More

George Bush Book 'Decision Points' Lifted From Advisers' Books

First Posted: 11/12/10 01:48 PM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

When Crown Publishing inked a deal with George W. Bush for his memoirs, the publisher knew it wasn't getting Faulkner. But the book, at least, promises "gripping, never-before-heard detail" about the former president's key decisions, offering to bring readers "aboard Air Force One on 9/11, in the hours after America's most devastating attack since Pearl Harbor; at the head of the table in the Situation Room in the moments before launching the war in Iraq," and other undisclosed and weighty locations.

Crown also got a mash-up of worn-out anecdotes from previously published memoirs written by his subordinates, from which Bush lifts quotes word for word, passing them off as his own recollections. He took equal license in lifting from nonfiction books about his presidency or newspaper or magazine articles from the time. Far from shedding light on how the president approached the crucial "decision points" of his presidency, the clip jobs illuminate something shallower and less surprising about Bush's character: He's too lazy to write his own memoir.

Bush, on his book tour, makes much of the fact that he largely wrote the book himself, guffawing that critics who suspected he didn't know how to read are now getting a comeuppance. Not only does Bush know how to read, it turns out, he knows how to Google, too. Or his assistant does. Bush notes in his acknowledgments that "[m]uch of the research for this book was conducted by the brilliant and tireless Peter Rough. Peter spent the past 18 months digging through archives, searching the internet[s], and sifting through reams of paper." Bush also collaborated on the book with his former speechwriter, Christopher Michel.

Many of Bush's literary misdemeanors exemplify pedestrian sloth, but others are higher crimes against the craft of memoir. In one prime instance, Bush relates a poignant meeting between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and a Tajik warlord on Karzai's Inauguration Day. It's the kind of scene that offers a glimpse of a hopeful future for the beleaguered nation. Witnessing such an exchange could color a president's outlook, could explain perhaps Bush's more optimistic outlook and give insight into his future decisions. Except Bush didn't witness it. Because, as he himself writes later in the book, he wasn't at Karzai's inauguration.

His absence doesn't stop Bush from relating this anecdote: "When Karzai arrived in Kabul for his inauguration on December 22 - 102 days after 9/11 - several Northern Alliance leaders and their bodyguards greeted him at an airport. As Karzai walked across the tarmac alone, a stunned Tajik warlord asked where all his men were. Karzai, responded, 'Why, General, you are my men. All of you who are Afghans are my men.'"

That meeting would sound familiar to Ahmed Rashid, author of "The Mess in Afghanistan", who wrote in the New York Review of Books: "At the airport to receive [Karzai] was the warlord General Mohammad Fahim, a Tajik from the Panjshir Valley .... As the two men shook hands on the tarmac, Fahim looked confused. 'Where are your men?' he asked. Karzai turned to him in his disarmingly gentle manner of speaking. 'Why General," he replied, "you are my men--all of you are Afghans and are my men.'"

Bush's lifting of the anecdote, while disappointing on a literary level, does raise the intriguing possibility that Bush actually read Rashid's article. Doubtful. It was excerpted in the Googleable free intro to his NYRB story. (Still, thinking of Bush browsing the NYRB's website almost makes it worthwhile.)

In a separate case of scene fabrication, though, Bush writes of a comment made by his rival John McCain as if it was said to him directly. "The surge gave [McCain] a chance to create distance between us, but he didn't take it. He had been a longtime advocate of more troops in Iraq, and he supported the new strategy wholeheartedly. "I cannot guarantee success," he said, "But I can guarantee failure if we don't adopt this new strategy." A dramatic and untold coming-together of longtime rivals? Well, not so much. It comes straight from a Washington Post story. McCain was talking to reporters, not to Bush.

In most instances of Bush's literary swiping, he was at least present for the scene. But the point of a memoir is that it is the author's version of events. Bush's book is a collection of other people's versions of events. But that's not what Bush promises readers. "Decision Points is based primarily on my recollections. With help from researchers, I have confirmed my account with government documents, personal interviews, news reports, and other sources, some of which remain classified," he offers. Bush, in his memoir, confesses to authorizing waterboarding, which is a war crime, so the lifting of a few passages might seem like a minor infraction. But Bush's laziness undermines the historical value of the memoir. Bush "recollects" - in a more literal sense of the term - quotes by pulling his and others verbatim from other books, calling into question what he genuinely remembers from the time and casting doubt on any conclusions he draws about what his mindset was at the time.

In a final irony, Bush appears to draw heavily from several of Bob Woodward's books and also from Robert Draper's "Dead Certain". The Bush White House called the books' accuracy into question when they were initially published.

The similarities between the way Bush recollects his and other quotes may be a case of remarkable random chance or evidence that he and his deputies were in an almost supernatural sync. If so, he essentially shares a brain with General Tommy Franks.

Bush writes: "Tommy told the national security team that he was working to apply the same concept of a light footprint to Iraq... 'If we have multiple, highly skilled Special Operations forces identifying targets for precision-guided munitions, we will need fewer conventional grounds forces,' he said. 'That's an important lesson learned from Afghanistan.' I had a lot of concerns. ... I asked the team to keep working on the plan. 'We should remain optimistic that diplomacy and international pressure will succeed in disarming the regime,' I said at the end of the meeting. 'But we cannot allow weapons of mass destruction to fall into the hands of terrorists. I will not allow that to happen.'"

Franks, in his memoir American Soldier, writes: "'For example, if we have multiple, highly skilled Special Operations forces identifying targets for precision-guided munitions, we will need fewer conventional ground forces. That's an important lesson learned from Afghanistan.' President Bush's questions continued throughout the briefing.... Before the VTC ended, President Bush addressed us all. 'We should remain optimistic that diplomacy and international pressure will succeed in disarming the regime.' ... The President paused. 'Protecting the security of the United States is my responsibility,' he continued. 'But we cannot allow weapons of mass destruction to fall into the hands of terrorists.' He shook his head. 'I will not allow that to happen.'"

A Crown official rejected the suggestion that Bush had done anything inappropriate, suggesting that the similarities speak to its inherent accuracy. The editor of Bush's book wasn't immediately able to comment.

But if you already bought Bush's book thinking you were getting only his own thoughts, you haven't entirely wasted your money. Finding lifted passages in Bush's book is like an Easter egg hunt. Look for passages with a number of quotes back to back and then slap the passage into Google Books or plagiarism detection software you might have access to. The slideshow below shows what HuffPost has found so far. If you find any more, send the passage to ryan@huffingtonpost.com and we'll verify it and add it to the list.

Hamid Karzai
1 of 16
From Decision Points, p. 205: "When Karzai arrived in Kabul for his inauguration on December 22 – 102 days after 9/11 – several Northern Alliance leaders and their bodyguards greeted him at an airport. As Karzai walked across the tarmac alone, a stunned Tajik warlord asked where all his men were. Karzai, responded, 'Why, General, you are my men. All of you who are Afghans are my men.'"

From Ahmed Rashid’s The Mess in Afghanistan, quoted in The New York Times Review of Books: “At the airport to receive [Karzai] was the warlord General Mohammad Fahim, a Tajik from the Panjshir Valley …. As the two men shook hands on the tarmac, Fahim looked confused. 'Where are your men?' he asked. Karzai turned to him in his disarmingly gentle manner of speaking. 'Why General,' he replied, “you are my men—all of you are Afghans and are my men...'"

Bush was not at Karzai’s Innauguration.
Total comments: 13650 | Post a Comment
1 of 16
Rate This Slide
Literary Malpractice

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
When Crown Publishing inked a deal with George W. Bush for his memoirs, the publisher knew it wasn't getting Faulkner. But the book, at least, promises "gripping, never-before-heard detail" about the ...
When Crown Publishing inked a deal with George W. Bush for his memoirs, the publisher knew it wasn't getting Faulkner. But the book, at least, promises "gripping, never-before-heard detail" about the ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13,650
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (340 total)
  1 of 21  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
RButler 07:40 AM on 11/13/2010
He and his cohorts, besides ending many lives unnecessarily, has ruined millions of lives in this country when you think of people who have  lost their jobs, homes, retirements, health care, etc. and will not be able to make it up in their lifetimes. 
They've suffered their own 'Great Depressions' while others prospered.  Remember, he had a friend named 'Kenny Boy' who did that for a few  Read More...
02:01 PM on 12/03/2010
Are you serious? Bush goes and takes quotes from other sources and you're saying it's wrong? Sure citation could be used here or there but seriously, if he would have worded something different, you'd but on Bush blaming him for being false about more things in this book than you already have. Give him a break for crying out loud.
06:40 AM on 12/01/2010
Lies, belligerence, plagiarism, moral ambivalence and no consequences. This is what America has become.
07:04 PM on 11/29/2010
He does to appear to be exhibiting the effects of a long term abuse of alcohol & who knows what other drugs. Maybe the secret service will expose this problem for further scrutiny. I am not surprised at his plagiarism & the lack of great leadership that led the country down towards the bottom where he seems to fit in better than as a leader of renown. He was a mistake as governor of Texas & I never voted for him & have absolutely no idea how he got elected except by devoted republicans who know not what makes a great leader for a great country that has misled the world for a long time at the expense of those less informed than they should have been. There may be some justice someday, but I think not as that would make his party look as bad as they seem to be, not caring what is right for the homeland.
09:32 AM on 11/24/2010
You all are concerned about THIS instead of HIM ADMITTING HE ORDER TORTURE? What is wrong with everyone? We have an on the record confession! Where are the indictments?
11:06 AM on 11/20/2010
Bush caught stealing again,

"Book" em Danno !
01:42 PM on 11/19/2010
Can't say I'm really surprised by this at all.
07:45 AM on 11/19/2010
the tommy franks incident must be lifted because the name of their war was operation iraqi liberation at the time.
05:44 PM on 11/18/2010
More Leftest Slander and Lies. An Objective analysis provided by Plagiarism Today shows without a doubt this post is almost entirely baseless and a fraudulent attempt to assassinate the character of George Bush. Here is a link, go read it yourself: http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2010/11/16/the-george-w-bush-plagiarism-controversy/ . Typical of the this propaganda rag Huffpost. Utterly sophomoric pandering to populist progressives while hypocritically creating controversy regardless of their validity to turn the almighty dollars in ad revenue.
09:11 PM on 11/17/2010
With purpose, Ryan Grim tries desperately to point out that he "caught" Bush in a lie regarding Karzai's inauguration. Ryan states - "Except Bush didn't witness it. Because, as he himself writes later in the book, he wasn't at Karzai's inauguration." Bush never intended to lead the reader to believe he was there, in fact, the very next sentence of the same paragraph Ryan quoted, Bush stated he met Karzai for the first time 5 weeks later. It wasn't "later in the book" as Ryan would like you to believe. The photo of Karzai's inauguration without Bush in the rank and file was a nice touch, a "got ya" moment. People are going to read this and believe Ryan, and it just isn't right. It makes me wonder what else in Ryan's article is misleading. It's a shame that people will read this and take it for the truth. There are plenty of mistakes the Bush administration made that warrants discussion, but doing it in this misleading way is just plain wrong. Where's your integrity, and honesty?
02:30 PM on 11/17/2010
Wow I dont even like Bush and I think this article is rediculous. So is everything he has ever said off limits? I mean 90% of the issues brought up are us Bush quoting himself or someone else. you would expect that QUOTES would be similar across ALL other accounts of the event. This level of bias is laughable...and I even consider myself biased against him.
02:24 PM on 11/17/2010
If you really take a moment and think about this, of course President Bush would have similar passages to what others who worked around the White House have written.

The anti-Bush crowd and others need to get over themselves. This is all in the past and let's keep it that way.

Our country has too many other problems facing us - unemployment, weak economy, the Afghanistan war, the environment, real terrorist threats, AIDS, etc. If we as a society would stop bickering over "who did what" or "where was he born" or "gotcha" games - then maybe we can focus on solving some of these problems.

Partisanship is healthy in some ways, and could help us to come up with solutions - but when either side is so blinded by ideologies and hatred then nothing happens. Our government has truly become a stagnant swamp rife with congressional "alligators" whose only instincts are surviving the next election and getting fatter on soft money and large donations.

I'm not a "teabagger" because they are also hateful - and sometimes racist. I'm also not a "flaming liberal" because they too are hateful. No. I'm an average person who has gotten tired of politics and the status quo. We MUST put aside blind allegences and work to solve our nations woes.

"Get over yourself and get a life!", is what I say to those who rant about Bush or Obama. Why not do something constructive? Work to solve the problem, not be the problem.
12:42 PM on 11/17/2010
Bush didn't tell the truth? I'm shocked, shocked I say.
07:29 AM on 11/17/2010
Perfect time for this book to come out...
photo
seeksthetruth
Why is my tax rate higher than Romney's?
01:54 AM on 11/17/2010
Former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Michael Brown have already come out and said Bush didn't tell the truth in his "memoir".
photo
seeksthetruth
Why is my tax rate higher than Romney's?
01:51 AM on 11/17/2010
Glad to hear this book has already been marked down to 50% off.