iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Alaska Senate Race: Write-In Ballots Break Towards Murkowski

Alaska Senate Race Vote Count

BECKY BOHRER   11/10/10 11:31 PM ET   AP

JUNEAU, Alaska — Alaska election officials began counting more than 92,500 write-in ballots Wednesday in a Senate race that may hinge on voters' penmanship and their ability to spell "Murkowski."

Murkowsi. Murkowsky. Even, possibly, Muckowski. All were variations of Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski's name noted by ballot counters and immediately challenged by observers for Joe Miller, her GOP rival in the still-unsettled Nov. 2 race.

Murkowski ran as a write-in candidate after losing Alaska's GOP primary to Miller, a tea party favorite, in August. In the election, voters cast several thousand more ballots for write-in candidates than they did for Miller, and it's those write-in ballots that are now in question in the count. Election officials had hoped to finish by Friday, but Wednesday's plodding pace indicated it may take longer.

An early tally of 19,203 ballots Wednesday showed Murkowski winning 89 percent of the write-in vote without dispute. Another 8.5 percent of ballots were counted for her but contested. There were two write-in votes for "Joe Miller."

The other candidate in the three-way race, Democrat Scott McAdams, has conceded.

The laborious tallying process bore some resemblance to the 2000 Florida presidential recount, though a decade later, it was misspellings and bad penmanship – not hanging chads – that took center stage in Juneau.

The process played out in a cavernous building on the outskirts of the city, with the two candidates' lawyers and observers carefully watching it unfold.

Observers for Miller – whose vote total trailed the number of write-in ballots cast in the Nov. 2 election by 10,799 as of Wednesday – were quick to challenge virtually any ballot on which Murkowski's scribbled-in name was misspelled or letters were difficult to decipher.

While the scene that unfolded Wednesday had all the makings of the Florida recount, it had none of the circus-like atmosphere. Election workers and observers went about their work studiously as it was aired for a statewide audience, with the noise barely raising above a din at times in the cavernous room while they were sorting.

"This is Juneau, Alaska. This isn't Caracas," said John Tiemessen, a Miller attorney. "I would've been shocked if there would've been anything interesting" broadcast from this.

Workers and observers came across a range of ballots, with plenty of variations on Murkowski's last name; common misspellings were "Merkowski," or "Murcowski." There even were some Lizas.

"Oh, misspelled. They forgot the 'k,'" one worker said as she put the ballot in box No. 4, which was reserved for variations or misspellings of Murkowski's name that needed a ruling from director of the Division of Elections, Gail Fenumiai. The final decision rests with Fenumiai.

Fenumiai was generous in crediting misspellings to Murkowski's tally, drawing objections from Miller observers. She said if the name written was phonetically similar to Murkowski's, it would count.

Murkowski spokesman John Tracy suggested some of the challenges were frivolous.

"This isn't supposed to be a penmanship test," he said.

The count began as planned in spite of a lawsuit filed Tuesday by Miller, seeking to prevent the state from using discretion in determining voter intent on ballots. Miller's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, said he wants to ensure a fair count.

A judge Wednesday refused to stop the count while Miller's complaint is being considered and set briefing schedules for next week.

Miller maintains election law must be upheld in scrutinizing the ballots, meaning the ballots must have the oval filled in and either "Murkowski" or "Lisa Murkowski" written next to it to be a valid vote for Murkowski.

Murkowski, hoping to make history as the first U.S. Senate candidate since 1954 to win as a write-in, focused intently on educating voters on this point during her campaign, saying it was the sure way to have their votes counted. She ran an ad riffing on a spelling bee, closed many of her rallying speeches by leading the crowds in spelling her last name – "MUR-KOW-SKI" – and handed out rubbery wristbands featuring a filled in oval and her name that voters were allowed to bring, discreetly, into the polling booth with them.

But election officials pointed to past case law in declaring their plans to use discretion in determining voter intent on ballots where voters misspell Murkowski's name, with a ruling coming from Fenumiai, with input from a state attorney. Officials have said they do not want to disenfranchise anyone.

"We're using the commonsense test," said Lt. Gov. Craig Campbell, a Republican and the overseer of state elections.

The recourse for challenges is court, with the deadline to file a case next month.

Security guards escorted more than 60 boxes of ballots into the venue shortly before 9 a.m., when the count was scheduled to start. A guard sat or stood in front of those boxes, in an area cordoned off to observers and reporters. Among those on hand to observe for Murkowski was attorney Ben Ginsberg, part of the Bush-Cheney legal team during the 2000 Florida recount.

Challenges came early as Fenumiai made her away among the 15 plastic tables, where 30 trained ballot workers – most women, of middle age or older, of a variety of political backgrounds – sifted through ballots in boxes labeled No. 4.

At one table, early in the count, for each vote she determined for Murkowski, an observer for Miller's campaign challenged that finding.

"We're applying the statutory definition and going with that," said another Miller observer, AJ Ferate, of Oklahoma City.

In some cases, Fenumiai lifted up her glasses to scrutinize the ballots more closely. In a few others, she put ballots at the bottom of the box, saying she needed time to think about it.

An attorney for the state was at her side.

It wasn't only Miller's camp that raised objections. Fenumiai's call to disallow "Lisa Murkaska" drew a challenge from one of Murkowski's attorneys.

Tracy was optimistic that by the end of Wednesday "we'll have enough of a lead to be confident in the outcome," figuring Miller needed one in nine ballots thrown out to have a shot.

Miller spokesman Randy DeSoto said the campaign remained cautiously optimistic and was determined to see the counting process through.

Aside from ballots for Murkowski, contested or not, there also were ballots without an oval marked, and others with votes for other write-in candidates. There also were voters who favored "Snoopy" and "Elmo," and at least one wrote in: "NONE OF THE ABOVE."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
JUNEAU, Alaska — Alaska election officials began counting more than 92,500 write-in ballots Wednesday in a Senate race that may hinge on voters' penmanship and their ability to spell "Murkowski.
JUNEAU, Alaska — Alaska election officials began counting more than 92,500 write-in ballots Wednesday in a Senate race that may hinge on voters' penmanship and their ability to spell "Murkowski.
Filed by Whitney Snyder  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,117
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (32 total)
06:20 PM on 11/12/2010
One problem is that there was an organized protest to deliberately misspell "Leesa Mercowsky" in order to send a message about her write-in campaign. Those protest votes should not be counted for her. Another problem is that the spelling standards are changing AFTER AN ELECTION from one counting table to another.
03:42 PM on 11/13/2010
Well, this was just a stupid idea all 'round. By doing so, they opened up the possibility that Murkowski's campaign would be able to count these votes for her side.

A better idea would have been for these nitwits to either vote for Miller or not vote at all.

Of course, this is assuming that the assertion of 'protest votes' is really true.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montn2
The poor man's son fights the rich man's war.
11:00 AM on 11/12/2010
Any phonetic spelling of Murkowski's name should be acceptable. Just common sense. Of course, Miller is going to put up road blocks, but he has lost, Lisa has won. Bye, bye tee bagger.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
02:02 PM on 11/12/2010
So Miller is a pretty easy spell, even if u spell it Meller,Mellor,Meler--------It is a far cry from Murkowski no matter how mispelled it is. If it says Lisa infront of it, it certainly wouldn't mean Joe Miller, now would it.
06:21 PM on 11/12/2010
Is "Mercowsky" an acceptable phonetic spelling?
09:20 AM on 11/12/2010
Sorry Lisa Mercocha:

JOE MILLER WILL BE THE REAL WINNER... THE LAW IS CLEAR:

The law says the vote is counted "if the name, as it appears on the write-in declaration of candidacy, of the candidate or the last name of the candidate is written in the space provided."

SO ANY WRITE-IN VOTE WITH A MISSPELLED NAME DO NOT COUNT..
photo
Mockdog
Call me Ishmael-We'll do lunch.
05:15 PM on 11/15/2010
SO ANY WRITE-IN VOTE WITH A MISSPELLED NAME DO NOT COUNT..
Sorry, but the word is "DOES", not "DO". Since you failed to spell correctly [or, I suspect, didn't know the difference], your post is discounted.
photo
marecek
What has always made the state a hell on earth has
09:20 AM on 11/12/2010
I'm not sure what Miller thinks he will accomplish. Even assuming he can get the Alaska officials to throw out all of the challenged ballots (11% of the write-ins perhaps for Murkowski), simple math will tell you that the uncontested Murkowski write-ins would still constitute over 36 % of the vote (89 % of 41 % equals 36.5 %), still higher than Miller's tally. Is Miller hoping that a bunch of the contested ballots will be counted as votes for him? After he lawyered up, his "legal counsel" did make that ludicrous argument that misspells of Murkowski should be interpreted as protest votes in favor of Miller.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgateman
09:17 AM on 11/12/2010
ah votd fer Sheesa Moreporksky cause ah was edmacated in Laska!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CarolinaYankee
08:27 AM on 11/12/2010
Why don't they just google what is on the ballot, if it comes up "Did you mean Lisa Murkowski" Bingo
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amantedelibros
07:12 AM on 11/12/2010
Laws are usually spelled out, but where there's ambiguity, the next step is to look at the intent. In this case, if Murkowski is misspelled, the intent of the voter is obvious and their votes should count. In any case, their votes should count. Period. If the majority of the U.S. population were required to take a spelling test to qualify to vote, they'd never have their voice counted. This is just one more act of obstructionism and I'd bet it's unconstitutional.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meldy1
Nurse&Pianist,but I don't have to work!
05:05 AM on 11/12/2010
the alaskan natives have spoken vigorously by voting for Murkowski and dismantling palin and the loser name is...... MILLER!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Terrorists keep you in fear
12:24 AM on 11/12/2010
What does the supreme court have to say about all this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zeroes
11:11 PM on 11/11/2010
What is nice is that a Rep won!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
alicante
08:39 PM on 11/11/2010
He was in DC measuring drapes? Sorry Joe, it's curtains.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amantedelibros
07:13 AM on 11/12/2010
Clever! Liked the post!
08:28 PM on 11/11/2010
So close to Russia you'd think you would see more Cyrillic spellings.
jjtx
living between the trees
07:57 PM on 11/11/2010
We're applying the statutory definition and going with that," said another Miller observer, AJ Ferate, of Oklahoma City.

Do we see where his backing comes from? I wish they could stop out-of-state observers for what is an Alaskan state election.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amantedelibros
07:14 AM on 11/12/2010
Or at the very least, get one that's educated and can interpret the law.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mytwocents02
my micro-bio does not meet guidelines
07:45 PM on 11/11/2010
It's frightening that the collective misspelled teabaggers' signs are not an aberration, but a norm. Voters needed to learn to spell only the name of the candidate they wished to elect and they couldn't even accomplish that? What does it say about our education system or lack thereof?
02:04 AM on 11/12/2010
About 97% of all write in ballots were spelled correctly. Senator Murkowski, the write in candidate, was not a tea bag candidate, that would be the one who lost, Joe Miller. Teabagger and carpetbagger.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CarolinaYankee
07:37 PM on 11/11/2010
Words from the Dalai Lama for Miller: "When you lose, do not lose the lesson"
llyd wlsh
chem, nuke, bio hazard
08:36 PM on 11/11/2010
The lesson for Miller.....YOU'RE A LOSER, JOE
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CarolinaYankee
08:44 PM on 11/11/2010
He just cannot seem to grasp that... Maybe his endorser can tell him what it was like for her, oops, forgot she never got over it either.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juhar
07:31 AM on 11/12/2010
Nicely said.

Fanned and Favorite.