More

Bernanke Defends The Fed, Takes A Shot At China

First Posted: 11/19/10 08:10 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

Bernanke China

WASHINGTON: Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Thursday hit back at critics of the U.S. central bank's controversial bond-buying program and issued a thinly veiled attack on China's policy of keeping its currency depressed.

Bernanke, facing a firestorm of protests from within and outside the central bank, said a more vigorous U.S. economy was essential to the global recovery and dismissed charges he was debasing the dollar.

"The best way to continue to deliver the strong economic fundamentals that underpin the value of the dollar, as well as to support the global recovery, is through policies that lead to a resumption of robust growth in a context of price stability in the United States," Bernanke said in comments prepared for delivery to a conference at the European Central Bank in Frankfurt on Friday.

The Fed's November 3 decision to buy a further $600 billion in U.S. government debt generated outrage among many nations who charged the United States with seeking to weaken the dollar to gain an export edge.

German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble has called the policy "clueless." Domestic critics have also lashed out, arguing the policy could ignite inflation and fuel asset bubbles.

Fed officials circled their wagons this week to defend the program. Two officials added their endorsements on Thursday, another expressed opposition, while a fourth said monetary policy should not play the main role in driving a stronger recovery.

SOCIAL COST

In his remarks, Bernanke said sluggish growth, declines in inflation and an unemployment rate that has hovered near 10 percent for months convinced U.S. policymakers they needed to act.

"On its current economic trajectory, the United States runs the risk of seeing millions of workers unemployed or underemployed for many years," he said. "As a society, we should find that unacceptable."

Bernanke said a fiscal program that combined near-term measures to enhance growth and steps to address long-range deficits would be an important complement to Fed policies.

Addressing international criticism of the Fed's action, Bernanke said much of the recent weakness in the dollar reflected an unwinding of the increases that were notched as investors fled to the safety of the greenback during the European sovereign debt crisis in the spring.

Many emerging economies have worried that volatile investment inflows sparked by the dollar's decline could be destabilizing -- either fueling inflation or asset bubbles.

Bernanke said the failure of some emerging market economies with trade surpluses to allow their currencies to appreciate was making the problems those countries face worse.

"Currency undervaluation by surplus countries is inhibiting needed international adjustment and creating spillover effects that would not exist if exchange rates better reflected market fundamentals," he said, without explicitly pointing to China.

U.S. officials have long argued that an undervalued Chinese yuan gives the Asian export powerhouse an unfair advantage in international markets.

Bernanke broadened the case against China, which keeps the yuan on a tight leash, by saying inflexible currencies are preventing a needed rebalancing of global growth and could end up destabilizing the world economy.

"For large, systemically important countries with persistent current account surpluses, the pursuit of export-led growth cannot ultimately succeed if the implications of that strategy for global growth and stability are not taken into account," he said.

A HAWK RELENTS

The Fed's bond-buying plan -- know as quantitative easing or QE, for short -- won a surprise endorsement from a policymaker who had been seen as an internal critic.

"I believe that QE is a move in the right direction," Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Narayana Kocherlakota told a conference in Chicago.

Cleveland Fed chief Sandra Pianalto also defended the plan as a way to help lift "uncomfortably low" inflation and fend off the risk of a debilitating broad drop in prices.

However, Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser said the costs of the program did not outweigh the benefits, while Fed Governor Kevin Warsh said the economy faced problems that monetary policy could not solve.

"Monetary policy has an important role to play," Warsh told business leaders in Chicago. "But it is not a predominant role."

Instead, he said, businesses need more certainty in terms of fiscal, trade and regulatory policies.

(Additional reporting by Pedro Nicolaci da Costa in Washington and Ann Saphir and Eric Johnson in Chicago; Editing by Nick Macfie)

Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON: Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Thursday hit back at critics of the U.S. central bank's controversial bond-buying program and issued a thinly veiled attack on China's policy of ke...
WASHINGTON: Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Thursday hit back at critics of the U.S. central bank's controversial bond-buying program and issued a thinly veiled attack on China's policy of ke...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 81
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kye154
04:34 PM on 11/25/2010
You have to agree with the Germans when they say our Federal Reserve is clueless. Debasing the dollar may look good from the standpoint of Wall Street, but it ends up making every American's hard earned dollar more worthless. (Notice, this is not even mentioned at all in any of Bernnake's arguements). The only way you will have price stability is with a strong dollar, well regulated banks, and domestic price controls. Only Nixon ever tried it, and despite all the criticism he got for it, price controls did work for awhile. The treasury and presidents since Nixon have always shied away from doing that again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
02:23 AM on 11/22/2010
No ! Ben !! do ya under stand what ?? the word No Means !!

every time we give you money we lose hundred ,s of thousand,s of jobs !!

SORRY we can,t afford your Bonuses this year !!
12:08 AM on 11/21/2010
How does globalization make thins cheaper when everything we buy is waaaay overpriced? I think globalization means the company gets to produce the product itself cheaper, but that has no effect on the final consumer price, which is always the MAX amount they can get people to pay for it. It helps nobody
09:39 AM on 11/20/2010
The world, congress and the american people.. have realized we've been fleeced and now laughing at the US Financial system for destroying the global economy..

it's like he came to the party half drunk with no pants on and everybody thinks he the fool.. but he stands there perplexed and says.. whaaaat...
08:34 AM on 11/20/2010
WARNING:
"quantitative easing", a new term for currency manipulation called "printing money" is banks bailout in DISGUISE; they're at it again:
http://the economicco llapseblog .com/archi ves/the-bi ggest-bank -robbery-i n-history- more-quant itative-ea sing-backd oor-bailou ts-for-the -big-banks -without-h aving-to-g o-through- congress

SPECULATIVE (hedging/d erivative, etc.) investments do NOT create REAL JOBS!!! Banks just move money around. And banks are one of the biggest outsourcers of jobs.

OMG. It never stops. Americans WAKE UP.
06:18 AM on 11/20/2010
As a matter of current our current corporate-government policy, The United States has exported her prosperity to other countries. So much so, that we have very few opportunities for prosperity left. The Oligarchs at the very top of our stratified social pyramid have paid to have the rules rewritten so that they now have Social and Governmental control of The United States.

The Corporate-Government entity now ruling America has repeatedly lied to the American public.

The Corporate-Government entity now ruling America have enshrined public bailout of their private monetary mistakes into public law and policy.

Political parties are now funded (or created), at the whim of corporate entities, in the amounts of billions of dollars - The Supreme Court has declared this legal in Citizens United vs. The United States.

Money has no loyalty or social responsibility; except unto itself.

Despite massive, and commonsense, evidence of pervasive fraud perpetrated by Global Wall Street - not much has been done to prosecute or remedy these crimes. The SEC has struck sweetheart deals with the top firms.

When will America have had enough of their continued debt slavery that is further impoverishing them to benefit a few?
07:12 AM on 11/20/2010
It is mostly political analysis and here I can’t help you.

In economy:
Globalization is good. It makes all product cheaper.

Globalization is bad. We can’t compete with Chinese workers, which agree to work for ten times less salary.

What to do in this situation?

First of all money can’t help. It is not free market anymore for American Companies, if workforces in development countries agree to receive ten times less.

Maybe innovation could help?

Make small innovation in cars industries and many others and very soon producer will put these innovations in places where costs of production are less.

What to do in this situation?
Answer on this question still do not made as Democrats, as Republican, the same as our economists and "The Corporate-­Government entity".
All of them are living in ideas before 1980 th.

In my opinion only engineering solution could help.
02:05 PM on 11/22/2010
Globalization produce global imbalances. Costs are realized in other sectors of the economy through other means. Such as the cost of unemployment insurance for those who have lost their job and cannot find another one. Funny how that is never added into the cost of a Chinese product.

Globalization is good. A few hundred newly minted middle-class Chinese brought up from poverty.

Exactly. There are no 'free' markets. They are a myth. Everything, and EVERYTHING has a cost. For example, what is the cost to society of a person losing their job because their company just 'relocated' to sunny Bahamas while outsourcing to China?

The only time there is 'free and fair' trade is when the playing field is equal. It is not, when you can pay one worker ten times less than another. That is not a level playing field.

Innovation is routinely stifled by large corporations seeking to maintain market share. Witness the explosion and innovation of cell phones only after Reagan revoked AT&T's monopoly.

And you make a wonderful point of an aging population (in America) who never seem to have quite realized that The USSR no longer exists and that The Chinese are not really Commies. Yet Obama must be... nudge, nudge, wink, wink.

Who have actually seen their prosperity evaporate under both Democrat and Republican cronyism to Global Finance. All during their lifetimes.

Don't be a Marxist. Humans are not machines.
06:07 PM on 11/19/2010
Most people in Amerika enjoy food and eating. We have all kinds of cooking shows on television now to confirm this. There is something that I rarely hear mentioned on the msm when they speak of the currency problems with China, however anyone who has gone to buy groceries is well aware of THE SKYROCKETING INCREASE IN THE PRICE OF FOOD. Wall street is gambling on food commodities and we the people need to BE AWARE!
Here is this article which speaks of this
http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2010/11/19/bernanke-vs-china-on-inflation-its-the-food-stupid/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Fey
04:49 PM on 11/20/2010
There are many reports about the "stability" and "Non-inflationary" food prices in the USA.

The people who write these reports have not been going to the same grocery stores as I have been. Many items have gone up. Especially grain items (cereal, bread) and dairy items (milk, cottage cheese).

A little while ago cottage cheese was uniformly $1.99- 2.49. Today its 3.49 in many places. Discount Bran Flakes have very recently gone from $1.49 to $1.69 (at 12% increase).
MSM carries stories about the great values; the stores cashiers tell a different story. Who oh who should I believe? *R I G H T*
08:42 PM on 11/20/2010
You should believe your own experiences. Lately I have been very disturbed about the amount due at the grocery stores. I believe that China is attempting to keep their prices for food stock down because of the past history of the many starving. My own experience is that when I am hungry and I have a hunger headache, nobody wants to be around me because I have NO patience for anything nor anyone. Wall street should really think twice about playing with the price of grains or anything other food stocks for their own profits. PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS!
photo
CulpeperMin
voting, a delusional act of self immolation
06:04 PM on 11/20/2010
And the Fed conveniently excludes food & energy from its core inflation metric.

This is the real risk/cost of QE2, a commodity bubble.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/how-ben-bernanke-sentenced-poorest-20-population-cold-hungry-winter
08:52 PM on 11/20/2010
You will get NO ARGUMENT from me on the SHENANIGANS OF THE FED.This has been going on a long, long, time. They need to audited and dealt with according to what is uncovered from a long time perspective.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ztck5356
04:41 PM on 11/19/2010
Nixon started wooing the Chinese trade during his administration. Now China has grown into the economic power that the US has been coddling, and they are expecting them to care a hoot about us? China is a COMMUNIST nation!! Wake up America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Fey
04:55 PM on 11/20/2010
Stop thinking of boogie men as your enemy. It doesn't matter what you call something. The word "Communist" will not bite you in the dark (which is more than I can say about certain political parties in the USA)

Deal with reality (just as you seem to propose.) China is a centrally planned nation with great ambition, That should be enough to have our guard up in dealing with them. The fact they are nominally so-called "Communists" is not relevent in deciding how to deal with them as a military/economic/political force in the world.
03:47 PM on 11/19/2010
President Bush had the best economists to help our economy. We knew results.
President Obama has the best economists to help our economy. We knew results.
Consensus of scientist from both parties worked to improve our economy and their effort show zero result.

WHY IT HAPPENS?

Our scientists are living in the ideas around 1980-th.
It is globalization economy and answers for new realities must be absolutely different.

Companies, which succeed in globalization environment, let do their businesses.

Government must think: “How create jobs in USA despite globalization?â€

NEW MUSIC IN NEW TIMES!
NEW MUSICIAN, PLEASE, Mr. President!
06:20 AM on 11/20/2010
Economics is a voodoo science. Never has a 'science' been so wrong about so many things. For instance, Bernanke has been wrong about everything regarding economics during the entirety of his career.

And yet, we call him Professor.
03:35 PM on 11/19/2010
Let me address the elephant in the room, why are interest rates on the rise? Two weeks ago the Fed announced its nuclear option; round 2 of quantitative easing. On paper this plan seems fool proof. However, the Fed forgot to check its math. It failed to take into account how China and Japan have begun pursuing monetary policies to protect their own economies. A possible scenario could see both China and Japan selling bonds in order to cheapen their currencies. This in turn would increase the supply of US treasuries, causing bond prices to drop and interest rates to rise. Check it out; it looks like we just might be at that turning point.

Chinese will act to protect the Yuan and to curb inflation, this will probably affect the intended outcome of QE2
Yuan vs US 10 yr. treasuries- http://www.hiddenlevers.com/hl/u?cnH5si

Japan is an export driven economy meaning they would prefer a weaker Yen
Yen vs US 10 yr. treasuries- http://www.hiddenlevers.com/hl/u?9mToKM

It seems what’s good for the US economy is no longer good for the global economy.
06:22 AM on 11/20/2010
Did they forget to check the math? Probably not. Anyone ever consider that this was the plan all along? That what is right for America is not right for the monsters who seek social control?

No? The monsters never left. History is replete with examples of monsters who will do anything to seize and maintain control of entire countries.

With Financial warfare (nuclear weapons rendering Military warfare obsolete among major nations) available, who needs armies?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:23 PM on 11/19/2010
I would not say that this was a thinly veiled attack on China - it was a full blown assault....

I find it very surprising that the Fed Chairman commented on the U.S. debt monetization’s effect on the U.S. dollar ! Does anyone else not find that shocking or at least a bit surprising ?

From the speech:
“The resulting increase in emerging market interest rates relative to those in the advanced economies would naturally lead to increased capital flows from advanced to emerging economies and, consequently, to currency appreciation in emerging market economies.â€

I thought comments on the U.S. dollar were to be left to the Treasury….

It also seems to be interesting that the Fed Chairman would call out those emerging markets seeking to manipulate their currencies lower when it seems that he is doing the same thing with the U.S. dollar….

This whole episode is seemingly acquiring a political character as well….

My full thoughts on the speech, comments appreciated, where am I wrong, what am I missing…?

http://alaricinvestments.blogspot.com/2010/11/bernankes-defense-of-debt-monetization.html
03:10 PM on 11/19/2010
Globalization is good. It makes all product cheaper.

Globalization is bad. We can’t compete with Chinese workers, which agree to work for ten times less salary.

What to do in this situation?

First of all money can’t help. It is not free market anymore for American Companies, if workforces in development countries agree to receive ten times less.

Maybe innovation could help?

Make small innovation in cars industries and many others and very soon producer will put these innovations in places where costs of production are less.

What to do in this situation? It need something more than fight monetary wars, stupid!
photo
raphaelbonee
The snake was right "the gods lie"
07:54 PM on 11/19/2010
Innovation is an illusory promise. You can't know something will be invented or innovated to get you out of a problem. You have to work within what is not go all dreamy eyed about what you think might be.

On that note watching what is leave the country leaves you with nothing.

Consuming your way to prosperity works as long as in consumption you rebuild your ability to make everyday things you need. Otherwise it's just more money for overseas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rachael Marie
02:44 PM on 11/19/2010
Here's what he's saying, just in case you missed it:

I would like to move further away from Constitutional Money and instead move towards a global fiat currency that international bankers can control.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20101119a.htm

"Thus, it would be desirable for the global community, over time, to devise an international monetary system that more consistently aligns the interests of individual countries with the interests of the global economy as a whole." -Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, Nov 19th, 2010
04:44 PM on 11/19/2010
right on, I say screw the global economy. who wants to be first in a race to the bottom?
06:24 AM on 11/20/2010
And QE 2 is among the steps being pursued to achieve this. Of course, let us just call that a conspiracy theory so that people can be reassured that Ben Bernanke is busy protecting their economic fortunes.

LOL.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:23 PM on 11/19/2010
This could be a war cause between usa & china economy http://finance.varolmak.com/2010/11/usa-china-dollar-wars-bernanke-defends.html