More

Bernanke Calls On Congress To Help The Economy -- For At Least The Fourth Time In Five Months

First Posted: 11/20/10 09:01 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

Bernanke

NEW YORK -- For at least the fourth time since June, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke publicly urged Congress to combat the lackluster recovery by increasing government spending, a recommendation that has gone unheeded by lawmakers.

In a speech at a conference of central bankers in Frankfurt, Bernanke once again said the Fed cannot save the economy on its own. The Fed's recent move to add to its ballooning balance sheet by committing to buy up to $600 billion of government debt faces "limits" to its effectiveness, Bernanke said. The rest of the government, the chairman added, could aid the Fed's efforts by hammering out a plan for stimulative spending. The right kind of spending, he noted, could help reduce the budget deficit over the long-term by first boosting economic growth.

"[I]n general terms, a fiscal program that combines near-term measures to enhance growth with strong, confidence-inducing steps to reduce longer-term structural deficits would be an important complement to the policies of the Federal Reserve," Bernanke said Friday, according to his written remarks.

The fiscal policy recommendation came directly after Bernanke acknowledged it isn't his job to make such policy proposals. "The Federal Reserve is nonpartisan and does not make recommendations regarding specific tax and spending programs," the chairman noted.

The official parameters of his job, though, have not stopped Bernanke from engaging in backseat driving. At least four times since June -- on June 9, July 21, July 22 and now Friday -- he has urged lawmakers to increase spending to jumpstart the lagging economy.

But policy makers have proved to be unable to agree upon such a plan -- or even propose one that's viable. The rest of the nation has suffered as a result, as near-10 percent unemployment continues to hobble the economy. Democrats recently lost control of the House of Representatives, and a substantial part of their majority in the Senate. Voters said the dismal economy was their top concern.

To combat an ineffectual Washington establishment, the Fed has taken matters into its own hands. By buying up to $600 billion of government debt, the central bank hopes to increase the flow of money through the economy. Critics of the program, which is intended to lower interest rates and encourage corporate spending, have said the cheap money will not convince businesses to create jobs.

Companies are already sitting on about $1.8 trillion in cash and other liquid assets, according to the most recent quarterly data from the Fed. Only an increase in consumer demand and business confidence, critics say, will spur a robust recovery.

Bernanke, too, has said the Fed's actions won't be enough. While its actions determine interest rates and the money supply, in order to be effective, Bernanke has said, it must be combined with expansionary fiscal policy. In other words, the government has to ramp up spending.

By law, the Federal Reserve's function is to "maintain long run growth of the monetary and credit aggregates" in order to promote "maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates."

As Rep. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.) reminded Bernanke during a July hearing, "it would be an unconstitutional role for the Fed to engage in fiscal policy."

The central banker has not publicly supported actual bills pending in Congress. But over the past year, he hasn't been shy about giving his opinion, and nudging Congress along:

  • June 9, before the House Committee on the Budget: "Achieving long-term fiscal sustainability will be difficult. But unless we as a nation make a strong commitment to fiscal responsibility, in the longer run, we will have neither financial stability nor healthy economic growth." And he went on: "Right now I don't think is the time -- this very moment is not the time -- to radically reduce our spending or raise our taxes because the economy is still in recovery mode and needs that support." Fiscal stimulus, he said, is necessary. "I think, you know, right now we have a broadly stimulative fiscal policy which, at the moment, is helping, is needed, that includes lower taxes and probably higher spending as well."
  • July 21, before the Senate Banking Committee: "At the current moment the large deficits, as unattractive as they are, are important for supporting economic activity."
  • July 22, before the House Financial Services Committee: "More generally, certainly both the Fed, the Treasury, the Congress and everyone should try to focus on growth-oriented policies. It's important to take steps, including control the fiscal deficit, that will support longer-term growth, which will increase confidence in the present, and to do what we can to reduce uncertainty, about policies and about the economy. ... [I]n general, as I said, I think that maintaining the current level of fiscal support is important because the economy is still quite weak."
  • Bernanke, though, also wants Congress to get a handle on the federal government's ballooning yearly deficits and overall debt. A growing chorus of experts believe that the government's bulging debt endangers long-term growth. Among Bernanke's statements:

  • April 7, Dallas, Tex.: "Indeed, a credible plan that demonstrated a commitment to achieving long-run fiscal sustainability could lead to lower interest rates and more rapid growth in the near term."
  • April 14, before the Joint Economic Committee: "In other words, addressing the country's fiscal problems will require difficult choices, but postponing them will only make them more difficult."
  • April 27, at the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform: "Thus, the reality is that the Congress, the Administration, and the American people will have to choose among making modifications to entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security, restraining federal spending on everything else, accepting higher taxes, or some combination thereof. "
  • August 2, Charleston, S.C.: "Thus, state governments may wish to revisit their criteria for accumulating fiscal reserves. Building a rainy-day fund during good times may not be politically popular, but it can pay off during the bad times." He continued, "The states have the opportunity to serve as role models for effective long-term fiscal planning."
  • October 4, Providence, R.I.: "What we do know, however, is that the threat to our economy is real and growing, which should be sufficient reason for fiscal policy makers to put in place a credible plan for bringing deficits down to sustainable levels over the medium term."
  • The Republican economist appears to believe that the best way to encourage economic growth and reduce the near-record unemployment rate is to increase government spending in the short-term; create a credible plan to tackle record deficits in the medium-term; and deploy that plan (and stick to it) over the long-term.

    Whether the White House and Congress can formulate such a plan -- and agree to it -- is a matter beyond Bernanke's control.


    *************************

    William Alden is the business writer for The Huffington Post. He can be reached at alden@huffingtonpost.com.

    Shahien Nasiripour is the business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 646-274-2455.

    FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
    Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
    NEW YORK -- For at least the fourth time since June, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke publicly urged Congress to combat the lackluster recovery by increasing government spending, a recommendation...
    NEW YORK -- For at least the fourth time since June, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke publicly urged Congress to combat the lackluster recovery by increasing government spending, a recommendation...
     
     
    • Comments
    • 5,263
    • Pending Comments
    • 0
    • View FAQ
    Comments are closed for this entry
    View All
    Favorites
    Highlights
    Bloggers
    Recency  | 
    Popularity
    Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (80 total)
      1 of 16  
    COMMUNITY PUNDITS
    themodernleader 07:29 PM on 11/20/2010
         The Fed Chairman is right about the duties of  the President and Congress to fashion an "expansionary fiscal policy"  that creates more than money growth   and a fictitious sense of wealth created by inflation.  The Congress must act to stop our trade deficits, to reindustrialize and revitalize our cities and country side.  We must provide  Read More...
    photo
    Eris23Skidoo
    Dischordian Keynesian
    07:27 AM on 11/28/2010
    Bernanke is a republican economist but he's talking like a Keynesian. It seems that everybody loves Keynes when they get desperate enough because of the proven record of Keynesianism. It got us out of the Great Depression so why not the Great Recession? Because of politics. See, the republicans don't want the economy getting better with a black man in charge. Their whole strategy is to keep on destroying the economy until 2012 when they can ride on that wave of economic bad feelings into the White House. And once they're in charge, they will abandon their religiousity toward the "free market" and adopt some Keynesian stimulus spending so that they can get credit for getting us out of this economic mess they created.
    03:50 PM on 11/23/2010
    Here's an idea I haven't heard in a couple years since this mess started ....

    The census says there are 115,000,000 household and 307,000,000 individuals in the US in 2010.

    How much have we spent on the bailout? (Fed programs, and two smoldering wars) $3 trillion is a very modest estimate, don't you think?

    Companies are making record profits due to higher productivity largely due to layoffs and sales oversees, but won't invest in new jobs, plant expansions, etc. here in the USA until local people start buying again.

    Take a $ trillion and give every household $8,700 dollars - think there will be any new spending to jump start the economy? How about if we distribute it more fairly? How about a trillion split with each and every legal citizen - lets say 307M minus the estimated 12M illegal immigrants = 295M. This would put about $3,400 in each PERSON's pocket. That shouldn't be too hard to do - Bernake printed that much last week .....

    The banks should love it - payments made on time, maybe some account paid off, lots of money in savings and checking accounts on which they make billions. Businesses should love it - lots of new customers. Landlords should love it - rent paid on time. The local, state, and federal governments should love it - lots of new tax revenue flow! Who have I left out.

    This money will actually trickle down the old fashioned way. I once heard that each dollar
    photo
    Eris23Skidoo
    Dischordian Keynesian
    07:32 AM on 11/28/2010
    Your idea is known to history as Keynesianism. I thought I had made it up too and applied for school when I thought it up so I could prove that it would work with my fancy economics degree. What I learned in school is that the idea was written about very much in the 1930s by John Maynard Keynes. Before I learned the proper name for it, I called it "trickle-up economics". This idea has worked in the past and the fact that FDR employed a whole host of Keynesians to run his economy is a major reason we got out of the mess the banksters and republicans created back then. The only way we are ever going to get out of the Great Recession is a return to Keynes.
    photo
    AyeChart
    Retired Army, half-retired physician
    01:09 PM on 11/23/2010
    Gee, I think the last time I heard advice that badly one of Washington's physicians urged the other to bleed the patient some more!

    Dear Ben:

    Deficit spending is THE PROBLEM, not the solution!  Are you incapable of learning? 

    Try graphing delta-GDP against delta-spending for the past few years.  You will see that the economy is DEPRESSED by 45 cents for each dollar of deficit spending in 2009.

    Get over Keynes.  He's not only dead, he's wrong.

    --AyeChart
    photo
    AyeChart
    Retired Army, half-retired physician
    01:13 PM on 11/23/2010
    BAD, not "badly."  Sorry for grammatical error.
    11:53 AM on 11/23/2010
    Portugal next then Spain and then California and capitulation should be complete in about 3-4 years.. and give the banksters immunity so we can get this party started again..
    This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
    photo
    american-dolt
    Truther since 2004
    04:10 PM on 11/22/2010
    Better start working for the People Bernanke.

    http://dailybail.com/home/real-ira-threatens-to-blow-up-bankers-explosive.html
    This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
    photo
    02:38 PM on 11/22/2010
    MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL. AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK CONTROLS ALLTHE MONEY.

    SOLUTION: NATIONALIZE THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AND PUT IT BACK UNDER THE OCC WHERE IT BELONGS: ARTICLE ONE, SECTION EIGHT OF THE US CONSTITUTION.
    photo
    AyeChart
    Retired Army, half-retired physician
    01:11 PM on 11/23/2010
    More government control over the economy is NOT the solution to too much government control over the economy.
    photo
    Eris23Skidoo
    Dischordian Keynesian
    07:37 AM on 11/28/2010
    Well, some of us Americans who don't pose stupidly in front of a flag believe the opposite. See, the only thing that protects you from being poked, prodded, tested and destroyed for corporate gain is the government. We don't have any control over corporations whatsoever but with the govt at least we get to vote. The problem, we believe, is not govt control over the economy. The problem is monopsony, monopoly, rigged markets and cartels. You know of a way to regulate those phenomena withOUT using govt, go ahead and tell us your ideas.
    02:38 PM on 11/22/2010
    The fault lies in the Republicans. How dumb do you have to be to not understand that putting more money into the economy will stimulate the economy. I predict a DEPRESSION coming soon.
    photo
    AyeChart
    Retired Army, half-retired physician
    01:21 PM on 11/23/2010
    Actually, if one graphs delta-GDP against delta-Spending, one notes that the deficit spending in 2009 DEPRESSED the economy by 45 cents for each dollar spent.  You don't have to be super-intelligent to understand this--you just have to ask the average guy around the water cooler whether he ever became wealthy by spending all he had, taking out a second mortgage and spending all that, and then maxing out his credit cards.

    Really, Uda, just think about it.  If massive spending worked, it would have worked.  It's NEVER WORKED.

    Cutting taxes and Bernanke's low interest rates put more money into the economy by many multiples than the stimulus spending.

    And you can see where Greece, Ireland, etc., are headed because of deficit spending.

    You don't have to be super-intelligent.  You just have to have a grasp of reality.
    photo
    Eris23Skidoo
    Dischordian Keynesian
    07:43 AM on 11/28/2010
    Your delta example is correlation without causation. The economy has been on a slow drizzle ever since the Bush tax cuts of 2001 gave tax breaks to companies who sent jobs to China and India.

    Funny thing about your water-cooler example. If the guy at the water cooler so happened to be the OWNER of the business, then his answer would be YES that he put everything he had into starting up his company including all of the credit he could get his hands on. That's how you get a business STARTED. So much for you knowing "it all" smarty pants.

    Regarding whether massive spending ever worked. Have you ever heard of the Great Depression? Do you know how we got out of it? MASSIVE SPENDING. We had a war on, see. It was a great big war. The greatest our world has ever seen and the stakes were high. So high, in fact, that the US Govt was handing out contracts left and right to anyone with a factory who could retool in order to make supplies needed for the war effort. Those contracts were not free, they involved MASSIVE SPENDING. Massive, Keynesian, spending, I might add, just to make you shiver. Oh, and by the way. We did get out of the Great Depression, economic historians say, due to the efforts of the war, FDR and John Maynard Keynes.
    photo
    rbchilds
    Independent with Open Eyes
    07:21 PM on 11/23/2010
    (Part 2:)

    This is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from principle becomes a precedent for a second; that second for a third; and so on, till the bulk of society is reduced to mere automatons of misery, to have no sensibilities left but for sinning and suffering... And the fore horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression." Thomas Jefferson
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    pjwrites
    08:02 AM on 11/22/2010
    Yes, please do tax the he$# out of us to get this economy off its feet.

    Or, you could take back the money stolen from us by the banksters and Wall Steet.

    Whatever.
    photo
    AyeChart
    Retired Army, half-retired physician
    01:23 PM on 11/23/2010
    Can you show me a city, state, or country that EVER taxed itself into prosperity?  Or a citizenry that was taxed into prosperity?
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    pjwrites
    07:11 AM on 11/26/2010
    No. Because that city, state or country doesn't exist.
    photo
    Eris23Skidoo
    Dischordian Keynesian
    07:46 AM on 11/28/2010
    United States, World War II. It wasn't that long ago. You display yourself in front of an American flag, the least you could do is learn a little history of your own country. By the way, it appears you are taking a dump in front of that flag. This veteran, for one, is offended.
    photo
    NHGranite
    Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
    12:59 AM on 11/22/2010
    Congress to Bernanke: "We can't hear you! La la la la la"
    photo
    AyeChart
    Retired Army, half-retired physician
    01:23 PM on 11/23/2010
    Thank heaven!  AyeChart to Congress:  "Keep your ear plugs in!  Bernanke's spouting nonsense!"
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    Rachael Marie
    10:51 PM on 11/21/2010
    As has been pointed out, a combination of 15 major national governments will have to borrow a total of more than $10 trillion next year to finance deficits and repay maturing bonds. That’s 27% of their total economic output. It also is equal to about twice the entire world’s annual savings.

    The authorities warn about the risk of “contagion.” They sweat to “calm” the markets. But why bother? Debt of this magnitude cannot be repaid. It the end really that close?
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    muck-raker
    give me liberty or give me death
    03:47 AM on 11/22/2010
    Rachael Marie F&F...excellent thoughts...the borrowing is all by design. The manifesto of the Fed is to shackle the public from cradle to grave...here is a long video save it to your FAV and watch it on a rainy day...it is professionally done and extremely all telling..it is a shocker.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6076118677860424204&hl=en&emb=1#

    signed: my3catsownme
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    Rachael Marie
    08:35 AM on 11/22/2010
    Thank you. I will hopefully have a chance to give the vid a look this weekend coming up.
    photo
    AyeChart
    Retired Army, half-retired physician
    01:24 PM on 11/23/2010
    It' s not the Fed, dear Muck-Raker, but PROGRESSIVES.  Marxists/Socialists.  Left-wingers.
    10:36 PM on 11/21/2010
    Bernanke is America's version of Iraq's Baghdad Bob.
    04:30 PM on 11/21/2010
    Yeah, it's almost the end of the year! how on earth are they going to pay out their ridiculous bonuses if they don't get some more stimulus! Oh, the horror... the horror!
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    momofvegasgirls
    My bio is not for sale !
    03:06 PM on 11/21/2010
    And as our bridges, tunnels, sewer systems, and interstates fail, We continue to wring our hands and cry "Oh, what shall we do?" As half of the Teabaggers live in communities still relying on dialup internet service, We wring our hands and cry "Oh, what shall we do??!" As millions of workers stand in line to interview for jobs they only have a hot chance in h#ll getting a call back from, We wring our hands and cry "Oh, what shall we do!". As public buildings and public schools built in the 40's and 50's strain to hold up, have abysmal plumbing, aren't wired for the 21st century, cost a kings ransom to heat and cool, We wring our hands and cry, "oh what shall we do !!??" As the Chinese rake in 50 billion dollars this year from producing solar panels to export around the world, a business they made $0.00 from 10-15 years ago, the technology WE invented, We wring our hands and cry "Oh, what shall we do???????!!!!!!!"

    It's really not that hard. We need to stop all of the hair pulling, hand wringing and posturing and just EFFING do it.
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    muck-raker
    give me liberty or give me death
    06:27 PM on 11/21/2010
    mom excellent post F&F
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    momofvegasgirls
    My bio is not for sale !
    10:07 PM on 11/21/2010
    Thank you muck-racker. I, too, am a fan of yours!
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    Wendy Davis
    Banned!
    08:21 PM on 11/21/2010
    And as we contemplate and speculate, it gets even worse. And we are told that in the end, it will be a life like 3rd world, lawless and survival of the fittest. It's so surreal, but it may be too late to save America. "The same errors committed during the Great Depression of the 1930s are being repeated and economists, including Mr. Bernanake know they do not work. Yes, the Fed contracted money supply and when they let it loose again, it was too late for it to be in anyway effective. Next comes tariffs as an outgrowth of: currency wars; interest and dividend penalties on the inflow of hot, inflationary dollars and retaliatory tariffs as a result of losing 8.5 million jobs and 432,000 businesses over ten years to free trade, globalization, offshoring and outsourcing. Smoot-Hawley tariffs and even dumb Fed moves were bad enough, but Hoover’s raising of taxes by 150% was a monumental piece of stupidity. At the root of all this is that the Fed is supposed to be saving the US economic and financial structure. They are not doing that, they are saving the banking system and Wall Street instead and these are the miscreants that caused the problem in the first place. The result of this policy of zero interest rates and easy money is that few are saving. There you have it, planned destruction. Is it any wonder the SCO members and observers are buying gold on every dip and will not stop doing so until they run out of dollars. Our only question is; what took them so long and why are they not buying more faster? Bob Chapman is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by Bob Chapman http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?c
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    muck-raker
    give me liberty or give me death
    03:39 AM on 11/22/2010
    Wendy. brilliant post, already F&F
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    earleh
    Defender of indigenous rights
    02:38 PM on 11/21/2010
    The only "credible plan to tackle record deficits" is to cut spending now. There is never going to be a convenient time to do it. Who is this guy? I don't remember voting either for him, or for his opponent. Is there anybody else considering a constitutional amendment to ban Harvard and MIT graduates from any government position? ;o)
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    John Ison
    Marketing and Merchandising Expert
    06:20 PM on 11/21/2010
    Just the approach I'd expect - disdain for education and actual knowledge in favor of a bumper sticker
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    earleh
    Defender of indigenous rights
    10:12 AM on 11/28/2010
    My disdain for education is well founded, Yale class of 1972. FYI, I didn't like Greenspan either. He would tinker with the interest rate constantly, and things would only get worse. Cut the spending, now, or go the way of Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain.
    photo
    Eris23Skidoo
    Dischordian Keynesian
    07:54 AM on 11/28/2010
    The Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve is appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate of the United States. Do you have any other stupid questions that you could easily answer with an internet search? You HAVE heard of the internet, right?
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    earleh
    Defender of indigenous rights
    10:13 AM on 11/28/2010
    The question was rhetorical. You'd better get your sense of humor back. You're going to need it, for the Palin administration.
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    Wendy Davis
    Banned!
    02:28 PM on 11/21/2010
    Or China could be preparing for a devastating mass unloading of US Treasury notes onto the market, in one sweep, and the Fed is preparing for that, purchase the debt so the dollar does not plummet.
    Summary Box: China buys more Treasury debtwww.lasvegassun.comSummary Box: China buys more Treasury debt in September
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    muck-raker
    give me liberty or give me death
    06:29 PM on 11/21/2010
    Wendy...China is now the #1 buyer of GOLD next to the IMF,, I suspect with US Fiat dollars
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    Wendy Davis
    Banned!