.

One thing that's really sad - and alas probably too true - in this that GOP governors and the GOP will do everything they can to keep Obama's programs for helping the country. This is what has already been going on. The country can go to hell, just so we get the Democrats out of office. Sick. Of course they'll say they are doing it from love of country, but party is what they love way more than country. And money and power mean even more to most of them than party, party is just the means to that end.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mamapower
OBAMA*BIDEN*2012
04:40 PM on 11/11/2010
When bush baby was able to steal the White House I knew America d!ed.
05:10 PM on 11/11/2010
"Bush baby"? Is that the same as calling Obama a boy?

I suspect that you have never really knew America from a historical perspective and have not felt a part of it; otherwise you would recognize how absurd your comment is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mamapower
OBAMA*BIDEN*2012
08:00 PM on 11/11/2010
Oh, byyytch please.

I suspect you are an !gnorant dolt and don't realize it. Otherwise you would recognize how absurd YOUR comment is.

Thanks for playing.
03:49 PM on 11/11/2010
OMG!!! can't we get a few weeks free of nay-saying? Give me a royal break!!!!

The GOP has to figure out how to herd their nasty cats and already HuffPost has a title about 2012 being worse????? Get real. You have no clue just exactly how nasty the next few years are going to be with these nasty-cats in charge - at least give them enough rope to hang themselves without greasing the skids for Democrats. come on, Arianna, is this what you meant about news? Or is this the opinionator-blowvericator????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwingoflibwing
Leftist, Christian, Non-Violent Revolutionary
03:41 PM on 11/11/2010
"Obama's spot at the top of the ticket also could help Democratic candidates spur turnout among liberals, minorities and young voters."

Unless his actions include caving on extending the Bush tax cuts, cutting Social Security and Medicare according to the Deficit Commission's recommendations, and jettisoning the deadline for starting withdrawal from Afghanistan.

If he does those things, and it sure seems like he plans to, then he can kiss liberals, minorities and young people good bye in 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimbutgar
03:15 PM on 11/11/2010
There will be no election in 2012 because Obama will be removed prior to 2012 as President due to the corrupt Supreme Ct. in collusion with the corporations and the republican party will take him out in a coup.
05:03 PM on 11/11/2010
Then it would have to be an actual coup with the military involved and a suspension of the Constitution. But any other scenario would not prevent elections in 2012. The four-year cycle has remained undisturbed by wars and assassinations and one resignation, after all. Let's keep things in perspective. Besides which, nobody knows what the political landscape will really be like in two years; and if the time is filled with outrageous examples of Republican extremism (like the House voting on articles of impeachment just because they can), then it is hard to see the majority of the electorate getting behind that. Don't forget that that midterm voters tend to be older and thus more right-wing than presidential-election voters. The comparatively more mild version of Republicans Gone Wild after 1994 is often credited with Clinton winning a second term in '96, so if the Republicans are trying to replicate the '90s...who knows? Speculating what the political landscape will be in two years is a mug's game.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimbutgar
03:13 PM on 11/11/2010
There will be no election in 2012 because the corporations with the help of the Supreme Ct. will do a coup and take Obama out of office before then. And effectively the republicans will be the only party.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TheRevV
My micro-bio is microbial.
03:26 PM on 11/11/2010
A bit extreme, but that's what will happen. It will be a bit under the radar...
...no, wait. It won't. The Supreme Court performed a coup twice already: 2000 election and this year's Citizen't United ruling.
04:18 PM on 11/11/2010
Since you appear to have insight no other mortal seems to have, would you care to explain, in exact detail, how this will happen and under what provision of the Constitution this will be authorized?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
04:41 PM on 11/11/2010
You go first and explain where in the Constitution it says the Supreme Court is expected to cut off a recount of a Florida vote. 

Also please show where in the Constitution it says corporations... even international corporations have the same right of free speech that humans do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanBeach
non-profiteer
03:12 PM on 11/11/2010
Just let the GOP keep working ...
02:52 PM on 11/11/2010
I have a simple question for anyone who thinks they know whats going to happen in the 2012 election. How many of you predicted that Barack Obama would be running against John McCain? Two years is a life time in politics and the truth is that NO ONE really knows what's going to happen in that time.
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
02:33 PM on 11/11/2010
Who's Charles Babington and why is this opinion/speculation/spin piece published without a bio ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rmonroe
01:32 PM on 11/11/2010
Nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
01:30 PM on 11/11/2010
If the Democrats try to follow Clinton's example and play nice with the GOP when they GOP won't play nice, it will be a blood bath...stand up for progressive principles, call the GOP on every refusal to help the country...make a clear distinction between the parties and we will be OK...GOP lite is always a loser.
photo
Falafel
The Most Liberal Labrador Who Ever Lived
01:22 PM on 11/11/2010
Ignore the Babington-they cannot frame the next election with their partisanship

http://phoenixwoman.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/charles-babington-coverup-artist/
01:16 PM on 11/11/2010
If Palin wins the GOP primary over Ron Paul, I might vote Democrat