More

US Funds Circumcision To Fight AIDS In Zimbabwe

ANGUS SHAW   11/14/10 11:36 AM ET   AP

Aids Circumscion

HARARE, Zimbabwe — The U.S. ranks high on President Robert Mugabe's enemies list, but at ground level it is leading a war on AIDS that may help save the life of 32-year-old Tineyi Marokwe and hundreds of thousands of other Zimbabweans.

The weapon is cheap and simple: male circumcision, considered a significant reducer of AIDS transmission.

In a 10-minute surgical operation, Marokwe recently became one of more than a million Zimbabwean men in the most sexually active age group who are being targeted for circumcision during the next seven years.

Dr. Bill Jansen, a senior American adviser with the U.S. Agency for International Development in Zimbabwe, says trials and circumcision pilot programs in South Africa and East Africa have shown a reduction in HIV infection by 60 percent.

The Zimbabwe program, begun in May 2009, has carried out 12,000 circumcisions. The U.S. spent $6.6 million on it in the first year and more money is promised as the program scales up.

It makes a quiet counterpoint to the stridency of Mugabe's confrontation with the West, primarily the United States and former colonial ruler Britain, over the sanctions imposed on his government because of its human rights record.

So vilified are Western nations by Mugabe that few Zimbabweans realize their continuing aid programs are the mainstay of humanitarian assistance to the troubled nation.

The U.S. is Zimbabwe's biggest aid donor – more than $1 billion since 2002 – and the biggest contributor to nationwide modern AIDS clinics that have tested and counseled 2 million people. This month it pledged another $50 million to its wider AIDS programs that include supplies of AIDS drugs.

While Mugabe has done nothing to hinder the program, some volunteers assigned to explain sexual health issues to the poor have been accused by Mugabe's supporters of abetting a U.S. political agenda and working for the opposition in next year's election.

Marokwe says he was afraid to go to the clinic in western Harare, the capital.

"I was worried, but when I came here I learned this could save my life," the unemployed laborer told The Associated Press.

Nurses unpacked one of 60,000 single-use circumcision kits allocated by USAID – forceps, disposable scalpels, needles and gauze – and administered local anesthesia while surgeon Shame Dendere exchanged cheerful banter with Marokwe.

He was told to expect minor pain after the anesthetic had worn off, to abstain from sex for six weeks and to come back three times for follow-up treatment.

The procedure complete, Marokwe dressed and headed to a bus stop to ride home, saying "I'm going to tell all my friends."

The clinic conducts more than 40 procedures a day and expects demand to grow to as many as 180 a day as word spreads.

If the program can circumcise 1.2 million Zimbabwean men by 2017, 750,000 new HIV infections can be averted, Jansen said. The organizers envisage a future stage for the program with circumcision at birth. At present more than 10 percent of Zimbabwean men are circumcised, mainly in tribal ceremonies during early childhood.

While condoms and fidelity remain essential, circumcision helps because the foreskin is more vulnerable to the AIDS virus.

According to Population Services International, an independent family planning and sexual health organization, Zimbabwe's infection rate is about 13 percent of the population, but rises above 20 percent in the 13-30 age group.

The circumcision is free, with USAID picking up most of the cost, helped by the international Population Services group and health care charities, but a nominal fee is being considered because "when something is free, there is a tendency for people not to attach any value to it," said Roy Dhlamini, a PSI social worker.

He said when the U.S. government provided free condoms, many Zimbabweans shunned them. That changed when they were priced at a token 10 U.S. cents.

Besides performing circumcisions, the doctors must cope with misinformation: that foreskins are used in healing rituals and witchcraft, in skin grafts or skin lotions.

"We've seen this in the media and heard it in our interaction with communities," Jansen said.

Fred Togara, 36, a brick maker and father of two, said he knew little about circumcision other than from verses he read in the Old Testament.

He said that after a policeman friend who got circumcised told him about the U.S. program, "I wanted to do this process for hygiene and put safety first."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 73
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:38 PM on 12/13/2010
A Cochrane Review of HIV-circumcision studies finds:
"Despite the positive results of a number of observational studies, there are not yet sufficient grounds to conclude that male circumcision, as a preventive strategy for HIV infection, does more good than harm."

"Circumcision itself may be a proxy measure of the knowledge and behaviour learnt during initiation, when young men are taught about traditional sexual practices, including monogamy and penile hygiene."

"Selection bias was problematic in all studies, and results were potentially confounded by other risk factors for transmission of HIV such as sexual behaviour and religion. Circumcised and uncircumcised groups (in cohort and cross-sectional studies) and HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups (in case-control studies) were seldom balanced for all or most of the 10 risk factors that we identified as potential confounders prior to quality assessment."

* "Age
* Sexual behaviour
* Location of trial
* Religion
* Education, occupation, socio-economic status
* Sexual behaviour – measured by age at first intercourse, number of sexual partners, contact with sex workers
* Any sexually transmitted infections
* Condom use
* Migration status, travel to different countries
* Other possible exposures, e.g. injection, blood transfusions"

"As HIV is related to sexual behaviour, which may in turn be partly determined by culture and religion, strong confounding factors in these studies seem likely."
06:02 PM on 11/24/2010
This article is yet another example of irreponsible journalism. The writer fails to report anything at all about differential rates of HIV between men and women, who is more likely to get infected and how - or basically, who is most at risk. Althought the research demonstrates reduction in male infection rates, it says nothing about female infection risk or the likelihood that men willl continue to infect women. In a nutshell, this program is about protecting the perpetrators not the victims. Sad, because so much more can be done to help the women.
01:16 AM on 11/19/2010
Since medical male "circumcision" (more properly called male genital mutilation) is demonstrably useless in preventing AIDS, throwing money at it is a waste of precious resources. How can we trust activists, foundations and government leaders that push such arrant nonsense to handle any AIDS funding properly? Consider that the gay male population of the USA devastated by AIDS was circumcised...

Six African nations have HIGHER rates of AIDS among circumcised men, circumcision does nothing to prevent male-to-female transmission, nothing to prevent male-to-male transmission, and the so-called studies that purport to show some benefit female-to-male have been blasted out of the water by researchers outside of the US (for a real eye-opener, see the magisterial round-up at:

http://circumstitions.com/HIV.html

We remain the only Western nation pushing male genital mutilation as a snake-oil cure-all for whatever ills befall the world. Our researchers ignore their own biases, ignore "dry sex", ignore cultural and religious differences in the spread of disease - all so that the whole world will look just like them. Those original African studies were pretty much destroyed when analyzed in other countries that don't see male genital mutilation as a magic cure-all, but you won't find these devastating critiques widely spread in American media (or, tragically, in African media where the truth that circumcision is useless against AIDS is most needed).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:05 AM on 11/18/2010
So we'll hack off their penis but we won't buy them condoms?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrHas
03:26 AM on 11/17/2010
Awesome work by the US agency, a 60percent reduction in spread is a huge deal. And if circumcision is the way then let it be, as studies show I helps prophylactically.
On the contrary ppl of San Francisco are about to vote on circumcision as it is part of religious tenets of some faiths. Maybe the ppl should be shown this news article before they vote.
Lol, even something proved to have Health benefits will be called fanatic if it's associated with religion.
And Oh yes, plz differentiate from this, female genital mutilation, a complete evil, which came about from the cultures of certain localities in africa (eg. female infanticide from parts of India is another example)
01:39 AM on 11/24/2010
The 60% statistic for AIDS is garbage science - researchers separate from the African studies discovered no benefits to circumcision in male-male transmission of AIDS and no benefit in male-female transmission. The African studies only addressed female-male transmission, a tiny subset in the spread of AIDS, apparently lumping together disparate groups from different regions without controlling for cultural practices like dry sex and widespread use of prostitutes outside of Muslim (circumcised) regions. The science was so badly managed, men who elected to be circumcised were checked for AIDS before the surgery and eliminated - something not done for the intact men, thus biasing the entire sample.

As for your statement about female genital mutilation - the World Health Organization lists different degrees of FGM, some identical to male circumcision, but all banned in the US. Rachel Stallings' study of mutilated women in Tanzania showed marked reduction in AIDS, while an Italian study states that FGM women reported orgasms 70% of the time during sex. None of this justifies FGM (a horror), it just shows the ignorance of those who promote male circumcision, a dangerous process that kills babies everywhere (including the US), and results in deaths and castrations due to infection across Africa. When you try to attack FGM by minimizing male genital mutilation, you reveal your hubris and hypocrisy to FGM's practitioners; your own prejudices weaken any attempt to end FGM by making its adherents see you for what you are, a biased product of a male-mutilating culture.
05:40 PM on 11/16/2010
This is weird. In the mostly African American neighborhoods in Houston, TX, billboards against circumcision are popping up. The billboards proclaim that these are dangerous and unnecessary surgeries. With African Americans having the highest HIV rates in the nation, why wouldn't wouldn't the US promote circumcision in these neighborhoods?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Notsosurearewe
Swish swish.
05:29 PM on 11/17/2010
There's a problem with the generalize-ability of the study. I've been reading up on this (it's rather detailed) but to put it bluntly, it wouldn't work as well here.
04:12 PM on 11/16/2010
More waste and experimentation on a relatively unsophisticated and powerless population.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:07 AM on 11/18/2010
Sophistication is relative and they're only powerless because people with your attitude colonized their land and took everything of value before leaving them globally crippled.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
iskra
Natural enemy of sharks and tro//s
11:58 AM on 11/16/2010
Zero risk if they just cut the whole thing off. No testicular cancer either if you remove the testicles while you're there. No breast cancer if we remove those at birth too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VanTroi
07:39 PM on 11/15/2010
How about promoting condoms?
07:45 PM on 11/15/2010
They already do that. Der.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Notsosurearewe
Swish swish.
05:30 PM on 11/17/2010
I'm not sure about Zimbabwe in particular, but I know for certain parts of Africa the ruling elite are actively against the promotion of condoms. Attitudes are changing, but it's a slow process.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:08 AM on 11/18/2010
Catholics actively preach that condoms are ineffective and evil.
photo
piul05
Can I have a biscuit yet?
05:28 PM on 11/15/2010
What's new? Back in the 70's, it used to fund the sterilization of women of child-bearing age in the Brazilian North-East.

It's the same imposition of any particular national dogma; only that now, instead of women, boys get mutilated.
04:35 PM on 11/15/2010
Education > circumcision. This will only provide them with a false sense of security, similar to the ludicrous belief that having sexual relations with a virgin will cure AIDs. The issue is a deadly combination of misinformation and a complete and utter lack of education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
06:56 PM on 11/15/2010
These are men who think they can rid themselves of HIV if they have intercourse with a virgin. Lack of education isn't the half of it. Circumcision improves public health today; education might help the next generation, if there is one, but breaking cultural and religious taboos is going to take more than a few hygiene classes.
07:42 PM on 11/15/2010
Hygiene classes? Is that what you thought I meant by education? Really?

I realize we're not dealing with Americans. Hygiene, abstinence, monogamy--that's not something that translates cross-culterally. I'm talking about realistic, culturally-specific education. Dispelling of ridiculous myths. Letting them know what works and what doesn't, based upon their cultural norms.

Even circumcision can't save them from dying of HIV, so why give them that false hope?
photo
cable1977
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance
12:53 AM on 11/16/2010
Education is a key component, but circumcision certainly does reduce the risk of contracting HIV. Just because education may work better doesn't mean that other options cannot be tried in concert to increase overall efficacy in reducing HIV transmission.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quindy
quindy
04:22 PM on 11/15/2010
Now, men in Zimbabwe will think that they can have unprotected sex because they got circumcised.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrsL
marriage & motherhood with mirth and grace
03:34 PM on 11/15/2010
How about promiting monogamy and abstinence - bet it's even more effective than circumcision!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clay Dunn-Roberts
lazy
10:01 PM on 11/15/2010
Monogamy might reduce it a little bit, but abstinence is really boring. How about education?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrsL
marriage & motherhood with mirth and grace
11:21 PM on 11/15/2010
Abstinence may be "boring" but it sure is a lot less painful than circumcision on an adult!
photo
babybecks
"because I am involved in Mankind;"
11:41 PM on 11/15/2010
Yes, promoting abstinence is very effective. Especially for the women who are forced into sex
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrsL
marriage & motherhood with mirth and grace
08:23 AM on 11/16/2010
Somehow, I'm thinking the kind of guy who do the raping are not the kind of guys who would be interested in circumcision to prevent the spread of HIV.
Paulo1
Thanks for reading, (even if you disagree)
11:47 AM on 11/15/2010
First they had to put up with British Colonialism, then it was a racist regime, currently its a kleptocracy under one of the most brutal dictators in Africa today (Mugabe) Now we add a bunch of scalpel happy Americans chasing guys to cut off a piece of their privates!

People have for years been trying to get Africans to abandon female genital mutilation, now suddenly we are encouraging it for boys? Absolutely horrid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
01:50 PM on 11/15/2010
Comparing circumcision to female genital mutilation is obscenely dishonest. Circumcision reduces the spread of HIV in Africa; it does not maim. It is a good thing. I'll never understand why people are so passionately opposed to circumcision, even when it's a boon to public health.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mainemomma
I don't want a micro bio
07:53 PM on 11/15/2010
No it isn't a boon to public health. Hogwash. Just keep your dogma away from my son's stuff. When he was born, I would have maimed the first person to get near my perfect baby with a scalpel. The procedure should be banned, because most parents agree 'because jr. should look just like his daddy'... who was cut by uninformed 60's era people. I'm glad my husband is enlightened. He thought the 'locker room' reason was hogwash. I think the 'health' reason is too. Wash, for gosh sakes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godwithin
02:58 PM on 11/18/2010
Obscenely dishonest are the fake excuses for money making harmful practices. Most of the worlds men are not circumcised because foreskin is not a defect. It is there to protect. Get the facts.
11:42 AM on 11/15/2010
And the men will then believe themselves to be able to have unprotected sex without fear of getting aids; thus increasing the amount of unprotected sex and the spread of aids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
01:45 PM on 11/15/2010
They have lots of sex with lots of women and girls as it is, and they rationalize a lot of it with superstition. The decrease in HIV infections in circumcised men is real.
03:32 PM on 11/15/2010
Sorry raker but the scientific data backing up your claim is murky at best. HIV is almost always passed from man to woman through sperm, by blood contamination, or sharing the sharing of needles during drug use or the reuse of needles in a medical setting. The incidence of HIV from woman to man during sex is very low and unless a man has cuts or lesions on his penis almost impossible since a womans vagina, if she has HIV, does not harbor the virus the way sperm or blood do. I suggest you read the report in the Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases March 2010 issue.