More

GOP Lawmakers: Elizabeth Warren's Job 'Undermines' Constitution

Warren

First Posted: 11/23/10 06:05 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

In the letters Reps. Spencer Bachus and Judy Biggert sent to the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, the GOP lawmakers challenge the legality of Elizabeth Warren's authority to set up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Bachus and Biggert have urged the inspectors general at the Treasury and the Fed to investigate how Elizabeth Warren, whom President Obama made special White House adviser in September, has been setting up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a new agency created under the summer's financial reform legislation.

As she leads the search for the agency's first director, Warren effectively serves as its interim head.

By appointing Warren as special adviser in September, the president "undermined" the Constitution, Bachus and Biggert contend, in two nearly identical letters dated Nov. 22. From the letters:

"First, the President's decision to appoint Professor Elizabeth Warren as a special advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury and as a senior advisor in the White House with lead responsibility for establishing the Bureau, hiring its staff, and setting its agenda -- as opposed to nominating the director of the Bureau, as contemplated by the Act -- circumvented the advice-and-consent process and undermined one of the key checks and balances in our Constitution. While the Act confers upon the Secretary of the Treasury limited interim authority 'to perform the functions of the Bureau' (Section 1066(a)), Professor Warren is now exercising that authority."

The GOP lawmakers say Warren is overstepping her authority. But Warren has responded to this criticism in the past.

As she explained on PBS in early October, her current job was specifically created by law. "There are two jobs on the table. And they were always there by statute. One certainly is the director of the agency," Warren said. "There is a second job that was available. And it's clear in the statute. Somebody is supposed to get out there and get that agency going. And the truth is, one has a cool title, but the other one gets to work right now."

A spokesperson for the House Financial Services committee, who speaks for Bachus on financial services issues, didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.

Zachary Cikanek, press secretary for Biggert, said the agency's eventual leader should face a full confirmation process. "What we would like to see is for the person with lead responsibility of the Bureau to be somebody nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate," Cikanek said.

Bachus is a leading contender to replace Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. During the 2009-2010 election cycle, his campaign received $132,200 from the securities and investment industry, and $80,800 from commercial banks, according to Open Secrets. His top contributors included Capital One, Credit Suisse, Wells Fargo and Bank of America, which each donated $10,000 to his campaign, Open Secrets says.


READ the letter to Treasury below:

Thorson BCFP Letter Biggert-Bachus 11-22-10

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
In the letters Reps. Spencer Bachus and Judy Biggert sent to the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, the GOP lawmakers challenge the legality of Elizabeth Warren's authority to set up the new Consumer F...
In the letters Reps. Spencer Bachus and Judy Biggert sent to the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, the GOP lawmakers challenge the legality of Elizabeth Warren's authority to set up the new Consumer F...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 854
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
08:17 AM on 01/04/2011
Behold, the usual rot coming from the Plutocrats and their lapdogs about whether a measure that is offensive to them is constitutional.
10:05 PM on 12/06/2010
Idiocy or hypocrisy – the face of the Republican party.

Ms. Warren is totally qualified and that terrifies the Repubs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeirdScience
Even our reality checks are bouncing!
04:16 PM on 11/29/2010
So appointing someone is unconstitutional, but preventing the government from carrying on its business by blocking appointments anonymously and indefinitely is not?

Stupid politicians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
02:51 PM on 11/29/2010
From now on anything that I don't like is un-constitutional. I construe the right to life to mean free health care. I don't like scallop potatoes, therefore they are unconstitutional. They taste nothing like scallops. What a rip off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeirdScience
Even our reality checks are bouncing!
04:12 PM on 11/29/2010
You want a ripoff? try Pepperidge farm cookies. Why are they so expensive?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
02:49 PM on 11/29/2010
It's been a while since my last civics class but I don't remember anything in the constitution about credit default swaps, derivitives and real estate investment products. I do remember the teacher telling us that in India people borrow money at exorbent rates and end up in debt for life, but that it can't happen here, because we have predatory lending laws. Gee, I guess things have a way of changeing.
photo
getsit
good morning, I'm here
02:35 PM on 11/29/2010
The constitution was written 'FOR THE PEOPLE" not for the corporations. She is UPHOLDING the constitution and protecting our rights against being gouged, defrauded, gutted, cheated, and any other word you can think of to add.

If people believe the Republicans then they need to change their first name to STUPID.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amber15
01:11 PM on 11/29/2010
the 'CORPORATE GOP' is undermining the constitution
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
genjac3213
I'm just saying...
11:02 AM on 11/29/2010
Could just one Republican politician just come out and say how much they hate the American consumer and the middle class? Could they also say they wouldn't know the difference between the Constitution and and a brown piece of paper with chicken scratch written on it? Nevermind that the previous Administration took the Constitution and wiped their @ s s with it. But somehow creating a CPA "undermined one of the key checks and balances in our Constitution" They claim their are for individual freedom, yet anytime any organization is created to protect people who don't happen to be in their tax bracket or higher, the GOP is against. Party of Ideas, my a r s e, more like the Party of the Same, Old, Annoying, Dangerous and by the way, Crappy Ideas.
09:47 AM on 11/29/2010
Yes, God forbid there be any consumer protection. That might interfere with the Republicans and their corporate masters' God-given, constitutionally supported right to screw the American people as hard as they can.
10:37 PM on 11/28/2010
As my Mother used to say during the ordeal that was Reagan:

"Anyone who works for a living and votes Republican aught to have his mind examined."
10:33 PM on 11/28/2010
Yes, undermines the cOn Stitution of the Repbulican Potty and they Facist Constituants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JCCross
10:12 PM on 11/28/2010
The only thing Elizabeth Warren is going to 'undermine,' is Corporate Amerika's ability to rip people off. I understand the Chamber of Commerce will disagree with me here, but being able to pull a 3-Card-Monty on America, is NOT protected by the Constitution!
10:41 PM on 11/28/2010
Very Well put
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruffmama
your ad here.....inquire within.
10:12 PM on 11/28/2010
good luck with that one, GOP
09:16 PM on 11/28/2010
By the time these Republicans hit their stride, they will make crossing the street unconstitutional on grounds that you do not have their approval.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
08:14 PM on 11/28/2010
Elizabeth Warren’s job undermines the underhanded. And, guess who has a problem with that?