More

Jalal Talabani President, Iraq Parliament Says

BARBARA SURK and REBECCA SANTANA   11/11/10 06:47 PM ET   AP

Talabani President

BAGHDAD — Iraq's president gave Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki the nod to form the next government Thursday after an eight-month deadlock, keeping him in his post despite a dramatic Sunni walkout from parliament that demonstrated the deep distrust between the two sides.

The walkout and the fact that it came just one day after an accord was forged to work together dealt a blow to hopes for a unified government – especially one that ensures continued Shiite domination while giving Sunnis a role far short of the greater political power they seek.

Sunni support is crucial. The Americans had been pushing for them to have a significant role, fearing that otherwise, disillusioned Sunnis could turn to the insurgency, fueling new violence as the last of U.S. troops prepare to leave by the end of next year.

The power-sharing deal reached Wednesday night was heralded by some politicians as a breakthrough, ending the months of wrangling since the inconclusive March 7 parliament elections. But Sunnis were already accusing al-Maliki of not fulfilling promises and have warned they could pull out if they are not met.

At a press conference after the walkout, a lawmaker from the Sunni-backed Iraqiya bloc, Haider al-Mulla, did not answer when asked whether the bloc would participate in the government. Instead, he said Iraqiya would seek "explanations from al-Maliki and State of Law over their broken commitments."

The session was called so lawmakers could take the first formal steps toward forming the new government by naming senior leadership positions. It began with a show of unity, as al-Maliki and his top rival, Iraqiya's leader Ayad Allawi, sat next to each other in the chamber, smiling and chatting.

The first vote went smoothly, with a Sunni from Allawi's Iraqiya block, Osama al-Nujaifi, elected parliament speaker. But before the vote to elect a president, about 57 Iraqiya lawmakers walked out. They had demanded that lawmakers first vote to reverse a ban on three of the blocs' members by a committee charged with rooting out members of Saddam Hussein's regime from government posts. Their demand was rejected.

Iraqiya lawmakers have said that as part of the power-sharing deal, the other factions agreed to get rid of the controversial De-Baathification law entirely within two years. Sunnis view the De-Baathification process as a thinly veiled Shiite attempt to bar Sunnis from returning to power.

Despite the walkout – which Allawi joined – lawmakers proceeded with the session and elected Kurdish leader Jalal Talabani as president for a second term. Talabani addressed the lawmakers remaining in the parliament hall, declaring: "Today is a day of victory, the victory of the free Iraqi will."

He then formally requested al-Maliki form a new government. Al-Maliki has 30 days to do so, as the factions work out the allotment of ministry positions, including key posts like foreign affairs and the interior ministry in charge of security forces.

A Shiite lawmaker from al-Maliki's alliance said the walkout was a surprise and emphasizes the suspicions that still define relations between Shiites and Sunnis who used to fight out their political differences on the streets with guns. But with or without Iraqiya, the political process would go on, he said.

"We have a parliament, an elected president and a candidate to form a government. There is no way back," said Abdul-Hadi al-Hassani.

The Sunni minority had put great hopes in the March elections and succeeded in lifting their bloc to a narrow victory: Allawi's Sunni-backed Iraqiya coalition won the most seats in the March elections, but not a majority. Al-Maliki, whose State of Law party came in second, cobbled together alliances with Iranian-backed religious Shiite parties, gathering enough seats to thwart Allawi's bids for either the prime minister job and the presidency.

Instead, Allawi is to lead a newly created council to oversee issues of security and foreign policy. But the council's powers remain vague, and already there were signs of a fight brewing over the extent of its authority.

Iraqiya lawmaker Falah al-Nakeed said the council would be a 20-member body including the prime minister but headed by Allawi. He said all strategic decisions over security, foreign policy and anything concerning the "destiny" of the country, would have to be passed unanimously by the council.

"It will be a real check on al-Maliki's power," al-Nakeed said.

But lawmakers from al-Maliki's State of Law bloc implied that was not the case. Al-Maliki is unlikely to give up the reins over security issues, and one of his key Shiite partners – the staunchly anti-American Sadrist movement – also appears to be angling for a hand as well.

The extent of Sunni power in the new government will not become clear until the allocation of ministry posts is announced. But their weight in the government will depend on other factors as well. Power in Iraq is often determined not just by formal roles but by the personalities of the individuals and their party backing.

The presidency, for example, is largely a ceremonial job, but Talabani has been able to wield considerable power because of his background as a longtime Kurdish leader.

Allawi has been criticized for his lack of participation in the previous parliament, preferring instead to spend time at his London house. For his council to have any weight, Allawi would have to play a vigorous and daily role.

The new government could also give a significant role to the Sadrist movement, led by anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, who has grown closer to Iran. Al-Maliki's alliance with the Sadrists was key to keeping him in power.

Sadrist lawmaker Hakim al-Zamili, said they have yet to discuss details of ministry positions. But he said the first thing to do was a shake-up of the security services, raising the prospect that Sadrists seek positions there.

__

Associated Press writers Hamid Ahmed and Bushra Juhi in Baghdad, Sameer N. Yacoub in Amman, Jordan and Qassim Abdul-Zahra in Boston contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BAGHDAD — Iraq's president gave Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki the nod to form the next government Thursday after an eight-month deadlock, keeping him in his post despite a dramatic Sunni...
BAGHDAD — Iraq's president gave Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki the nod to form the next government Thursday after an eight-month deadlock, keeping him in his post despite a dramatic Sunni...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 59
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
alan2a
Actual Progressive
04:46 PM on 11/12/2010
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
photo
Salfana
Concerned citizen
10:19 AM on 11/12/2010
Isn't ironic that our Iraq illegal war and bad policies we handed up giving Iraq to Iran on a golden plate. You can say now that Iran was the King Maker.

Before we invaded Iraq, Iran and Iraq hated each other. Now they are the best trading partners and both have Shiites in power. In light of the growing influence of Iran in Iraq politics, I suggest that our usual warmongers would like to strike Iran so we can keep Iraq to ourselves.

The disastrous policies of DE-Baathification, put into law by the Bush administration with his Viceroy Bremer and the shadowy figureChalabi, triggered a civil war. Most Sunnis who had most government jobs found themselves without work overnight. That meant teachers, soldiers, all government civil jobs. Most Sunnis couldn't get a job anymore because in order to get a job while Saddam ruled you need to be a member of the Baath party. Did we really believe the Sunnis would sit there and do nothing? They were the rulers before the war.

So this new government will not solve the problem for the Sunnis that feels left out. Furthermore, there will be a census in rich oil Kirkuk with the Kurds wanting the price. This will determine which of the Kurds, Sunnis or Shiites is the majority. Again, a lot of tension right now.
10:30 PM on 11/12/2010
Or so the official story goes.

Iraq's military under Saddam went to war with Iran, but in no way is this reflective of the sentiment of the population. Saddam was a US puppet tyrant acting on the behest of his master to act out part of a long strategised offensive against the most likely leader in the oil rich region of the middle east. War on Afghanistan and the occupation of Iraq are subsequent maneuvers in this same strategy.

Iranians don't censor their textbooks to omit the fact that the border between Iraq and Iran was imposed by the Allied Powers after WW2, so Sunnis in Iraq are more likely to identify with Sunnis in Iran than Shiah in their own country and the converse is true for the Shiah.

The Ottoman Empire was very much a aristocratic, theocratic tyrannical fiefdom
photo
Salfana
Concerned citizen
11:09 AM on 11/13/2010
I completely agree with you on the fraternization of both Shiah and Sunnis from both countries. I was merely talking about Iraq and Iran government since the Shah was ousted by the Iranians and the US lost their OK man to rob Iranian oil.

This is a West create conflict to divide and conquer to secure the oil. All the borders change by the West has been a disaster creating more tension in the area. Yes, Saddam was a US puppet. If Saddam would have had a trial we would have learned a lot about our dirty politics.

When I comment here at the HP, I can see many not knowing where is Iraq or Iran location on map so, I hope you will pardon me of not going into details. Iranians with their Persian heritage are a very sophisticated nation and massively educated. I would bet a lot of money on Iranians being more educated than our own country about the world and its history.

Thank you for your comment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
koroush1336
An human rights activist and totally anti-mullahs,
09:22 AM on 11/12/2010
As long as the mullahs are behind the stage, there will no peace in this country. The killins would go on and the devastations would continue. The problem is coming from the mullahs in Iran and nowhere else!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:58 AM on 11/12/2010
OK, we can come home now, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
09:06 AM on 11/12/2010
That would make sense, but one guesses that the generals told Obama to keep troops there, so Obama will do their bidding.
I'd guess the military wants to keep lots of troops on both of Iran's borders for some reason...
03:47 AM on 11/12/2010
The problem with Iraq is all these wacky religious parties dreaming of an islamist state.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
09:07 AM on 11/12/2010
It's a Shia majority nation that has been oppressed by a Sunni minority for decades.
It's as predictable as sunrise that they'd never let the Sunnis rule them again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donbrown
A television producer in Hawaii
02:32 AM on 11/12/2010
Mark my word this will end badly because of two main reasons:

1) The Kurds, having been nearly autonomous and benefitting from controlling the oil fields of the north, are not about to take a back seat to the far more numerous Sunni and Shiite majorities easily...who controls the oil in Kirkuk will the the main bone of contention.

2) In spite of being a minority, the Sunnis were in charge for 20 years under Saddam and cannot see themselves in subordinate status to the Shiites.

The current leadership will find themselves h*nging by their th*mbs eventually.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paganus
Classics Ninja
06:17 AM on 11/12/2010
I agree that it will not end well, but I see a Shiite reign of terror as the likely outcome. Maliki has been busy ensuring that the security forces are all commanded by people personally loyal to him. This nearly year-long dance has all been about the ethnic factions positioning themselves for the bloodbath after we leave. And we could leave tomorrow or three years from now and the same thing would happen.

Iraq is the former Yugoslavia on steroids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
09:08 AM on 11/12/2010
"The current leadership will find themselves h*nging by their th*mbs eventually"

More likely if the Shia get in real trouble they'll call on Iran to help them put the Sunnis down once and for all.
02:30 AM on 11/12/2010
Good luck, Talabani, in stopping the upcoming Iraqi civil war.

I curse Bush for launching this terrible war. What were those words he expressed on the first days of assault? "Mission accomplished?" Was it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FogBelter
Illegitimis non carborundum
12:44 AM on 11/12/2010
Iraq is heading back into a sectarian civil war. There is a reason the English and French colonial powers designed the power structure of the ME as they did after WWI to include brutal strongmen to keep the population in line ... because if you have a brutal bastard like Saddam Hussein in power over a secular Iraq all the focused hatred of peoples who would otherwise be murdering each other would be focused on him instead. Iraq had one brutal leader after another, and when the British presided over Iraq they were brutal as well. The reason for the brutal treatment of Iraqis by their leaders, as we shall soon see again, was to keep a lid on the blood feud between Shi'ite and Sunni that has existed since the beginning of Islam.

From an article by Vali Nasr

"The Shiite-Sunni conflict dates to the beginning of Islam, when a dispute over succession to Prophet Muhammad split the religion into two sects. Sunnis won control of the political institutions and suppressed the Shiites, often brutally. In the 16th century, Shiites triumphed in Iran, but in the Arab world down to modern times, they have remained on the economic and political margins. The Middle East that the British created at the end of World War I confirmed Sunni hegemony, but the war in Iraq threatens to undermine it."

http://www.spme.net/cgi-bin/articles.cgi?ID=1037

My guess, US Troops return to Iraq in force soon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leazzel
12:03 AM on 11/12/2010
Sunni, Shiite, both Islamic..different fatwa. Can't they just, get along?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
09:09 AM on 11/12/2010
Tell it to the Irish, or the Serbs.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WasteNJ
All Out Of Bubble Gum.
09:46 AM on 11/12/2010
Short answer? No.
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
11:52 PM on 11/11/2010
The US bans the Kurds and Al Sadr from government, pushing for a Shiite unity government. Now the Sunnis walk out. That's the end of the game we all knew was unavoidable before the US declared war against Iraq. One more reason why US wars are so wrong. Billions of dollars spent to kiII hundreds of thousands Iraqis for nothing. You could get the same result by helping the Shiites overthrow Saddam 9 years ago. But the US was only interested in steaIing the lraqi oil. Blood for oil, that's the truth of the US wars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinyrainbows
12:36 AM on 11/12/2010
At least a lot of Iraqis were killed.
photo
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
02:33 AM on 11/12/2010
Your turn will come from this, piece of garbage
08:20 AM on 11/12/2010
Meh, commerce drives the world.
researcher
researcher
11:44 PM on 11/11/2010
I guess the sunni dont like our puppet gov.

this is heading straight for a civil war.

we love to get involved in civil wars.

how many americans know that vietnam was a civil war? ie viet cong.

our next goal will be to help create a civil war in iran then take sides. ie oil.

the sad part is that americans think they have a right to police the world.

communism was used as a fear factor now it is WMD's and terrorism.

it is always some fear to keep the industrial military complex needed and funded.

to watch your country self destruct with its imperialism is difficult to do but self destruct it must.

the universe demands it. the same mentality that fosters an imperialism is the same mentality that is causing self destruction within america.

this is not punishment by some god made in the image of humans but a mentality of greed at any cost. even the cost of destroying other nations and lives of our own citizens.

take your next vac to iraq and see the results of shock and awe.
11:49 PM on 11/11/2010
Americans don't think they have a right, they think they have a profit motive.
photo
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
02:34 AM on 11/12/2010
They think they have a right to a profit motive
11:00 PM on 11/11/2010
And to think the US wasted 3 trillion on these buffoons. If we could only send DA Bush over there to be their new president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
10:47 PM on 11/11/2010
This won't end well.
10:37 PM on 11/11/2010
Here is how the largest circulation newspaper in India, editorializes the Iraqi government formation. Note that Obama has just left India and the reference to the trip, in the bottom of the article, is so mind boggling.

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/article880280.ece

The question is what did US achieve with trillions of dollars and loss of life?
photo
Salfana
Concerned citizen
02:21 AM on 11/12/2010
Thanks for the link. Very interesting.
photo
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
02:37 AM on 11/12/2010
Thanks for the post, one cannot have too many perspectives
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:30 PM on 11/11/2010
Iraq has 3 choices:

1) Break up into Shia, Kurd and Sunni nations with ownership of oil determined strictly by borders.

2) Create a Federation with 3 largely autonomous components (as in above) with the oil wealth shared according to a strictly enforced, fair formula.

3) Become the 51st State.

The US has so far resisted every effort to do the smart thing, i.e., some version of # 2 - because it insists on absolute control of the oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinyrainbows
10:31 PM on 11/11/2010
What makes you say we control the oil?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Codefile
Does anybody know the tab to that song?
04:09 AM on 11/12/2010
M A R I N E S and their US Armed Forces counterparts
Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard say you what !! It
is at a convenience market in YOUR neighborhood waiting
for your POV tinyrainbows. Filler up!!
And you do filler up thanks to USA control of oils accessibility.

What...you thought you just run down to the pump and prime?
Tinyrainbows it is BIG CONCERN...so "we" control the oil. Check?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
10:51 PM on 11/11/2010
I think we've "helped" enough in Iraq already.
Let them sort it out.