iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

GM Mutant Mosquitoes Fight Dengue Fever In Cayman Islands, But Experiment Could Wreak Havoc On Environment, Critics Say

MARIA CHENG   11/11/10 10:51 AM ET   AP

Mosquitoes

LONDON — Scientists have released genetically modified mosquitoes in an experiment to fight dengue fever in the Cayman Islands, British experts said Thursday.

It is the first time genetically altered mosquitoes have been set loose in the wild, after years of laboratory experiments and hypothetical calculations. But while scientists believe the trial could lead to a breakthrough in stopping the disease, critics argue the mutant mosquitoes might wreak havoc on the environment.

"This test in the Cayman Islands could be a big step forward," said Andrew Read, a professor of biology and entomology at Pennsylvania State University, who was not involved in the project. "Anything that could selectively remove insects transmitting really nasty diseases would be very helpful," he said.

Dengue is a potentially fatal mosquito-borne disease that can cause fever, muscle and joint pain, and hemorrhagic bleeding. More than 2.5 billion people are at risk and the World Health Organization estimates there are at least 50 million cases every year. There is no treatment or vaccine.

Unlike malaria, which is also spread by mosquitoes, dengue outbreaks are unpredictable and bed nets are of limited use because dengue-spreading mosquitoes also bite during the day.

Researchers at Oxitec Limited, an Oxford-based company, created sterile male mosquitoes by manipulating the insects' DNA. Scientists in the Cayman Islands released 3 million mutant male mosquitoes to mate with wild female mosquitoes of the same species. That meant they wouldn't be able to produce any offspring, which would lower the population. Only female mosquitoes bite humans and spread diseases.

From May to October, scientists released batches of genetically mutated male mosquitoes in cages three times a week in a 40-acre (16-hectare) area. By August, mosquito numbers in that region dropped by 80 percent compared with a neighboring area where no sterile male mosquitoes were released.

Luke Alphey, Oxitec's chief scientific officer, said with such a small area, it would have been very difficult to detect a drop in dengue cases. But their modeling estimates suggested an 80 percent reduction in mosquitoes should result in fewer dengue infections.

For years, scientists have been working to create mutant mosquitoes to fight diseases like malaria and dengue, which they say could stop outbreaks before they start. But, others suspect it could be an environmental nightmare.

"If we remove an insect like the mosquito from the ecosystem, we don't know what the impact will be," said Pete Riley, campaign director of GM Freeze, a British non-profit group that opposes genetic modification.

He said mosquito larvae might be food for other species, which could starve if the larvae disappear. Or taking out adult mosquito predators might open up a slot for other insect species to slide in, potentially introducing new diseases.

Humans have a patchy track record of interfering with natural ecosystems, Riley said. In the past, such interventions have led to the overpopulation of species including rabbits and deer. "Nature often does just fine controlling its problems until we come along and blunder into it."

Oxitec's Alphey said their genetically modified mosquitoes can't permanently change the ecosystem because they only last for a generation. But to stamp out dengue in endemic areas like Asia and South America, billions of the special-order mosquitoes would likely be needed to stifle their wild counterparts.

Yeya Toure, who leads the World Health Organization's team on Innovative Vector Control Interventions, called the Cayman Islands trial promising and said it's worth continuing the genetic modification experiments.

He said genetically altered mosquitoes aren't meant to replace existing tools like insecticides, but to compensate for their limitations, like when mosquitoes develop resistance.

Read said creating mutated mosquitoes might actually be the least invasive way to control dengue. By keeping a lid on the mosquito population via genetic modification, Read said entire ecosystems would be spared the toxic effects of indiscriminately spraying pesticides.

He said the bigger problem would be selling the idea of genetically altered mosquitoes to the public. In the Cayman Islands, officials said they worked closely with the local community and encountered surprisingly little resistance.

"We still have people who don't believe in vaccines," Read said. "How are we going to convince them it's OK to let scientists release genetically altered mosquitoes into the wild?"

_____

Online:

http://www.oxitec.com

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

LONDON — Scientists have released genetically modified mosquitoes in an experiment to fight dengue fever in the Cayman Islands, British experts said Thursday. It is the first time genetically a...
LONDON — Scientists have released genetically modified mosquitoes in an experiment to fight dengue fever in the Cayman Islands, British experts said Thursday. It is the first time genetically a...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 331
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
05:02 PM on 12/28/2010
It was irresponsible of Ms. Cheng/HuffPo to write this article in such a tone as to provide the environmentalist critics of RIDL equal credibility to the expert scientists who make it their life's work to combat these diseases.

Do you think the infant child dying from Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever or malaria gives a damn about whether or not an effective new intervention is genetically modified?

What other motivation could these academics possibly have? Sure, Oxitec is profit driven, but what about Toure at WHO? What at Read at PSU? People don't just stumble into these careers. If their sole motivation was to make money, there are far easier ways.

Ironically, Oxitec's RIDL is "greener" and safer than other methods; not only those used in the past, but also those used today (such as insecticide treated nets and spraying DDT or other insecticides)

What would the GMO-phobes propose as a better solution? Where is one single scrap of data to suggest that the elimination of a single mosquito species would result in some catastrophic calamatiy in the ecosystem?

Current estimates suggest that more than 20,000 species go extinct each year on Earth. Imagine just one of these was a mosquito that was responsible for the death of millions of people each year. Is this not an acceptable loss to the environment?

Those who make these vague, hand-waving claims are always seem to be non-experts. It's always some grand "What if" question with no ending and no solution.
12:11 PM on 11/17/2010
http://www.theonion.com/video/joad-cressbeckler-fears-genetic-modification-cause,18433/

sums up the anti-science GM opponents pretty well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Danek Greori
06:37 PM on 11/15/2010
How could genetically modifying a living creature and then unleashing it in the wild possibly go wrong?

If you've ever seen the movie "Mimic" there's this great scene where the main character is talking to her old professor about the situation:

Professor: “So, you think your little Frankensteins got the better of you,” “Evolution has a way of keeping things alive.”

Scientist: “But,” she replies, “they all died in the lab.”

Professor: “Yes, Susan. But you let them out—into the world. The world is a much bigger lab.”
12:10 PM on 11/17/2010
im sure if you lived somewhere where a mosquito bite could ill you, you would feel a bit differently.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Danek Greori
07:51 PM on 11/17/2010
You know what's funny? In the same movie I quoted, the genetically modified insects were also created to combat a prevalent disease.
10:58 AM on 11/14/2010
We already have mutant mosquitoes in America. We call them Wall St. bankers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodgrade
Learn to grow banannas
03:44 PM on 11/12/2010
Or they want to spread disease.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shaw
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
11:53 AM on 11/12/2010
I think Id like to take my chances in a mosquito free world...like mentioned, the fact that there are about 50 million cases are identified each year is outrageous not to consider the benefits to humans. I hardly believe that the world's food chain would be thrown completely off its axis if the mosquito population was to see a decline..Not saying we should try this with all animals but I could really get use to a summer where Im not being dive-bombed by blood suckers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xanxia
Dazed and Confused
05:18 AM on 11/12/2010
MUTANT mosquitoes? isnt this the stuff that destroys the natural order of things and then zombies come? or an apocalypse?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titanshanks
Back for more
10:12 PM on 11/11/2010
I'm an environmentalist, but you guys did notice the part about 50 million people contracting dengue fever every year, with no treatment or cure, right? Mosquitoes mutated to be sterile obviously aren't going to spread any genetic traits. The problem is that the environmental balance will be upset.

It's worth it.

And yes, white people would do the same thing predominantly white countries if they thought it would help stop an untreatable, incurable disease.

Liberals who are afraid of everything scientific come off sounding like Republicans, and conspiracy theories to explain humanitarian efforts make you sound like Tea-baggers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xanxia
Dazed and Confused
05:25 AM on 11/12/2010
What are the negative effects these mosquitoes can bring to the environment? And can they do this kind of intervention with other disease carrying insects? Can these same mosquitoes help with malaria and yellow fever?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shaw
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
11:50 AM on 11/12/2010
I believe they have been doing it with bees in Europe..specifically England.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titanshanks
Back for more
02:39 PM on 11/12/2010
I'm not an ecologist, but I know one effect is that with fewer mosquitoes, frogs and the fish which feed on mosquito larvae lose a large portion of their food source. That leads to fewer frogs, fish, etc, leading to fewer frog-eaters and fish-eaters, sending a shock wave up the food chain. It's not a minor issue, but:

They're already spraying for mosquitoes, and rightly so if it's saving many humans' lives. And spraying is (I think) usually indiscriminate--it kills all sorts of organisms and contaminates others, and I could be wrong here- it may have changed- but certainly in the past the really nasty sprays like DDT worked their way up the food chain. I've heard of some sprays which are supposed to target very specific proteins in mosquitoes' eggs or something, so perhaps they're not all as bad as I described. But I can't see any way that spraying is better than this solution.

An ecologist would know better, but I suspect that if mosquitoes leave a gap in the ecological system, another insect will very quickly take advantage of it and the system will right itself. But there's no question that screwing with the food chain can have serious consequences. I just think it's well worth it in this case, and I think people are afraid of it for the wrong reason. I think your questions are the ones to be asking, and not just because you complimented my post earlier:-)
09:16 PM on 11/11/2010
Yeah, nothing to worry about. Genetically modified animals released into the population. What could possibly go wrong....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titanshanks
Back for more
11:00 PM on 11/11/2010
Are you worried they'll pass on their sterility to their offspring?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xanxia
Dazed and Confused
05:27 AM on 11/12/2010
:D well...ive seen too many end of the world movies and they always start with humans and genetic mutations. its funny. with the scientific advances now i can only imagine what we will do next
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Ipswich, Mass. 1641
08:43 PM on 11/11/2010
2 words. Africanized bees.
09:16 PM on 11/11/2010
The Africanized bees weren't supposed to be released, the skeeters are designed to be released by the billions. Bad analogy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Christensen
Of course I mock you.
07:47 PM on 11/11/2010
So here's a quick poll. Was this an experiment on mosquitoes or an experiment on people using mosquitoes?
09:18 PM on 11/11/2010
It's an experiment on how to make money reducing mosquitoes.
06:22 PM on 11/11/2010
Sounds like the beginning to a horror film
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:09 PM on 11/11/2010
All I can say is, notice that they didn't release them in London.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
08:46 PM on 11/11/2010
Could that be because the population of dengue-spreading vectors is very low in London?
09:11 PM on 11/11/2010
They wouldn't have been allowed to do so regardless of the risk level.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zumajim
Reality has a liberal bias.
05:45 PM on 11/11/2010
The recent death of surfer Andy Irons has been attributed to dengue fever. I'll admit I knew next to nothing about the disease until that sad event. I thought dengue was found in equatorial Africa, but the Caribbean? Yikes. That aside, I'm not sure that science can eradicate a disease by killing off the carrier. Didn't really work for malaria, did it? I'd rather see more research going into vaccines.
06:15 PM on 11/11/2010
Dengue is Ki-swahili for an evil spirit that causes bone pain. It got transliterated to "Dandy Fever" in the Carribean because it caused people to walk with a "dandy" (aristocratic) gait (due to the bone pain / arthalgia). In Philadelphia, the site of the first US case in the late 1700s, it was called break bone fever.

Plenty of research is going into vaccines, but because of the specific etiology of Dengue (really bad infections by multiple Dengue viruses), generating an effective vaccine is a challenge. The intent of the sterile insect technique is not to kill off the carrier, but rather simply to reduce the load.

The mosquitoes that carry Dengue (and other viruses) are all all over South Asia, the Carribean, Central and South America, and the lower US. As temperatures rise and people continue to travel, the prevalence will only increase.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
08:47 PM on 11/11/2010
Thank you for an extremely informative comment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titanshanks
Back for more
11:21 PM on 11/11/2010
Good question--it can. Italy worked to drain the malarial Maremma marshes for quite some time (I want to say centuries, though I don't know when the efforts began). Under Mussolini the efforts were greatly ramped up, and by the 70's Italy was declared malaria free.

Now I'm not saying I'm a fan of draining marshes, but yes; killing off the carrier can eradicate the disease.

Incidentally, malaria is an Italian word meaning "bad air," and when I was in Italy a few years ago people still, rather adorably, used the name of the old marshlands Maremma! as a mild curse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xanxia
Dazed and Confused
05:17 AM on 11/12/2010
I love it that i learn about things coming here in hp :) There are people with incredible minds. I appreciate that. I just came from reading about Palin's wisecracks so this is refreshing
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tomteboda
05:44 PM on 11/12/2010
It also worked largely in the United States, where malaria was once a rampant health problem.
yournext865
My micro-bio is empty
05:21 PM on 11/11/2010
i think a hear a train of disaster coming.