More

Insider Trading: 'Steal A Lot, They Make You King'

First Posted: 11/22/10 02:59 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

Whisper

It feels perversely quaint that the national conversation is momentarily focused on the likelihood of insider trading cases dropping on a hive of nefarious and presumably well-connected individuals -- huge cases, we are told via breathless leaks from the federal cops on the beat, cases worth -- are you sitting down? -- tens of millions of dollars. With numbers like these, one can only imagine what's up next -- a crackdown on employees who brazenly pilfered office supplies from their jobs at publicly bailed-out institutions like Bank of America, perhaps?

Don't get me wrong: Insider trading is unambiguously bad. It corrodes the working of the marketplace and shortchanges honest investors. People who engage in it ought to be prosecuted and forced to suffer consequences. But put this up against the multi-trillion-dollar financial shenanigans that turn out to be pretty much legal or so maddeningly nebulous that they render prosecution impotent, and insider trading seems, well, adorable.

More importantly, it is hard to see how a nation still furious about the financial crisis and its aftermath will (or should) take consolation from cases such as these. Not without justification, the public wants scalps on the wall and the spectacle of a perp walk, following the effective demolition of much of the real economy by a handful of gazillionaire executives for whom freedom still entails private jets and mansions by the sea.

In this context, insider trading reeks of the small-time. The smart kids in school, we have learned, went into major-league banking and invented brilliant financial machinery that effectively turned smoldering waste into gold. They lent money to any would-be homeowner with a signature and bundled these lousy loans together. Then they refashioned these malodorous piles of trash into new securities that complicit ratings agencies deemed as safe as Uncle Sam's savings bonds. They sold their inventory to pension funds, municipalities and other institutions that saw a AAA rating and dug no deeper. By the time the world figured out that the bankers had been peddling garbage, somebody else owned it.

Would-be prosecutors then found themselves mired in confusing and unpalatable circumstances. They had to unravel arcana with forbiddingly awful names -- collateralized debt obligations, credit default swaps. Perp walk? Good luck merely describing the crime.

Even the one high-profile case that has captured the public fancy, the Securities and Exchange Commission's fraud charges against Goldman Sachs, failed to leave a satisfying sense that justice had been fully served. Goldman was accused of cheating clients by stuffing a security with particularly ridiculous loans and then peddling it to clients just so another client would have something to bet against. In the end, Goldman settled the case for $550 million, a veritable fleabite to a company whose revenues reached nearly $9 billion in its most recent quarter.

And the Goldman case might never have been brought, given its considerable legal uncertainty, had it not been for the extraordinary politics of the moment. People close to the SEC have described an effort inside the building to find a case that would distract the public from the agency's miserable track record in failing to act on tips that once-respected money manager Bernie Madoff had been operating a global Ponzi scheme. Goldman found itself in the right spot at the wrong time. In the national narrative, the firm's name had become a synonym for everything wrong with American capitalism -- which is to say, mother earth-style socialism for giant banks and Ayn Randian laissez faire for everyone else.

You almost -- and only almost -- can pity these naïve insider traders who failed to keep pace with the cool kids in finance, who so foolishly bought and cashed the shares they allegedly manipulated and thereby left a handy paper trail for the prosecutors to follow. They failed to master the lessons of the era: The way to cheat people and stay on the side of the law with valet parking is to avoid touching the product. You play hot potato with the toxic stuff, move it quick and get your money out. And you do your business on such an enormous scale that it becomes the normal course of finance; so huge that its cessation would threaten the real economy. You keep it so mind-bendingly complicated that anyone without an advanced degree in high finance has no idea what's going on; so that any prosecutor who hopes to ever again see their family at dinner time would run screaming from such a case. Too Big To Fail works brilliantly, we have learned. So does Too Complicated to Build A Case.

All of which makes the insider traders seem both a little bit pathetic and largely beside the point. They are another sacrifice thrown into the volcano that is American populist anger. This latest offering may sate the populist fury for a few minutes, much as the Madoff case captured public fascination because it seemed to provide a readily identifiable villain to the story of imploding national fortunes (particularly for wealthy people who live in Manhattan and Beverly Hills). Where did our retirement money go? That guy took it!

Except, of course, that's not true. Insider trading and demonstrably criminal Ponzi schemes are not why the economy stopped functioning for tens of millions of ordinary people. They don't explain why homes are continuing to slide into foreclosure and people who have been out of work for two years still don't have jobs (and are about to lose their unemployment insurance: Happy Holidays!).

It's not the small-time cheats who explain the strains of contemporary America, but rather the grand and diabolical geniuses who have learned to grow so huge and interconnected that their model has insinuated itself into the commonplace ways of the marketplace. And if everyone is doing it, how can it be a crime?

Bob Dylan had it right: "Steal a little and they throw you in jail, steal a lot and they make you king."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 301
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
outofstepper
Turn off Fox News and turn on reality
11:40 PM on 11/23/2010
" People close to the SEC have described an effort inside the building to find a case that would distract the public from the agency's miserable track record in failing to act on tips that once-respected money manager Bernie Madoff had been operating a global Ponzi scheme."

Problem with this is that the public is even more outraged at the virtual slap on the wrist to Goldman Sachs. The SEC made things worse, not better.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:34 PM on 11/23/2010
“Heeeeeer weeee GO! !… Heads up ’Progressives’ and ‘Libs’! BIG RED FLAG! !
Stop the ‘Rupugnancans’ from rolling back YOUR rights!

News Now...
________________________________________________________________
** In the letters Reps. Spencer Bachus and Judy Biggert sent to the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, the GOP lawmakers challenge the legality of Elizabeth Warren's authority to set up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The Bureau of CONSUMER Financial PROTECTION, is not an entirely new bureau, since it will pick up consumer protection responsibilities from the Federal Trade Commission.
It will ultimately set rules and regulations for any business that provide financial services to consumers, controlling a host of financial products that include:
• Deposits
• Credit extensions and loan services
• Property leases and purchases
• Real estate settlements
• Check cashing, collection and guaranty services
• Online banking
• Financial advisory services
• Credit reports and other consumer financial reports
• Debt collection
__________________________________________________________________
If you’ve NEVER had a horror story /nightmare scenario…

Or, haven’t been ripped off by any of the agencies listed then, YOU can stop reading…

But, if you are over the age of 17, and have your own business affairs, and want to be PROTECTED, and have it against the LAW to be treated like human ATM…

Speak up! They want to stop Elizabeth Warren and Obama from regulating them, and protecting YOUR interest! …

Be afraid….be very AFRAID, and don’t buy the media/TeaPublican hype! Get active! FIGHT to keep this federal department and Cabinet post!” -Coop
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
02:03 PM on 11/23/2010
Time to start builing new prisons, we could get these financial crooks off the street and stimulate the construction industry at the same time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
hdohighdesertobserver
The high desert is a place in between
12:47 PM on 11/23/2010
Charlie Chaplin said, as Monsieur Verdoux in 1947, "Wars, conflict - it's all business. One murder makes a villain; millions, a hero. Numbers sanctify, my good fellow!"

Numbers sanctify.
12:26 PM on 11/23/2010
I'm reading this and watching "Jansing & Co;" they're talking about Palin's book tour and her daughter’s competition in "Dancing of the Fools (sic)". I can't remember what the subject was two minutes before that, or multitask.

I guess I’m just as responsible as most in turning this Democratic/Republic into a Plutocratic Corporatocracy. Where was the ‘fine line’ we crossed; _Citizens’ United_ almost two years ago when natural personhood was overtaken by corporate personhood? Or _Bush v. Gore_ when Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, et al SELECTED (as opposed to elected) Dick Cheney… oops, strike that, George Herbert Walker Bush’s son? Or perhaps it was the 1886 case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U.S. 394?

Or… (maybe I’m too concerned about the) History of the debate in the United States (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood)?
11:59 AM on 11/23/2010
Excellent article. You want to find the guilty guy? check who made money while everybody else was losing money.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
outofstepper
Turn off Fox News and turn on reality
11:41 PM on 11/23/2010
Most of Congress fits into that category.
11:30 AM on 11/23/2010
Tail end of a bad market cycle right on track...the perp walks.
http://yieldpig.blogspot.com/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
woodnwire
08:23 AM on 11/23/2010
why do feds wait until all the money is gone to put on their little show? do they wait , so every shiester on wall st. has a chance to hide their stash ?
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage aginst stupidity
12:27 PM on 11/23/2010
Because the "Feds" have to get their cut first.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
08:20 AM on 11/23/2010
And go facist on those from whom you have stolen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrPdZmPB36U&feature=player_embedded

When the meltdown comes to your door don't expect pity from the powerful.

Truly
photo
darkmark
religion, the veil of evil.
11:05 AM on 11/23/2010
that's america. land of the what? home of the who? i think fascist fits because it sure doesn't belong to the rest of us.
07:23 AM on 11/23/2010
Isn't it all really about how much lawyer you can afford? Once you can afford one that can lick the public servant class lawyer, you've got it made.
07:21 AM on 11/23/2010
*Slow clap* for the feds. The government misses the point once again. Three years of work and massive raids. Hedge funds are on the buy side. They buy financial products not make them. I did not hear of any hedge funds getting bailouts or being too big to fail. As a matter of fact half of them went underwater after 2008. Wake me up when there are massive raids on the CEO's of companies on the sell side like Goldman and Citi. This is going after a homeowner because he lied on his insurance application and calling it success but not addressing the issue of mortgage bubble situation. Blame the victim seems to be the name of the game. "You should not get unemployment insurance because it makes you lazy."

Now onto the insider trading. While insider trading should be prosecuted it looks like the fed just cast a net on bunch of companies, took their data and going to sift through them because they do not having anything. If they find a shark in there they will prosecute but i get a feeling none of these companies will be charged with anything. The galleon was already charged many months ago. This whole operation is a moot point.l
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KeithClark
21 year old rapper
05:36 AM on 11/23/2010
I was watching Chris Whalen talk about this on Bloomburg yesterday and I think it's great! Now the only people around who are SEC free are the Venture Capitalist. Great job FBI!
05:09 AM on 11/23/2010
It should read: "BIG things(instead of GREAT) have small beginnings". Now it makes more sense, not that it didn't as it is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:24 AM on 11/23/2010
Crime definitely pays. Remember Michael Milken? He was known as the "junk bond king" back in the 80's. He made anywhere from $200 million to $500 million, A YEAR before the SEC finally caught up with him (gotta love the SEC ... they were so cute at that age.) Even though he made billions from insider trading, he was only fined $600M. I know ... it's a lot of money, but why was he allowed to keep hundreds of millions of dollars? You're guess is as good as mine. Why did he get out after only serving 22 months of a ten year sentence? Supposedly he was sick with cancer, yet he seems to be alive and well today. He stole a lot and did spend some time in Club Fed, but there is no question he ended up as a King!!
04:06 AM on 11/23/2010
The bad thing is the big fish would want to make sure that they are the only ones doing the same thing. Small fish are should not get involved in what the big fish are doing.