Charlie Rangel Scandal: Congressman Could Be 23rd House Member To Be Censured

Charlie Rangel

LARRY MARGASAK   11/19/10 06:32 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — One of Congress' most likable veterans, Rep. Charles Rangel, would become the 23rd House member in the nation's history to be censured if the House goes along with a recommendation of its ethics committee.

After Thanksgiving, House members will take up the solemn task of disciplining one of their own when the New York Democrat is reproached for financial and fundraising misconduct.

It will be one of the more unpleasant jobs in the waning days of the 111th Congress because the congressman from Harlem is legendary for his friendliness and greetings to anyone he passes on the grounds of the Capitol.

The normally self-confident, 80-year-old Rangel, newly re-elected with 40 years of House service behind him, was reduced to pleading with the ethics committee Thursday to refrain from calling him corrupt.

It didn't.

"Although prior committee precedent for recommendation of censure involved many cases of direct financial gain, this committee's recommendation of censure is based on the cumulative nature of the violations and not any direct personal financial gain," the committee said in a report.

The ethics committee deliberated about three hours before voting 9-1 to recommend a censure, plus a requirement that Rangel pay taxes he owes on income from a vacation villa in the Dominican Republic.

If the House agrees to a censure resolution, Rangel would stand before his colleagues at the front of the chamber – known as the well – where the resolution of censure would be read by the speaker of the House.

The House has the option of changing the punishment to a reprimand, which eliminates an oral rebuke at the well.

Rangel was convicted in an ethics trial this week by a panel of lawmakers on 11 counts of ethical wrongdoing, including his use of House letterheads and staff to solicit money for a college center named after him. A number of the donors had business before the House Ways and Means Committee while Rangel served as chairman.

Rangel also filed a decade's worth of misleading financial statements understating his assets and converted a subsidized New York apartment – designated for residential use – into a campaign office. Other tenants who violated their lease got evicted.

The tax issue was a sore point for several members of the ethics committee, who said it was especially egregious that a former chairman of the House's tax-writing committee failed for 17 years to pay taxes on the income from his island villa.

It's unclear how much Rangel owes in taxes. An ethics committee document indicated he owed $16,775 as of 1990, but Rangel has paid some of his back taxes.

The Rangel case won't end the ethics committee's business. On Nov. 29, the panel of five Democrats and five Republicans will hold an ethics trial for Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif.

Waters is vigorously fighting charges that she improperly attempted to get federal financial aid for a bank where her husband is an investor.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

Filed by Simon McCormack  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:17 PM on 12/12/2010
Being told in front of your peers that you should be ashamed of yourself is quite a heavy penalty for tax evasion, eh?
05:15 PM on 12/12/2010
Oh well, he WILL be censured because the house won't risk the embarassment of taking it back. Bye Rangel
12:44 PM on 11/21/2010
Bet you didn't talk like that when Ted Stevens career was on the line.
10:56 AM on 11/19/2010
As long as we keep making excuses for these criminals this will go on...

This guy is a disgrace and if any one of us ever did half of what he did we'd be on Riker's Island washing Bubba's underwear...
12:53 PM on 11/21/2010
For fudging on taxes? Obviously he was wrong to do so and it has cost him severly. But every waitress, bus boy, cabdriver, elevator operator and hairdresser does it every day. Every person who works for cash and probably everyone of us who was able to save a couple nickles by simple omission of facts. He has already lost his job with Ways and Means and paid 2 million for some sleeze bag lawyer who didn't show up to represent him.........a lawyer he was entitled to have at a trial. Collecting funds for this college was not in violation but using White House stationary to do so was. Really? The wrong stationary? How terrible is that. But he does need to pay these back taxes and it's a shame that 2 million he wasted on that lawyer was not used for that purpose.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwithaclue
N Y C - L I B - M O U S......
10:35 AM on 11/19/2010
Eat you own, Democrats, while the GOPers laugh all the way. You don't see GOPers doing this to there members, why do we have to? Democrats should have shut this down. Shoot your own soldiers while a war is raging? This IS a war.
photo
pickles n pops
No more payroll tax cuts Mr. Obama!
03:02 PM on 11/19/2010
Exactly right. Before everyone congratulates themselves on "cleaning out the corruption" take a moment to think: Charlie Rangel's one of ours. In the forty years he's served in the House, he's done so with honor and distinction. And one other thing: Unlike the current occupant of the White House, Chairman Rangel never stabbed us in the back, or sold out to the highest bidder, or looked for ways to enhance his political fortune at our expense.

This whole affair smacks of retribution for petty misdeeds very similar to the media frenzy whipped up against Eliot Spitzer, and brought on by the Wall Street thieves, because his incessant probing into their crimes was getting too close for comfort. In Rangel's case, I have a strong suspicion that the Obama Administration instigated these charges, because he refused to participate in the sellout against seniors, Medicare and Social Security.

Charlie Rangel is our friend. Let's not celebrate his crucifixion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwithaclue
N Y C - L I B - M O U S......
11:09 AM on 11/20/2010
Amen. F&F
10:21 AM on 11/19/2010
At this time in Rangel's life he likes his soap box and deep down he cares very little for the ongoings in Congress. He will continue to represent his district which he does quite well until he retires or expires.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:59 AM on 11/19/2010
This just underscores how corrupt american politics is becoming. This is not a democrat or republican problem, this is a dangerous crack in the foundation of the government. People have little faith in the system as is, and this is the kind of thing that can get real ugly, real fast. The electorate is on to this, and the weak reprimand handed down only further damages the integrity of the whole government.