More

Color-Coded Terror Alerts To Be Dropped By Department Of Homeland Security

EILEEN SULLIVAN   11/24/10 04:53 PM ET   AP

Colorcoded Terror Alerts

WASHINGTON — Goodbye danger defined as yellow, orange and red. The Homeland Security Department is looking to scrap the five-tiered color-coded terror warning system in favor of a streamlined one with as few as two alerts. The post-9/11, Bush-era system has been criticized as too vague to be useful in communicating the terror threat to the public, either ignored or the butt of jokes.

One option under consideration is to go to two threat levels instead of five: elevated and imminent. When the threat level would change to imminent under the new model, government officials would be expected to be as specific as possible in describing the threat without jeopardizing national security. And an imminent threat would not last longer than a week, meaning the public wouldn't see a consistently high and ambiguous threat level.

The 8-year-old alert system, with its rainbow of colors – from green, signifying a low threat, to red, meaning severe – has become a fixture in airports, government buildings and on newscasts.

Over the past four years, millions of travelers have begun and ended their trips to the sound of airport recordings warning that the threat level was orange, an alert that has become so routine that many now simply tune it out. This could be the last holiday season they hear the monotonous message.

U.S. officials confirmed the recommendation for a change had been made to President Barack Obama, who has final say in the matter. The details of the proposal were described to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because no final decisions have been made.

The current system was one of the Bush administration's most visible anti-terrorism programs.

The color has stayed the same since 2006: yellow for the country as a whole, meaning an elevated or significant risk, and orange for the aviation sector, a high risk. But the government has changed security protocols during that time without changing the color of the threat. For example, new airport security measures were introduced after a terrorist tried to bring down a Detroit-bound jetliner last Christmas.

The Homeland Security Department would not discuss the specific recommendations or estimate when a new system might be rolled out. The current color system remains in place.

"The overall sense is that we can do a better job of helping inform the public," Transportation Security Administrator John Pistole told the AP. There are several options on the table, he said. "For example, at the airport, instead of having that same recording that we've heard for all these years, replacing that with something more meaningful and relevant and timely."

In July 2009, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano ordered a review of the system. Earlier this year, the department decided the best way forward would be to scrap the colors and use more descriptive language to talk about terror threats. With a new system, there would be an understanding with the public that there is a baseline level of vigilance needed in the U.S., but when the government gets information that suggests the threat is more specific, the new system would be used to communicate those details. One of the recommended names for the new system is the National Terrorist Advisory System, replacing the current Homeland Security Advisory System.

As part of her review in 2009, Napolitano solicited comments from the public about the current system. Some likened the color-coded system to the boy who cried wolf. Others criticized it for not following the natural color spectrum.

Under the current system, green, at the bottom, signals a low danger of attack; blue signals a general risk; yellow, a significant risk; orange, a high risk, and red, at the top, warns of a severe threat. Since the outset, the nation has never been below the third threat level, yellow – an elevated or significant risk of terrorist attack.

The use of colors emerged from a desire to clarify the nonspecific threat information that intelligence officials were receiving after the 2001 terrorist attacks.

"We had no way of informing the public," former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said Wednesday. Ridge helped develop the system in 2002 when he was the president's homeland security adviser, and he also helped with the 2009 review. The question, he said, has always been: "How do you inform the general public that the threat is different tomorrow than it's been today?"

"I'm anxious to see what their alternative is to this," Ridge said.

From the beginning, officials knew comedians would have a field day with the concept, Ridge wrote in a 2009 book.

Late-night TV host Conan O'Brien chimed in just days after the Bush administration announced it in March 2002.

"Earlier this week, Homeland Security Adviser Tom Ridge announced a new color-coded warning system. A color-coded system to keep the public informed about disasters. Seems like a good idea," O'Brien said. "Yeah, apparently red is the highest alert, and it means Dick Cheney is about to eat a mozzarella stick."

The colors weren't part of the original concept, said John Fenzele, an Army special forces officer who led the development eight years ago. "I think it's a positive development that they're looking at revisions and refining the system." Fenzele said, "I don't think ... necessarily that the colors were at all vital."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Goodbye danger defined as yellow, orange and red. The Homeland Security Department is looking to scrap the five-tiered color-coded terror warning system in favor of a streamlined on...
WASHINGTON — Goodbye danger defined as yellow, orange and red. The Homeland Security Department is looking to scrap the five-tiered color-coded terror warning system in favor of a streamlined on...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 446
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
PharmaCan 05:34 PM on 11/25/2010
Good! Now if they just do away with the Department of Homeland Security, the War on Terror and any other remnants of the Bush/Cheney regime we will all be better off.

The War on Terror is such a scam. It put us into a perpetual state of war that can't be won and, in fact, promulgates itself by it's very existence. Aside from being a profit center for the MIC, the War on Terror is useless and even  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wally51
03:06 PM on 11/26/2010
Georgie liked the pretty colors, especially red, like his favorite crayon
photo
Plissken
It tastes like... chicken.
02:48 PM on 11/26/2010
Good. It was a stupid idea.
01:22 PM on 11/26/2010
There was only one reproducible reason linked to raising the threat level - a drop in George W. Bush's approval rating. Yes, it was to scare people into supporting a self-induced "war-time President."
12:30 PM on 11/26/2010
It was phony to begin with; just like the carbon-alerts you see in Texas.

All part of this Orweillian-style NWO where behaviourial scientists are the high priests for empire of bankrupt finance.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
studmoose
This Micro-Bio Intentionally Left Blank
11:54 AM on 11/26/2010
Tom Ridge - Didn't he manipulate some of these reports to help out GWB win?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:22 PM on 11/26/2010
Back then, the best way to tell how near we were to election day was to look at the color of the threat chart.
10:47 AM on 11/26/2010
First they take away our fall out drills under our desks, now this? I feel so vulnerable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howzat
12:56 PM on 11/26/2010
What desk? Now its Ipads
photo
Imzadi
Proud Progressive for decades
10:16 AM on 11/26/2010
Now, I feel sooooo much safer.

/snark off
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
legaleyeleft
Respect my authoriteyyyyy
10:07 AM on 11/26/2010
Excellent.

This was nothing more than a human cattle-prod.

Bush apologists hail it as an innovation in national security. None will likely ever address the fact that it was only used immediately after it was created and right before elections.
09:34 AM on 11/26/2010
Why break the pattern of thoughtless continuing along with Bush doctrine, Obama?
And what a place to start, changing a chart.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:00 AM on 11/26/2010
Is the world a safer place because of the policies of G W Bush/Dick Cheney? Even a 1st grader knows it is not, it's actually less safe because these two stole the office of the President and played "god" with the world. What's sad is that neither cared what their actions did to other people because it put SO much $$$ in their pockets. People died so they could profit. They used fear better than any terrorists ever dreamed of, because the public trusted them even when they lied.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EmmaLib
Vote right, vote the right right out the door!
08:27 AM on 11/26/2010
Those color coded alerts were nothing more than a political tool to increase the fear factor level in certain areas right before a crucial election, or vote in congress. The blatant abuse of the system was clear...... and the people who manipulated it should really be ashamed of themselves, using fear to forward their bullying, war-mongering agenda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AuntLoonie
08:12 AM on 11/26/2010
There's not need to drop it if they just use this more accurate version:
http://unsoliciteddrivel.blogspot.com/2010/11/new-and-improved-terror-alert-chart.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pat2 718
FOSS emergency management software developer
08:22 AM on 11/26/2010
That's more like it, AuntLoonie!
photo
MyDawg1967
No Party Affiliation
07:43 AM on 11/26/2010
And that Emergency Broadcast System works so well.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CheneysACoward
05:59 AM on 11/26/2010
Color code aka Bush administration.... pre election advertising
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AuntLoonie
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:01 AM on 11/26/2010
The two new threat levels really translate to:

Danger! High risk of terrorists threats from undisclosed parties (possibly al Qaeda or the Taliban, one of those two might be responsible), but due to national security, we can't tell you anything other than the threat is high.

AND

OMFG!!! Danger! Danger! Danger! Be very, very afraid! Terrorists hate you for your freedoms and want to kill you. Under the name of security, forget about your privacy and rights. Toss your reason away, even though we cannot disclose out any information in the name of national security.
photo
Imzadi
Proud Progressive for decades
10:20 AM on 11/26/2010
Enthusiastic bravos for that post.