iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Big Oil Companies Move Toward Natural Gas

CHRIS KAHN   11/ 9/10 06:06 PM ET   AP

Earns Exxon Mobil

NEW YORK — Pretty soon, Big Oil will be more like Big Gas.

The major oil companies are increasingly betting their futures on natural gas, with older oil fields producing less crude and newer ones either hard to reach or controlled by unfriendly nations.

They are focusing more than ever on natural gas because it burns cleaner than oil and is gaining traction as a fuel for transportation. The latest move came Tuesday, when Chevron made a $4.3 billion deal to buy up natural gas fields in the Northeast.

Earlier this year, Exxon Mobil bought XTO Energy to become America's largest producer of natural gas. And Royal Dutch Shell expects natural gas to make up half its total global production in two years.

"If you look at most of the big developments now, they're not about oil, it's gas," said Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Fadel Gheit.

The world will continue to run on crude oil for years to come, but even with new discoveries, oil production is expected to flatten out during the next few decades, according to the latest estimates from the International Energy Association.

Far down the road, Gheit believes, Exxon and Shell will lead the energy industry into a new era where oil companies devote most of their efforts to producing natural gas. The Energy Information Administration expects worldwide natural gas production to increase 46 percent from 2007 to 2035, compared with a 30 percent increase in world production of crude and natural gas liquids.

Gas is becoming more attractive to the oil companies because it's more accessible. While OPEC controls most of the world's oil reserves, it controls less than half of the natural gas reserves.

In the United States and Europe, natural gas is primarily used to heat homes. About three in five American homes use it for heat. And more and more power plants are using it to generate power. Natural gas is used to generate 23 percent of electricity in the U.S., up from 16 percent a decade ago.

If the country focuses more on reducing greenhouse gas emissions in years to come, the trend should accelerate. Natural gas emits less carbon dioxide than other fossil fuels.

Natural gas is used in small amounts for transportation in the U.S., mostly for city buses and garbage trucks. The oil industry is pressing Congress to add financial incentives for trucking and freight companies to convert their fleets.

Until recently, Big Oil watched the rise of U.S. natural gas from the sidelines, and smaller companies drilled into underground layers of shale. New techniques allowed companies to drill parallel to the ground and hit previously tough-to-reach deposits, helping them tap ever larger bounties of shale gas.

Production costs fell. Drilling rigs started popping up along America's shale-rich regions in Appalachia, Texas and North Dakota. Experts now say the U.S. is sitting on enough natural gas to last the country for the next century.

This year, Big Oil jumped in. Exxon bought XTO for more than $30 billion, immediately making it America's largest natural gas producer. XTO so far has helped Exxon increase its natural gas production by 50 percent.

Then Shell agreed to buy East Resources Inc. for $4.7 billion, and China's state-owned offshore oil and gas company, CNOOC Ltd., invested $2.16 billion in oil and gas fields owned by Chesapeake Energy.

Production jumped to 1.94 trillion cubic feet in August, the highest monthly total since January 1973, according to available government data.

"Production is screaming," said E. Russell Braziel, managing director of BENTEK Energy, which tracks natural gas prices in the U.S.

The U.S. now holds about 3.82 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in storage, about 10 percent more than the average over the past five years. And the industry keeps pumping more out of the ground.

There are challenges. The same low prices that make the assets affordable have caused some companies, namely ConocoPhillips, to pull back on production. Natural gas has dropped about 24 percent this year.

And people near shale rigs complained that groundwater supplies were contaminated by the industrial chemicals used in the drilling process. The Environmental Protection Agency is studying the possible effects on drinking water and the public health.

Still, most of the big companies continue to press ahead with multibillion-dollar acquisitions.

"When the market is weak, that's when it's time to act," Argus Research analyst Phil Weiss said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW YORK — Pretty soon, Big Oil will be more like Big Gas. The major oil companies are increasingly betting their futures on natural gas, with older oil fields producing less crude and newer on...
NEW YORK — Pretty soon, Big Oil will be more like Big Gas. The major oil companies are increasingly betting their futures on natural gas, with older oil fields producing less crude and newer on...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 255
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeyJaii
Free $$ For Everyone.
02:45 AM on 12/25/2010
Non-oil dependency all the way!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:51 PM on 12/06/2010
Why are comments closed on this other natural gas related article after just two pages of comments?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/01/ge-mobile-evaporator-will_n_746659.html

It is the story promoting the stock of a company engaged in a greenwash, fracking-related service which rather than minimizing ecological impact primarily lowers the cost of fracking, thereby encouraging it, while leaving untouched almost all of the potentially fatal effects of this technology.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James M Connor
11:37 PM on 11/17/2010
good story. energy independence will come through private industry. hooray!
11:14 PM on 11/13/2010
These big resource exploiting companies are in it to win it. I don't know what I would be doing right now if I didn't have my HHO system on my car. It probably sucks to get less than 40 mpg.... Wouldn't know anymore though. If you want to find out how to build your own, go to http://www.actgreennow.com
02:08 PM on 11/12/2010
jimmy barrows • Comment to "Morning Joe" MSNBC:

your spot on ENERGY next week seems cast and scripted by industrial giants,not about innovation reality and promising already invented, tested and purposefully left on the shelf.

natural gas, in AMERICA: Fill-UP from HOMES. Much cheaper; more useful when converted to hydrogen.

Cars, trucks or any cumbusttion engine can, and should convert to natural gas. Tech been available for generations. Creates jobs and puts savings in the hands of the spenders.

Hydrogen is available to anyone with access to natural gas; converters to hydrogen have been available for generations.

Neighborhood generation is silent and pollution free with fuel cells using natural gas, water, or grey water converted to hydrogen all available for generations. HONDA and UTC make these in the USA but will not sell them to us. A new Google related company discussed on "60 Minutes" might..

Nothing in fuel cells is new. Parts tooling and high-volume manufacturing techniques have been available for generations yet media and the current industrial giants won't let us.

Here's where philanthropy can make the economy turn-around within months. Make and install the units without the giants and the foundations funding this will make $billions$ every year and keep their good works into perpetuity.
Great show--just keep the "all-in" talking interruptions and side comments to a minimum. annoying. Mika looks like the boss and Joe looks for trouble to get into. your audience will dwindle.

Best sincere regards,
jimmy-jo
ItsGettingWeird
(or is it just me?)
06:50 PM on 11/11/2010
Every time I think about Big Oil, I get gas.

So there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
12:48 PM on 11/11/2010
At the beginning of the Bush administration, I remember reading a critique of his billion dollar hydrogen Initiative from a science advisor in the Sierra Club. I wrote him, and said how the best next step in energy would be hydrogen and fuel cells. I said, look at this way, 19th century: coal: a solid. 20th century: oil: a liquid. 21st century: hydrogen: a gas.
photo
AwakeNow
just flew into town
10:40 AM on 11/11/2010
Here is a video which shows the contamination of water supplies. This is happening in many areas here in the State.

Ignite your drinking water http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMS8VsG2LSY&feature=related
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dominick Roffo
Cut the b.s..I'm tired of it
08:47 AM on 11/11/2010
I think more emphasis should be place into hydrogen, the most abundant gas in the universe....well, we do have an infinate amount of natural gas...it's called Congress...lol
03:59 AM on 11/11/2010
It would be a lot easier to produce methane from wastes rather than cracking open rocks deep underground, but mineral rights are more lucrative.  Of all the biofuels we could be commercializing, methane is by far the easiest and most economical.  

But there's a massive glut of natural gas right now, so it's difficult to raise private capital.  The oil/gas companies are just snapping up mineral rights and fracking new wells with the expectation of increased demand in the future.  Few other entities have deep enough pockets to invest into a supply glut and ride it out for years.  

There are going to be shortages of oil followed by gas, but there is nothing close to a shortage at the moment.  The standard model of capitalism dictates that there will be no significant investment in alternative fuels until there of shortages of fossil fuels, and then the capital may come too late to avoid a devastating transition period.

But the standard model of capitalism does not apply to the fossil fuel industry.  They know that demand for their products will generally increase over time and that the supply will eventually fall off in spite of their investments, and they have the cash to follow an unusually long-term investment strategy.

The last people in the world that will realize that we need to invest in alternative energy will be the institutional investors on Wall Street, because they stand to benefit from investing in fossil fuels right up until the point where there just isn't enough to go around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SierraSon
07:57 AM on 11/11/2010
I would agree with you; however, by 2013 we (my company) will be providing, clean, 100% renewable (made from woody biomass), sustainable, gasoline and diesel fuel for a wholesale cost of about $1.25/gallon. By about 2030 with improved agricultural management, per ton yields will lower that cost easily by half. All of this while reducing negative impact to the environment by about 80% of what fossil fuels cause. With more R
09:18 PM on 11/11/2010
Cool, which company?  I assume this is a hydrous pyrolysis method?
01:59 AM on 11/11/2010
See the movie "Gasland". Marvel at burning water directly from the fosset. Also think about that there is no "Strategic Gas Reserve" (like there is a Strategic Petroleum Reserve). Any disruption in the flow of natural gas hits consumers immediatly (see the political games Russia plays with it's neigbours). For "Big Hydrocarbons" this is just a way to hold onto power in a changing world. Put solar panels on your roof, buy a Nissan Leaf e-car and wave goodbye to the miseries of gasstations...
01:28 AM on 11/11/2010
Big Business: Fraking me, fraking you, all for a fraking buck.
01:06 AM on 11/11/2010
Let's get this party started already! Long overdue...long, long overdue!
photo
RealityBaseCamp
My micro-bio did not meet someone's guidelines!
12:47 AM on 11/11/2010
Excuse me? The only mention of HYDROFRACKING is in the COMMENTS?? And it's reduced to "industrial chemicals used in the drilling process" in the article. You call this journalism?
12:39 AM on 11/11/2010
Yay polluted tap water and exploding pipelines for all. Fossil fuels are the gift that keeps on giving.