More

FDIC: List Of 'Problem' Banks Grows In Q3

DANIEL WAGNER   11/23/10 01:08 PM ET   AP

Sifma Fdic
FDIC Chairman Shelia Bair

WASHINGTON — The number of banks on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s "problem" list grew over the summer, even as the industry posted solid net income and fewer loans soured.

The number of troubled banks rose to 860 in the July-September quarter from 829 in the previous quarter. That's the most since 1993, during the savings and loan crisis.

The FDIC also said banks earned $14.5 billion during the third quarter. That was a decrease from the previous quarter's result of $21.4 billion.

The FDIC said earnings fell because Bank of America Corp took a one-time hit of $10.4 billion. That was because of new limits on debit card swipe fees that retailers pay to banks.

The industry's third-quarter results were well above the $2 billion that banks earned a year earlier.

The troubled banks were smaller, on average, holding $379.2 billion in assets. That's down from $403.2 billion in the April-June quarter.

FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair said she remained "cautiously optimistic" about the industry as banks work through bad loans made during the real estate bubble.

"The industry has come a long way in cleaning up balance sheets, building capital and adjusting to changes in the financial markets and the economy," Bair said. But she said "the adjustments are not over, and this is no time for complacency."

The strong earnings were reported as banks set aside less money for future loan losses than at any time since the October-December quarter of 2007, before the financial crisis. Fewer borrowers were behind on payments for credit cards and construction loans.

Bair said banks' solid profits in the past three quarters were the result of stable revenues and lower provisions for loan losses. At some point, she said, "the industry must begin to grow its revenues, and loan growth will be an essential ingredient."

Banks constricted lending more modestly in the third quarter, reducing total loans and leases by $6.8 billion. The reduction was small compared to the second quarter, when loan balances fell by $106.6 billion.

The fund that insures bank deposits added $7.2 billion during the quarter, but remained $8.0 billion in the red. It was the third quarterly increase in a row for the fund, which is managed by the FDIC and guaranteed by the Treasury Department.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The number of banks on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s "problem" list grew over the summer, even as the industry posted solid net income and fewer loans soured. The number of...
WASHINGTON — The number of banks on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s "problem" list grew over the summer, even as the industry posted solid net income and fewer loans soured. The number of...
Filed by Nicole Hardesty  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Kache
Toodlum, wake up, I hear a prowler downstairs
12:01 AM on 11/28/2010
Move Your Money from one of the TBTF banks to one of these small banks.

TBTF banks borrow at far lower rates that the smaller banks because your taxes are the bedrock of their balance sheet. No wonder those banks are showing "significant improvements".

If you still bank with one of the TBTF banks you are part of the problem. That's not a moral statement, it's simply a fact.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:52 PM on 11/25/2010
The Bank of Noth Dakota is owned by the state of North Dakota and it partners with its own small banks to lend to business and consumers at low rates. Budget surplus. Education funded. Pensions funded. Low taxes. Might be only state that has done that in these times. Interesting history. It is rich in farming and oil and prospered because of it but California and all the other states are rich in natural resources and people know how. They can do their own banking better and stop being held hostage. Why not? Socialism? Not exactly. There are plenty of bankers and Republicans in North Dakota who like how their state has prospered even in difficult times. California and other states could learn something from North Dakota. Might even be able to solve the mortgage crisis govt and big banks continue to push down the road with a bulldozer.
photo
Kache
Toodlum, wake up, I hear a prowler downstairs
12:13 AM on 11/28/2010
Thanks for bringing that up how now.

What intrigues me most is how BND gets it's funding - how it literally creates money. All levels of government collect taxes, municipal, state, school districts, special districts, etc., and then deposit said collections in some bank somewhere, and then spend out of that account. In North Dakota, state law simply requires that those deposits be put in BND. BND then leverages the average balance, the same way other banks leverage depositor's deposits. In effect, North Dakota creates it's own money. If California did the same they could leverage over a trillion dollars. What intrigues me about this is that other states deposit their revenues in TBTF banks, becoming hostages to Wall Street - and somehow think that's "normal".
photo
Max Headroom
Your micro-bio is empty
10:44 PM on 11/23/2010
Nothing to see here people. Don't worry about a thing, move along.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SEXYLEO
micro-bio
08:48 PM on 11/23/2010
Well, what a surprise...Wall Street has money to burn but some banks are in trouble.

NOT ONE MORE PENNY FOR ANY BANK...screw them!
photo
jmdziuban1
Heeey, Mr Spaceman.
01:26 AM on 11/24/2010
It is smaller local ad regional banks which are being allowed to fail. They are then sold to slightly larger competitors. this will only result in the average bank being larger than it was before. And the disappearance of truly community banks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:38 PM on 11/23/2010
want more information about "problem" banks?

follow Calculate Risk's blog @ http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/
03:28 PM on 11/23/2010
No worries the Fed will print more money to help things out.
photo
Pucifer
What Ever Happened to Baby Pucifer?
02:05 PM on 11/23/2010
More importantly, how will this news affect sales of Sarah Palin's new book?
01:36 PM on 11/23/2010
Seriously, you guys

You should google:

The housing bubble has popped - MSN Money (April 2006)

Hot Homes Get Cold - Wall Street Journal (April 2006)

That's when the economy tanked - There's no way around it

Unregulated financial "products" (scams) in the private sector are what brought our economy down.

Fannie and Freddie did not push for nor did they start the sub-prime mess - they got into it because of the successes of private institutions in the sub-prime market

Dodd and Frank are not Jedi masters and so could not force a congressional Republican majority to do their bidding

FOX/GOP (same difference) talking points are seriously ignorant of the facts.
03:12 PM on 11/23/2010
Let's look at some facts. The Fannie Mae and Fredie Mac Products were the province of sub-prime debacle.

Barney Franks' spouse (his term) was the author of many of the Fannie Mae sub-prime products that were authorized for underwriting.

It was the Demwits, lead by Chris Dodd and Barney Franks, that championed the sub-prime loans.

Private institutions would have preferred to avoid sum-prime lending because it was a statistical unknown.

Braney Franks with the help of his Demwits, stopped the Bush effort to put in oversight of Fannie Mae and Feddie Mac.
03:28 PM on 11/23/2010
Republican means never having to say you're sorry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chuck Mak
04:44 PM on 11/23/2010
And the Republican mantra at this time was "Go out and buy a new car, some jewelery, and a new house, otherwise the terrorists win. The American way of life is not to be compromised."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Olderandwiser55
getting older and wiser....
01:35 PM on 11/23/2010
Not the best article on this on the web. But I am truly amazed we avoided a second great depression. Tough times but not nearly as tough as they could have been.
03:29 PM on 11/23/2010
We haven't avoided it yet IMO.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rachael Marie
12:55 PM on 11/23/2010
Let's consolidate them all into the to-big-to-fail banks then! That should work!
03:13 PM on 11/23/2010
It worked so well with B of A and Wells Fargo and Bank One.
photo
jmdziuban1
Heeey, Mr Spaceman.
01:23 AM on 11/24/2010
That is what they are doing, on a smaller scale. Local banks are being sold, through the FDIC to other , somewhat larger, local and regional banks.
photo
Kache
Toodlum, wake up, I hear a prowler downstairs
12:42 AM on 11/28/2010
U.S. Bank (#19 in size ranking) has been making out like a bandit on those deals.