More

Alan Simpson, Fiscal Commission Co-Chairman, Eager For A Fight

First Posted: 11/19/10 12:25 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

Cutting Deficits

WASHINGTON -- Alan Simpson, the notoriously loud-mouthed co-chair of President Obama's fiscal commission, delightedly predicted on Friday morning that the new freshman class of congressional Republicans will close down the government rather than agree to further increase the national debt limit.

"This is going to be beautiful politics -- the brutal kind. I love those," said Simpson. "The debt limit... will prove who's a hero, who's a jerk, and who's a charlatan, and who's a fakir."

The nation's debt limit, now $14.3 trillion, will likely be reached in early 2011. If Congress doesn't raise it, the government would no longer be able to borrow money, forcing it into default.

Calling members of the incoming class "sharp cookies," Simpson predicted they would refuse to vote for the debt limit extension unless they got significant spending cuts in return. The threat that the government would close down will not impede them, he said. "They'll say: 'That's what I came here for.'"

Simpson said he's looking forward to it. "I can't wait. It'll be something. And I'll be watching."

By contrast, incoming House Speaker John Boehner is reported to be counseling the incoming class that they need to cool their jets on the debt limit issue. "We're going to have to deal with it as adults," he told reporters this week. "Whether we like it or not, the federal government has obligations and we have obligations on our part."

Simpson, along with fellow fiscal commission co-chair Erskine Bowles, was speaking to reporters at a breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor.

The co-chairmen last week released their personal suggestions for cutting the federal budget deficit.

Both Simpson and Bowles seemed to delight in the howls that greeted their plan.

"It's a great place to be, because we have irritated hopefully everyone in the United States and especially the groups," Simpson said. He likened the attacks by interest groups to "harpies off the cliff" with "talons extended."

Bowles didn't disagree. "As Alan said, we've laid that stink bomb out there now."

Earlier this week another group of deficit hawks, this one from the Bipartisan Policy Center and led by former Republican Senator Pete Domenici and former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Alice Rivlin, put forth a competing plan.

Simpson and Bowles both took swipes at it.

Among the difference between the two plans, Simpson-Bowles would increase the retirement age for Social Security, while Domenici-Rivlin would "index" the benefit formula "for increases in life expectancy."

"What we did," Bowles said, "is exactly the same arithmetically... But because we're transparent and we're telling the truth.. we got dinged."

"Theirs is mysterious opaqueness," said Simpson.

Bowles pointed out that the retirement age under their plan wouldn't go up to 69 for another 65 years, saying "I think that gives people a good amount of time to prepare."

A GAO report leaked this week concluded that raising the retirement age for Social Security would disproportionately hurt low-income workers and minorities,

The chairmen also mocked the Domenici-Rivlin plan for including a new nationwide sales tax.

"We got a little message," Bowles said, referring to an April "sense of the Senate" resolution against any kind of consumption tax, which passed 85 to 13.

"If you want to run into that wall, you must be goofy," Simpson said.

Simpson predicted that rather than being adopted all at once, various deficit reduction proposals will get passed by Congress one at a time, over a period of years, although he suggested that the first bill could end up being "so watered down you could gum it."

Bowles said elected officials will come around. "I think the world's changed. I think they're going to be heavily penalized if they don't make the tough choices."

And he gushed over the assembled members of the mainstream media for their part in promoting deficit hawkery. "The era of deficit denial is over. You all made it over," he said.

The chairmen said their proposal is just a starting point for negotiations among the 18 members of the commission. The commission has a December 1 deadline for its report, and all official proposals must get 14 votes.

And they praised Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), one of the few actual liberals on the commission, for drafting a comprehensive proposal of her own -- even though Bowles called it "the opposite of ours."

Bowles in particular warned of doom if the deficit is not addressed, predicting a brutal reaction from the financial markets at some point in the future along with hyperinflation. "We won't have the capital to fund our military," he warned. And if the debt continues to grow, he said, "pretty soon you have no money left for anything else."

Bowles said the reason the financial markets haven't abandoned America already -- and they haven't; interest rates on federal bonds are at an all-time low -- is "because we're the best- looking horse in the glue factory right now."

Earlier in the day, Simpson ridiculed one of his foremost conservative critics, Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist, for calling on Republicans to oppose the fiscal commission chair's proposal on grounds that it was a tax increase.

To those who just wish the commission would go away, Simpson had one bit of good news: "That's exactly what we're going to do December 2."

WATCH Simpson talk about the debt limit:

*************************

Dan Froomkin is senior Washington correspondent for the Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail, bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed, follow him on Twitter, friend him on Facebook, and/or become a fan and get e-mail alerts when he writes.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Alan Simpson, the notoriously loud-mouthed co-chair of President Obama's fiscal commission, delightedly predicted on Friday morning that the new freshman class of congressional Republica...
WASHINGTON -- Alan Simpson, the notoriously loud-mouthed co-chair of President Obama's fiscal commission, delightedly predicted on Friday morning that the new freshman class of congressional Republica...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 190
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:41 PM on 11/26/2010
I remember when Senator Simpson was in Congress. His policies and his behavior showed absolutely no compassion nor sense of fairness for the average American. Why was he named as a co-chair on this commission? Anyone familiar with his narrow views knows he could have mailed in his deficit reduction ideas. His mind has always been made up. He was not and will never be in interested studying/negotiating alternative proposals. His expenses as part of this commission were a further burden on the American taxpayer. This man's arrogance and mean-spirited-ness appears to have no bounds.
nobodysgirl
VOTE in 2012, Women!!
02:31 PM on 11/24/2010
These people delight in the power they have to shred the dignity of fellow americans who find themselves without work through no wrong of their own. It makes them feel good to rip the flooring out from beneath those 'lazy, spoiled unemployed." It totally boggles my mind that Americans, mostly on the right, once more allowed themselves to be fooled by the republicans-flowering rhetoric about founding fathers (who would be mortified if they could hear how their ideals about a free republic were being bantied about by these fradulent 'constitutionalists'). They did it in past elections by shoving the abortion/gay rights issues to the public forefront right before voting time, and the entire nation - indeed, the world - suffered the results with the election of georgie the emporer for 8 years. Now, while our country is desperately trying to get back on track, they've succeeded again, bringing us right back to the ideology that got us here.

I lost some faith in my fellow americans when they 'voted' dubya back in in '04 (although there is clear evidence of fraud there too; see Ohio), but the midterm election has been the clincher.

America is doomed, my friends. This is just the beginning of more of the same. The rich will continue to get fat, the poor will be forgotten, and the middle class remain a catch-all phrase for the next campaign season. I would love to be wrong but most of you know I am not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noeffect
01:15 PM on 11/20/2010
"...never TOUGH on the people making them - " dammit
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noeffect
01:14 PM on 11/20/2010
The language "tough choices" is supposed to make you feel good for being abused. It's supposed to increase the morale of the abused, because they prove they are tough by living through it. Tough choices are never touch on the people making them - only on the people who have to suffer the consequences - the middle class, working people, minorities, the unemployed, etc.

"Lost your job and your house?" Ooh, that's tough."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gnorrfa
emitte lucem et veritatem
10:56 AM on 11/20/2010
when alan was a child, his father took him to a movie about the christians being persecuted in the coliseum. the christians, women and children were thrown into the arena, the lions were let loose, tearing at the christians. little alan began to cry, and his dad tried comforting him by telling him that this was the suffering the founding christians were put through. "it's that little lion, cried wee alan, "he's not getting any!"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:40 AM on 11/20/2010
If they truly want to make the Republican tax breaks permanent, effectively reducing government income by over 1/3rd, then yes, the only way to balance the budget is to shut if down, so that it can't spend any money. Of course, that will put a lot more people out of work. The freeway system, the railroads, the airplane corridors, the riverways, the electrical grid, the military, NASA, ......what in this country can stay operational without government dollars overseeing its operation?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RockydaDog
05:26 AM on 11/22/2010
At first I misread your post I thought I read that the TSA would be defunded. Alas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
"Without a struggle, there can be no progress. "
08:30 AM on 11/20/2010
"Fakir" or faker?

I seriously doubt he was referring to Sufi Dervishes.

☮
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleverboots
09:31 PM on 11/19/2010
Ebenezer Scrooge had nothing on Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles.With Christmas just weeks away, the parallel is pretty clear.I can just hear the ghosts of Cristmas past,present and future. Charles Dickens could have written the 21st Century version of A Christmas Carol. He would had a field day with Simpson and Bowles.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:06 PM on 11/19/2010
What would the deficit look like if we were all fully employed in meaningful jobs?

Does the Republican's ever sharpening focus on spending indicate that they believe high rates of unemployment and underemployment are only going to get worse as we shove more and more jobs across the oceans --that they know revenues won't be coming back, or at least they won't be doing anything to stem the exodus?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FredBrighton
up the establishment!
06:09 AM on 11/20/2010
I keep wishing that since everything in America today is politics, we should know the political affiliations of those people making political decisions. For instance it changes the way you look at the Supreme Court if you know that there are 5 Republicans and only 4 Democrats, no independents and votes are cast along party lines. The vote that turned multinational corporations into American citizens with no limitations on their political donations was 5-4 exactly along political party lines. So I also want to know, of those companies shipping jobs overseas, how many are run by Republicans? This would tell us a great deal about economics. So far I found that it is Republican business owners, the ones who are shipping our jobs out to China who demand Obama do something about jobs shipping out and the trade deficit. You would almost believe that when you become a multi-millionaire you can afford to play games with your businesses in order to make a Democratic President look weak on the economy, especially if you object to a black man in the White House. Which I seriously think they do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:02 PM on 11/19/2010
...and who's a crazy old coot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
06:43 PM on 11/19/2010
Why in the world did Obama choose a long time enemy of SS to head the Deficit Commison. ,?

Why create such a Commison by executive order , in the first place?The Senate voted it down.

It can only be because Obama wants to do away with our Social Security.
Beware ! We have elected a wolf in sheep's clothing
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleverboots
12:34 AM on 11/20/2010
Why,indeed? F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RockydaDog
05:29 AM on 11/22/2010
No, he really wants to do nothing but look progressive while doing so. He thinks the job of President is beneath him. Its just a stepping stone to some higher pulpit.
06:21 PM on 11/19/2010
I love it when retired millionaires tell me I'll need to work until the day I die just so their friends can have MORE money because lawyers live six years longer than the rest of us.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleverboots
12:37 AM on 11/20/2010
Can you imagine being a bricklayer at 69? F&F
12:40 AM on 11/20/2010
Dear Clever,

My grandfather was a maintainance worker until 72, and he also laid some bricks. Nothing wrong with that.
05:59 PM on 11/19/2010
times are tough and getting tougher and everyone needs to have skin in the game.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Krow
05:59 PM on 11/19/2010
It's not that tough. There is about $1.39T budgeted for discretionary spending. $844B for Defense and $546B for everything else. Reduce the budget proportionately. If they cut $100B in spending, $64B would be in defense cuts and $46B would be in other discretionary spending cuts. The public could buy that.
05:51 PM on 11/19/2010
Um....its not a game, guys. Please grow up soon.